1 1.8.1.1.3.6 Structural and Failure Analysis Compiled by Shahram Sharafat for the TBM Conference Call Oct 27, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finite element method Among the up-to-date methods of stress state analysis, the finite element method (abbreviated as FEM below, or often as FEA for analyses.
Advertisements

September 13, 2011 David Workman Senior Engineer, Resistance and Solid-State Welding Phone: Resistance.
Multi-Physics Numerical Modeling and Experimental Characterization of Materials Vincent Y. Blouin Assistant Professor Materials Science and Engineering.
Damage and Optimization Models for Analysis and Design of Discontinuous Fiber Composite Structures Ba Nghiep Nguyen Acknowledgements: PNNL’s Computational.
1 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel Handling Machine.
Presented by Robert Hurlston UNTF Conference 2011 Characterisation of the Effect of Residual Stress on Brittle Fracture in Pressure Vessel Steel.
Training Manual Aug Probabilistic Design: Bringing FEA closer to REALITY! 2.5 Probabilistic Design Exploring randomness and scatter.
1st Hungarian-Ukrainian Joint Conference on SAFETY-RELIABILITY AND RISK OF ENGINEERING PLANTS AND COMPONENTS” BAY-LOGI 1 Fatigue calculations on benchmark.
Compression Members. Compression Members: Structural elements subjected only to axial compressive forces Stress:Uniform over entire cross section.
Page 1 of 14 External Transition Joints for Tungsten Divertors D. Navaei, X. R. Wang, M. S. Tillack and the ARIES Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power.
Structural and Failure Analysis Cost & Risk Assessment Shahram Sharafat TBM Cost Estimate Meeting UCLA Dec , 2005.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Prediction of Load-Displacement Curve for Weld-Bonded Stainless Steel Using Finite Element Method Essam Al-Bahkali Jonny Herwan Department of Mechanical.
Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.
R.Valbuena NBI March 2002 CNGS Decay Pipe Entrance Window Structural and Thermal Analysis A.Benechet, P.Cupial, R.Valbuena CERN-EST-ME.
Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical & Aerospace Engr., SJSU Discontinuity in Cross Section Stepped shafts Discontinuity.
Unit 3: Solid mechanics An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Solid mechanics Learning summary By the end of this chapter you should have.
FE calculations for the bolted helium vessel May 6th 2015
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Machine design 2 Joints 1. loads mechanical  forces, moments… thermal  chemical changing in place/ time … static cyclic dynamic 2.
NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FABRICATED TEES – A QUALITY ASSURANCE DESIGN GUIDELINE A.C. Seibi and R. J. Lawrence, GPPA.
Pressure Vessels.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Design Agains Fatigue - part Fatigue Endurance Prediction Design Agains Fatigue - part Fatigue Endurance Prediction Milan Růžička
© 2011 Autodesk Stressed Up: From Inventor Simulation to Simulation Mechanical Wasim Younis Senior Application Engineer, Symetri UK James Herzing Technical.
1 Recent Progress in Helium-Cooled Ceramic Breeder (HCCB) Blanket Module R&D and Design Analysis Ying, Alice With contributions from M. Narula, H. Zhang,
FAILURE INVESTIGATION OF UNDERGROUND DISTANT HEATING PIPELINE
RUP Implementation and Testing
Structural and Failure Analysis: Tasks, WBS, and Cost Estimates Shahram Sharafat and Nasr Ghoniem University of California Los Angeles, CA. US ITER TBM.
API 6HP Process1 API 6HP Example Analysis Project API E&P Standards Conference Applications of Standards Research, 24 June 2008.
FAILURE ANALYSIS Sources of failure - - Sources of failure - - Material Related Failures. Deficiency in Design. Service Related Failures. Environmental.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
FORMING (Conformado) Geometry, microstructure and materials FORMING vs. CASTINGS?: Even when modern castings can possses good structural integrity and.
Bay Zoltán Foundation for Applied Reseach Institute for Logistics and Production Systems BAY-LOGI Integrity Assessment of Dissimilar Metal Welds BAY-LOGI.
Applied mechanics of solids A.F. Bower.
1 PED: equivalent overall level of safety PED Annex 1, clause 7: The following provision apply as a general rule. However, where they are not applied,
Preparing for the Hydrogen Economy by Using the Existing Natural Gas System as a Catalyst // Project Contract No.: SES6/CT/2004/ NATURALHY is an.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy TBM Structure, Materials and Fabrication Collaboration Issues R.J. Kurtz 1, and A.F. Rowcliffe.
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Jiangyu Li, University of Washington Lecture 1 Overview Jiangyu Li University of Washington Mechanics of Materials Lab.
Conceptual Design Requirements for FIRE John A. Schmidt FIRE PVR March 31, 2004.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Initial Cost Estimates for Development of DCLL TBM Ferritic Steel Structural Components.
Welding Inspection and Metallurgy
A Damage-Mechanics Based Approach to Structural Design of ITER Components US-ITER TBM Meeting UCLA Nov. 3-5, 2003 S. Sharafat 1, N. Ghoniem 1, R. Odette.
Page 1 of 17 Evaluation of high heat flux components under normal and off-normal conditions M. S. Tillack with contributions from X. Wang, A. R. Raffray,
Probabilistic Design Systems (PDS) Chapter Seven.
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
Review of Cavity Load Cases and relevant analysis L. Dassa and C. Zanoni feat. N. Kuder 08/02/2016.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Chapter 1 Introduction Concept of Stress. Road Map: Statics  Mechanics of Materials  Elasticity  Plasticity Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Creep Mechanics.
EGM 5653 Advanced Mechanics of Materials
Warm cryostat mechanical calculations A.Catinaccio PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN Page 1 CERN, May 27th 2015.
Bay Zoltán Foundation for Applied Reseach Institute for Logistics and Production Systems BAY-LOGI Assessment of crack like defect in dissimilar welded.
Page 1 of 19 Design Improvements and Analysis to Push the Heat Flux Limits of Divertors M. S. Tillack, X. R. Wang, J A. Burke and the ARIES Team Japan-US.
IS:800 Section 13 FATIGUE. Introduction Mechanism of Fatigue Fracture Factors Affecting Fatigue Strength Design Strength & Cumulative Fatigue Damage IS:800.
Software Project Configuration Management
Dynamic Property Models
Preliminary analysis for the dressed LHC RF cavity (2) April 28th 2016 – EDMS L. Dassa, L. Mettler.
Turbo Power Life Prediction- Overview
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
Chapter 1 Introduction  Concept of Stress.
Thermo-mechanical Analysis
11/22/ /22/2018 HOT MATERIALS © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or.
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Configuration Management
Advanced Manufacturing: What is this going to do for us in Fusion?
Presentation transcript:

Structural and Failure Analysis Compiled by Shahram Sharafat for the TBM Conference Call Oct 27, 2005

2 TBM- Structural and Failure Analysis

3 TASK-A: Structural and Failure Analysis A.1 Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A.1.1 Establish Analysis Category A Thermal A Mechanical A Thermo-Mechanical A Multiphysics A.1.2 Establish Component-Type Analysis A Global SFA (entire components) A Local or Substructure Analysis A TBM Structural Component A Breeder A Structure-Breeder Interaction A TBM Support Structure A Piping A Solid Joints (HIP, welds, brazes, coatings) A Frictional Joints (flanges, bolts, fittings) A Flexible Joint A Cooling Manifolds A Other: Keys, Gaskets, etc. A.1.3 Establish Event Category A Normal Operation A Off-Normal Operation A Transients A Cyclic A Creep A Disruption A Start-Up A Shut-Down A.1.4 Determine Analysis Type (mechanical only) A Elastic A Inelastic A Load Limit & Elastic-Perfectly Plastic A Elastic-Plastic A Buckling A Modal A.1.5 Establish Service Requirements (allowable damage limits) A Operational A Likely A Unlikely A Extremely Unlikely Event A.1.6 Assess Analysis Requirements A Model A Component/design geometry details A Interface information A Boundary conditions A Loads A Loading History A Explanatory Diagrams A CAD model transferability A Material Property Data and Models A Property data A Property models (constitutive eqs., damage functions) A.1.7 Justify 3-D models used for geometry and loadings A.1.8 Develop 3-D Geometry Models A Import or create 3-D models A Justify 3-D model simplifications (if any) A Justify loading model A.1.9 Perform Structural & Failure Analysis Calculations A FEM: A Establish computational needs A Upload and run FEM A Archive model, loading, and results A Perform analytical calculations (when possible) A.2 Analysis of Results A.2.1 Assessment of Validity of Results A.2.2 Compare with analytical or experimental results A.2.3 Compare results with acceptance criteria: A Identify and classify stresses (primary, secondary, bending, membrane, etc.) A Determine stress and/or strain concentration factors A Compare with SDC-IC design rules (stresses, strains, deformations, damage fractions, etc.) A.2.4 Determine uncertainties A.2.5 Establish need for "design by experiment" (too complex for SFA alone): A Unacceptable uncertainties A Non-justifiable simplifications A Insufficient material property data or models A.3 Reporting Results A.3.1 Report and Archive Results on Analysis Database A.3.2 Write and Archive Results Summary Report on Analysis Database Task A: WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

4 TASK-B: Design Evaluation B.1 Design Engineering and Analysis B.1.1 Receive, Approve, Archive SFA Work Order Request (SFA-WO) B.1.2 Record Design Feature Details (thickness, fillets, rounds, chamfers, welds, brazes, etc.) on Analysis Database B.1.3 Determine Design Tolerances B.1.4 Identify Material Choices B.1.5 Identify Loads and Load Histories B.1.6 Establish Event Category B.1.7 Complete SFA-WOR B.1.6 Archive B B1.1.7 in Analysis Database B.2 Archiving Results B.2.1 Channel SFA Result Report to Design Team B.2.2 Report Key SFA Findings to Design Team B.2.3 Archive Design Team Response to SFA Results B.2.4 Establish further Need for SFA B.2.5 Archive Future Action on Analysis Database Task B: WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

5 TASK-C: Fabrication Engineering C.1 Interfacing with Fabrication Engineering Team C.1.1 Establish Component Fabrication Methods in Analysis Database C Forming and Shaping Procedures C Joining C HIP C Weld C Braze C Bolt C Coating C.1.2 Submit Fabrication Team with Needed Material Property Data C Physical C Thermal C Mechanical C Fracture C DBTT C Creep C Fatigue C Irradiation C Microstructure C Grain Structure C Defect, bubble, density C.2 Integration of Fabrication Engr. Response C.2.1 Acquire and Archive Fabrication Procedures C.2.2 Archive Material Data and Material Models in Analysis Database C.3 Integration with SFA Calculation Team C.3.1 Inform SFA Team of Fabrication Procedures C.3.2 Request SFA Team to analyze and comment on Fabrication Impact on analysis results (e.g., residual stresses) C.3.3 Archive Response from SFA Team on Fabrication Impact on Analysis C.4 Request for "Design by Experiment" (DBE) C.4.1 Identify Need for DBE (mission critical component; inconclusive SFA results, analysis too comples for SFA alone) C.4.2 Report Requirements/Conditions for DBE to Fabrication Team Task C: WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

6 TASK-D: Operation D.1 Detailing Operational Conditions and Analysis Requirements D.1.2 Acquire Detailed Operating Conditions of Component from TBM Team D.1.3 Record Details of the Event Category D.1.4 Identify Material Property Data and Modeling Sufficiency for SFA D.1.5 Report to Materials Development and Fabrication Teams any needed Material Property Data D.1.6 Report to Materials Modeling Team any needed Property Models (constitutive eqs., damage functions) D.1.7 Identify Design Rules and Codes (SDC-IC) Sufficiency D.1.8 Archive D.12 - D.1.7 in Analysis Database D.2 Integration with SFA Calculation Team D.2.1 Channel Operational Conditions to SFA Calculation Team D.2.2 Supply SFA Team with Material Property and Model Data D.2.3 Inform SFA Team of ITER Design Rules to be used (SDC-IC) D.3 Archiving SFA Operational Damage Response D.3.1 Archive Response from SFA Team on Impact of Operational Condition on Analysis Task D: WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE

7 TASK-E: Integration of SFA Activities E.1 Organizational E.1.1 Establish SFA Task Force E.1.2 Develop and maintain "SFA-Database" - Intranet Web-Site for Maintaining Rolling Records of SFA Activities E.1.3 Establish Guidelines and Procedures for SFA Calculations E.1.4 Establish Protocols for Interaction with Design Team Members E.1.5 Establish Protocol for Interaction with Fabrication Team Members E.1.6 Establish Guidelines and Protocols for SFA Results Reporting E.1.7 Develop Templates and Forms E Request for Work Order E Request for Material Property Data E Request for Material Property Models E Request for "Design by Experiment" E.1.8 Channeling and assignment of tasks to SFA members E.2 Material Properties Tracking E.2.1 Submit Request for tailoring and expanding US-Fusion Materials Database for SFA Needs (add Breeder Materials, SiC, Cu, Be, W: as needed) E.2.2 Augment US-Fusion Materials Database with Material Property Models E.2.3 Augment US-Fusion Materials Database with Material Property Data from Fabrication Activities Task E: WORK BREADKDOWN SCHEDULE