FRYSC CONTINUATION PROGRAM PLAN

NEEDS ASSESSMENT COVERSHEETS RATIONALE Consistency across the state, while allowing for individual school and community needs Focused data collection Data that identifies true needs, gaps, and barriers Data that actually drives services and programs and leads to outcomes

NEEDS ASSESSMENT DATA SHEETS 2 parts to needs assessment data sheets: Standardized data o Standard for every center, specific to center type o Possible source is identified Other data unique to the community o Additional relevant data collected by center staff o Examples of each included o Data expected in each of the categories (school, county/district, FRYSC) o Local supporting data that highlights a significant need or gap *Will be included with the rest of the CPP

ACTION COMPONENT FORM Changes include: Needs Assessment Data Summary Strengthening Families Protective Factors Implementation section (formerly I and R)

NEEDS ASSESSMENT DATA SUMMARY

Coordinators should consider all relevant data identified on the needs assessment data sheet(s) and list top needs that will be addressed within the appropriate component. This eliminates the need to retype data that may appear in multiple action components Use measurable words – more, increase, decrease, improve, etc.

STRENGTHENING FAMILIES PROTECTIVE FACTORS

A simple, quick way to maintain coordinator awareness of the protective factors, and how their programs and activities contribute to building them.

CHANGES TO THE I AND R SECTION OF THE ACTION COMPONENT Now in 2 parts: Implementation Report on Action Component Form Impact Report on SurveyMonkey Rationale: Top request by coordinators according to Regional Advisory Council survey Reduces time spent on paperwork Current I and R format was confusing with some parts redundant (outcomes vs. outputs, data in Infinite Campus) Outcome data was not in a useable format, not easily compiled for sharing with stakeholders KDE no longer uses this format

IMPLEMENTATION SECTION The purpose of this section is to document if the activity was implemented to help the coordinator and Advisory Council make decisions on the activity’s effectiveness Report date: Sept. 30, 2017 and 2018

IMPACT REPORT Rationale: To document demonstrable outcomes in a useful format To share statewide outcome data with stakeholders Data can be filtered by region, component, type of impact, etc. Allows for focused outcome reporting Only those activities that show clear outcomes are reported Does not force a response for every activity

IMPACT REPORT SPECIFICS SurveyMonkey, compiled automatically, able to be filtered Expectation that coordinators will evaluate significant activities Every center must submit AT LEAST one activity that was measured for change At a later date, a committee may be organized to decide which pieces of reported data should be publicized in an official report

OTHER CPP FORMS Only minor changes including : Checklist – added the data sheet and inventory Assurance pages, minor language change Center Operations Form, Description “ of center site ”