Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and reference purposes only.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Allen Overstreet Bureau of Re-Entry Programs & Education Correctional Education Overview of Services.
Advertisements

MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
Agenda My Background Homeless and Highly Mobile Children and Families McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act Our Research What we all can do Website.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk PROGRAM OVERVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ANNUAL REPORTS.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Lord, Remember me. REHAB CENTRE, Bangalore Objectives: To provide released Prisoners and Young offenders with facilities like short stay, Food, medical.
Chicago Public Schools Office of High School Programs Department of Dropout Prevention and Recovery Dr. Darreyl M. Young, Manager ConfidentialNot for Publication.
Arkansas Department of Workforce Education Adult Education Division.
EFFECTIVE TRANSITION THROUGH SYSTEMS OF CARE: COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY SUPPORTS AS A MEANS TO SUCCESS FOR SYSTEM – INVOLVED YOUTH Simon Gonsoulin, Reyhan.
The Bishops of Texas have endorsed the Texas Catholic Action Plan for Criminal Justice. Why? Meet Pastoral Needs for 1.1 Million Men & Women Stimulate.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
Source: Postsecondary Education OPPORTUNITY Collaborating to Expand the Pipeline “Let’s Get Real” Presented by: Ed C. Apodaca November 3-5, 2005.
Title I-D, Subpart 2 Neglected, Delinquent, and At- Risk Youth Program ESEA Odyssey Summer 2013 Russ Sweet Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
Neglected & Delinquent (N&D) Foster Care Program School Mental Health Component Javier Zuniga License Clinical Social Worker 13+ years LAUSD 5TH. year.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Change…Challenge… Choice… Debra Jones Administrator, Adult.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 What’s It All About?
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas.
Prevention and Early Intervention Linking Long-Term Vision with Short-Term Costs J effrey P oirier, B.A. M ary M agee Q uinn, Ph.D. American Institutes.
Federal Programs Northwest Independent School District.
Neglected & Delinquent Support and Transition from Residential Placement 2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 27, 2015.
1 2 A Parent’s Guide to Title I The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was enacted in The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
Pyramid Response to Intervention Never in our nation’s history have the demands on our educational system been greater or the consequences of failure as.
Grants to States for Workplace and Community Transition Training for Incarcerated Youth Offenders “ Youth Offender Program”
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
Transition Services for Youth in Correctional Settings Presented by: Dr. Robert B. Rutherford, EDJJ/ASU Dr. Sarup Mathur, EDJJ/University of Phoenix Heather.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability N or D Application.
Federal Program Funding to Improve Student Outcomes Consolidated Application Spring Report District Learner Advisory Commitee (DAC) Meeting June.
The Regionalization Project New Regional Field Coordinator Orientation.
> Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education | Beverly Mackereth, Secretary of Public Welfare Governor’s Proposed Budget
Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Rebecca Derenge, Title I N&D Coordinator …including information from: Family Ties: The Link Between Engaging Families and Improving Education for Delinquent.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
Collaborative Practices: Transition Toolkit 2.0 – Meeting the Educational Needs of Youth Exposed to the Juvenile Justice System Simon Gonsoulin.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Spring N or D Application.
TITLE I, PART D Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Introduction Results Treatment Needs and Treatment Completion as Predictors of Return-to-Prison Following Community Treatment for Substance-Abusing Female.
What to Expect When You Are Expecting Consolidated Monitoring: Every Step of the Way Office of Federal Programs Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Federal Update: Title I, Part D “Neglected or Delinquent” Education Programs John McLaughlin, Ed.D. Federal Coordinator/Program Manager Title I, Part D.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
Arizona Department of Education September
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
Title I, Part D and the Common Core Simon Gonsoulin.
HN 299 Welcome to our second Seminar. Review Review of first week Review of first week Second week Second week Projects ahead Projects ahead Discussion.
Rae-Anne Montague, Joe Coyle, and Jeanie Austin Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Youth Empowerment.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting. 2 Let’s learn about Title I Title I is the largest federal assistance program for our nation’s schools.
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Thoughts for today *Teacher: I want you to tell me the longest sentence you can think of Pupil: Life imprisonment! You know you can’t sleep in this workshop…would.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Title 1 Annual Parent Meeting September Purpose of Title 1 The purpose of Title 1 is to provide supplemental resources and services to high poverty.
Title 1, Part D Neglected & Delinquent Institutions
State Operated Programs: Family Engagement and Re-Enrollment
Call with the US Department of Education and Title I, Part D Coordinators October 17, 2016 Katie Deal.
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
ND Community Call Salmon Community November 29, 2016.
Broward County Sheriff’s Office Civil Citation Program Evaluation
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community
WELCOME PARENTS 2018  Title I Annual Parent Meeting.
Federal Programs Public Hearing
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
Title I Part D Reporting
Title I Part D Reporting
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and reference purposes only.

Title I, Part D--Prevention and Intervention Programs for Youth Who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk of Dropping Out Subpart 1 State Agency Program n supports educational services to help children identified as failing or at-risk of failing state standards and supplements and improves educational services provided to children in state operated institutions for neglected and delinquent youth

Title I, Part D Subpart 2-- Local Agency Programs Supports LEA programs that involve collaboration between LEAs and locally operated correctional facilities to-- –carry-out quality education programs that prepare youth to complete H.S diploma or GED, enter training or employment programs, or further their education

Title I, Part D, Local Agency Programs (Continued) –facilitate the transition from the correctional facility to the local school or employment –operate drop-out prevention programs for at-risk youth in local schools and/or youth returning from correctional/delinquent facilities

Study of Local Agency Activities Under Title I, Part D Program Program Profiles April 2000 Available at: ED-PUBS

Study Findings (Based on site visits to 9 local programs) n Formal transition or aftercare programs remain scarce n In general, the overall designs of the subpart 2 programs visited were not based on effective practices research n subpart 2 funded staff in all the programs visited have the same opportunities for training and TA as staff funded by Title I, Part A

Study Findings-Continued n Facilities that use program funds to hire staff employ paraprofessionals more often than certified teachers n in a few programs, local businesses and employers provide students w/ an orientation to or actual experience in the workplace

Study Findings--Continued Respondents’ perceptions of impediments to more successful programs: n High student mobility n Mandated pretests administered a day or two after a student arrives at a facility may not provide an accurate assessment of a students achievement level n inadequate funding

Captive Students: Education and Training in America’s Prisons (ETS) n Most inmates in prisons will eventually be paroled yet two-thirds don’t have the literacy skills needed to function in society n inmates exposed to education programs are more less likely to end up back in prison than non-participants n at least half of all correctional facilities have cut their inmate education programs during the last five years

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report (By OJJDP) n More than three-quarters of youth newly admitted to State prison were minorities n The abuse rate in low-income families was two times the rate in other families, and the neglect rate was more than three times higher n The number of youth under 18 in jails rose 35% from 1994 to 1997

Budget Information

Helpful Information Helpful Information Visit the Department of Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency website: – – to subscribe to the National Crimminal Justice Reference Service listserv