1 Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC) Contract / Subcontract Issues Working Group Industry Issues and Position Summary 13 August 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contract and Project Management: A Field Perspective Moderator Michael Peek, PE CCE CFM Office of Engineering and Construction Management.
Advertisements

Presented to: NDIA PMSC By: Keith Kratzert Date: January 29, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Improving Program Performance at FAA.
1 ANSI/EIA A STANDARD Earned Value Management Systems Proposed Changes Discussion January 31, 2007 NDIA Program Management Systems Committee.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
DII Best Practices Forum: New Developments Peter J. Eyre Crowell & Moring © Crowell & Moring LLP All Rights Reserved. June 23, 2011.
1 NDIA Earned Value Management Application Guide Status Report May 3, 2005.
CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (CAGE CODES) DFARS Case 2003-D040 DFARS Parts 204, 212, 213 and 252 are amended to remove policy on Central Contractor.
ANSI/EIA A EIA STANDARD Earned Value Management Systems Overview May 2, 2006 NDIA Program Management Systems Committee Walt Berkey, Lockheed.
1 EVM Policy July 2013 NAVY CEVM 2 Outline DoDI DFARS DFARS DFARS June 2012 AT&L Policy Letter.
1 Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC) Contract / Subcontract Issues Working Group 04 February 2010.
2010 National Defense Industrial Association - Program Management Systems Committee (NDIA PMSC). All rights reserved.. 1 Program Management.
Page 1 National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC). NDIA Earned Value Management Systems Intent Guide Overview.
2009 National Defense Industrial Association - Program Management Systems Committee (NDIA PMSC). All rights reserved.. Dave Roberts NDIA PMSC.
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
1 Overview of Compliance, Surveillance, and Integrated Baseline Reviews August 2013 NAVY CEVM.
PCARSS: Transfers of Accountability
CONTRACTUAL FLOW DOWN OF DPAS PRIORITY RATINGS
Copyright © 2009 NDIA PMSC Robert Loop August 2009 NDIA PMSC Guides Working Group Status.
Office of Management and Budget Program Management Systems Committee February 8, 2005 EVMS Actions in Process David Muzio.
1 NASA Earned Value Management Update August 2006.
1 Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC) Contractual Requirements/Issues Sub-Team Update 7 August 2007.
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reporting Requirements Presented by: Darryl Grant Procurement Analyst Division of Acquisition Policy &
Earned Value Management Systems (EVMS) Defense Support Team (DST) and Report to Congress Mr. Richard Ginman OUSD(A&T)/DPAP Presentation to National Defense.
Contractor Business Systems (CBS) Rule Eric Fassett.
1 Program Management Systems Committee Joint Industry/Government Meeting May 21, 2009 EVM for Service Contracts Working Group.
1 Earned Value Management (EVM) Center ‘Moving Forward’ Presented by Mr. David Kester Director, Program Integration Division April 25, 2007.
1 Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC) Contract / Subcontract Issues Working Group 29 January 2009.
2009 National Defense Industrial Association - Program Management Systems Committee (NDIA PMSC). All rights reserved.. Gay Infanti Dave Roberts.
Revised Department of Defense Earned Value Management Policy Deborah A. Tomsic Senior Program Analyst Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition,
OSD Earned Value Management Activities Update Larry L. Axtell Senior Program Analyst Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
© MCR, LLC MCR Proprietary - Distribution Limited Earned Value Management Application, Guidance, and Education Neil F. Albert President/CEO MCR, LLC
1 The Voice of the Industrial Base 1 IBR Guide NDIA PMSC Working Group NDIA PMSC Meeting January 31, 2007 Updated Feb 4, 2007 Prepared by; Joe Houser KM.
Generic GFE Implementation Toolset for Prime Contractors -IUID Guidance- –Initial population of Government Furnished Equipment Data into the IUID Registry.
Page 1 National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC). NDIA Surveillance Guide Overview May
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
Presented to: NDIA By: Keith Kratzert Date: August 16, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Improving Program Performance at FAA.
Office of Management and Budget NDIA Program Management Systems Committee May 3, 2005 EVMS Compliance Requirements David Muzio.
Presented to: NDIA PMSC By: Keith Kratzert Date: May 21, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Improving Program Performance at FAA.
Strength through Industry & Technology Program Management Systems Committee Procurement Division Educational Seminar 31 March 2008 Sarasota, Florida Current.
Earned Value Management Presented By: Steve Krivokopich May , 2006.
1 NDIA Earned Value Management Application Guide Status Report August 16-17, 2005 Wayne Abba Walt Berkey David Muzio David Treacy NDIA EVM Application.
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
Internal Information Services Risk Management Working Group Gay Infanti Northrop Grumman 15 August 2006.
Department of Energy EVM Update NDIA Program Management Systems Committee August 17, 2005 Mike Donnelly Office of Engineering and Construction Management.
NASA Update NDIA PMSC Quarterly Meeting August 26, 2010 NDIA PMSC Quarterly Meeting August 26, 2010 Ken Poole NASA/MSFC/CS40 (Project Planning & Analysis.
1 Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC) Contract / Subcontract Issues Working Group 27 August 2009.
Internal Information Services Risk Management Team Gay Infanti/John Driessnack Northrop Grumman 3 May 2005.
Alpha Contracting Sole Source Negotiations between Government and Industry (13 CFR (c)(2))
Project Management Project Integration Management Minder Chen, Ph.D. CSU Channel Islands
NDIA PMCS May Rosslyn, VA Earned Value Management System Acceptance Working Group Buddy Everage Working Group Lead.
Defense Cost and Resource Center Contractor Cost and Software Data Reporting: An Update Ron Lile May 2006.
2010 National Defense Industrial Association - Program Management Systems Committee (NDIA PMSC). All rights reserved.. Mary Ann Hale NDIA PMSC.
Report Performance Monitor & Control Risk Administer Procurement MONITORING & CONTROLLING PROCESS.
Strength through Industry & Technology How is the Government Managing for Value? Program Management Systems Committee March 11, 2007 The Voice of the Industrial.
Small Business Programs Tatia Evelyn-Bellamy Director Small Business Division Small Business Center February 2016.
1 The Voice of the Industrial Base 1 IBR Guide NDIA PMSC Working Group NDIA PMSC Meeting August 7, 2007 Prepared by; NDIA IBR Working Group August 2007.
1 The Voice of the Industrial Base 1 IBR Guide NDIA PMSC Working Group NDIA PMSC Meeting April 24, 2007 Prepared by; NDIA IBR Working Group April 15, 2007.
Teaming and Joint Ventures To “WIN” United States Department of Veterans Affairs Industry Day Palo Alto, CA October 1, 2015 VA Office of Small and Disadvantaged.
Small Business and Subcontracting. Subcontracting for Small Business 6 steps to successful subcontracting 6. Report Contractor performance 1. Consider.
Earned Value Management
EVM 202—Lesson 5 EVMS Surveillance
EVM 202—Lesson 3 EVMS Guidelines and Compliance
NDIA Earned Value Management Application Guide
Overview of Compliance, Surveillance, and Integrated Baseline Reviews
EVM Policy NAVY CEVM July 2013
NDIA Intent Guide Update for EVMIG.
CMO DPAS RESPONSIBILITIES
Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC)
Earned Value Management System Acceptance Working Group
Presentation transcript:

1 Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC) Contract / Subcontract Issues Working Group Industry Issues and Position Summary 13 August 2008

2 Issues List  The following issues have been addressed by the Contracts Working Group and consensus has been reached among industry and government participants concerning next steps: –Contract vs. EVM system order of precedence. –Subcontractor compliance, validation and surveillance –Knowledge gap between EVM and contracting communities –Integrated and virtual team (badgeless) subcontracting teaming arrangements –DCMA EV Standard Surveillance Operating Manual (SSOM)  DCMA EV Center is establishing a position paper on each of these issues. After a review by other DOD segments, the position paper, which will represent a consolidated DOD position, will be published. Position Paper Under Review  The actions contained herein will be executed through a collaborative industry / government effort  Dr. Finley has requested that these issues be worked and closed out.

3  In addition to including FAR or DFARS EVMS clauses on contracts, contracting officers frequently include other provisions that often require suppliers to modify or depart from their standard, validated EVM Systems to manage their contracts and meet the requirements of their contracts. These provisions may be found in sections of the contract that take precedence over Section I, where the EVMS clauses are contained, e.g., –Section H – Special Provisions –Section C – Statement of Work requirements  DCMA’s stated policy was to issue Corrective Action Request (s) against the contractor for following contract direction. Issue Order of Precedence  In the sprit of cooperation the Contractor and the cognizant CMO should notify the PCO of the conflicting requirements  The DCMA CMO and the PCO should reach a solution with the government PM which precludes noncompliance with either the ANSI or the contractor’s validated EVMS  DCMA Director has instructed the EV Center not to initiate CARs when an inconsistency exists  DCMA must issue a communication regarding this position to all CMOs and EV Center personnel.  Contractors are obligated to follow the contracts. Update: Due to recent developments DCMA will revisit the 1716 process and is reevaluating its position on this issue.. Team Position

4 Issue  Previously a subcontractor had the ability to request one of three options when required to have a validated EVMS; the EVMIG and other guidance documents vested primary responsibility in the prime contractor. 1)Prime Contractor Review Only 2)DCMA Review Only 3)DCMA and Prime Contractor Review  October 2006, DCMA revised the EVMIG to make option 2 the sole available option  The EVMIG may conflict with NDIA EVMS System Acceptance Guide since it appears to categorically eliminate alternative approaches, e.g., 3 rd party as well as reciprocity, i.e., recognition of acceptance by another agency Subcontractor Compliance, Validation and Surveillance  Validation / Compliance Reviews: DCMA has taken over responsibility for subcontractor validation and surveillance, however prime contractors will be encouraged to participate in subcontractor validation and/or compliance reviews since they retain responsibility for –Subcontractor performance –Accuracy and fidelity of CPRs, including reported subcontractor data  Suppliers with DoD contracts must review their system descriptions to ensure they comply with recent change in responsibility for subcontractor validation and surveillance.  Surveillance: Program- DCMA prime will issue a LOD to the Subcontractor DCMA for ongoing program surveillance. System - Normal joint system surveillance will take place. Prime may be part of the review. Team Agreement

5  Evidence that EVM and Contracting experts are not collaborating, via IPTs, on the contractual application and use of EVMS during acquisition planning  Evidence of this is as follows: – Incorrect flow down and/or omission of EVM contractual requirements. – Improper contract direction forcing the contractor or subcontractor to violate their approved system. – Over application of EVM requirements – Improper application of requirements for follow on options – Improper use of Management Reserve (MR) – Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) timing IssueTeam Position EVM Knowledge Gap  NDIA PMSC should establish an Industry / Government team to generate a training package which can be delivered to all federal agencies and contractor organizations. Update: D. Tomsic developed/delivered this training on 7/29/08 through NCMA audio seminar. Industry will review material to ensure it is acceptable to a broader audience.  Issue DOD “EVM Contract Requirements Checklist” under OUSD signature to all commands. Update: DPAP correspondence drafted “EVMS Requirements and Reporting.” Will reference checklist with link to web site to obtain current version.  DOD is considering the establishment of a common Procurement Initiation Document (PID) process to review contract requirements prior to solicitation. Update: Being actively worked within OSD.

6  The use of a single EVMS by all program participants to manage large programs involving major subcontractors is viewed as non-compliant to the DFARS EVMS clause by DCMA. – This approach also referred to as badgeless, virtual, or gray badge. – Characterized by adoption of a single validated system to manage the effort (typically the prime’s EVMS), use of a common tool set, integrated schedules and performance reporting. Issue  Team will review matrix and establish general guidance for various types of integrated solutions. Update:  Establish Matrix of Variable Implementations – Complete.  Update Matrix to Establish Validation, Compliance and System Surveillance Responsibilities.  Completed guidance will be communicated through NDIA PMSC and agreed to via letter correspondence.  Published in the EVMIG.  Schedule weekly meetings through September and October to achieve industry closure. Integrated Subcontract EVMS Implementations Industry Position

7 Issue Standard Surveillance Operating Manual (SSOM)  DCMA EV Standard Surveillance Plan (SSP) will be implemented throughout the agency without being distributed for comment.  Issues include but are not limited to: –Existing AA provisions allowing system description change after ACO notification. –Review and adjudication of all CARs by the EV Center. –Risk Based Surveillance approach appears to eliminate contractor input. –Level of detail and amount of data requests to support surveillance have increased. –Training and Implementation - Demonstrated DCMA response time for final reports and system description changes must be improved. –Relationship of NDIA Intent Guide to the surveillance  PMSC Clearinghouse has received input related to issues arising from surveillance experiences since SSOM took effect  NDIA PMSC will work with DCMA to achieve a timely review and closure on any areas of concern. Update : DCMA has agreed to break out separate small group of Industry and Government participants to review the process and make recommendations. Industry Representatives –Northrop Grumman: Gay Infanti –Raytheon: Jeff Poulson –Pratt & Whitney: Mike Martin –DCMA EV Center: Donna Holden, TBD, TBD Team wishes to start in advance of EV Center availability. Schedule weekly meetings through September and October to establish industry draft. Team Position