Globalization of HEP Subgroup of Young Physicists Forum steering committee Véronique Boisvert, John Krane, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick, Mark Palmer, Manuel Toharia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results from the survey on The Future of HEP
Advertisements

CERN Veronique Boisvert CERN EP-ATR/TA1 Introductory meeting October 22 nd 2002
Joseph A. Formaggio University of Washington Young Particle Physicists Present and Future.
Young Physicists Panel Closing Report for Survey Project John Krane Iowa State University DPF Executive Committee Meeting 5/24/02.
U.S./DOE Policies and Programs for HEP Data Preservation Amber Boehnlein U.S. Department of Energy Office of High Energy Physics.
After ISS Where Do We Go From Here?. 21 August 2006P Dornan - After ISS2 Next - until the end of 2006  Produce the ISS Report - with the present team.
K. Whelan, AAPT, Jan The QuarkNet Collaboration: How “Doing Science” is Changing Science Education Kris Whelan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Oct 24 MOST MeetingDenis Perret-Gallix Asia-Pacific Cooperation.
Conseil Europèenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire Where it is ? What is it ? How is it managed ? International Cooperation for the Large Hadron Collider Conclusions.
A national science policy challenge: access to major research facilities abroad in an era of increased globalization Homer A. Neal University of Michigan.
Issues in international collaboration in large astronomical projects Richard Schilizzi Chair, IAU Working Group on Future Large Scale Facilities.
Supercomputing Center Jysoo Lee KISTI Supercomputing Center National e-Science Project.
YPP Activities Strong interest in social activities Some of your suggestions –BBQ, something like Summie Cocktail –Getting to know area together, some.
1 Albrecht Wagner, Snowmass 0805 Albrecht Wagner DESY and Hamburg University Challenges for Realising the ILC.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
ICFA Report to KILC12 January 2011 to April 2012 Pier Oddone – ICFA Chair Pier Oddone; 23 April 2012ICFA Report to KILC121.
Results from the Survey on the Future of HEP John Krane Iowa State University The Young Physicists Panel presents August, 2001 survey design demographics.
Monitoring :Thailand’s Experiences Session 2: Monitoring: Processes, Potentials, Tools and Instruments Global Dialogue of Agencies and Ministries for International.
Latin America: 8 Countries 22 Universities Argentina Brasil Chile Colombia Cuba Mexico Peru Venezuela Europe 5 Countries.
HELEN High Energy Physics Latinamerican-European Network Training Types Complementary training (CT): Mobility of students of the two final.
Opening Remarks: ICFA and Governments Presented at Special Evening Forum By Jonathan Dorfan.
ATTRACT is a proposal for an EU-funded R&D programme as part of H2020 for sensor, imaging and related computing (ICT) development Its purpose is to demonstrate.
American Neutrino Strategy: Consequences of P5 Report Jim Strait, LBNE Project Director NuFact August 2014.
Long Range Planning Pier Oddone September 24, 2007.
Report from the Young Physicists Ken Bloom (U. of Michigan) Veronique Boisvert (CERN) Joe Formaggio (U. of Washington) Ben Kilminster (U. of Rochester)
EPS Budapest August The Challenge of Going Global Ian Corbett European Southern Observatory.
IUPAP International Union of Pure and Applied Physics C11 Commission of Particles and Fields Gregor Herten, Chair of C11 Freiburg University, Germany Report.
Draft Collaboration Model for HLLHC-DS HLLHC-DS Meeting 20th July 2010.
Learning Objectives by Karen McNamara Define ingredients to a successful collaborative How to establish a structure for a collaborative partnership Recognize.
Program started on August 1st, 2005 ALFA PROGRAMME CONFERENCE 'BEST PRACTICES & RESULTS OF ALFA PROJECTS THE FUTURE OF EU-LA COOPERATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION.
Physics 321 Hour 37 Collisions in Three Dimensions.
LCFOA Meeting at SLAC Linear Collider Forum of the Americas 1 LINEAR COLLIDER FORUM OF THE AMERICAS CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES OVERVIEW Victor R. Kuchler.
The Future of High Energy Physics R. Aleksan CPPM/IN2P3 and DAPNIA/CEA EPS HEP2005 Lisbon, July 23,
CERN Strategy Group WS at Zeuthen Input from Japan Mitsuaki NOZAKI (KEK)
Helping Develop America’s Technological Workforce K. Whelan Oregon QuarkNet Meeting, June 2012 QuarkNet 101 Kris Whelan University of Washington.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
Promoting ICT in Developing Regions Love Ekenberg Professor of Computer Science Acting Director SPIDER Dept. of Computer and Systems Sciences Stockholm.
US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, The CMS Physics Analysis Center - PAC Dan Green US CMS Program Manager Jan. 28, 2004.
1 HiGrade Kick-off Welcome to DESY Hamburg Zeuthen.
Proposal for Euro–Asia–Pacific Schools of High-Energy Physics CERN-Korea-Committee CERN / 11 October 2010 presented by Nick Ellis on behalf of CERN.
Globalization Working Group International Steering Structure of the Lab Operation of the Lab Career Issues Veronique Boisvert, John Krane, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FUTURE ACCELERATORS (ICFA) Roy Rubinstein2nd International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - 4 September
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK ILCSC Chair GDE meeting at Frascati December 7, 2005.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
Valeria Perez Reale YPP GA 6/031 YPP "HEP Young Particle Physicists Club at CERN” part of the CERN Staff Association Club system since 11/02 Constitution:
ECFA European Committee for Future Accelerators Report from the chairman M. Krammer HEPHY, Vienna, Austria July 24, 2014RECFA DESY1.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Mexican Space Agency Plenary Agenda Item # 3 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto,
CERN October 2010CERN-Korea Committee1 CERN Teacher Programmes Inspiring the next generation of scientists Mick Storr Head CERN Teacher Programmes and.
Atsuto Suzuki (KEK), Chair ICFA Report from ICFA ICFA mission and membershipICFA PanelICFA Activity.
ILD SiD CALI CE LC- TPC FCAL R&D group (ILC) group (ILC) “collab” (CLIC)  host lab “collab” (LC) “collab” (LC) “collab” (LC) R&D groups involved in “world-wide.
John Womersley LHC Joel Butler, Marcela Carena, Jim Strait, John Womersley No formal meeting of the group yet, but we took the opportunity to sit with.
FP6 for women in science in Lithuania Jurgita Petrauskiene Agency for International Science and Technology Development Programmes in Lithuania.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
IPC Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Joint Strategy for the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) CARE International, FAO, FEWS.
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group Global Design Effort CFS EDR Kick-Off Mtg, FNAL Aug 22 – 24, CFS EDR FNAL Kick-Off Planning.
Elections for USLUO’s Executive Committee John Huth, Harvard Boaz Klima, Fermilab 2 nd US LUO Annual Meeting September 25-26, 2009.
ICFA Report to New Frontiers in Physics January 2011 to April 2012 Pier Oddone – ICFA Chair Pier Oddone; June 15, 2012New Frontiers in Physics1.
International Collaboration for Data Preservation and Long Term Analysis in High Energy Physics RECODE - Final Workshop - January.
45 th Session Advisory Committee on Health Research of the Pan American Health Organization (CAIS) Hamilton, ON, Canada 17 – 19 October 2012 Partnerships.
Future Research Infrastructures: Challenges & Opportunities Varenna, Italy July 11, 2015 Dr. Amy K. Flatten Director of International Affairs American.
Asia-Europe Physics Summit – Tsukuba, March 26th 2010 Large International Research Facilities The Asia-Europe cooperation Michel Spiro (CNRS) President.
Forging New, Non-Traditional Partnerships among Physicists, Teachers and Students Marjorie Bardeen, Fermilab quarknet.i2u2.org.
Nicholas Hadley University of Maryland
Terms of Reference for the Near-Earth Object Threat Mitigation
Francois Le Diberder 1rst China-France on LHC and Grid in2p3.
Grant writing Session II.
V SuperB Workshop ENS May 9-11, 2007
Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa & Pisa
International Cooperation in High Energy Physics
Participation of the private and academic sectors in ITU activities
Presentation transcript:

Globalization of HEP Subgroup of Young Physicists Forum steering committee Véronique Boisvert, John Krane, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick, Mark Palmer, Manuel Toharia

Overview Demise of SSC: Lack of international cooperation in the project Need for consensus International Cooperation in HEP Steering of long-term decisions Funding and Construction of Large Projects Operation of Large Projects

International Cooperation Right now no international steering group Now: Ad hoc committees: form, report, disband Could have a semi-permanent advisory group, eventually some funding control? Important to have government representatives Theorists, particle experimentalists, accelerator physicists: all need to be represented Possible Disadvantages: Loss of national pride Possible HEP budget decrease?

The International Laboratory National facilities: Operated by host country, planning, project definition done in international collaboration Larger facilities: Operated by host country, construction by several countries HERA model Very large projects collaboration of several countries with comparable share of the total construction and operation cost Never been done before Very large projects in the frame of an international organization CERN model From

Regional Centers Distance is a barrier for effective contributions, specially for young physicists ! Possible solution is Regional Centers: Laboratory capable of remote operation of the accelerator and detectors data processing Make use of current national laboratories Don’t have to travel too far: attract students Funding agencies will like the periodic control Host lab doesn’t get completely overwhelmed Disadvantage: $ cost! $, viability?

What you should be thinking about while at Snowmass: Can and should the field start a planning process at an international level? How? Etc. What should be the structure of a future International Laboratory? Are the benefits of Regional Centers worth the costs? How can we solve the problem of separation for young physicists?