1 1 Eric Linder 22 November 2010 UC Berkeley & Berkeley Lab Institute for the Early Universe Ewha University, Korea CMB Probes of Dark Energy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Advertisements

Dark Energy and Extended Gravity theories Francesca Perrotta (SISSA, Trieste)
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
COSMOLOGY AS A TOOL FOR PARTICLE PHYSICS Roberto Trotta University of Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Observational Cosmology - a unique laboratory for fundamental physics Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
Å rhus, 4 September 2007 Julien Lesgourgues (LAPTH, Annecy, France)
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
José Beltrán and A. L. Maroto Dpto. Física teórica I, Universidad Complutense de Madrid XXXI Reunión Bienal de Física Granada, 11 de Septiembre de 2007.
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, MK, JHEP 07 (2008) Dimopoulos, MK, Lyth, Rodriguez,
Falsifying Paradigms for Cosmic Acceleration Michael Mortonson Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago January 22, 2009.
CMB as a physics laboratory
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?
COSMO 2006, Lake Tahoe 9/28/2006 Cuscuton Cosmology: Cuscuton Cosmology: Dark Energy meets Modified Gravity Niayesh Afshordi Institute for Theory and Computation.
The Baryon Acoustic Peak Nick Cowan UW Astronomy May 2005 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy May 2005.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, Karčiauskas, JHEP 07, 119 (2008) Dimopoulos,
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
Primordial density perturbations from the vector fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas in collaboration with Konstantinos Dimopoulos Jacques M. Wagstaff Mindaugas.
Program 1.The standard cosmological model 2.The observed universe 3.Inflation. Neutrinos in cosmology.
COMING HOME Michael S. Turner Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics The University of Chicago.
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
1 1 Dark Energy in Dark Antarctica Dark Energy in Dark Antarctica Eric Linder 21 July 2009 Berkeley Center for Cosmological Physics, UC Berkeley & Berkeley.
1 1 Eric Linder October 2011 UC Berkeley & Berkeley Lab Institute for the Early Universe Ewha University, Korea ★ ★ GR. Chasing Down Cosmic Acceleration.
CMB acoustic peaks.
Inflationary Freedom and Cosmological Neutrino Constraints Roland de Putter JPL/Caltech CosKASI 4/16/2014.
1 1 Eric Linder 27 June 2012 Testing Dark Energy and Gravity with Cosmological Surveys UC Berkeley & Berkeley Lab Institute for the Early Universe, Korea.
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
Modified (dark) gravity Roy Maartens, Portsmouth or Dark Gravity?
Early times CMB.
1 Edmund Bertschinger MIT Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research Testing Gravity on Large Scales Dekel 1994 Ann.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
1 1 Eric Linder 24 July 2013 Chasing Down Cosmic Acceleration UC Berkeley & Berkeley Lab Institute for the Early Universe, Korea.
Relic Neutrinos, thermal axions and cosmology in early 2014 Elena Giusarma arXiv: Based on work in collaboration with: E. Di Valentino, M. Lattanzi,
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
Probing fundamental physics with CMB B-modes Cora Dvorkin IAS Harvard (Hubble fellow) Status and Future of Inflationary Theory workshop August 2014, KICP.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
1 1 Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Interpreting Dark Energy JDEM constraints.
Lecture 5: Matter Dominated Universe: CMB Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure Today, matter is assembled into structures: filaments, clusters, galaxies,
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
University of Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Galaxy clusters.
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity collaborated with Elcio Abdalla.
CMB as a dark energy probe Carlo Baccigalupi. Outline  Fighting against a cosmological constant  Parametrizing cosmic acceleration  The CMB role in.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
Ignacy Sawicki Université de Genève Understanding Dark Energy.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: The Heart of Darkness Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Three theoretical issues in physical cosmology I. Nonlinear clustering II. Dark matter III. Dark energy J. Hwang (KNU), H. Noh (KASI)
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
The Cosmic Microwave Background
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: Acceleration and Deceleration Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Investigating dark energy with CMB lensing Viviana Acquaviva, SISSA, Trieste Lensing collaborators in SISSA: C. Baccigalupi, S. Leach, F. Perrotta, F.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Cosmology : a short introduction Mathieu Langer Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale Université Paris-Sud XI Orsay, France Egyptian School on High Energy.
The Dark Side of the Universe L. Van Waerbeke APSNW may 15 th 2009.
Smoke This! The CMB, the Big Bang, Inflation, and WMAP's latest results Spergel et al, 2006, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year results:
Testing Dark Energy and Gravity
Observational Constraints on the Running Vacuum Model
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
CMB Anisotropy 이준호 류주영 박시헌.
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

1 1 Eric Linder 22 November 2010 UC Berkeley & Berkeley Lab Institute for the Early Universe Ewha University, Korea CMB Probes of Dark Energy

2 2 Outline 1.Handles on Dark Energy 2.CMB Lensing and CMB-Galaxy Correlations 3.Early, Cold, and Stressed Dark Energy 4.Testing GR with the CMB 5.Is Acceleration Unique?

3 3 Cosmic Acceleration We observe cosmic acceleration, ä>0 (most directly from supernovae). Freedman et al 2009 Amanullah et al 2010 with sys accelerating decelerating accelerating decelerating

4 4 Kindergarten Cosmology This implies a modification of the Friedmann equations. So there is either a new source of energy, or a modification of gravity. These are just energy conservation and Newtons 2 nd law: H 2 =

5 5 Dark Energy and Expansion Either way, call it dark energy. For any modification of matter-only Friedmann equation, can always define equation of state. Acceleration is exactly equivalent to w total <-1/3. The EOS w de (z) characterizes the effect of the modification on the expansion. For example, w de (z)=-1 is the cosmological constant – but many diverse physics give w de (z)~-1.

6 6 Handles on Dark Energy We need more observational handles on dark energy. Consider inflation – in the 1980s people believed it was untestable. Now we explore: Tilt and running Tensor modes (GW) Non-Gaussianity Topological defects/relics Tilt and running are like w and w – the other quantities arise from perturbations, basically spatial variation in addition to time variation.

7 7 Microphysics of Dark Energy Spatial variation of dark energy is the next frontier, and the CMB is the prime probe for it. Remember “many diverse physics give w de (z)~-1.” For example, exponential f(R) gravity, barotopic fluids, DBI action all naturally give w obs ~-1 despite totally different origins. To learn the physics, we must delve into the microphysics. We are basically asking whether there are more degrees of freedom than in quintessence.

8 8 Outline 1.Handles on Dark Energy 2.CMB Lensing and CMB-Galaxy Correlations 3.Early, Cold, and Stressed Dark Energy 4.Testing GR with the CMB 5.Is Acceleration Unique?

9 9 CMB as a Probe CMB probes perturbations – that’s what the anisotropy power spectrum is, the spatial distribution of photons. The photons undergo oscillations due to (EM) coupling to matter, forced/damped by gravity, and redshifted by gravity. Dark energy perturbations contribute to the gravitational potential and affect the CMB. W. Hu

10 CMB as a Probe Dark energy microphysics enters in the Sachs-Wolfe effect on acoustic peak heights of T, E, TE spectra, in addition to the ISW and peak locations due to DE effects on expansion. ISW (late time) Sachs-Wolfe (recombination)

11 CMB Lensing Gravitational potentials (spatial variation) between recombination and the present also affect CMB through gravitational lensing. This shifts and recorrelates the CMB ( Linder 1988 ; older than galaxy weak lensing (Linder 1990) ! ). Main effects are smearing out peaks and generating B-mode polarization (from E-mode). [160μK  8μK  0.3μK] Individual deflection ~ 4ψ ~ ~ 20  Line of sight deflection ~ (H 0 -1 /L) 1/2 × 20  ~ 2.5 Coherence scale ~ (L/H 0 -1 ) ~ 2° Want to extract lensing deflection field ψ on sky (OQE Hu 2001, Hu & Okamoto 2002 ).

12 CMB – Galaxy Crosscorrelation Since the CMB photon perturbations and matter density perturbations were once tightly coupled, there’s correlation between hot/cold and void/dense. These Tg correlations will be a powerful addition to pure CMB (cf. ISW), especially with nearly fully sky galaxy surveys. Such correlations can also probe specific redshift slices.

13 Outline 1.Handles on Dark Energy 2.CMB Lensing and CMB-Galaxy Correlations 3.Early, Cold, and Stressed Dark Energy 4.Testing GR with the CMB 5.Is Acceleration Unique?

14 Early Dark Energy When w~-1 then perturbations have no effect. We know today w~-1, plus perturbations today would only affect large scales (small l in the CMB). So we need DE at high redshift, either z~1-5 for CMB lensing or Tg, or recombination for CMB itself. Many such Early Dark Energy models exist, and indeed are quite common from high energy physics (dilaton, DBI, moduli, barotropic models). Thus, there is a high redshift frontier for DE, that only CMB can explore. Current constraints have Ω EDE <0.035 (95% cl de Putter, Huterer, Linder 2010 ) but can still give important effects.[Ω b ]

15 Early, Cold, Stressed Dark Energy Early DE density parametrized by Doran & Robbers 2006 form. (Note Ω Λ (z=10 3 )~10 -9.) Perturbations by sound speed c s 2 =dp/dρ. Quintessence has c s 2 =1. Largest effect for smallest c s 2 – “cold dark energy”. Finally, anisotropic stress c vis ≠0 ( Hu 1998 ).

16 The Speed of Dark Current constraints on c s using CMB (WMAP5), CMB × gal (2MASS,SDSS,NVSS), gal (SDSS). Best fit Ω e =0.02, c s =0.04, w 0 =-0.95 but consistent with Λ within 68% cl. de Putter, Huterer, Linder 2010 ★ ★

17 CMB Lensing in the Future CMB lensing adds powerful leverage on fundamental physics. Neutrino masses smooth perturbations through free streaming. Determining Σm < 0.1 eV decides normal vs. inverted hierarchy. de Putter, Zahn, Linder 2009 de Putter 2009

18 CMB Lensing in the Future Must include full set of effects on matter power spectrum, e.g. neutrino mass, dark energy. de Putter, Zahn, Linder 2009

19 Early, Cold, Stressed Dark Energy Perturbations enhanced by lowering sound speed c s 2 (from 1) and suppressed by raising stress c vis 2 (from 0). Enhanced perturbations strengthen gravitational potential, so reduce photon Sachs-Wolfe power and enhance ISW. cs2cs2 c vis 2 Calabrese, de Putter, Huterer, Linder, Melchiorri 2010

20 Early, Cold, Stressed Dark Energy Also affects CMB lensing. Enhanced perturbations New degrees of freedom can be detected; testing consistency difficult. Does not degrade other parameters. ★ ★

21 Outline 1.Handles on Dark Energy 2.CMB Lensing and CMB-Galaxy Correlations 3.Early, Cold, and Stressed Dark Energy 4.Testing GR with the CMB 5.Is Acceleration Unique?

22 Testing Gravity G relates the metric to the density (Poisson+ eq); central to ISW and lensing. V relates the metric to the motion (velocity/growth eq); central to growth. Can also test gravity in model-independent way. Gravity and growth: Gravity and acceleration: Are  and  the same? (yes, in GR) Daniel & Linder 2010 ; also Song 2010

23 Current Data Testing GR Model independent test of GR: divide G, V into high/low z and high/low k bins – test time and scale dependence. WMAP7+Union2+ CFHTLS WMAP7+Union2+ CFHTLS+Tg+gg COSMOS “2x2x2 gravity” Daniel & Linder 2010

24 Future Data Testing GR 3D galaxy survey can play big role. Future data offer 5-10% tests of 8 post-GR parameters. Dotted=Curren t (TT+SN) space +Tg+g g

25 Nearer Future σ8σ8 Ωνh2Ωνh2 Das & de Putter, in prep ; also see HSLS

26 Outline 1.Handles on Dark Energy 2.CMB Lensing and CMB-Galaxy Correlations 3.Early, Cold, and Stressed Dark Energy 4.Testing GR with the CMB 5.Is Acceleration Unique?

27 Testing Expansion History How well do we really know the standard picture of radiation domination  matter domination  dark energy domination? Not well at all in detail. Although we know the magnitude of H, we don’t know its slope. Even during BBN, w=[0,1]. Maybe acceleration is occasional; two ways to get early acceleration: Superacceleration Superdeceleration w<<-1 w=+1 Carroll & Kaplinghat 2002

28 Early Acceleration Superacceleration: Less than e-folds allowed by dynamics (if w too negative, Ω w driven too small to allow w tot <-1/3). Also, N acc ~(1+z acc ) -3. Linder 2010 Superdeceleration: Best probe to early universe is CMB. Expansion enters in many ways! We can probe back to when a mode entered the horizon: l >η 0 /η(z mod )

29 CMB Probes of Acceleration Post-recombination, peaks  left and adds ISW. Pre-recombination, peaks  right and adds SW. Effect of 0.1 e-fold of acceleration Linder & Smith 2010

30 Cosmic Acceleration WMAP7+ACT rules out extra acceleration back to z~3×10 4. Planck can test back to z~2×10 5. Current acceleration unique within last factor 100,000 of cosmic expansion!

31 Summary Spatial variation of dark energy and early dark energy are exciting frontiers, and the CMB is the prime probe for them. CMB lensing and CMB-galaxy correlations can probe fundamental physics – neutrino mass, dark energy microphysics, gravity. E.g. “early, cold, or stressed” dark energy and 8 post-GR parameters to 10%. Expansion history can be tested to z~10 5. Current acceleration appears unique! “World Class University” program in Seoul, Korea. 8 postdocs hired, 5 more open, 2 new faculty open.