Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus TonoPen- Applination Theodore H. Curtis, M.D.1, Douglas L Mackenzie, M.D.1, Robert J. Noecker.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Il controllo circadiano della pressione intraoculare: implicazioni farmacologiche N. ORZALESI, P. FOGAGNOLO Università degli Studi di Milano Ospedale San.

Advertisements

A Wireless, Implantable Intra- Ocular Pressure Sensor for the Management of Glaucoma Gabriel Simon, M.D. Ph.D. Sept 16, 2008 ESCRS.

Transpalpebral Tonometry H.v.Below, O.Riemer Common practice for ambulant and stationary ophthalmology Grimma/Sachsen.

Canadian Ophthalmological Society Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Glaucoma in the Adult Eye.

Comparison of Endothelial Cell Count by Manual and Automated Methods in Normal Corneas and in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Somasheila I Murthy, Debarun.

Corneal biomechanical properties and their association with intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) Dimitrios P. Bessinis 1, Pandelis.

A Prospective Trial Evaluating Scleral Rebound Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Andrew Logeman, Shuchi Patel, MD Loyola University Chicago, Department of Ophthalmology,

Recent Advances in IOP measurements

Comparison between Dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry and Ehlers-corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry in eyes after Laser In.

Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.

Anterior Chamber Depth, Iridocorneal Angle Width, and Intraocular Pressure Changes After Phacoemulsification: Narrow vs Open Iridocorneal Angles Huang.

Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in the Management of Refractory Acute Angle-closure Glaucoma Ghasem Fakhraie*, MD, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, MD,

SEI IOP and its correlations in a population based study in Central India. The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Krishna Bhojwani, Vinay Nangia, Jost.

CR The Glaucoma Tonometer. What sets it apart? Reichert’s 7CR Auto Tonometer + Corneal Response Technology takes corneal biomechanical properties into.

OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA Frank J. Weinstock, MD, FACS Professor of Ophthalmology- NEOUCOM Canton, Ohio USA.

Contrast-Enhanced Corneal Wound Imaging by Optical Coherence Tomography Preeya K. Gupta, MD Justis P. Ehlers, MD Terry Kim, MD Duke Eye Center, Durham,

Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus Goldmann Applanation R. S. Davidson 1 ; N. Faberowski 2 ; R. J. Noecker 3 ; M. Y. Kahook 1 1.

Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. David Zadok, MD, Yakov Goldich, MD, Yaniv Barkana,

A Prospective Trial Comparing Scleral Pneumotonometry to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Usiwoma Abugo, BS, Shuchi Patel MD Loyola University.

Methods of measuring intra ocular pressure. What is intra ocular pressure ? Definition Intra ocular pressure refers to the pressure exerted by the intra.

TRANSPALPEBRAL TONOMETER APPLICATION DURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE EVALUATION IN THE PATIENTS WITH REFRACTION ANOMALY BEFORE AND AFTER KERATOPHOTOREFRACTIVE.

Purpose: Introduction:  At initial evaluation: For post-op day # 0 patients: Pre-op VA was 20/50.6 (0.395 ± 0.198); Post-op VA was 20/102.0 (0.196 ± 0.162);

Presents: Diaton Tonometer Tonometry through the Eyelid! September 2006.

Glaucoma Screening With a New Non-Contact Air Impulse Tonometer Pandelis A. Papadopoulos,1,2, Dimitrios P. Bessinis 3, Alexandros A. Papadopoulos 1, Konstantinos.

Glaucoma and Penetrating Keratoplasty : Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.

In-vitro measurement of Intra- Ocular Pressure Alex Luce Undergraduate Research Symposium 2008.

Riley Hall BSc α, Robert Mitchell MD, FRCSC β University of Saskatchewan α, University of Calgary β Authors have no financial interest Comparison of postoperative.

Evaluation of refractive error measurements obtained by three different aberrometers Radha Ram, BA Li Wang, MD, PhD Mitchell P. Weikert, MD, MS Disclosure:

Effect of Corneal Thickness on Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty to Decrease Intraocular Pressure as Primary or Secondary Treatment of Glaucoma ASCRS 2010.

Phoebe D. Lenhart, M.D. 1, Amy K. Hutchinson, M.D. 1, Michael J. Lynn, M.S. 2, Scott R. Lambert M.D. 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University,

Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD

Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. Yakov Goldich, MD, David Zadok MD, Yaniv Barkana,

Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.

Tonometry Objective measurement of IOP based, most commonly, on the forces required to flatten the cornea,or the degree of corneal indention produced.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,

1 Non-contact Specular Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium in Early Fuchs’ Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Jianyan Huang 1, MD, PhD; Tudor Tepelus.

Naomi R. Goldberg, MD PhD Kenneth J. Wolf, MD Eric J. Wolf, MD FACS The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. Comparison.

A Prospective Trial Comparing Pneumotonometry of Cornea and Sclera Usiwoma Abugo BS 1, Sara Duke MD 2, Shuchi Patel, MD 2 1 Loyola University Chicago,

Effect of Eyelid Specula on Intraocular Pressure in Cataract Surgery Gustave N. Alberti, M.D. 1, Martha Schatz, M.D 2. The authors have no financial interests.

Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD

Charles D Cohn, MD; Jay C Bradley, MD;

Nang-Hee Song(MD) 1, Jae-Woong Koh (MD/PhD) 1, Gil-Joong Yoon (MD/PhD) 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Republic.

The effect of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements after phacoemulsification surgery Ilker Eser M.D. 1 Arzu Taskiran-Comez M.D. 1 Baris Komur.

Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,

LogMAR-Analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical performance A. Mannsfeld, I.-J. Limberger, A. Ehmer, M.P. Holzer, G. U.Auffarth International.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.

Diminished Endothelial Cell Counts in Corneas with Krukenberg Spindles Authors: Tod M. Haller1, Chad B. Haller2, Melvin L. Haller1, Judah Beck3, Keith.

Elmira Baghdasaryan1,2, M.D. Sophie X. Deng1, M.D., Ph.D.

Poster# P36 Comparison of Techniques of Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth and Corneal Curvature in Indian Eyes Sujata Das, MS, FRCS Anjula Kumari, B.Optom.

CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL PROFILE AFTER FERRARA RING IMPLANTATION Leonardo Torquetti, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara Eye Clinic Belo Horizonte.

Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Dynamic Contour Tonometry: A Comparative Study on.

Use of the ICare Home Rebound Tonometer for home self-monitoring of intraocular pressure in a Singaporean population Jeanne Joyce OGLE1, Wai Cheng SOO.

iStent with phacoemulsification, n=50

CRF variations ( initial CRF – final CRF )

Suppressive effect of combined treatment of orthokeratology and 0

Intraocular pressure & tonometry

Safety of medication reduction for Primary Angle Closure (PAC) –

Influence of UVA-Riboflavin corneal collagen cross-linking on biomechanical properties of keratoconic eyes David Zadok MD, Yakov Goldich MD, Yaniv Barkana.

Copyright © 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

R. S. Davidson1; N. Faberowski2; R. J. Noecker3; M. Y. Kahook1 1

Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices

Associate Professor of Ophthalmology

Vicente J. Correa-Gomez MD, Guillermo Tapia MD, Oscar Macias Manuel MD, Alejandro Navas Perez MD, Gilberto Islas MD, Tito Ramírez-Luquin MD, Enrique O.

Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

Yakov Goldich MD,Yaniv Barkana MD, Isaac Avni MD, David Zadok MD,

John C. Hwang, MD MBA Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute

EFFECT OF CORNEAL THICKNESS ON SELECTIVE LASER TRABECULOPLASTY

ASCRS 2010 Joseph A. Donnelly Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Presentation transcript:

Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus TonoPen- Applination Theodore H. Curtis, M.D.1, Douglas L Mackenzie, M.D.1, Robert J. Noecker M.D.2, and Malik Y. Kahook M.D. 1 1 The Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 2 Eye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA

Financial Disclosures None of the authors have financial interests relevant to the subject discussed.

Purpose To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with Diaton transpalpebral tonometry versus Tonopen applanation tonometry in children and adults.

Introduction Goldmann applanation is the gold standard for IOP measurement It has been supplanted by TonoPen applanation in many settings because of it’s ease of use, portability, convenience, and minimal training requirements. The TonoPen requires contact with the corneal surface, and has the risks of iatrogenic corneal injury, spread of pathogens, and requires topical anesthetics.

Introduction The newly-developed Diaton tonometer is a handheld device that measures pressure through the tarsal plate (Figures 1 & 2). It avoids contact with the cornea and the need for topical anesthesia.

Figure 1: The Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer

Figure 2: Using the Diaton Tonometer

Methods We looked at 74 eyes of 38 consecutive patients who received both Tonopen and Diaton tonometry TonoPen measurements were taken in the sitting position following topical anesthesia with proparicaine. Diaton measurements were performed in the sitting position with the patient gazing at a 45° angle, placing the eyelid margin at the superior limbus. If necessary, gentle traction was placed on the brow to align the lid with the limbus. The device was activated when the signaling mechanism indicated the device was vertical.

Results Age range 3-91 years of age (mean 47.5 years). The average IOP with the Diaton was (+/-5.11 mm Hg; range = 7-32 mmHg). The average IOP with the TonoPen was (+/-4.90 mm Hg; range = 8-33 mmHg). The mean variation between the two modalities was 1.59 mmHg (+/ mm Hg; range = 0-6 mmHg). Eighty-one percent of all measurements were within 2 mmHg of each other (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in mean IOP values obtained with the two devices (p=0.87).

Table DeviceMean IOP (standard deviation) IOP Range Tonopen16.37 (+/-4.90 mm Hg)8-33 mm Hg Diaton16.24 (+/-5.11 mm Hg)7-32 mm Hg Variance between devices 1.59 (+/-1.31 mm Hg)0-6 mm Hg

Conclusions The Diaton tonometer pressure measurements correlated well with TonoPen measurements in this retrospective review. We did not find problems performing the exam in children, and many were reassured by the fact that no drops were needed. There may be a notable benefit in patients after refractive surgery or with corneal pathology since the Diaton does not applanate the cornea. The Diaton tonometer appears to be a clinically useful device in the IOP measurement of both children and adults.

References Li J, Herndon LW, Asrani SG, Stinnett S, Allingham RR. Clinical comparison of the Proview eye pressure monitor with the goldmann applanation tonometer and the TonoPen. Arch Opthalmol 2004;122: Eisenberg DL, Sherman BG, McKeown CA, Schuman JS. Tonometry in adults and children: a manometric evaluation of pneumotonometry, applanation, and TonoPen in vitro and in vivo. Ophthalmology 1998;105: Diaton: digital portable tonometer of intraocular pressure through the eyelid. Operation Manual. Ryazan State Instrument Making Enterprise. Ryazan, Russia. Garcia Resua C, Giraldez Fernandez MJ, Cervino Exposito A, Gonzalez Perez J, Yebra- Pimentel E. Clinical evaluation of the new TGDc-01 “PRA” palpebral tonometer: comparison with contact and non-contact tonometry. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82: Troost A, Yun SH, Specht K, Krummenauer F, Schwenn. Transpalpebral tonometry: reliability and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry and palpation in healthy volunteers. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89: Losch A, Scheuerle A, Rupp V, Auffarth G, Becker M. Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the TGDc-01 tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Opthhalmol. 2005;243:313-6.