Analytic Frameworks Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Resource for: Stage 1, Stage 2 mentor preparation and ongoing annual Mentor Updates. 10 Chapters: Chapter 1: Mentorship – an overview. Chapters 2 – 9:

Advertisements

Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence on Diagnostic Tests Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for.

Mentor’s Guideposts An Online Mentor’s Guide to eLearning.

DEVELOPING UNITS OF COMPETENCY FOR ACCREDITED COURSES.

Searching for Relevant Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.

When To Select Observational Studies as Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Clinical Science Investigator’s Toolkit: An Evidence Based Practice Resource for the Bedside Nurse Beth Lacoste RN, APRN, CNS, MSN, CCRN Nicole Jones RN-BC,

Oregon EPC DRUG EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW PROJECT Methods for Comparative Evidence Reviews September 2005 Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center for the Drug.

CHAPTER 2 THE RESEARCH PROCESS. 1. Selection of topic  2. Reviewing the literature  3. Development of theoretical and conceptual frameworks  4.

(HINARI) PubMed Conduct systematic reviews of the literature Limit to specific populations & publication types Utilize EBM built-in filtersbuilt-in filters.

Summarizing Community-Based Participatory Research: Background and Context for the Review Lucille Webb, MEd Eugenia Eng, DrPH Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera.

Project Life Cycle Jon Ivins DMU. Introduction n Projects consist of many separate components n Constraints include: time, costs, staff, equipment n Assets.

LESSON 2: ROLES OF LEADERS AND FOLLOWERS IN DRILL Leadership through the Use of Drill and Ceremonies Lesson 3: Squad Drill Lesson 3: Squad Drill Chapter.

IS&T Project Management: Project Management 101 June, 2006.

Introduction to Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice

Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research

Tools, Training and Transformation Readying the Healthcare Workforce for Transformation Norma Morganti – Executive Director Health Information Technology.

Assessing Quality of Individual Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.

Topic Refinement Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide.

Analytic Frameworks Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide

Exploring Online Assessment Techniques: Wikis & Discussion Boards September 28, 2006 Margaret (Peggy) Cassey, MPH, RN, BC Office 1024 College of Nursing.

Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.

Performance Criteria: The Fundamentals. Session outcome By the end of this session participants will be expected to be able to: … demonstrate an understanding.

The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.

Using the AASHTO Audit Guide for the Development of A/E Consultant Indirect Cost Rates Introduction Target Audience Course Structure Learning Outcomes.

Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.

Systematic Review Module 7: Rating the Quality of Individual Studies Meera Viswanathan, PhD RTI-UNC EPC.

Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal

Quick Quiz 1 An organ is: A another name for a living thing.

Systematic Review Module 2: Analytic Frameworks Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor,

Back to Basics – Electronic Patient Registry Essentials Adam Baus MA, MPH West Virginia University Department of Community Medicine Office of Health Services.

Refining Key Questions: Interactive Case Study Quiz C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.

Reporting the Review Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.

CED Application Reviewer Training Module 4: Organizational Capacity June 2012.

Presentation of Findings Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.

Quantitative Synthesis I Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.

Study Eligibility Criteria: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director, Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.

August 2014 Dr James Fergsuon-Clinical Lead Debbie Johnston–RCP Head of Assessors & Accreditation Consultant Liver quest project Project update.

Analytic Frameworks: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor, Institute.

Nursing Process: The Foundation for Safe and Effective Care Chapter 5.

Moving the Evidence Review Process Forward Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH, MS September 22, 2011.

GUIDE TO EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS. ASDs now affect one in every 110 children Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Lifelong effect on functioning,

When To Select Observational Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.

Module 5 Session 5.2 Visual 1 Module 5 Refining Objectives, Scope, and Other Project Parameters Session 5.2 Reviewing the PAR and refining key project.

Presentation of Findings: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Jeff Seroogy, BS Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center Joseph Lau,

Grading Strength of Evidence Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.

Quantitative Synthesis II Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews.

What we’re working on.. Defining the role of different types of evidence in decision-making. Develop tools to go from evidence to decisions about clinical.

 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.

RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute Nancy Berkman, PhDMeera Viswanathan, PhD

Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 17 Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Prediction Rules.

October 4, Microbial Risk Assessment Frameworks, Principles, and Approaches Rebecca Parkin, PhD, MPH Department of Environmental and Occupational.

Assessing Applicability Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods.

EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER Melissa McPheeters, PhD Co-Director, Vanderbilt EPC Engaging Stakeholders in EPC Work.

Clarifying the Evaluation Focus in a Complex Program Context Howard Kress, PhD* Natalie Brown, MPH** *Battelle Memorial Institute, with National Center.

Module 7 Presentation and Evaluation.

Dallas Court Case Management Training Manage Payment Groups Training – City of Dallas, TX Carol Gauntt and Eddy Perez.

CRISP Presentation on PCT Study Design: Case Study for Patient-Centered PCTs C. Daniel Mullins, PhD Professor and Chair Pharmaceutical Health Services.

Cluster Coordinator for Early Recovery Training Review of Key Readings.

Transgender/Trans* Health

Individual Thinking Time

Data Extraction Interactive Quiz

Manage Project Costs Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit Code BSBPMG504A.

Study Eligibility Criteria Interactive Quiz

Presentation and Evaluation

Module 4 Part 2 Selecting Measures

DEC Recommended Practices are Here!

Perfect MatchSM Physician Locator

Presentation transcript:

Analytic Frameworks Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide

What is an analytic framework? A.A way to identify and measure bias B.A visual way of linking and defining clinical concepts, evidence, and populations as they relate to outcomes C.A way to check for logical flaws in the systematic review D.Both B and C E.None of the above Definition of an Analytic Framework

Analytic frameworks are developed during the writing phase, at the end of the systematic review. A.True B.False When Analytic Frameworks Are Developed

Why are analytic frameworks used in the course of a systematic review? A.To provide clinical, biological, or health services underpinnings for the mechanism of action B.To identify logical flaws as key questions are developed C.To identify distinct bodies of evidence to be included in the review D.To provide a starting point for discussions with key informants E.All of the above Key Uses of an Analytic Framework

One of the essential components of an analytic framework is the population of interest. A.True B.False Population of Interest

When is the most productive time to use the analytic framework? A.During the writing phase to allow the team to view the framework with fresh eyes B.As the team needs it throughout the project C.Only during quality assessment to assess applicability of studies D.During the preparation phase to develop the key questions to provide a starting point for the key informants When To Use the Analytic Framework

 An analytic framework :  Should be developed during the topic refinement process  Clarifies assumptions and complex questions  Identifies logical flaws as key questions are developed  Should be used throughout the comparative effectiveness review to revisit criteria, control scope, reconsider appropriate questions, guide interviews, and help structure results and the report Summary

 This quiz was prepared by Melissa L. McPheeters, Ph.D., M.P.H., a member of the Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.  The module is based on an update of chapter 2 in version 1.0 of the Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (available at: roducts/60/294/2009_0805_principles1.pdf). Author