S ESSION 2 C ARLYN W INTER P RISK U.S. EPA R EGION 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B O S T O N H A R T F O R D N E W L O N D O N S T A M F O R D G R E E N W I C H N E W Y O R K Case Law Updates on Lender and Fiduciary Liability Presented.
Advertisements

Due Care and Continuing Obligations: Government Requirements Relating to Long-Term Environmental Stewardship A. J. Birkbeck President, American Brownfields.
Slide 6- 1 CERCLA Chapter 6 Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act “CERCLA”
Brownfields Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of.
THE BRAC PROCESS – Not Your Usual Brownfields Redevelopment Mary K. Ryan.
Managing Hazardous Solid Waste and Waste Sites
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES IN 2010.
August 13, 2009 Brownfields Redevelopment and the Threat of CERCLA Liability.
REVITALIZING CONTAMINATED LANDS: ADDRESSING LIABILITY CONCERNS Susan Kunst Boushell EPA’s Office of Site Remediation Enforcement March 25, 2015.
Federal Legal Liability Concerns when Acquiring Contaminated Property
Isn’t There a Law? Federal Laws and Dumps Kristin Hall U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (206)
Isn’t There a Law? Federal Laws and Regulations and Illegal Dumps Dolly Tong U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 (312)
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 50 Environmental Law and Land Use Controls Twomey Jennings Anderson’s.
23 rd Annual Real Estate Symposium Snowmass Village, Colorado The New Rules for Environmental Assessments in Real Estate Transactions by John R. Jacus.
Chapter 22 Liability, Agency Problems, Fraud, And Ethics in Real Estate Finance © OnCourse Learning.
1 Welcome to the CLU-IN Internet Seminar Tenant Liability Considerations for Siting Renewable Energy on Contaminated Lands Sponsored by: Office of Enforcement.
THE BEST OF CLE NOVEMBER 30, 2011 IDENTIFYING AND RESPONDING TO ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN TRANSACTIONS.
Managing HAZMAT Liability in Easement Acquisitions Gary Fremerman NRCS Easement Programs Division Workshop Denver, Colorado October 31, 2006.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
All Appropriate Inquiry The New Rules SARA BETH WATSON Steptoe & Johnson LLP Washington, D.C. American Bar Association Teleconference Wednesday, November.
Do It Right or Pay the Price! AAI Property Transfer Environmental Assessments.
* Old gas stations * Old dry cleaners * Oil/chemical spills from past commercial/ industrial operations * Industrial wastes left on property * Old.
EPA’s Brownfields Program Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment (OBCR) September 2005.
Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated limited.
All Appropriate Inquiry International Right of Way Association Appraisal Institute Federal Agency Update, January 15, 2009 Presented by Richard A. Maloy,
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
1 Chapter 1 An Introduction to Real Estate Investments: Legal Concepts.
1 Everything about CERCLA You Were Afraid to Ask: Superfund Basics for Environmental Business Lawyers Presented by: Environmental, Energy and Resources.
CERCLA, a/k/a Superfund 1. History Love Canal & Times Beach 1980: lame duck Congress “polluter pays” Burford era.
Superfund. Introduction – passed in 1980 after Love Canal – reauthorized and amended in 1986 (SARA)
Legal Liability Regarding the BoRit Asbestos Superfund Site Community Advisory Group Meeting dated March 3, 2010 Presenters Timothy J. Bergere, Partner,
Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser – How to be a BFPP Linda C. Martin and Michael C. Wofford Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P.
Managing Potential Liability under Chapter 21E Lucas Rogers, Esq., MassDEP 1.
CERCLA SAFE 210. History  Enacted in 1980  Focused on abandoned disposal sites/inactive hazardous waste sites and spills/discharges into the environment.
Chapter 22 Liability, Agency Problems, Fraud, Ethics in Real Estate Finance.
Superfund Overview John Burchette EPA Remedial Project Manager.
S ESSION 1 C ARLYN W INTER P RISK U.S. EPA R EGION 3.
S ESSION 8 C OURTNEY K UDLA U.S. EPA R EGION 6. B ASELINE PRP S EARCH The format of a baseline search report should include two deliverables:  Site History.
LEGAL LIABILITY FRAMEWORK Liability for environmental cleanup of contaminated properties under both CERCLA or MTCA falls on: 1. Current owners and operators.
1 Third Party Liability Protections – The Next Wave of Brownfields Reforms? Evans Paull Northeast-Midwest Institute Redevelopment.
Reclamation of Abandoned Mine Lands: EPA Perspective.
Environmental Considerations prior to purchasing Properties Sabine E. Martin, Ph.D., P.G. Center for Hazardous Substance Research Kansas State University.
AAI Rulemaking and Minimizing Environmental Liabilities Charlotte Neitzel Holme Roberts & Owen LLP.
1 The Brownfields Grant Program and Opportunities for Revitalization of RCRA Sites Linda Garczynski, Director Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment.
TOO TOXIC? THE CHALLENGE OF NON-STATUTORY ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY AT BROWNFIELDS SITES September 2, 2015 – 10:45 am AMY L. EDWARDS, Holland & Knight LLP.
FDIC Perspective on Environmental Risk Presented by: Gordon Stoner Legal Division Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation May 6, 2008.
November Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for All Appropriate Inquiries Patricia Overmeyer EPA Office of Brownfield Cleanup and Redevelopment.
Icemiller.com Sarah E. Lynn, Esq. Senior Counsel Ice Miller LLP 250 West Street Columbus, Ohio (614) Ohio Brownfield.
©2004 Warner Norcross & Judd LLP THE MOST BASIC, SHORT-COURSE INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH BROWNFIELDS TRANSACTIONS Brownfields 2004: Gateway.
EPA Staying Flexible: Adaptive Management Approaches for Superfund Redevelopment An Enforcement Perspective Helena Healy Branch Chief Office of Site Remediation.
THE UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS ACT—THE EPA PERSPECTIVE BROWNFIELDS 2009 Michael A. Hendershot Senior Assistant Regional Counsel United States Environmental.
Environmental Site Assessments in Waste Cleanup Cases July 29, 2012 Risk Assessment.
EPA P-1 The CERCLA Law and Policy of “Involuntary” and Eminent Domain Acquisitions Brownfields 2006 November 15, 2006.
Threading the BFPP Needle: You Can Succeed Where Others Have Failed Timothy A. Haley, Esq., Barnes and Thornburg (Moderator) William R. Weissman, Esq.,
1 ALL APPROPRIATE INQUIRIES PROPOSED FEDERAL STANDARDS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment.
1 Mission Impossible: Redeveloping the Most Complex Brownfield Sites The Legal Perspective Brownfields 2006 November 15, 2006 James B. Witkin Linowes and.
ASTM E1527 (Phase I Environmental Site Assessments) ASTM E1528 (Transaction Screen Process) ASTM 1903 (Phase II Environmental Site Assessments) ASTM Standards.
November 14, Still Afraid of CERCLA? Tools and Techniques for Managing Environmental Liability Concerns Susan Bromm, Director Office of Site Remediation.
Brownfields 101: Liability EPA Brownfields 2006 Conference November 12, 2006 Barbara Kessner Landau, Esq. Bernstein, Cushner & Kimmell, P.C.
Who I am Darren Bowling Phone: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Remediation and Redevelopment.
33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4200
After reading this chapter, you will be able to:
The Prepared Process: The Next Generation
CERCLA and Oil & Gas Operations Professor Tracy Hester
Kane Russell Coleman Logan PC
Liability Under CERCLA
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Every Acre of Brownfields Developed
Presentation transcript:

S ESSION 2 C ARLYN W INTER P RISK U.S. EPA R EGION 3

W HAT IS A P OTENTIALLY R ESPONSIBLE P ARTY (PRP)? “PRP” is often used interchangeably with “liable party” or “responsible party.” PRP must satisfy criteria in CERCLA Section 107(a). Statutory defenses and exemptions to CERCLA liability.

L IABILITY U NDER CERCLA Liability is defined in CERCLA Section 107(a). A party is liable for response costs when:  There is a release or a threatened release;  Of a hazardous substance;  From a facility into the environment;  Which causes response costs to be incurred; and  The party is included in at least one class of persons described in CERCLA Section 107(a).

S ECTION 107( A ) DEFINES LIABLE PARTIES AS : The current owner and operator of a facility; Owner or operator of a facility at the time hazardous substances were disposed of; Person who arranged for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances; and Person who transported and chose the disposal location of hazardous substances.

S TATUTORY D EFENSES TO CERCLA L IABILITY Section 107(b) provides that a party is not liable if a release was caused solely by an: Act of God; Act of war; or Act or omission of a third party (“third party defense”).

T HIRD P ARTY D EFENSE D EFINED IN S ECTION 107( B )(3): Act or omission performed by someone other than the PRP; Burden is on PRP to prove it; PRP had no direct or indirect contractual relationship (defined in Section 101(35)) with the third party; PRP exercised due care with respect to the hazardous substances; and PRP took precautions against foreseeable acts or omissions of any such third party.

S ERVICE S TATION D EALERS  CERCLA Section 114(c);  Service station dealers that manage recycled oil;  Cannot be mixed with any other hazardous substances;  Managed in compliance with appropriate regulations or standards. S TATE AND L OCAL G OVERNMENTS  CERCLA Section 107(d);  State and local governments are not liable for costs or damages resulting from an emergency response;  Exception for negligence or misconduct. S TATUTORY E XEMPTIONS FROM CERCLA L IABILITY

S ECURED C REDITORS  CERCLA Section 101(20)(A) and (E);  Without participating in the management of a facility, holds “indicia of ownership” primarily to protect that person’s security interest in the facility. R ECYCLERS  Superfund Recycling Equity Act of 1999 (SREA);  CERCLA Section 127;  Exempt certain arrangers and transporters who “arrange for recycling of recyclable materials.” S TATUTORY E XEMPTIONS FROM CERCLA L IABILITY ( CONT ’ D )

2002 B ROWNFIELD A MENDMENTS L ANDOWNER L IABILITY P ROTECTIONS CERCLA Section 101(35)(a)(1) clarified “Innocent Landowner.” CERCLA Section 107(q) added Contiguous Property Owner (CPO). CERCLA Sections 101(40) and 107(r) added Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser (BFPP).

I NNOCENT L ANDOWNER Section 101(35) Contractual Relationship  “includes, but is not limited to, land contracts, deeds, easements, leases, or other instruments transferring title or possession, unless the real property on which the facility concerned is located was acquired by the defendant after the disposal or placement of the hazardous substance on, in, or at the facility, and one or more of the circumstances described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) is also established by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence…”

I NNOCENT L ANDOWNER At the time the party acquired the facility, the party did not know and had no reason to know of hazardous substances. Government acquired facility through “involuntary” transfer or acquisition. Party acquired the facility by inheritance or bequest.

I NNOCENT L ANDOWNER PLUS  Section 107(b)(3) – Third Party Defense;  Provide full cooperation, assistance, and facility access;  Be in compliance with any land use restrictions;  Not impede the effectiveness or integrity of any institutional controls.

I NNOCENT L ANDOWNER 101(35)(A)(i) - Did not know and had no reason to know  carry out all appropriate inquiries….into previous ownership and uses of the facility  take reasonable steps to: stop any continuing release; prevent any threatened future release; and prevent or limit any human, environmental, or natural resource exposure to any previously released hazardous substance.

C ONTIGUOUS P ROPERTY O WNER CERCLA Section 107(q); Owner of property contaminated solely by a release from a contiguous property or similarly situated property owned by someone else is not liable if it:  Is not a PRP or affiliated with a PRP;  Did not cause, contribute, or consent to the release of hazardous substances; and  Conducts “all appropriate inquiries” prior to purchase and demonstrates that it did not know or have reason to know of contamination.

B ONA F IDE P ROSPECTIVE P URCHASER CERCLA Section 101(40); Current owner is exempt from liability if disposal at the facility occurred prior to purchase, and the current owner:  Purchased the facility after January 11, 2002;  Is not a PRP or affiliated with a PRP;  Conducted all appropriate inquires into previous ownership and uses of the facility;  Took reasonable steps to stop continuing releases and threatened future releases;  Provides cooperation, assistance, and access to EPA; and  Complies with all land use restrictions and institutional controls affecting the property.

O THER S TATUTORY E XEMPTIONS FROM CERCLA L IABILITY M UNICIPAL S OLID W ASTE (MSW)  CERCLA Section 107(p);  Conditional exemption for response costs incurred with respect to MSW disposed of at a facility on the NPL. D E M ICROMIS C ONTRIBUTORS  CERCLA Section 107(o);  Party contributed < 100 gallons of liquid materials or 200 pounds of solid materials containing hazardous substances.

EPA E NFORCEMENT D ISCRETION Orphan Share De Minimis Settlements Ability to Pay

O RPHAN S HARE P OLICY

D E M INIMIS P OLICY

EPA E NFORCEMENT D ISCRETION ( CONT ’ D ) Owners of residential properties  Unless the residential homeowner’s activities led to a release or threatened release. Owners of contaminated aquifers  Contamination of property solely as the result of subsurface migration in an aquifer from a source or sources outside the property.

CERCLA E NFORCEMENT P ROCESS Where PRP search fits in; “Enforcement First” policy; Remedial and removal process timelines.

S ETTLEMENT AND S ETTLEMENT T OOLS A DMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENTS  Orders on consent;  Do not involve courts (except to enforce);  Typically used for removal and RI/FS. J UDICIAL SETTLEMENTS  Consent decrees.  Court-approved.

C OST R ECOVERY Statutory authorities. Demand letters. Referrals to DOJ. Cost documentation.

R EFERENCES CERCLA Lender Liability Exemption: Updated Questions and Answers liability-exemption liability-exemption Interim Guidance on the Municipal Solid Waste Exemption Under CERCLA Section 107(p) superfund superfund Superfund Recycling Equity Act of 1999: Factors To Consider In A CERCLA Enforcement Case Interim Enforcement Discretion Guidance Regarding Contiguous Property Owners property-owners Interim Guidance on Orphan Share Compensation for Settlors critical-removal-settlors Orphan Share Reform Implementation Update

R EFERENCES ( CONT ’ D ) Interim Guidance on the Ability to Pay and De Minimis Revisions to CERCLA § 122(g) by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act 122g-2002-brownfield General Policy on Superfund Ability to Pay Determinations Policy Toward Owners of Residential Property at Superfund Sites Policy Toward Owners of Property Containing Contaminated Aquifers EPA Negotiating Superfund Settlements Webpage EPA Recovering Cleanup Costs Webpage