Prediction of chamber condition at long time scale is the goal of chamber simulation research.  Chamber dynamics simulation program is on schedule. Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plasma Window Options and Opportunities for Inertial Fusion Applications Leslie Bromberg Ady Herskovitch* MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting.
Advertisements

What experiments should we be doing? Dion L. Heinz University of Chicago.
Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting February 5-6, 2004 Georgia Institute of.
427 PHC.  Atomic emission spectroscopy (AES) is based upon emission of electromagnetic radiation by atoms.
Progress in UCSD Chamber Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi Sophia Chen, Andres Gaeris, Bindhu Harilal, S.S. Harilal, John Pulsifer, Mark Tillack.
April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,
EFFECTS OF CHAMBER GEOMETRY AND GAS PROPERTIES ON HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.
April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,
Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark Tillack (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein (ANL) Laser-IFE Program Workshop February 6-7, 2001.
HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS WITH DIFFERENT PROTECTIVE GASES AND PRE-IGNITION CONDITIONS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of.
IFE Chambers: Modeling and Experiments at UCSD Farrokh Najmabadi 5 th US-Japan Workshop on Laser IFE March 21-23, 2005 General Atomics, San Diego Electronic.
Progress in UCSD Chamber Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi Sophia Chen, Andres Gaeris, John Pulsifer HAPL Meeting December 5-6, 2002 Naval Research.
Prediction of Fluid Dynamics in The Inertial Confinement Fusion Chamber by Godunov Solver With Adaptive Grid Refinement Zoran Dragojlovic, Farrokh Najmabadi,
John Pulsifer, Mark Tillack S. S. Harilal, Joel Hollingsworth GIMM experimental setup and tests at prototypical pulse length HAPL Project Meeting Princeton,
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:
October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.
Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.
Laser IFE Program Workshop –5/31/01 1 Output Spectra from Direct Drive ICF Targets Laser IFE Workshop May 31-June 1, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory Robert.
1 of 16 M. S. Tillack, Y. Tao, J. Pulsifer, F. Najmabadi, L. C. Carlson, K. L. Sequoia, R. A. Burdt, M. Aralis Laser-matter interactions and IFE research.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
Chamber Clearing by Electrostatic Fields L. Bromberg ARIES Meeting UCSD January 10, 2002.
RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.
Sensor Systems for CPI Sensor Transmitter temperature sensors
Slide # 1 Examples of pressure sensor packaging Temperature characteristics of a piezoresistive pressure sensor. Transfer function at three different temperatures.
Update on Armor Simulation Experiments At Dragonfire Facility Farrokh Najmabadi, John Pulsifer, Mark Tillack HAPL Meeting August 8-9, 2006 General Atomic.
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
Vacuum system in the main Linacs C. Garion CERN/TE/VSC CLIC09 workshop, October.
A Plan to Develop Dry Wall Chambers for Inertial Fusion Energy with Lasers Page 1 of 46 DRAFT.
Long Term Exposure of Candidate First Wall Materials on XAPPER February – May 2004 Presented by: Jeff Latkowski XAPPER Team: Ryan Abbott, Robert Schmitt,
Progress in Chamber Simulation Experiments At UCSD Laser Facility Farrokh Najmabadi Kevin Sequoia, Sophia Chen HAPL Meeting September 24-25, 2003 University.
EFFECTS OF THE VENUS GROUND AMBIENT ENVIRONMENT ON MATERIALS Principal Investigator: Linda Del Castillo Co-Investigators: James Polk, Michael Pauken, Elizabeth.
Plan to Develop A First Wall Concept for Laser IFE.
HiCAT- a Novel Diagnostic for Mass Loss and Species Composition Analysis Goal: Provide In-situ, real time characterization of ablated/ vaporized materials.
Chamber Development Plan and Chamber Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi HAPL Meeting November 12-13, 2001 Livermore, CA Electronic copy:
Plasma diagnostics using spectroscopic techniques
Progress in Chamber Simulation Experiments At UCSD Laser Facility Farrokh Najmabadi and Kevin Sequoia HAPL Meeting February 5-6, 2004 Georgia Institute.
Progress in UCSD Chamber Simulation Experiments – Initial Results from Fast Thermometer Farrokh Najmabadi Sophia Chen, Andres Gaeris, John Pulsifer HAPL.
Status of Target Injector and In-Chamber Tracking Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Neil Alexander, Gottfried Besenbruch, Tom Drake, Brian Vermillion, Bob Stemke,
Progress Report on SPARTAN Simulation of IFE Chamber Dynamics Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting March 3-4, 2005 Naval Research Laboratory.
Armor Simulation Experiments At Dragonfire Facility Farrokh Najmabadi and John Pulsifer HAPL Meeting March 3-4, 2005 Naval Research Laboratory Washington.
Recent Results from Dragonfire Armor Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi, Lane Carlson, John Pulsifer UC San Diego HAPL Meeting, Naval Research Laboratory.
/15RRP HAPL Dec 6, Robert R. Peterson Los Alamos National Laboratory and University of Wisconsin Calculations of the Response of Inertial Fusion.
Mass spectrometry (Test) Mass spectrometry (MS) is an analytical technique that measures masses of particles and for determining the elemental composition.
July 11, 2003 HAPL e-meeting. 1 Armor Design & Modeling Progress A. René Raffray UCSD HAPL e-meeting July 11, 2003 (1)Provide Parameters for Chamber “System”
SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Code Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California in San Diego HAPL Meeting, June 20-21, 2005, Lawrence Livermore.
Update on Armor Simulation Experiments At Dragonfire Facility Farrokh Najmabadi and John Pulsifer HAPL Meeting November 8-9, 2005 University of Rochester.
Modelling the damage to carbon fibre composites due to a lightning strike Please use the dd month yyyy format for the date for example 11 January 2008.
Temperature Response and Ion Deposition in the 1 mm Tungsten Armor Layer for the 10.5 m HAPL Target Chamber T.A. Heltemes, D.R. Boris and M. Fatenejad,
NCSX NCSX CDR May 21-23, 2002 H.W. Kugel Slide 1 Conceptual Design for NCSX Auxiliary Systems Heating, Fueling,Wall Conditioning and Vacuum Systems.
Effect of Re Alloying in W on Surface Morphology Changes After He + Bombardment at High Temperatures R.F. Radel, G.L. Kulcinski, J. F. Santarius, G. A.
Design of an Inertial Fusion Energy Target Injection & Tracking System Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Mike Hollins, Chuck Gibson, Neil Alexander, and Gottfried.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 13 – November 18, 2011, Salt Lake City, UT Laser Blow-Off Impurity Injection Experiments.
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 8 – November 12, 2010, Chicago, IL Development of Laser Blow-Off Impurity Injection Experiments.
Engineered-material exposure in Dragonfire – Progress Report Farrokh Najmabadi, Lane Carlson, UC San Diego HAPL Meeting, UW Madison October 22-23, 2008.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Consider following problem Want to measure temperature range of: -15 o C < T 1 < 35 o C. Reference junction, T 2, = 0 o C. Output must be in range of -5Volts.
Liquid Walls Town Meeting May 5, 2003, Livermore, CA Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
International Conference on Science and Technology for FAIR in Europe 2014 APPA Cave Instrumentation for Plasma Physics Vincent Bagnoud, GSI and Helmholtz.
Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi, Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting April 8-10, 2003 Sandia National Laboratory,
Acknowledgements Slides and animations were made by Dr. Jon Karty Mass Spectrometry Facility Indiana University, Bloomington.
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
M. Tomut GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung
K. H. Lee, H. Y. Lee, Young-Gi Kim, J. Yang, S. M. Yang, K.J. Chung, Y.S. Na and Y. S. Hwang Residual Gas analysis during Glow discharge cleaning, Baking.
Impurity Transport Research at the HSX Stellarator
V. Measurement pressure gauges, flow meters
VISUAL AIDS for instruction in VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS
M. S. Tillack and F. Najmabadi
ATF 120 Hz Photocathode RF Gun Injection System Design Studies
University of California, San Diego
Presentation transcript:

Prediction of chamber condition at long time scale is the goal of chamber simulation research.  Chamber dynamics simulation program is on schedule. Program is based on: Staged development of Spartan simulation code. Periodic release of the code and extensive simulations while development of next-stage code is in progress.  Chamber dynamics simulation program is on schedule. Program is based on: Staged development of Spartan simulation code. Periodic release of the code and extensive simulations while development of next-stage code is in progress.  Documentation and Release of Spartan (v1.0) Two papers are under preparation  Exercise Spartan (v1.x) Code Use hybrid models for viscosity and thermal conduction. Parametric survey of chamber conditions for different initial conditions (gas constituent, pressure, temperature, etc.)  Need a series of Bucky runs as initial conditions for these cases.  We should run Bucky using Spartan results to model the following shot and see real “equilibrium” condition. Investigate scaling effects to define simulation experiments.  Documentation and Release of Spartan (v1.0) Two papers are under preparation  Exercise Spartan (v1.x) Code Use hybrid models for viscosity and thermal conduction. Parametric survey of chamber conditions for different initial conditions (gas constituent, pressure, temperature, etc.)  Need a series of Bucky runs as initial conditions for these cases.  We should run Bucky using Spartan results to model the following shot and see real “equilibrium” condition. Investigate scaling effects to define simulation experiments.

Several upgrades are planned for Spartan (v2.0) Numeric:  Implementation of multi-species capability: Neutral gases, ions, and electrons to account for different thermal conductivity, viscosity, and radiative losses. Physics:  Evaluation of long-term transport of various species in the chamber (e.g., material deposition on the wall, beam tubes, mirrors) Atomics and particulate release from the wall; Particulates and aerosol formation and transport in the chamber.  Improved modeling of temperature/pressure evolution in the chamber: Radiation heat transport; Equation of state; Turbulence models. Numeric:  Implementation of multi-species capability: Neutral gases, ions, and electrons to account for different thermal conductivity, viscosity, and radiative losses. Physics:  Evaluation of long-term transport of various species in the chamber (e.g., material deposition on the wall, beam tubes, mirrors) Atomics and particulate release from the wall; Particulates and aerosol formation and transport in the chamber.  Improved modeling of temperature/pressure evolution in the chamber: Radiation heat transport; Equation of state; Turbulence models.

Progress in UCSD Chamber Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi Sophia Chen, Andres Gaeris, John Pulsifer HAPL Meeting December 5-6, 2002 Naval Research Lab, Washington, DC Electronic copy: UCSD IFE Web Site:

Thermo-mechanical Response of the Wall Is Mainly Dictated by Wall Temperature Evolution  Most phenomena encountered depend on wall temperature evolution (temporal and spatial) and chamber environment. Only sputtering and radiation (ion & neutron) damage effects depend on “how” the energy is delivered.  Wall response depends strongly on the “spectrum” of incidence energy from the target blast. Target designs are not finalized and target spectrum is not known; There is no simulation source that can completely simulate the energy spectrum from the target.  In order to develop predictive capability: Focus on achieving temperature profiles similar to those expected in a laser-IFE wall (Laser, ion source and X-rays can all do this). Measure and understand the wall response in the relevant range of wall temperature profiles and in real time.  In order to develop predictive capability: Focus on achieving temperature profiles similar to those expected in a laser-IFE wall (Laser, ion source and X-rays can all do this). Measure and understand the wall response in the relevant range of wall temperature profiles and in real time.

Thermo-Mechanical Response of Chamber Wall Can Be Explored in Simulation Facilities Capability to simulate a variety of wall temperature profiles Requirements: Capability to isolate ejecta and simulate a variety of chamber environments & constituents Laser pulse simulates temperature evolution Vacuum Chamber provides a controlled environment A suite of diagnostics:  Real-time temperature  Per-shot ejecta mass and constituents  Rep-rated experiments to simulate fatigue and material response Relevant equilibrium temperature A suite of diagnostics:  Real-time temperature  Per-shot ejecta mass and constituents  Rep-rated experiments to simulate fatigue and material response Relevant equilibrium temperature

Components of Simulation Experiment  Optical trainOperational. YAG laser is upgraded with injection seeding for reproducible and smooth temporal profile.  Vacuum ChamberOperational. Capable to below Torr.  High-Temperature Operational. Specimen “equilibrium” temperature Specimen Holdercan be maintained at up to 1,200 o C. Endurance runs of several hours have been made at 1,000 o C.  Master Timing Operational (~100ps gitter). Capable of single shot to Control System10 Hz.  Data Acquisition SystemOperational (1GHz, 1.25 GS/s, upgradeable to 2.5GS/s).  Diagnostics: PIMAX & SpectrographOperational. ThermometerCalibrated externally (< 2% error). In-chamber shake-down and tests are in progress. IR CameraPurchase is deferred (exploring alternatives). Quartz MicrobalancingPurchase order is being placed. RGAPurchase order is being placed.  Specimen preparationProcedure in place. Need measurement of thermophysical properties at elevated temperatures.

Specimen holder operating at 1000 o C High Temperature Specimen Holder is tested to 1200 o C with endurance runs at 1000 o C. Stainless steel vacuum seal Specimen holder is made of Mo Thermocouple feed through Power feed through Specimen is heated by radiation from a tungsten element located behind the specimen. Specimen

Real-time Temperature Measurements Can Be Made With Fast Optical Thermometry Temperature deduction by measuring radiance at fixed  One-color: Use tables/estimates for  ( ) Typical error < 25%  Two colors: Assume  ( 1 ) =  ( 2 ) Typical error < 5 %  Three colors: Assume d 2  /d   [usually a linear interpolation of Ln(  ) is used] Typical error < 1 % Temperature deduction by measuring radiance at fixed  One-color: Use tables/estimates for  ( ) Typical error < 25%  Two colors: Assume  ( 1 ) =  ( 2 ) Typical error < 5 %  Three colors: Assume d 2  /d   [usually a linear interpolation of Ln(  ) is used] Typical error < 1 %  Spectral radiance is given by Planck’s Law (Wien’s approximation): L(,T) = C 1  (,T) -5 exp(-C 2 / T)  Since emittance is a strong function of, T, surface roughness, etc., deduction of temperature from total radiated power has large errors.  Spectral radiance is given by Planck’s Law (Wien’s approximation): L(,T) = C 1  (,T) -5 exp(-C 2 / T)  Since emittance is a strong function of, T, surface roughness, etc., deduction of temperature from total radiated power has large errors.

 Published work with Multi-color Optical Thermometry: Complicated optical designUse fiber optics Response time of >  sUse fast PD or PMT  Published work with Multi-color Optical Thermometry: Complicated optical designUse fiber optics Response time of >  sUse fast PD or PMT MCFOT Is a Natural Extension of Multi-color Optical Thermometry MCFOT — Multi-Color Fiber Optical Thermometry  Simple design, construction, operation and analysis.  Can be easily mounted inside a vacuum vessel.  Easy selection of spectral ranges, via filter changes. MCFOT — Multi-Color Fiber Optical Thermometry  Simple design, construction, operation and analysis.  Can be easily mounted inside a vacuum vessel.  Easy selection of spectral ranges, via filter changes.

Schematic of Multi-Color Fiber Optical Thermometer

Sensor Head can be focused to < 1mm 2 spots.  Rugged design with accurate swivel controls allows sensor head to be focused to < 1mm 2 spots with a high degree of position accuracy.  Steel foil protects the sensor head from thermal radiation.

Thermal radiation is injected by the Sensor Head into four bundled low-OH Silica fibers and relayed into fast PMTs

Each branch of the fiber bundle is filtered in a narrow spectral band by an interference filter and connected to a fast PMT

MCFOT is calibrated using the Optronics UL-45U lamp with a total error of < 3%  14 Calibration points  One adjustable parameter (c 1 c 3 /c 2 2 ) c i =V i (PMT) / L i (Sensor head)  14 Calibration points  One adjustable parameter (c 1 c 3 /c 2 2 ) c i =V i (PMT) / L i (Sensor head)

MCFOT is installed in the chamber and shake-down tests are in progress System Improvements:  Issue: Limited range of voltage from PMTs (need > ~ 5 mV for good SN ratio, PMT output saturates around 200 mV) Channel balancing by using neutral density filters in each channel Balance between voltages from calibration lamp filament and specimen to be handled by a neutral density filter in sensor head. Reliability Issues:  Calibration: How long it is dependable?  Speed: Individual PMT response is better than 700 ps. Would thermometer achieve the same response time?  Sensitivity: what is the minimal T measurable?  Ease of use: mounting, alignment, interference, vacuum.  Maintenance: Is it foolproof? PMTs electrode degradation? Heat/vacuum damage to optics/mechanicals? Fiber breakage? System Improvements:  Issue: Limited range of voltage from PMTs (need > ~ 5 mV for good SN ratio, PMT output saturates around 200 mV) Channel balancing by using neutral density filters in each channel Balance between voltages from calibration lamp filament and specimen to be handled by a neutral density filter in sensor head. Reliability Issues:  Calibration: How long it is dependable?  Speed: Individual PMT response is better than 700 ps. Would thermometer achieve the same response time?  Sensitivity: what is the minimal T measurable?  Ease of use: mounting, alignment, interference, vacuum.  Maintenance: Is it foolproof? PMTs electrode degradation? Heat/vacuum damage to optics/mechanicals? Fiber breakage?

Several Tungsten samples have been prepared for initial simulation experiments.  Each sample has its own pedigree.  Samples have been prepared with different initial polishing and cleaning method.  Pre-shot surface examination has been performed.  Similar samples are also prepared for testing at RHEPP.  Each sample has its own pedigree.  Samples have been prepared with different initial polishing and cleaning method.  Pre-shot surface examination has been performed.  Similar samples are also prepared for testing at RHEPP. WYKO 500X Microscope Surface photograph of samples polished with 1  m grit

Development of predictable capability for the thermo-mechanical response of the chamber wall is the goal of UCSD simulation facility Experiment Assembly:  Thermometer shakedown should be completed by Mid January.  Quartz Micro-balancing and RGA should be also operational in January. Experiment Assembly:  Thermometer shakedown should be completed by Mid January.  Quartz Micro-balancing and RGA should be also operational in January. Experimental Studies:  Temperature Response studies Impact of surface morphology and impurities/contaminants, etc.  Thermal Fatigue Studies Different temperature gradients, “equilibrium temperature,” etc.  Material Loss Studies Survey of impact of surface temperature, surface morphology, impurities, etc. NEED: Characterization of thermophysical properties of specimen at high Ts Experimental Studies:  Temperature Response studies Impact of surface morphology and impurities/contaminants, etc.  Thermal Fatigue Studies Different temperature gradients, “equilibrium temperature,” etc.  Material Loss Studies Survey of impact of surface temperature, surface morphology, impurities, etc. NEED: Characterization of thermophysical properties of specimen at high Ts

Backup Slides

QCM Measures Single-Shot Mass Ablation Rates With High Accuracy QCM: Quartz Crystal Microbalance  Measures the drift in oscillation frequency of the quartz crystal.  QCM has extreme mass sensitivity: to g/cm 2.  Time resolution is < 0.1 ms (each single shot).  Quartz crystal is inexpensive. It can be detached after several shots. Composition of the ablated ejecta can be analyzed by surface examination.