Writing Assistance Congressional Legislation— the Indian Removal Act of 1830.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT WAS THE U.S. POLICY TOWARD NATIVE AMERICANS BEGINNING IN 1830? WHY DID PEOPLE SUPPORT THIS POLICY AT THE TIME? Today’s objective is to develop answers.
Advertisements

Cherokee Indian Removal
Wednesday, March 18 Do Now: 1.Get out something to write with and your spiral 2.Turn in homework: Jackson guided reading 3.Update Table of Contents if.
Chapter 10, Section 3 Indian Removal.
Indian Removal Act (IRA). Objectives: 1. Identify the reasons for Indian removal. 2. Explain why the trip became known as the "Trail of Tears" for the.
Indian Removal The Big Idea President Jackson supported a policy of Indian removal. Main Ideas The Indian Removal Act authorized the relocation of Native.
By Stephanie Cran. In the 1820s and 1830s, Georgia conducted a relentless campaign to remove Cherokees who held territory within the boundaries of Georgia,
Chapter 10, Section 3 Pages 332 – 335. President Andrew Jackson had become famous as an American Indian fighter. He had no sympathy with Native Americans’
Andrew Jackson 7th President.
Indian Removal, Andrew Jackson and the Federal Government.
Native Americans & White Settlers As the U.S. expanded west, settlers wanted the Native American lands, and the Native Americans didn’t want people taking.
Indian Removal. Cherokee Nation  Some whites hoped Natives would adapt (assimilate) Way to avoid conflict  The Cherokee adapted well to white society.
Trail of Tears & Indian Removal Forced Removal of Native Americans Under the Jackson Administration.
Removal of Native Americans Balancing Nationalism and Sectionalism Part 5.
Supreme Court Cases Jackson and the Native Americans.
INDIAN REMOVAL IN THE UNITED STATES. Americans wanted to move west into Native American land.
Native Americans and Indian Removal Act Is Andrew Jackson doing this for the good of the Indians or for the white settlers? Do you see Andrew Jackson working.
Writing Assistance Congressional Legislation— Introduction.
Chapter 11, Sec. 2 Conflicts Over Land. Moving Native Americans  1830’s—U.S. expanding westward.  Many Native Americans stilled lived in eastern part.
Moving the Native Americans Native American Resistance
Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act. Before the Presidency Jackson was a General during the War of 1812 –War Hero Battle of Horseshoe Bend –Destruction.
The Marshall Court (1801 to 1835). OBJECTIVE(S): Describe the function of the judicial branch Describe the function of the judicial branch Explain how.
Chapter 11 Section 2 Conflicts Over Land. “Five Civilized Tribes” Cherokee, Creek, Seminole, Chickasaw, Choctaw Lived in Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi,
Writing Assistance Presidential Decisions— Thomas Jefferson: The Louisiana Purchase.
Writing Assistance Presidential Decisions— George Washington.
Cherokee Removal. A little background 2 approaches to the Native American Issue --Assimilation OR Removal In the 1790s the federal government recognized.
Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal
Objectives Describe the culture of Native Americans in the Southeast.
Trail of Tears 1838.
JACKSONIAN DEMOCRACY Key events of Andrew Jackson’s Presidential Term.
Conflicts Over Land Chapter 10, Section 4. Questions ► Why did many Americans want the Cherokee removed from Georgia? What was Andrew Jackson’s response?
Trail of Tears Image 1 :
Writing Assistance Constitutional Powers— Executive Orders: The Emancipation Proclamation.
Dealing with Other Nations Chapter 10 A Changing Nation.
Aim #26: To what extent was Jackson responsible for the Trail of Tears? Do now! Read “The Cherokee Nation’s Appeal to the American people” and the excerpt.
INDIAN REMOVAL ACT & INDIAN WARS. ANDREW JACKSON VS. THE NATIVES By the time Andrew Jackson became President in 1829, the native population east of the.
TWO SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT Civilization Means Native Americans would become farmers Would convert to Christianity Own individual land Learn to read and write.
Indian Removal.
Native American Removal. Native Removal many supported removing Native Americans  For years, many supported removing Native Americans  About 100,000.
Reading Like a Historian: Indian Removal
The Age of Jackson Indian Removal Chapter 9 Section 3.
Indian Removal. Cherokee Nation  The Cherokee adapted well to white society  Sequoya’s invention of a system of written language  Drew up a constitution.
Chapter 10 Section 3: Indian Removal. Indian Removal Act: Native Americans had lived in settlements from ______to Mississippi, but Jackson wanted to open.
Aim: How did AJ’s native policy effect the U.S.?.
Judicial System - Case Study impartiality, weighing the evidence and the power of Reason and Justice.
Alexander McGillivary Creek Chief Signed the Treaty of New York that gave away the Creek land east of the Oconee River. Promised no white settlers west.
Indians in America.  Since 1600, white settlers had pushed Native Americans westward as they took more and more of their land.  By the 1820s, about.
Native American Policy
Native American Indian Removal
“Walk” the Trail of Tears
Chapter 9 Section 3 Indian Removal.
President Jackson supported a policy of Indian removal.
Objectives Describe the culture of Native Americans in the Southeast.
11/10 I can explain whether Andrew Jackson was a Democratic President for the people, or an Authoritative President who did whatever he wanted.
Conflicts Over Land Chapter 10, Section 4.
Conflicts Over Land Section Two.
U.S Expansion Worcester vs. Georgia Indian Removal Act
Creek & Cherokee INDIAN REMOVAL.
Choctaw, Creek, Chickasaw,
Objectives Describe the culture of Native Americans in the Southeast.
Terms and People Worchester vs. Georgia – The Supreme Court declared that Georgia’s law (which made Native Americans give up their land) had no force within.
Indian Removal For years, many supported removing Native Americans About 100,000 American Indians lived east of the Mississippi River Mainly in.
The Age of Jackson, : Indian Removal
Reading Like a Historian: Indian Removal
The Indian Removal Act of 1830
Thinking Question Describe your “home”.
Conflicts Over Land Section Two.
Indian Removal Act Trail of Tears
Cherokee Indian Removal
Reading Like a Historian: Indian Removal
Presentation transcript:

Writing Assistance Congressional Legislation— the Indian Removal Act of 1830

Using the Spartan Writing Protocol (SWP)

Step 1: Read the task/question carefully.

Step 2: Circle key words and underline key concepts.

Step 1&2: Use active reading strategies to understand the task.

Theme: Government (Congressional Legislation) Throughout United States history, Congress has passed legislation to address important political, social, or economic issues. These laws have often had a significant impact on American society.

Task: Select two laws passed by the United States Congress and for each Discuss the historical circumstances that led to the passage of the law Discuss the historical circumstances that led to the passage of the law Discuss the impacts of the law on American society Discuss the impacts of the law on American society

Describe means “give an account in words of (someone or something), including all the relevant characteristics, qualities, or events.”

Discuss means “examine and talk about all sides of a subject or issue in a carefully organized manner.”

Step 3: Read the passage carefully

Step 4: Take notes that respond to the task/question

Steps 3 & 4: Collect information and record it on a graphic organizer.

Congressional Legislation Indian Removal Act (1830)

Historical Circumstances (1/5) Georgia’s legislature started passing laws to move Native American tribes out of the way of white settlement to land further west.Georgia’s legislature started passing laws to move Native American tribes out of the way of white settlement to land further west. There were questions as to whether a state could pass laws impacting Indians as there were legal precedents established that Indian tribes were to be treated like foreign nations. This meant only the federal government could make treaties.There were questions as to whether a state could pass laws impacting Indians as there were legal precedents established that Indian tribes were to be treated like foreign nations. This meant only the federal government could make treaties.

Historical Circumstances (2/5) While these questions swirled around, President Andrew Jackson asked Congress— controlled by his party, the Jacksonian Democrats—to propose a bill authorizing the president to make treaties with Indian tribes, granting them federal land west of the Mississippi River and arranging for removal out of the way of white settlement. The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress and signed by the President in 1830.While these questions swirled around, President Andrew Jackson asked Congress— controlled by his party, the Jacksonian Democrats—to propose a bill authorizing the president to make treaties with Indian tribes, granting them federal land west of the Mississippi River and arranging for removal out of the way of white settlement. The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress and signed by the President in 1830.

Historical Circumstances (3/5) Removal was challenged in the court system.Removal was challenged in the court system. The first case was a loss. In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the Cherokee tried to argue that U. S. laws didn’t apply in their territory because they were a foreign nation.The first case was a loss. In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the Cherokee tried to argue that U. S. laws didn’t apply in their territory because they were a foreign nation. The Court threw the case out because the Cherokee were a dependent nation, living under the guidance of the U. S. government.The Court threw the case out because the Cherokee were a dependent nation, living under the guidance of the U. S. government.

Historical Circumstances (4/5) The second case, Worcester v. Georgia seemed like a victory.The second case, Worcester v. Georgia seemed like a victory. Christian missionaries living among the Native American (one of which was Worcester) were needed a license issued by the state of Georgia (and none were issued). Worcester was arrested and convicted for violating this law.Christian missionaries living among the Native American (one of which was Worcester) were needed a license issued by the state of Georgia (and none were issued). Worcester was arrested and convicted for violating this law.

Historical Circumstances (5/5) The Supreme Court—under Chief Justice John Marshall—agreed that any Georgia laws dealing with Native Americans were unconstitutional because only the federal government could deal with them.The Supreme Court—under Chief Justice John Marshall—agreed that any Georgia laws dealing with Native Americans were unconstitutional because only the federal government could deal with them.

SPECIFIC impact (1/3) The Court’s ruling applied to the Indian Removal Act, but President Jackson ignored it. He famously said that the Chief Justice could enforce his ruling himself.The Court’s ruling applied to the Indian Removal Act, but President Jackson ignored it. He famously said that the Chief Justice could enforce his ruling himself. He began using federal resources to remove Native Americans.He began using federal resources to remove Native Americans.

SPECIFIC impact (2/3) First he had the executive branch make treaties with the different groups giving up their land in exchange for federally owned land on the frontier (in present day Oklahoma).First he had the executive branch make treaties with the different groups giving up their land in exchange for federally owned land on the frontier (in present day Oklahoma). Then he used federal troops to arrange and, when necessary, forcibly move any groups who refused to leave.Then he used federal troops to arrange and, when necessary, forcibly move any groups who refused to leave.

SPECIFIC impact (3/3) The Trail of Tears was the forced migration Native American tribes. Along this long march, a quarter of them died.The Trail of Tears was the forced migration Native American tribes. Along this long march, a quarter of them died. This set a precedent for the treatment of Native Americans by the United States government. Those who refused to assimilate would be moved out of the way of white settlement to lands further west.This set a precedent for the treatment of Native Americans by the United States government. Those who refused to assimilate would be moved out of the way of white settlement to lands further west.

Congressional Legislation—the Indian Removal Act of 1830 Law Historical Circumstances SPECIFIC long-term effect Indian Removal Act (1830) Georgia’s legislature started passing laws to move Native American tribes out of the way of white settlement to land further west. There were questions as to whether a state could pass laws impacting Indians as there were legal precedents established that Indian tribes were to be treated like foreign nations. This meant only the federal government could make treaties. While these questions swirled around, President Andrew Jackson asked Congress—controlled by his party, the Jacksonian Democrats—to propose a bill authorizing the president to make treaties with Indian tribes, granting them federal land west of the Mississippi River and arranging for removal out of the way of white settlement. The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress and signed by the President in Removal was challenged in the court system. The first case was a loss. In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the Cherokee tried to argue that U. S. laws didn’t apply in their territory because they were a foreign nation. The first case was a loss. In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the Cherokee tried to argue that U. S. laws didn’t apply in their territory because they were a foreign nation. The Court threw the case out because the Cherokee were a dependent nation, living under the guidance of the U. S. government. The Court threw the case out because the Cherokee were a dependent nation, living under the guidance of the U. S. government. The second case, Worcester v. Georgia seemed like a victory. The second case, Worcester v. Georgia seemed like a victory. Christian missionaries living among the Native American (one of which was Worcester) were needed a license issued by the state of Georgia (and none were issued). Worcester was arrested and convicted for violating this law. Christian missionaries living among the Native American (one of which was Worcester) were needed a license issued by the state of Georgia (and none were issued). Worcester was arrested and convicted for violating this law. The Supreme Court—under Chief Justice John Marshall—agreed that any Georgia laws dealing with Native Americans were unconstitutional because only the federal government could deal with them. The Supreme Court—under Chief Justice John Marshall—agreed that any Georgia laws dealing with Native Americans were unconstitutional because only the federal government could deal with them. The Court’s ruling applied to the Indian Removal Act, but President Jackson ignored it. He famously said that the Chief Justice could enforce his ruling himself. He began using federal resources to remove Native Americans. First he had the executive branch make treaties with the different groups giving up their land in exchange for federally owned land on the frontier (in present day Oklahoma). First he had the executive branch make treaties with the different groups giving up their land in exchange for federally owned land on the frontier (in present day Oklahoma). Then he used federal troops to arrange and, when necessary, forcibly move any groups who refused to leave. Then he used federal troops to arrange and, when necessary, forcibly move any groups who refused to leave. The Trail of Tears was the forced migration Native American tribes. Along this long march, a quarter of them died. The Trail of Tears was the forced migration Native American tribes. Along this long march, a quarter of them died. This set a precedent for the treatment of Native Americans by the United States government. Those who refused to assimilate would be moved out of the way of white settlement to lands further west.

Step 5: Complete the Evidence and Analysis boxes on your Spartan Writing Template (SWT)

Step 6: Write your claim.

Throughout United States history, Congress has passed legislation to address important political, social, or economic issues. These laws have often had a significant impact on American society. One important piece of legislation that had a major impact was the passage of the Indian Removal Act of 1830.

Step 7: Determine the relevancy of your evidence in supporting your claim.

Step 8: Complete a concluding sentence box on your Spartan Writing Template (SWT).

Step 9: Write your response (using the Spartan Writing Template [SWT])

Step 10: Self-Assess your paragraph using the Spartan Writing Rubric