Conference Impressions John Bahcall (http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jnb) NeSS02, 9/21/02.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stellar Structure Section 5: The Physics of Stellar Interiors Lecture 11 – Total pressure: final remarks Stellar energy sources Nuclear binding energy.
Advertisements

ICECUBE & Limits on neutrino emission from gamma-ray bursts IceCube collaboration Journal Club talk Alex Fry.
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
Neutrinos 2. Neutrino scattering
Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics: Understanding Neutrino Oscillations 2-3 neutrino detectors with variable baseline 1500 ft nuclear reactor Determining.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
The Celebration of Undergraduate Research Valparaiso University Spring 2009 Expect Surprises! Donald D. Koetke Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Thursday, October 20 4:00-8:00pm University of Colorado (room to be announced). Please register for this free workshop now at
Solar Neutrinos, Neutrino Cross Sections, and NUSEL Developments A.B. Balantekin ORNL SNS Workshop August 28, 2003.
Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy Board on Physics and Astronomy Committee on Setting Priorities for NSF’s Large Research Facility Projects.
ANTARES aims, status and prospects Susan Cartwright University of Sheffield.
Neutrino Facilities Assessment Committee Board on Physics and Astronomy National Research Council December 10, 2002 Neutrinos and Beyond: New Windows on.
Neutrinos Jason Cook. Topics of Interest Neutrinos  History  Sources  Detection  Solar Neutrino Problem  Neutrino Oscillation  Practicality of Neutrinos.
1962 Lederman,Schwartz,Steinberger Brookhaven National Laboratory using a   as a source of  antineutrinos and a 44-foot thick stack of steel (from a.
The latest experimental evidence suggests that the universe is made up of just 4% ordinary matter, 23% cold dark matter and 73% dark energy. These values.
No s is good s Sheffield Physoc 21/04/2005 Jeanne Wilson A historical introduction to neutrinoless double beta decay.
Peggy Norris, Black Hills State Univ/Sanford Underground Laboratory at Homestake.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
Chapter three Sun’s model Major contributions in building the Sun’s model have been made by Eddington (1930’s), Hoyle (1950’s),Bahcall, Clayton (1980’s)
The Long Range Plan for Nuclear Physics The LRP working group “After the big meeting” Richard Seto University of CA, Riverside RHIC-AGS User’s Group –
Planets Elsewhere? Protoplanetary Disks and universality suggest many stars have planets First discovery in Now 853 around 672 stars Finding planets.
Revelations of the neutrino:
T HE D AVIS E XPERIMENT AT H OMESTAKE Physics of Atomic Nuclei Peggy Norris,
1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay using TITAN ◆ Nuclear matrix elements.
BENE Meeting April 28, 2006 A. Bross US Contribution to the IDS Aka WDS BENE IDS/FP7 at RAL April 28, 2006 A. Bross.
Long Range Plan (LRP) & EDM Nuclear Physics LRP is prepared every 5- 6 years Provides guidance to funding agencies w.r.t. scientific and funding priorities.
September 4, 2003Jordan Goodman Ad Hoc Science Committee for the Proposed Laboratory for Science and Engineering at Homestake Who am I and what am I doing.
PHYS 1621 The Sun Some Properties Diameter times Earth’s Volume - about 1,000,000 times Earth’s Mass - about 300,000 times Earth’s 99.8% of Solar.
Stellar Nucleosynthesis Charles Hyde 2 March 2009.
0 Physics of Neutrinos From Boris Kayser, Fermilab.
Recommendations for Science at SNOLAB Andrew Hime On behalf of the Experiment Advisory Committee Aug. 17, 2005 SNOLAB Surface Building.
Outlook on Underground Science Thomas Bowles Los Alamos National Laboratory / University of Washington American Physical Society Meeting Philadelphia April.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar 1 David Toback Texas A&M University Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics.
Andrew Hime Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory Workshop on Low-Radioactivity Techniques Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Astronomy 100 – Section 2 As Presented by Paul Ricker This class: The Sun II: Interior.
Conference Impressions John Bahcall ( NeSS02, 9/21/02.
Monday, Feb. 24, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #11 Monday, Feb. 24, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Brief Review of sin 2  W measurement 2.Neutrino.
Pyramid Scanning (~1970) Luis Alvarez (1970): Are there undiscovered chambers in the Chephren pyramid? Investigate with cosmic rays Detector installed.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy National Security Issues Underground Harry Miley National Security Directorate Pacific.
Context: astroparticle physics, non-accelerator physics, low energy physics, natural sources physics, let’s-understand-the-Universe physics mainly looking.
Made by Stanislav Hristov. Why Solar Neutrino?  Examining solar neutrino allows us to find what the physics of the Sun’s core is.  The Sun produces.
Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #6 Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2.Neutrino.
Neutrino Nobel Prize overview
Pathways to Explore Neutrino Physics Fred Gilman NuFact03 New York June 5, 2003.
NWG 4/11/03 Executive Summary R.N. Cahn, W.C. Carithers, S.J. Freedman, K.M. Heeger, R.W. Kadel, V. Koch, K.T. Lesko, Z. Ligeti (deputy), K-B. Luk, H.
Neutrinoless double-beta decay and the SuperNEMO project. Darren Price University of Manchester 24 November, 2004.
Alexander Kappes Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics for the ANTARES collaboration IAU GA, SpS 10, Rio de Janeiro, Aug Status of Neutrino.
Neutrinos: What we’ve learned and what we still want to find out Jessica Clayton Astronomy Club November 10, 2008.
Particle Physics: Status and Perspectives Part 7: Neutrinos Manfred Jeitler.
PHY418 Particle Astrophysics
1 Study of the Physics of Neutrinos Sponsored by the American Physical Society Divisions of —  Particles and Fields  Nuclear Physics  Astrophysics 
QuarkNet Mentor Presentation – April 24, 2002 B. Beiersdorf, QuarkNet Staff Teacher 1 Beth Beiersdorf Fermilab QuarkNet – Beyond the First Year.
…continued from solar neutrino presentation, NESS02, Sept papers presented tomorrow morning Many thanks to Wick Haxton for giving us the extra.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Alexander Kappes (E. Strahler, P. Roth) ECAP, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg for the IceCube Collaboration 2009 Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Łódź,
Birth of Neutrino Astrophysics
Solar Neutrinos By Wendi Wampler. What are Neutrinos? Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles.
The cosmic connection There is a very close connection between particle physics and astrophysics. I’m going to show two examples: Type II supernovas Dark.
Neutrino Pre-Town Meeting This is a town meeting: make your voice heard!
Detector R&D through the NSF PHY division. Jim Shank/Jim Whitmore, NSF CPAD Meeting Arlington, TX 5-7 October, 2015.
STELLAR EVOLUTION – THE STANDARD SOLAR MODEL AND SOLAR NEUTRINOS – MARIE ZECH.
Solar Neutrinos Learning about the core of the Sun Guest lecture: Dr. Jeffrey Morgenthaler Jan 26, 2006.
Solar Neutrinos & Homestake or Something new under the Sun Kevin T. Lesko Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis International workshop on double beta decay searches Oct SNU Sin Kyu Kang (Seoul National University of.
Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics
Chapter 9 The Main Sequence.
Solar Neutrino Problem
Chapter 9 The Sun.
Some Comments to the Neutrinoless Double Beta-Decay
Presentation transcript:

Conference Impressions John Bahcall ( NeSS02, 9/21/02

Thanks! Jordan Tom Kera NSF colleagues SOC Speakers (especially from other countries) Participants Dr. Marburger

Your small proportional counters have an important national security application (Xe isotopes). Geo-biologists have found unique bacteria in extreme conditions in an active mine and could look for eukaryotes in a deep mine (and conceivably the origin of terrestrial life). Look how they are going to bore holes at the South Pole! Highlights for Ray Davis

Highlights for Dick Feynmann Ninety percent of what they said they were going to measure was bull. I just couldn’t figure out which 90%. The WIMP searches are going to be so precise that supersymmetry will be in trouble if they don’t find anything. What’s the answer if they don’t find any WIMPs?.

Highlights for Hans Bethe Nuclear fusion is established experimentally and solar neutrino oscillations are demonstrated. There could be p-p neutrinos for your 100 th birthday! Sensitive experiments could see double-beta decay, proton decay, and WIMPs, but robust theories are lacking. Under ice and under water detectors are powerful and may see GRBs or microquasars, or more likely, surprises.

Highlights for Willy Fowler With an underground laboratory, they can study stellar fusion reactions at stellar energies. The background from double beta-decay will be a problem in next generation neutrinoless double beta-decay experiments.

Why deep?

Eloquent arguments for ICECUBE

GRBs? by Eli Waxman

Yogi Berra “The most important sources you will see are the sources you can’t see.”

1964: Sole motivation PRL 12, 300, 1964 “… to see into the interior of a star and thus verify directly the hypothesis of nuclear energy generation in stars.”

“From the point of view of detection probabilities, an ideal object is the Sun.” 1967: ‘Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Leptonic Charge’ Sov Phys JETP 26, 984 (1968)

Dear Dr. Marburger, The NRC committee has reviewed critically the scientific merit of ICECUBE and an underground national laboratory. We find that both are essential for scientific progress, a healthy economy, and a secure nation.

Each facility will provide fundamental advances in many different branches of science. The discovery potential of the National Lab and ICECUBE is 100%, and will be guaranteed by the salary of Professor Francis Halzen. Sincerely, Professor B. Boorish

My impressions Fantastically exciting. Wonderfully stimulating. I don’t know what to work on first. The biology and geology presentations changed the way I think about the underground laboratory. The synergisms are mind boggling. Underground science should be a major program at NSF and DOE.

Personal remarks to whomever cares to listen This is fun! This is exciting! This is important! This has Great outreach appeal! But, this is serious …