Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.
PHYSTAT2007, CERN Geneva, June 2007 ALICE Statistical Wish-List I. Belikov, on behalf of the ALICE collaboration.
Simulation of the RPC Response José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco September.
1 STAR TOF Calibration. 2 Detectors TPC(TPX) - tracking MRPC TOF (TOFr) – stop time measurement pVPD/upVPD - start time measurement Particle momentum;
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT in general scanning (unbiased) mode Giovanni De Lellis on behalf of Andrea Russo Naples University.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Particle Identification in CBM ● Geometry and acceptance at 25 AGeV ● Hadron identification - TOF performance - Matching to the Silicon Tracker ● Summary.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
Zhihong Ye Hampton University Feb. 16 th 2010, APS Meeting, Washington DC Data Analysis Strategy to Obtain High Precision Missing Mass Spectra For E
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
HKS Analysis Status Report HKS Analysis Status Report Liguang Tang (Hampton/JLAB) Hall C User Meeting, Jan. 15, 2011 HKS has data taken in 2005 (E01-011)
JUNE 1997PHOBOS Review Mark D. Baker PHOBOS Review Physics Simulations Mark D. Baker Physics PHOBOS design is sound. –( & PHOBOS Computing Project is on.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
HADES coll. meeting, Oct. 31, 2007 Charged pion production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV results of data analysis from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 Jehad Mousa.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.
Top threshold Monte Carlo generator Stewart Boogert John Adams Institute Royal Holloway, University of London Filimon Gournaris (Ph.D student and majority.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration.
April 27-29, Hangzhou1 STAR time-of-flight detector Calibration Ming SHAO USTC.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
KEK beam test in May 2005 Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 27 th, 2005.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Time of Flight Detectors at RHIC Time of Flight Measurements at RHIC  TOF detector as a PID devices  PHENIX-TOF and BRAHMS-TOF PHENIX Time-of-Flight.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
The ALICE Experiment Event by Event fluctuations ALICE TOF Calibration 30th November 2007Chiara Zampolli1.
TOFp Status Report Introduction: system overview Functional requirements Analysis status –track extrapolation & matching –start time –stop time –identified.
Mu to e Meeting BNL, June 2006 Extinction requirement relaxation (Kevin O’Sullivan) Stopping Target Geometry (Cenap Ozben, David Morse) Yannis Semertzidis.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
David Silvermyr Lund University for the PHENIX Collaboration Early global event results using the PHENIX Pad Chambers at RHIC.
TOF Reconstruction, Calibration & Test-beam Simulation Jiang Linli 2005/6/1 (13th BES Annual Meeting )
QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
Centrality, N part & N collision at BRAHMS H. Ito University of Kansas For the BRAHMS Collaboration.
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CLAS12 Workshop Jefferson Lab February 23, 2016 Time-of-Flight Software Status Jerry Gilfoyle, Evgeny.
Comparison of algorithms for hit reconstruction in the DTs: Test of calibration procedures for t trig and drift velocity on Test Beam data Test of calibration.
April12 DST calibration status
Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
Measurements of Cosmic-Ray Lithium and Beryllium Isotopes
Status of the TOF Detector
Study of dE/dx Performance in TPC at CEPC
CLAS Collaboration Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned? Position calibration Curved tracking What have we learned? Questions raised Time calibration Status What remains to be done?

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Straight-line tracking Use Inkyu Park’s code to create straight-line tracks. The number of hits on the TOF is about times the number of reconstructed tracks (vertex dependent). A clear correlation exists between the hits on the TOF and the straight-line tracks. |z| < 1 cm

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Straight-line Tracking Create straight-line tracks: Use theta-track to extrapolate to TOF Use hits on last two planes to extrapolate to TOF Conclude that using the last two hits improves TOF - SPEC matching.

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Impact of multiplicity on TOF tracking Use vertical position to improve Signal/Noise

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Using straight-line tracks for vertical position calibration of the TOF The vertical position of the TOF scintillators can be determined using the vertical position information from the track. Due to vertical segmentation of last silicon planes, we need to use the azimuthal track angle. A clear correlation is observed between y(track) and y(TOF). Procedure works nicely for the central scintillators, but not for those near 32.5 and 90 degrees.

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Curved Tracks and TOF Multiplicity Number of straight-line tracks in SPECN scales with TOF multiplicity. Number of curved tracks in SPECN peaks at 1, independent of TOF multiplicity. Only events with at least two tracks can be used for TOF-based particle identification.

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Curved Tracking Use Gunther’s DSTs with curved tracks. Use last two hits in SPECN and do a linear extrapolation to the TOF. Expect a correlated angular shift as a function of momentum. Simulation for pions

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester B-, PID 9 Positive charges, bending backward Correlated Hits.

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester B-, PID 8 Negative charges, bending forward Correlated Hits.

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester B+, PID 9 Negative charges, bending backward Correlated Hits.

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester B+, PID 8 Positive charges, bending forward Correlated Hits.

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester TOF Timing Procedure: Calculate timing shift in TDC START due to vertex position (START delayed when vertex is not at 0 cm). Apply offset and slewing corrections. Find the fastest particle (note: not necessarily the earliest). Assume the fastest particle travels with v = c, and use this to determine t0. Correct all times for t0.

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester TOF Timing Optimizing TOF Resolution: Look at time difference between fastest and second fastest particle. Adjust slewing parameters to minimize the width of the time distribution: Threshold: determined for each channel using the timing efficiency Rise time: one common time for all channels (to be adjusted individually) Time resolution achieved so far is 140 ps (1  ). This corresponds to a resolution of 100 ps (1  ) per scintillator.

Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Summary and To-Do List Capability to match SPECN tracks and TOF hits has been developed for both field-on and field-off data. Straight-line tracks useful for vertical position calibration. Procedure to determine t0 has been developed (field off). TOF resolution of 140 ps (1  ) has been achieved. Finish vertical position calibration for scintillators located close to 32.5 degrees and 90 degrees. Optimize slewing corrections by using separate rise times for each PMT channel (various procedures are under consideration). Modify t0 determination for curved tracks. Use vertical position info to improve matching efficiency.