Selection Models Evaluation Research (8521) Prof. Jesse Lecy 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparing Two Means: One-sample & Paired-sample t-tests Lesson 12.
Advertisements

REGRESSION, IV, MATCHING Treatment effect Boualem RABTA Center for World Food Studies (SOW-VU) Vrije Universiteit - Amsterdam.
Review of Identifying Causal Effects Methods of Economic Investigation Lecture 13.
Climate and Happiness Katrin Rehdanz and David Maddison
Marriage, Money and Happiness By Ted Goertzel Rutgers University, Camden NJ Spring, 2004.
Personality and Well-being What makes some people happier than others? May be partly a question of individual differences. But first, what is happiness.
EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY EIGHTH EDITION IN MODULES David Myers PowerPoint Slides Aneeq Ahmad Henderson State University Worth Publishers, © 2011.
1 Multiple Regression A single numerical response variable, Y. Multiple numerical explanatory variables, X 1, X 2,…, X k.
The World Bank Human Development Network Spanish Impact Evaluation Fund.
1 James P. Smith Childhood Health and the Effects on Adult SES Outcomes.
Pooled Cross Sections and Panel Data II
QUALITATIVE AND LIMITED DEPENDENT VARIABLE MODELS.
A Happiness Index and Determinants of Happiness Study Prof Lok Sang Ho Centre for Public Policy Studies Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences Lingnan.
CHAPTER 12 VALUING IMPACTS FROM OBSERVED BEHAVIOR: DIRECT ESTIMATION OF DEMAND CURVES.
Chapter One The Nature of Probability and Statistics.
Clustered or Multilevel Data
So far, we have considered regression models with dummy variables of independent variables. In this lecture, we will study regression models whose dependent.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 6: Correlation.
Chapter 2 – Tools of Positive Analysis
Stat 512 Day 6: Sampling. Last Time Get lots of sleep! Characteristics of the distribution of a quantitative variable  Shape, center, spread, outliers.
Incarceration and the Transition to Adulthood Gary Sweeten Arizona State University Robert Apel University at Albany June 4, Crime and Population.
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
Propensity Score Matching
Matching Methods. Matching: Overview  The ideal comparison group is selected such that matches the treatment group using either a comprehensive baseline.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Chapter 2: Research Methods.
On the Heterogeneity, Stability and Validity of Risk Preference Measures Chetan Dave Catherine Eckel Cathleen Johnson Christian Rojas University of Texas.
Understanding Statistics
The health effects of later-life employment Katey Matthews ESRC & MRC PhD Student ( ) CCSR, University of Manchester Tarani Chandola Social Statistics.
Welfare Reform and Lone Parents Employment in the UK Paul Gregg and Susan Harkness.
Instrumentation (cont.) February 28 Note: Measurement Plan Due Next Week.
Evaluating Job Training Programs: What have we learned? Haeil Jung and Maureen Pirog School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana University Bloomington.
Changing Families and Relationships in the US. Lecture 2 Family Sociology.
CAMPBELL SCORES: ELIMINATING COMPETING HYPOTHESES.
Matching Estimators Methods of Economic Investigation Lecture 11.
Scientific Method A systematic approach to problem solving.
Chapter 3.1.  Observational Study: involves passive data collection (observe, record or measure but don’t interfere)  Experiment: ~Involves active data.
The Health Consequences of Incarceration Michael Massoglia Penn State University.
Public Policy Analysis ECON 3386 Anant Nyshadham.
1 REGRESSION ANALYSIS WITH PANEL DATA: INTRODUCTION A panel data set, or longitudinal data set, is one where there are repeated observations on the same.
AFRICA IMPACT EVALUATION INITIATIVE, AFTRL Africa Program for Education Impact Evaluation David Evans Impact Evaluation Cluster, AFTRL Slides by Paul J.
Non-experimental methods Markus Goldstein The World Bank DECRG & AFTPM.
Christel M. J. Vermeersch November 2006 Session V Instrumental Variables.
Using Propensity Score Matching in Observational Services Research Neal Wallace, Ph.D. Portland State University February
When should you use fixed effects estimation rather than random effects estimation, or vice versa? FIXED EFFECTS OR RANDOM EFFECTS? 1 NLSY 1980–1996 Dependent.
Randomized Assignment Difference-in-Differences
The Science of Well-Being and Societal Quality of Life Ed Diener University of Illinois and the Gallup Organization American Association for the Advancement.
Comparing Two Means: One-sample & Paired-sample t-tests Lesson 13.
Seven Sins of Regression Evaluation Research (8521) Prof. Jesse Lecy Lecture 7 1.
Extension: How could researchers use a more powerful measure of analysis? Why do you think that researchers do not just rely on descriptive statistics.
The Evaluation Problem Alexander Spermann, University of Freiburg 1 The Fundamental Evaluation Problem and its Solution SS 2009.
Copyright © 2015 Inter-American Development Bank. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons IGO 3.0 Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (CC-IGO.
Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 1 Overview of non- experimental approaches: Before After and Difference.
The Evaluation Problem Alexander Spermann, University of Freiburg, 2007/ The Fundamental Evaluation Problem and its Solution.
Looking for statistical twins
to see if program cost causes more in savings. $1.74
Advanced Quantitative Techniques
General belief that roads are good for development & living standards
Inferential statistics,
Impact evaluation: The quantitative methods with applications
Matching Methods & Propensity Scores
Propensity Score Matching Makes Program Evaluation Easy
Matching Methods & Propensity Scores
Multiple Regression Analysis with Qualitative Information
Methods of Economic Investigation Lecture 12
Matching Methods & Propensity Scores
Impact Evaluation Methods: Difference in difference & Matching
Evaluating Impacts: An Overview of Quantitative Methods
Applied Economic Analysis
School Finance Indicator Database
Types of Statistical Studies and Producing Data
Presentation transcript:

Selection Models Evaluation Research (8521) Prof. Jesse Lecy 1

2 The “selection” problem Program OutcomeChoice to participate When happens when people are given the choice to participate in a program? When do problems arise? How do we estimate program impact in this case?

3 Microfinance example of bias from selection Not an Entrepreneur Entrepreneur No Loan3015 Takes a Loan2035 Not an Entrepreneur Entrepreneur No Loan$10$20 Takes a Loan$10$20 Number of people per category Average weekly income per category The loan appears to have an impact even when we know it didn’t!

4 Charter school example

5 Propensity score matching Program OutcomeThis is the “propensity” Selection bias is just another case of omitted variable bias

6 Propensity score matching ID#AgeGroupOutcomeProgram? #140Blue$750 #243Blue$641 #354Blue$690 #423Red$320 #541Red$490 #638Red$871

7

8 Probability Models Age Program? 1 0 Age 1 0 Program? Linear Probability Model (OLS) Logit Model These models predict the probability of participation in the program, i.e. the “propensity” of an individual

9 Propensity score matching ID#AgeRaceOutcomeProgram?Predicted Propensity #140Blue$ #243Blue$ #354Blue$ #423Red$ #541Red$ #638Red$ We add a variable for the predicted propensity score. Remember not to use your outcome in your propensity score calculations.

10 Propensity score matching ID#AgeRaceOutcomeProgram?Predicted Propensity #140Blue$ #243Blue$ #354Blue$ #423Red$ #541Red$ #638Red$ Then matches are made to form a synthetic control group: #5 #6 #2 #1

Harry Potter Example 11 Propensity Score

Harry Potter Example 12

Harry Potter Example 13

How do we know matching has been successful? 14

What are the problems with Propensity Scores? 15

What are the problems with Propensity Scores? 16 You can only match on observables!

17 “Marriage is one of the most important institutions affecting people’s life and well- being…This commitment has positive effects, for instance on spouses’ health and their earnings on the labor market.” Married people are happier... So we should get married to be happy, right? Marriage and happiness (Stutzer & Frey 2006)

18 Marriage and happiness “Is marriage an institution for the happy and joyful crowd that finds a partner? This question summarizes the selection hypothesis in research on marriage and well-being. It proposes that those who get married are intrinsically happier people.” “In order to test the selection hypothesis, we follow a simple approach and compare two different groups of singles. The level of subjective well-being of singles who marry later in life is contrasted with the well-being of those who stay single, controlling for numerous observable characteristics.” For any given age, a comparison of the average life satisfaction in these two groups indicates systematic heterogeneity to some extent. However, it has to be taken into consideration that the years immediately before marriage might not be representative for a person’s intrinsic happiness level. People might live in a marriage-like relation, as cohabitants, thinking and planning their joint future in a loving relationship. As these years end in marriage, they are more likely to be the best years in life.

19 Marriage and happiness Married Young Married Later Never Married

20 Marriage and happiness Does this gap represent the happiness bump?

21 Marriage and happiness “For any given age, a comparison of the average life satisfaction in these two groups indicates systematic heterogeneity to some extent. However, it has to be taken into consideration that the years immediately before marriage might not be representative for a person’s intrinsic happiness level. People might live in a marriage-like relation, as cohabitants, thinking and planning their joint future in a loving relationship. As these years end in marriage, they are more likely to be the best years in life.”

Marriage and happiness Bummer…