CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority EAF-2010 – the best of a generation Jean-Christophe Sublet, Lee Packer Euratom/CCFE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Combined evaluation of PFNS for 235 U(n th,f), 239 Pu(n th,f), 233 U(n th,f) and 252 Cf(sf) (in progress) V.G. Pronyaev Institute of Physics.
EMERALD1: A Systematic Study of Cross Section Library Based Discrepancies in LWR Criticality Calculations Jaakko Leppänen Technical Research Centre of.
Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.
Modeling of Photonuclear Reactions & Transmutation of Long-lived Nuclear Waste in High Photon Fluxes M.-L. GIACRI-MAUBORGNE, D. RIDIKAS, J.-C.
Nuclear Physics Lesson 13
I. Dillmann Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe KADoNiS The Sequel to the “Bao et al.” neutron capture compilations.
Evaluation the relative emission probabilities for 56 Co and 66 Ga Yu Weixiang Lu Hanlin Huang Xiaolong China Nuclear Data Center China Institute of Atomic.
Validation of EAF-2005 ( New tools for EAF-2007 ) J. Kopecky JUKO Research The Netherlands TC IFMIF Meeting FZK 4-6/10/2005.
Status of Fusion Nuclear Data Development Mohamed Sawan Tim Bohm U. Wisconsin-Madison Fusion Neutronics Team.
Astrophysical S(E)-factor of the 15 N(p,α) 12 C reaction at sub-Coulomb energies via the Trojan-horse method Daniel Schmidt, Liberty University Cyclotron.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft L. Mercatali, FZK/IRS IP EUROTRANS Training Course Santiago de Compostela (Spain), June 7-10,
Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
Recent Developments in Geant4 Hadronics Geant4/Spenvis Workshop at JPL 6 November 2006 Dennis Wright.
Astrophysical S(E)-factor of the 15N(p,α)12C reaction at sub-Coulomb energies via the Trojan-horse method Daniel Schmidt, Liberty University Cyclotron.
Oct.18, Neutron Field and Induced Radioactivity in IFMIF Environment M. Sugimoto(JAERI) IEA International Work Shop on Fusion Neutronics The Kongreshous.
Energy deposition for 10 MeV neutrons in oxygen, carbon, argon and hydrogen gaseous chambers (1mx1mx1m). Energy Deposition in 90% argon (1.782mg/cm 3 )
Boris Pritychenko Nuclear Physics Data Compilation for Nucleosynthesis Modeling, Trento, May 29 – June 1, 2007 MACS and Astrophysical Reaction Rates from.
ELBE Neutron Source IAEA TC Meeting “Nuclear Data for IFMIF”, FZ Karlsruhe, October 4-6, 2005 Klaus Seidel Technische Universität Dresden.
Status and needs of activation data for fusion Robin Forrest 1 and Jura Kopecky 2 1 Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association Culham Science Centre, UK 2 JUKO Research,
Summary of Work Zhang Qiwei INFN - CIAE. Validation of Geant4 EM physics for gamma rays against the SANDIA, EPDL97 and NIST databases.
Analytical vs. Numerical Minimization Each experimental data point, l, has an error, ε l, associated with it ‣ Difference between the experimentally measured.
A=193 Mass Chain evaluation: A summary IAEA-ICTP Workshop on Nuclear Structure and Decay Data: Theory and Evaluation, Trieste, Italy November
Thomas W. Burrows NSDD 2007, St. Petersburg June 11-15, 2007 Status of the ENSDF Analysis & Utility Codes Thomas W. Burrows* National Nuclear Data Center.
Spectral Analysis of Archival SMM Gamma-Ray Flare Data Gerald Share 1,2, Ronald Murphy 2, Benz Kozlovsky 3 1 UMD, 2 NRL, 3 Tel Aviv Univ. Supported under.
1 Low Neutron Energy Cross Sections of the Hafnium Isotopes G. Noguère, A. Courcelle, J.M. Palau, O. Litaize CEA/DEN Cadarache, France P. Siegler JRC/IRMM.
Studies of neutron cross-sections by activation method in Nuclear Physics Institute Řež and in The Svedberg Laboratory Uppsala and experimental determination.
V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Progress Report on Theoretical Tools and Calculations of Cross Sections.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory PREPRO Accomplishments Dermott “Red” Cullen Presented at the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Technical Conference.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Data for the Production of Therapeutic Radioisotopes: Background, Objectives and Expected Outputs 1 st RCM,
Status of Nuclear Data Processing Codes at CNDC China Nuclear Data Center(CNDC) China Institute of Atomic Energy(CIAE) P.O.Box ,Beijing.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Update of uncertainty file in the EAF project J. Kopecky 1 and R.A. Forrest 2 1 JUKO Research, the Netherlands 2 EURATOM/UKAEA Association, Culham, UK.
TENDL for FENDL Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting December 6-9, 2011, IAEA, Vienna.
Recent improvements in the GSI fission model
Cross-sections of Neutron Threshold Reactions Studied by Activation Method Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department.
Measurement of fragment mass yields in neutron-induced fission of 232 Th and 238 U at 33, 45 and 60 MeV V.D. Simutkin 1, I.V. Ryzhov 2, G.A. Tutin 2, M.S.
Filling up FENDL with an all-in-one nuclear data evaluation and validation system around TALYS Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting.
NUCLEAR LEVEL DENSITIES NEAR Z=50 FROM NEUTRON EVAPORATION SPECTRA IN (p,n) REACTION B.V.Zhuravlev, A.A.Lychagin, N.N.Titarenko State Scientific Center.
1 On extraction of the total photoabsorption cross section on the neutron from data on the deuteron  Motivation: GRAAL experiment (proton, deuteron) 
Applied Nuclear Physics Group The final meeting of IAEA CRP – 6. 2 Calculation and Evaluation of (n,  ) Cross Sections for Producing 32 P,
Current nuclear data processing status of JAEA JAEA Research Group for Reactor Physics and Standard Nuclear Code System Kenichi Tada 1.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
Activities Nuclear Data Service Yolanda Rugama OECD/NEA.
Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced Systems: Fusion Devices FENDL-3 IAEA, Vienna, 2-5 December 2008 A Mengoni IAEA Nuclear Data Section.
Short Update on Deliverables K. Yokoyama M. Ishikawa Japan Atomic Energy Agency Dec 4, 2015WPEC SG39, Institute Curie, Paris, France1.
Plans for Validation and General Observations Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin-Madison 3 rd RCM on FENDL December.
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
232 Th EVALUATION IN THE RESOLVED RESONANCE RANGE FROM 0 to 4 keV Nuclear Data Group Nuclear Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department of Nuclear Reactors, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Modern , d, p, n-Induced Activation Transmutation Systems EURATOM/CCFE.
Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of.
Data Needs in Nuclear Astrophysics, Basel, June 23-25, 2006 Nuclear Astrophysics Resources of the National Nuclear Data Center B. Pritychenko*, M.W. Herman,
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
Pavel Oblozinsky NSDD’07, St. Petersburg June 11-15, 2007 ENDF/B-VII.0 Library and Use of ENSDF Pavel Oblozinsky National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven.
9 th session of the AER Working Group “f “ - Spent Fuel Transmutations Simulations of experimental “ADS” Mitja Majerle, Gael de Cargouet Nuclear Physics.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Review of IEAF-2001 Cross Section Data Libraries for IFMIF Activation.
Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.
KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE for NEUTRON PHYSICS and REACTOR TECHNOLOGY (INR) Nuclear Data for Calculation.
1 Alushta 2016 CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n,α) 63 Ni REACTION at CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n, α) 63 Ni REACTION at E n = 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 MeV I. Chuprakov,
Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section.
1. Nuclear Data Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
Decay Data for Fusion Applications: Status, Issues and Needs
Bayesian Monte-Carlo and Experimental Uncertainties
7. Gamma-ray strength functions
4. Level densities Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová, V. Wagner
The TALYS nuclear model code II
Presentation transcript:

CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority EAF-2010 – the best of a generation Jean-Christophe Sublet, Lee Packer Euratom/CCFE Fusion Association Culham Science Centre and Jura Kopecky JUKO Research

Overview of presentation Summary of modifications made from EAF-2007 release to EAF-2010 Modifications to SAFEPAQ Cross Section Analysis Tool in support of SACS –Automatic generation of cross section data for threshold reactions Distinguishing threshold reactions Plotting the skewness parameter of cross sections for threshold reaction types Conclusions and the future

Main comments on EAF-2010 EAF-2010 is now completed EAF-2010 will be the last of the generation of EAF files. It will be the most complete and improved version of the EAF files – the best of the generation

Activities: EAF-2007 to EAF-2010 Revision of all reaction channels supported by experimental data using –visual comparison with EXFOR and updated Private EXFOR (most recent data not yet included in EXFOR) databases –SACS analysis –C/E analysis at reference energies ( eV, 30 keV, 14.5 MeV and RIs) Update and revision of capture data: –Extensive reviewing of all capture cross sections including the revision of applied XS systematic (in particular 30 keV) –Results are in detail presented in: RA Forrest, J Kopecky and AJ Koning, Revisions and improvements of neutron capture cross sections for EAF-2010 and validation of TALYS calculations, UKAEA 546, March –Associated uncertainty data based on TALYS

Activities: EAF-2007 to EAF-2010 threshold reaction data Update and revision of threshold reaction data: –Revision of (n,d) and (n,n’p) XS to improve the agreement with activation experiments for (n,d + n,n’p) cross sections –Revision of neutron emission channels (n,2n) and (n,3n) to compensate for competition with (n,f) –Revision of XS based on the validation using integral measurements. Reported in: RA Forrest et al., Validation of EASY-2007 using integral measurement, UKAEA 547, April –J-Ch. Sublet et al., Decay power: a comprehensive experimental validation.

Activities: EAF-2007 to EAF-2010 uncertainties Update and revision of uncertainty file (a major action in this work): –Build from TENDl-2009 variance files –Revision of non-threshold (Score = 0) reactions: new error factors introduced from XS systematics –Revision of non-threshold (Score > 0) reactions based on comparison with experimental information –Revision of all non-threshold reactions: new semi-quantitative approach used for error factors of 1/v and <100 keV regions, based on error propagation of  ( eV) and RI with corresponding C/E values.

Activities: EAF-2007 to EAF-2010 Status - Assembling Assembling the EAF-2010 starter file –the starter file in a point-wise format has been assembled using the EAF-2007 list of targets (816) –The action of modifications has been documented in EAF-Doc-50, Revision and modifications for EAF- 2010, by J. Kopecky (July 2009). –Correctness of formats for group structure processing by SAFEPAQ-II has been tested. –Addition a two new groups structure Red-616 and LANL-66

Activities: EAF-2007 to EAF-2010 Validation Validation of the EAF-2010: –A complete validation against all available differential measurements By SACS analysis of all major reactions with Q < 20 MeV By C/E histogram analysis at major pertinent energies eV, 30 keV (n,g), 14.5 MeV and resonance integrals The results are presented in EAF-Doc-51, Validation of EAF-2010, by J. Kopecky (November 2009). –A complete validation against all available integral measurements experiments (FNS, FNG, REZ, etc…) –The validation reports will be produced with emphasis on different nuclear applications (High energy, inertial and tokamak fusion, reactor types).

Reactions that tend to be most important for fusion applications are: –(n,2n) – neutron multiplication –(n,p) - produces hydrogen –(n,  ) - produces helium –(n,  ) –(n,n') – for isomeric states –However, other reaction types can be important data for 86 reaction types Neutron-induced reactions

Statistical Analysis of Cross Sections (SACS) See, R A Forrest et al., Detailed analysis of (n,p) and (n,  ) cross sections in the EAF and TALYS generated libraries, Fus. Eng. Des

Analysis options: Distinguish Threshold Reactions

Defining skewness for threshold reactions Skewness parameter,

SACS: Skewness parameter implementation

Statistical analysis of cross sections plots Extract (store) polynomial fit coefficients to each set of cross section statistical parameters (versus asymmetry) for a given reaction type.

EAF-2010 example of SACS The following questions needs some attention: –The competition of proton emission with the neutron channel, which is manifested in (n,2n) vs (n,n’p), (n,p) and at higher energies (n,2p) depending on the binding energies of neutrons and protons. This influences the width and skewness of excitation curves for the above reaction channels. See examples for (n,p). –This is the reason effort was given in the extension of SACS analysis.

Cross section parameters

Generate cross section data tool Fitting options Calculated quantities

Generate cross section data tool: 7 reaction types enabled

Fitting options P3 – 3 rd order polynomial, P4 – 4 th order polynomial Exp – exponential fit Parenthesis refers to points which the curve passes through

Error handling: all required trendlines are not stored

Error handling: user selects non-threshold reaction type for the selected target

Cubic fit to E th, E low and E max Determine A -1 using Gauss-Jordan elimination method and multiply by b matrix  solution to cubic coefficients. Fits well over asymmetry range 0.01 – 0.25

Option 1: Quartic fit to E max, E high and E 30 ; exponential fit to 30 and 60 MeV

Option 2: Cubic fit to E max and E high ; exponential fit to E high and 60 MeV

Options 4 and 5: Lorentzian fit to parameters Standard Lorentzian: Modified Lorentzian:

Options 4 and 5: Modified Lorentzian Solve for a1, a2 and a3 using 3 conditions. Cannot directly use the Gauss-Jordan method of matrix inversion used previously, so solve this problem algebraically. Three unknowns require three conditions: –Option 4: passing through Eh, Emax and d  /dE=0 at Emax –Option 5: passing through El, Emax and Eh

Small improvements: omit systematic error bars

Concluding remarks for SAFEPAQ SAFEPAQ is a tool which can be used to plot and compare evaluations from all sources. It is continuously being improved: several new features have been added to enhance the plotting functionality and some tools to aid the evaluator(s) SAFEPAQ will continue to be used as an integral part of the evaluation process - future development of the tool will focus on tools to aid the merge of transport and activation data.

Validation: SACS Validation: C/E Cross sections 816 targets (H-1 to Fm-257) 86 reaction types 2,233 nuclides Stables and isomeric states (T½ > 1s) Decay data

EAF-2010 The files are ready for distribution: cross sections, uncertainty file, decay data, hazard indices,… The documentation is been finalized With updates on the FISPACT code it will form part of EASY-2010 Validation & Verification tasks have already started

Concluding remarks EAF-2010 will be the last of a generation of EAF files The approach has combined TALYS derived data with careful and experienced evaluation using EXFOR and the SAFEPAQ evaluation/visualisation tool. It will be the most complete and improved version of the EAF generation For the future there is a strong desire to combine activation and transport calculations using complete and consistent data libraries (unique) Now its time to move towards this goal by taking the best data and approaches available