ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 4  SPRING 2015 Matt Carpenter, Grant Gumina, Chris Holly, and Michael Pak.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Left to Right: Michael Kelton, Ethan Hall, Greg Wegman, Vashisht Lakhmani.
Advertisements

ECE 477 Design Review Team 6  Spring 2010 Shao-Fu ShihSteve AndersonMike Goldfarb Josh Smith.
Outline Project overview Project-specific success criteria Block diagram Component selection rationale Packaging design Schematic and theory of operation.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2006 Elmer Chao (not pictured), Matt Cozza (not pictured), Joe Waugh (not pictured), Evan Zelkowitz (not pictured)
Flatiron Mobile Device Security Monitor Thomas Horacek Lucas Greve.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2012 Brennan Tran Jonah Ea Ben Pluckebaum Kevin Meyer.
Twitch Plays ECE477 ECE 477 Design Review Team 1 − Spring 2015 Hannan Harlan Root Tornquist.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT CAROLINE TRIPPEL, ANDREW LOVELESS, ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Stuart Pulliam Will Granger Linda.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Spring 2005 Omar Shaikh - Nathan Smith - Jeff Huston - Ryan Koors.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
ECE 477 Design Review – Spring 2010 Team 15. Team Members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8  Spring 2008 Mike Cianciarulo, Josh Wildey, Robert Toepfer, Trent Nelson.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 19  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Calvin Mwesigwa John Marston Noah.
Wireless Sensor Monitoring Group Members: Daniel Eke (COMPE) Brian Reilly (ECE) Steven Shih (ECE) Sponsored by:
Ryan McLean John-Michael Mulesa Joe Perrin Zach Schoenberger Formal Design Review.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2008 Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Ian Bacon Eric Yee.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 11  Spring 2005 Paul Dulle Pat McLaughlin Randy Scheifele Chad Bjorklund David Meyer.
Xin Jin Zelun Tie Ranmin Chen Hang Xie. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Spring 2010 Digi-Brush Josh LongCaleb Ayew-ewKatie Schremser.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 14  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2007 Wes Chris Josh Dave.
ECE Grande ECE 477 Design Review Team 3 - Fall 2008.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 09  Spring 2010 Luke Ethan Andy Dhruv.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 11  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2009 Ben Carter – Jacqui Dickerson – Ian Oliver – Dennis Lee.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Fall 2009 Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips,
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2007 Joe Land Ben Fogle James O’Carroll Elizabeth Strehlow.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Fall 2006 Sumanth Peddamatham Alex Tucker Chris Arges Radhika Mulani.
Team 6 DOODLE DRIVE Alexander Curtis Peachanok Lertkajornkitti | Jun Pan | Edward Kidarsa |
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Fall 2007 Steven Kingsley (Analog) Roy Scheck (Leader) Tony Liechty (Digital) Charles Lan (Software)
Team /02/28 1. Chun Ta Huang Xirong Ye 2 Libo Dong Zongyang Zhu.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Spring 2008 Alan BernsteinIan AlsmanIlya VeygmanDarshan Shah.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE477 Midterm Design Review: Team #
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Spring Project Overview Inertial based character recognition deviceInertial based character recognition device Battery.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2006 Justin Thacker, Matt Kocsis, Ian Snyder, Dustin Poe.
Colin Graber Jason Kohl Jacob Varnau Cameron Young ECE 477 Design Review Team 2 - Spring 2015 R.I.S.K.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 3  SPRING 2015 Garrett Bernichon Bryan Marquet John Skubic Tim Trippel.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Spring 2010 Fred Grandlienard Andrew Gregor Kevin Mohr Ryan DeFord.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Fall 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2009 Ben Carter – Jacqui Dickerson – Ian Oliver – Dennis Lee.
V i t a l i s Wireless Biometric Sensor ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate.
Treasure Chess ECE 477 Team 2 - Spring 2013 Parul Schroff, Brock Caley, Sidharth Malik, Jeremy Stork Design Review.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2009 Scott Shaw Hussain Vasi Matt Sbai John Fawcett.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall 2006 Wirelessly Integrated Menu System (WIMS) Ryan Coppa Lee Bush Aaron Replogle Neil Bedwell.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 6  SPRING OUTLINE  Project overview  Block diagram  Design challenges  Individual contributions  Project demonstration.
Maze Twinbots Group 28 Uyen Nguyen – EE Ly Nguyen – EE Luke Ireland - EE.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING Project Overview  Target Audience: Amateur Musicians  Obtain a “Guitar Tab” format of music  View Tabs.
ECE 477 Design Review Team BOAR  Fall 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Left to Right:
TRANSMISSION LINE MULTIPLE FAULT DETECTION AND INDICATION TO EB
ECE 477 Design Review Group 3  Spring 2005 “VoIP Connect” Ankur TrushalAshish Dushyant.
<Add team picture or relevant project picture here>
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2007
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2007
ECE 477 Design Review Team 21 - Spring 2013
Jeff Kubascik Matt Rockey Joe Trefilek Paul Scheffler
ECE 477 Design Review Team 6 - Spring 2012
Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey
ECE 477 Design Review Group 10  Spring 2005 I, Robotic Waitress
ECE 477 Design Review Group 10  Spring 2005 I, Robotic Waitress
ECE 477 Design Review Team 14  Spring 2012
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2006
ECE 477 Design Review Team ??  Fall 2012
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2011
Team RAPTORS Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey
Presentation transcript:

ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 4  SPRING 2015 Matt Carpenter, Grant Gumina, Chris Holly, and Michael Pak

OUTLINE Project overview Project-specific success criteria Block diagram Component selection rationale Packaging design Schematic and theory of operation PCB layout Software design/development status Project completion timeline Questions / discussion

PROJECT OVERVIEW A system which allows the user to draw and manipulate objects in a virtual environment Utilizes a pen whose location in the 3D workspace is known to provide an intuitive, natural interface Environment can be viewed and settings modified remotely through a web interface

PROJECT-SPECIFIC SUCCESS CRITERIA An ability to remotely view the canvas as well as analytical data using a web or mobile interface. An ability to identify and communicate to the user (using some form of haptic feedback mechanism) when the stylus is in close proximity to a previously drawn object. An ability to assist the user in drawing straight lines and other primitive shapes using smoothing algorithms. An ability to determine the location of a point in 3D space based on wireless signal strength as measured from multiple locations. An ability to maintain reasonable (percentage TBD) accuracy locating the stylus regardless of its orientation.

BLOCK DIAGRAM

COMPONENT SELECTION: MICROCONTROLLER Selection Criteria: Performance Community support and software tools Power consumption Considerations: ATmega328p, TI MSP430, and PIC24FJ256DA206-I/PT Final Decision: ATmega328p for strong community

COMPONENT SELECTION: CENTRAL COMPUTING DEVICE Selection based on Cost and amount of I/O Decision between Beaglebone Black, Raspberry Pi, and Hummingboard Raspberry Pi was overall winner

COMPONENT SELECTION: RF MODULE Requirements Operate in the unlicensed MHz band Release and experience minimal interference from system Support RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indicator) Final Selection: Link TRM-433 Transceiver IC

COMPONENT SELECTION: ORIENTATION SENSOR Inertial Measurement Unit Combines Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope Allows device orientation to be determined with reasonable accuracy Contenders: Razor IMU & Sensor Stick Sensor Stick similarly equipped while being smaller, less expensive

PACKAGING DESIGN - STYLUS Two piece, 3D printed construction comprised of outer body and inner core to which PCBs are attached Modular Inexpensive to manufacture Easy to swap in different grip designs for testing

PACKAGING DESIGN - STYLUS

PACKAGING DESIGN: MAIN BOARD & RECEIVERS Main Board: Simple combination of two sheets of Polycarbonate/Acrylic with board attached in the middle to protect it from damage Receivers: Dependent on results of experiments once boards have been produced and assembled

SCHEMATIC/THEORY OF OPERATION: STYLUS

SCHEMATIC/THEORY OF OPERATION: RECEIVER

SCHEMATIC/THEORY OF OPERATION: MAIN BOARD – POWER CIRCUIT

SCHEMATIC/THEORY OF OPERATION: MAIN BOARD - CONNECTIVITY

SCHEMATIC/THEORY OF OPERATION: MAIN BOARD

PCB LAYOUT – STYLUS

PCB LAYOUT – RECEIVER

PCB LAYOUT – MAIN BOARD

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT STATUS: RASPBERRY PI ENVIRONMENT Camera Location: In Progress Object Drawing Single Point Objects: COMPLETE Double Point Objects: In Progress Intersection Detection: COMPLETE Save/Load: Future

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT STATUS: RASPBERRY PI INTERFACE Coordinate Input (UART) Determine Transmission Standards: In Progress Convert Raw Signal to Float: COMPLETE Button Input (GPIO): In Progress Haptic Feedback (GPIO): In Progress

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT STATUS: MICROCONTROLLER Process RSSI Input (SPI): In Progress Transmit Coordinates (UART): COMPLETE Process IMU Input (I 2 C): Future Compute Coordinates: In Progress Smooth Coordinates: Future

PROJECT COMPLETION TIMELINE Projection Completion Goal: 3 rd week of April

QUESTIONS?

SOFTWARE: TESTING STILL TO BE DONE Camera Alignment Dual Point Object Drawing Saving/Loading Objects GPIO (Button) Input Haptic Feedback Computing/Smoothing Coordinates Processing IMU Input

RASPBERRY PI SOFTWARE LAYOUT

RASPBERRY PI SOFTWARE PROGRESS