ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING. -actively involved in their own learning; -able to judge the success of their work and set and understand targets for improvement;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Advertisements

Curriculum for Excellence Aberdeen City November 2008.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Grade levels (1- 5). Science Assessment criteria.
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
MYP Task-specific clarification
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Standards and assessment: session 1.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Standards and assessment: session 2.
© Crown copyright 2008 Assessing pupils’ progress (APP) Science Shane Clark Science Adviser
Learning Outcomes: the impact on teachers and trainers Edwin Webb Emeritus Reader in Education and Training University of Greenwich London.
Senior Secondary Reform Team, DECS Curriculum Services Task design – SACE Stage 2 Workshop term Part 1.
PATHWISE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION SYSTEM
Articulating Clear Learning Goals for the Lesson that are Appropriate to the Students Domain A A2.
A2 Unit 4A Geography fieldwork investigation Candidates taking Unit 4A have, in section A, the opportunity to extend an area of the subject content into.
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training Implementing English K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
CB330005S Review and Planning UND: April 2007.
Mathematics in the MYP.
Providing Constructive Feedback
Aim: To have a basic understanding of the philosophy and framework of the curriculum.
Know and understand how to apply the principles of assessment, recording and reporting as an integral part of the teaching process. (2.1.5) Have knowledge.
Middle Years Programme
Assessment in the Middle Years Programme. How are students assessed? The MYP offers a criterion-related model of assessment. This means that students'
Consistency of Assessment
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT FORMS OF ASSESSMENT.
Aligning e-learning with assessment and learner support Janet Macdonald Open University in Scotland QAA Assessment Series, Edinburgh, April 2004.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Richards Middle School Columbus, Georgia
Curriculum for Excellence Aberdeenshire November 2008.
Australian Curriculum Science K-6
PLANNING YOUR EPQ How to write a great research paper – Cambridge Uni.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
A big picture for Outstanding Citizenship. Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we trying to achieve? 2 How do we organise.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Art & Design National 3, 4 & 5.
Relaxing with rubrics An attempt to stop worrying and start enjoying rubrics as an assessment tool.
Understanding MYP Criteria
The Areas of Interaction are…
Internal Assessment Group 4 Aims: “While the scientific method may take on a wide variety of forms, it is the emphasis on a practical approach through.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
* Research suggests that technology used in classrooms can be especially advantageous to at-risk, EL, and special ed students. (Means, Blando, Olson,
BTEC 1 NQF BTEC Foundation Diploma in Art and Design PLANNING.
Presenting Evidence to meet the Graduating Teacher Standards at the conclusion of Edprac 608 The use of MyPortfolio.
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
1. Preparing a TASK 2. Making a judgment. Grade 10 (MYP5) - Sciences Grade 10 (MYP5) – English A.
MYP: Humanities The Criteria.
Curriculum Planning Overview Doveton North Primary School.
Programming the New Syllabuses (incorporating the Australian Curriculum)
FYITS – Students Mktg Briefing Nov 2010 BSc (Hons) Engineering Management Nature of Course The course seeks to equip students with management knowledge.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
FLIBS Dec Biology Category 1 Session 2: Learning Biology within the IB Philosophy.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
What is assessment for learning?
The Monitoring and Assessment Assignment TS – 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
Reading and Writing National Standards Phase 2 Workshop (Updated 2 July 2010)
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs People and Society National 3 and 4.
National PE Cycle of Analysis. Fitness Assessment + Gathering Data Why do we need to asses our fitness levels?? * Strengths + Weeknesses -> Develop Performance.
The Middle Years Programme (MYP) is a great way to grow and learn in middle school. Students: Study a range of different subjects in interesting ways Are.
Investigate Plan Design Create Evaluate (Test it to objective evaluation at each stage of the design cycle) state – describe - explain the problem some.
The Future for Assessment? Assessing Pupil Progress (APP) as a tool for effective Teacher Assessment in Primary Science.
MYP Science. What is MYP Science? MYP = Middle Years Program Science = you will have integrated science which means you will learn about biology, physics,
Main strand session 17 Session Seventeen Measuring Learning 2: Assessment evidence Jim Rogers.
2015 / 2016 and beyond.  1. High quality leadership drives school improvement  2. Quality of teaching and learning  3. Quality of maths provision 
Analysis of Research and Impact on Practice, Action Planning Monday December 13th.
MYP Task-specific clarification
Task design – SACE Stage 2
Writing Criterion Referenced Assessment Criteria and Standards
Assessment The purpose of this workshop / discussion is to extend further teachers’ understanding of the Department's Assessment Advice. This workshop.
Assessing Pupil Progress in Science (APP) Department CPD session Spring 2009 Slide 0.1.
The Assessing Cycle Module 1 Assessment Assessment Accountability Data
Presentation transcript:

ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING

-actively involved in their own learning; -able to judge the success of their work and set and understand targets for improvement; -able to take responsibility for their own progress When assessment for learning is well established in a classroom pupils are :

KEY ELEMENTS OF AFL WE NEED TO DEVELOP Sharing clear learning objectives and expected learning outcomes Helping students to know and recognise the standards they are aiming for (including sharing the assessment criteria Peer and self assessment Feedback Developing confident learners (learning to learn) Reflection and reviewing progress

Example of alignment: Technology (Developing webpage for NGO) Core assessment: An environmental group want to publicise the issue of shark fishing – how will you do this? Why? MYP objective A Consider the importance of the problem for life, society and/or the environment Outline a simple design brief. B… C… MYP criterion A: investigation 0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below. 1–2 The student states the problem. The student investigates the problem, collecting information from sources. The student lists some specifications. 3–4 The student describes the problem, mentioning its relevance. The student investigates the problem, selecting and analysing information from some acknowledged sources. The student describes a test to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification. 5–6 The student explains the problem, discussing its relevance. The student critically investigates the problem, evaluating information from a broad range of appropriate, acknowledged sources. The student describes detailed methods for appropriate testing to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification.

MODIFIED CRITERIA AND INTERIM OBJECTIVES Check through Use for assessment tasks, reporting and ensuring PROGRESS

TYING IT ALL TOGETHER: TEACHING, LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT Look back through one unit plan you have: What is the key question and focus of the unit? Are the objectives related to this? Modify if necessary Is the assessment criteria related to this and the objectives? Modify as/if necessary

DEVELOPING A CORE ASSESSMENT This is needed for each course unit Be clear about the assessment criteria. Be specific and keep it focused (you CANNOT cover all criteria and you do not have to!) Try and be task specific! Over the MYP curriculum, ensure that learners have a variety of assessment tasks through MYP. Why? To allow all types of learners to demonstrate knowledge, understanding, skills, values and develop weaker areas To allow all learners the opportunity to cover all strands of the assessment criteria (use handbook, unit plan, AfL support area ed, P to P)

RECORDING AND REPORTING Core assessment record sheet (this will go in the front/back of every subject book) Portfolio (selected work, photos, reflections on learning) Reports (see schedule) All recording and reporting must be formative – use the assessment criterion and related strands to sign post the next steps for learning and set targets)

THE INTERIM AND FULL REPORT Interim report: criteria mark – this must be a best fit not based on one assessment but on ALL evidence (I do not want yo-yo students) Full report: As above but will also receive a best fit grade based on all evidence against AfL criteria

TWO EXAMPLES OF TASK-SPECIFIC CLARIFICATIONS

Application of concepts is appropriate but superficial. The student demonstrates conceptual awareness and understanding by describing connections to the subject matter. The student attempts to apply concepts to other situations but is not always successful. Your application of the concept of ‘Change’ was appropriate but superficial. You demonstrated conceptual awareness and understanding by describing connections to the issue of slavery in the American Civil War. You also attempted to apply the concept of ‘Change’ to social, economic and political factors contributing to the War but were not always successful. Humanities: How was slavery related to the American civil war? Core assessment: A narrative story/diary extract of a slave during the American civil war Criterion B: concepts (5-6)

The student explains how science is applied to addressing a specific local or global issue. The student explains some of the benefits and limitations of science in solving the issue. The student discusses how science and its applications interact with some of the following factors: social, economic, political, environmental, cultural and ethical. You explained how genetically modified organisms are used to addressing the problem of global food shortages. You explained some of the benefits and limitations of GM organisms in solving food shortages. You discussed how GM organisms and their use interact with some of the following factors: social, economic, political, environmental, cultural and ethical. Sciences: Are GM organisms a danger to people? Core assessment: Role play and debate on GM with a follow up report of the environment minister of India Criterion A: one world (5-6)

DEPARTMENT TASK: LONG TERM OVERVIEW Go through your long term SoW showing the unit plans for the year groups Draft some ideas for core assessments for each unit plan (write this in red below your course unit in your long term plan) Through and at the end of the year reflect and review your core assessments. Do they cover all assessment criteria over the course? To be drafted by the end of term

Geography long term example My next step: Identify key criteria covered in each. Is there a good balance and range?