Lead. inspire. teach. Welcome! iTeachAZ Co-Teaching & Professionalism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

Mentoring New Educators
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Work-based learning Click on the speaker on each slide to learn more!
AVID Overview (From AVID Support Curriculum Resource Guide)
Breakfast & Conversation
Co-Teaching? What’s That?
PORTFOLIO.
TEN TOP THINGS EVERY INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHOULD KNOW.
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
Lead. inspire. teach. Welcome! Mentor Collaboration working together to increase student achievement.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Clinical Teaching Tricks and Tips Julie Story Byerley, MD, MPH.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
1 Reading Instruction and Co-teaching: How General and Special Educators Can Work Together Colleen Klein Reutebuch, PhD.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Administrator Session July 17, 2013 Co-Teaching for Gap Closure Kick-Off Training.
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
Cooperative Learning An Overview.
Welcome to Project High Five: Culture Collaboration Commitment Communication Community.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
Lead. inspire. teach. Welcome! Mentor Collaboration working together to increase student achievement.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities. Component 4a: Reflecting on Teaching ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished AccuracyTeacher does not.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Welcome HS & MS RtI Liaisons! Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. SVVSD RtI Coordinator January 29, 2013.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Parkway School District Summer, Outcomes Why Mentor? Phases of New Teacher Development Roles of the Mentor Teacher Responsibilities and Expectations.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Effective Practices Co-Teaching Presented by: Cynthia Debreaux, Regional Consultant DPI/ECU August 21, 2012 Hertford County Schools 1.
Teacher Evaluation Training Gen Admin Meeting December 1st, 2011 By Dr. Glenn Maleyko.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
Instructional Coaching February 1, Welcome! Please Do Now: Take 2 minutes to write 3 lines: How would you define Instructional Coaching? What is.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Common Core State Standards & North Carolina Essential Standards Support for School Executives 1.
Mentors and beginning teachers teaching together in a collaborative setting AIP & Co-Teaching.
Roles and Responsibilities for Paraprofessionals District Learning Day Location goes here 2:00 p.m. – 2:55 p.m. August 5 th and 6th.
 Please sign in!  Then select a piece of colored cardstock.  Create a table tent by folding the cardstock in half.  Write your first name and school.
Setting the Stage Implementing Math Coaches – Do you have all the right pieces?
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. School, Family, and Community Collaboration Chapter 3.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Preparing Novice Teachers in Classroom Management At The Elementary and Secondary Level By: Yelena Patish Charles Peck Elizabeth West Laura Rothenberg.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
EdHD 5016 Teaching a Class of Mixed Abilities: Differentiated Instruction Instructional Intervention Ideas Fall, 2012.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Student Teaching Orientation Dec 13, 2017
Mentoring: from Teacher Candidate to Successful Intern
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
Presentation transcript:

lead. inspire. teach. Welcome! iTeachAZ Co-Teaching & Professionalism

lead. inspire. teach. Norms Listen carefully to one another Be respectful of others by valuing different perspectives Actively participate Silent cell phones Laptops and iPads will not be needed during today’s session

lead. inspire. teach. Logistics- Comments/Questions +∆?

lead. inspire. teach. Objectives Describe the 6 co-teaching approaches and the benefits/disadvantages of each Describe the professionalism expectations of our teacher candidates

lead. inspire. teach. Word Splash When you think of co-teaching, what comes to mind?

lead. inspire. teach. It’s All About Them! Co-teaching is first and foremost an approach for meeting the educational needs of students with diverse learning abilities. Cook & Friend, 1995

lead. inspire. teach. Key Features of Co-Teaching 1 Teacher Candidate per classroom 1 mentor teacher for full year On-going support from university faculty Clearly defined expectations, with gradual increase or responsibility for Teacher Candidate Designated planning time for co-teaching

lead. inspire. teach. Co-Teaching vs Traditional Model In today’s world of high stakes testing and accountability, the traditional model of student teaching (turning the classroom over to a teacher candidate) does not fully utilize the resources of all the people in the classroom The teacher candidate deserves the opportunity to work side-by-side with the lead teacher, learning from him or her every day, before entering the education profession Co-teaching offers teacher candidates the best instruction we can present. It also offers the teacher candidate extensive opportunities to find his or her own teaching style Highly effective teachers in today‘s classrooms recognize collaboration and communication as imperative to student academic success

lead. inspire. teach. Co-Teaching Approaches One Teaching, One Assisting One Teaching, One Observe Alternative Teaching Station Teaching Parallel Teaching Teaming

lead. inspire. teach. Read & Think Read the co-teaching approaches and examples. Think-how would this approach contribute to student learning?

lead. inspire. teach. Co-teaching Carousel Definition/DescriptionAdvantagesDisadvantages

lead. inspire. teach. Station Teaching

lead. inspire. teach. Parallel

lead. inspire. teach. Alternative Teaching

lead. inspire. teach. Team Teaching

lead. inspire. teach. One Teach, One Assist

lead. inspire. teach. One Teach, One Observe

lead. inspire. teach. Which model??? 1. Which model??? 6. Which model??? 5. Which model??? 3. Which model??? 4. Which model??? Which model??? 2. Which model???

lead. inspire. teach. Co-Teaching Expectations Mentor Teacher is still ultimately responsible for content, implementation, and management Mentor Teacher has final authority So what does the teacher candidate do? Works collaboratively with the Mentor Teacher, using the co-teaching model, gradually moving into more complex co-teaching approaches Teacher candidates can begin engaging with students sooner

lead. inspire. teach. Minimum Expectations for Co-Teaching Beginning Week 1 Beginning Week 3 Beginning Week 7 Beginning Week 11 One Teach, One Observe One Teach, One Assist *Mentor teaches, Teacher Candidate observes or assists Alternative Teaching Station Teaching *Continue previous strategies as appropriate Parallel Teaching *Continue previous strategies as appropriate Team Teaching *Continue previous strategies as appropriate. Orientation, partial responsibility for teaching some routines and content. Assume responsibility for small group on a regular basis. Assume responsibility for whole group occasionally. Continue responsibility for small group. Continue responsibility for whole group occasionally. (or class period for junior high).

lead. inspire. teach. Internal Summary

lead. inspire. teach. Objectives Describe the 6 co-teaching approaches and the benefits/disadvantages of each Describe the professionalism expectations of our teacher candidates

lead. inspire. teach. Professionalism: Placemat Consensus When you think of someone who is very professional, what criteria led you to that decision? Consensus Elements Write individually for 1 minute

lead. inspire. teach. Table Talk Consensus Discuss your answers in your groups Write your group’s definition of professionalism on your placemat Definition

lead. inspire. teach. Professionalism It is that quality which drives a person's appearance, personal and professional interactions, and which provides others with an impression.

lead. inspire. teach. Gallery Walk  Showing Professionalism  Growing and Developing Professionally  Maintaining Accurate Records  Home-School Communication

lead. inspire. teach. Professionalism Jigsaw Read the descriptors for your section of the rubric Discuss with your group: –Why does it matter? –What does it look like/not look like? –What does it sound like/not sound like? Create a summary to present to the group Be ready to share

lead. inspire. teach. Showing Professionalism  A1. Relationships with others in the school and in the profession.  A2. Fulfilling professional responsibilities

lead. inspire. teach. Growing & Developing Professionally  B1. Content knowledge and pedagogical skill  B2. Continued professional growth

lead. inspire. teach. Maintaining Accurate Records C1. General record keeping C2. Student progress in learning

lead. inspire. teach. Home School Communication  D1. Communicates instructional program information to parents  D2. Communicates individual student performance to parents  D3. Advocacy/Resources for students

lead. inspire. teach. Game Time! I will read a scenario. With your group: –Identify which area of the Professionalism Rubric is being violated.

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario 1 A teacher candidate has had two absences in her Field Placement. On one occasion, she has not contacted the Site Coordinator in advance. Also, on both occasions, she has failed to provide her Mentor Teacher with the plans and materials she was responsible for that day. She has not turned in documentation of the absences in a timely manner. Which area of the Professionalism Rubric is being violated?

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario 1- debrief Attendance Policy Teacher Candidates are allowed to miss up to 2 days for each 8 week rotation Professionalism Rubric: Section A, Part 2 Violates the procedures for notifying mentors and site coordinators Fails to follow procedure for ensuring student learning is not disrupted.

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario 2 A teacher candidate is not turning in his lesson plans to his mentor teacher 72 hours in advance. The mentor teacher is getting frustrated because she doesn’t have enough time to provide feedback and help prepare. Which area of the Professionalism Rubric is being violated?

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario 2 Debrief Professionalism Rubric: Section C, Part 1 Does not meet deadlines

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario 3  A Teacher Candidate complains about having to attend a professional development that the district is having. While walking down the hallway, other teachers hear her say that the topics aren’t relevant to her and that she has more important things to do. Which area of the Professionalism Rubric is being violated?

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario 3 Debrief Professionalism Rubric: Section B, Part 1 Belittles professional development activities

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario 4  A Teacher Candidate is not taking initiative in contributing lesson ideas or working with students. Unless the MT gives specific directions, the TC sits in the back of the room and passively ‘observes’ and surfs on her computer while the mentor teaches. Which area of the Professionalism Rubric is being violated?

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario Debrief Professionalism Rubric: Section A, Part 2 Fulfilling Professional Responsibilities –Follows school district and university policies and practices with minimal guidance

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario 5 After school, a parent comes to the classroom and wants to talk about her daughter’s performance. The mentor is not in the classroom so the Teacher Candidate decides to facilitate the conversation on her own. Which area of the Professionalism Rubric is being violated?

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario Debrief Professionalism Rubric: Section D, Part 1 Communicating Instructional Program Information to Parents –Communicates without knowledge and approval of Mentor Teacher.

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario 6 A Teacher Candidate arrives at school right before the students and is not prepared to begin teaching when the bell rings.

lead. inspire. teach. Scenario Debrief Professionalism Rubric: Section A, Part 2 Fulfilling Professional Responsibilities –Exhibits expected workplace behaviors, avoiding tardiness, excessive or unwarranted absences

lead. inspire. teach. How Are Teacher Candidates Evaluated in Professionalism?

lead. inspire. teach. Professionalism Evaluations Bi-weekly Progress Report: Gets sent out every two weeks from TK 20 Communication tool between mentor and site coordinator Coaching opportunity for mentor teacher After every Performance Assessment

lead. inspire. teach. Objectives Describe the 6 co-teaching approaches and the benefits/disadvantages of each Describe the professionalism expectations of our teacher candidates