Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora-Herrera Département de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève ATLAS Reconstruction Meeting 8 June 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RPC & LVL1 Mu Barrel Online Monitoring during LS1 M. Della Pietra.
Advertisements

Releases and Validation Status Simon George, David Strom, Dmitry Emeliyanov, Monika Wielers, Ricardo Goncalo Trigger Open Meeting – 15 July 2009.
Releases & validation Simon George & Ricardo Goncalo Royal Holloway University of London HLT UK – RAL – 13 July 2009.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Trigger Data Formats From CBNT to ESD and/or DPD June 11, 2008 Fabrizio Salvatore, Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Sickness Absence Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
ATLAS Analysis Model. Introduction On Feb 11, 2008 the Analysis Model Forum published a report (D. Costanzo, I. Hinchliffe, S. Menke, ATL- GEN-INT )
CSC DQA and Commissioning Summary  We are responsible for the online and offline DQA for the CSC system, a US ATLAS responsibility  We are ready for.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.
Plans for Trigger Software Validation During Running Trigger Data Quality Assurance Workshop May 6, 2008 Ricardo Gonçalo, David Strom.
Event Data Model in ATLAS Edward Moyse (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration CHEP 2004, Interlaken.
2nd September Richard Hawkings / Paul Laycock Conditions data handling in FDR2c  Tag hierarchies set up (largely by Paul) and communicated in advance.
Darren Price – HLT B-trigger offline status report :: B-Physics meeting July 23 rd ‘08Page 1 HLT B-trigger offline monitoring status Darren Price, LANCASTER.
The huge amount of resources available in the Grids, and the necessity to have the most up-to-date experimental software deployed in all the sites within.
Introduction Advantages/ disadvantages Code examples Speed Summary Running on the AOD Analysis Platforms 1/11/2007 Andrew Mehta.
OFFLINE TRIGGER MONITORING TDAQ Training 5 th November 2010 Ricardo Gonçalo On behalf of the Trigger Offline Monitoring Experts team.
LVL2 ID ESD/AOD classes Status and plans. PESA L2 ID Algorithms Review - RAL 25 July Ricardo Goncalo ESD/AOD More and more interest from physics.
DPDs and Trigger Plans for Derived Physics Data Follow up and trigger specific issues Ricardo Gonçalo and Fabrizio Salvatore RHUL.
AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.
Trigger Offline Expert Report Simon George (RHUL), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) Trigger General Meeting – 25 th November 2009.
News from Jet/Etmiss Monica. Jet/Etmiss meeting yesterday (25/5) at P&P week – Mostly review of conf notes for ICHEP10 – Good review to check where we.
Andrei Gheata, Mihaela Gheata, Andreas Morsch ALICE offline week, 5-9 July 2010.
Main priorities for the next years. Where do we stand Muon system in good shape (in my opinion) – Sub-systems hardware quite robust (see later for main.
Trigger Software Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) TAPM Open Meeting – April 12, 2007 Outline: Reminder of plans Status of infrastructure.
Latest News & Other Issues Ricardo Goncalo (LIP), David Miller (Chicago) Jet Trigger Signature Group Meeting 9/2/2015.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
AOD/ESD plans Status and plans focusing on LVL2 e/  and some items for discussion On behalf of: J.Baines, P.Casado, G.Comune, A.DiMattia, S.George, R.Goncalo,
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 13/09/2012.
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 24/01/2013.
Trigger Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) on behalf of trigger community Physics Validation Meeting – Feb. 13, 2007.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
The ATLAS TAGs Database - Experiences and further developments Elisabeth Vinek, CERN & University of Vienna on behalf of the TAGs developers group.
Trigger Offline Monitoring Report Experts: Jiri Masik, Ricardo Gonçalo Shifters: Iwona Grabowska-Bold, Holger von Radziewski, Gustavo Otero y Garzon, Michael.
AliRoot survey: Analysis P.Hristov 11/06/2013. Are you involved in analysis activities?(85.1% Yes, 14.9% No) 2 Involved since 4.5±2.4 years Dedicated.
Performance DPDs and trigger commissioning Preparing input to DPD task force.
1 Offline Week, October 28 th 2009 PWG3-Muon: Analysis Status From ESD to AOD:  inclusion of MC branch in the AOD  standard AOD creation for PDC09 files.
TAGS in the Analysis Model Jack Cranshaw, Argonne National Lab September 10, 2009.
Trigger Input to First-Year Analysis Model Working Group And some soul searching… Trigger Open Meeting – 29 July 2009.
Data processing Offline review Feb 2, Productions, tools and results Three basic types of processing RAW MC Trains/AODs I will go through these.
M. Gheata ALICE offline week, October Current train wagons GroupAOD producersWork on ESD input Work on AOD input PWG PWG31 (vertexing)2 (+
E/gamma report Ricardo Gonçalo for the e/γ slice.
CWG7 (reconstruction) R.Shahoyan, 12/06/ Case of single row Rolling Shutter  N rows of sensor read out sequentially, single row is read in time.
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Points from DPD task force First meeting last Tuesday (29 th July) – Need to have concrete proposal in 1 month – Still some confusion and nothing very.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
WLCG November Plan for shutdown and 2009 data-taking Kors Bos.
Trigger release and validation status and plans David Strom (Oregon), Simon George (RHUL), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL)
Some topics for discussion 31/03/2016 P. Hristov 1.
ATLAS Physics Analysis Framework James R. Catmore Lancaster University.
MET Slice Monitoring Xiaowen Lei, Venkat Kaushik Ken Johns.
1/5/09 Jiri Masik1 Event Filter Tracking in the Inner Detector Jiri Masik EFID Trigger related work –Trigger bytestream –Event display.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)ALICE Offline week / CERN Update on the SPD Offline Domenico Elia in collaboration with H. Tydesjo, A. Mastroserio Overview:
ANALYSIS TRAIN ON THE GRID Mihaela Gheata. AOD production train ◦ AOD production will be organized in a ‘train’ of tasks ◦ To maximize efficiency of full.
Peter van Gemmeren (ANL) Persistent Layout Studies Updates.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Concluding discussion on Commissioning, Etmiss and DPD
From delivery to acceptance
Analysis trains – Status & experience from operation
Developments of the PWG3 muon analysis code
Status of the CERN Analysis Facility
ALICE Computing Upgrade Predrag Buncic
HLT Jet and MET DQA Summary
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
ATLAS DC2 & Continuous production
Presentation transcript:

Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora-Herrera Département de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève ATLAS Reconstruction Meeting 8 June 2010 Summary of Recent Trigger Changes Affecting Tier0

Trigger Updates Affecting Tier0 Trigger monitoring packages: Frequent updates & improvements, bugfixes, additional histograms & checks  Obviously important for trigger operations  Pure monitoring, no impact on EDM schema nor physics output  Nonetheless all these updates are always carefully tested by running full reconstruction on cosmics / MC / collision BS files to ensure absence of ERRORs or related WARNINGs before submission. Trigger ntuple production at Tier0: Occasional bugfixes, updates & additions  Important for commissioning and fast validation/feedback for the trigger  Again no impact on EDM / physics output  Again comprehensive reconstruction tests are performed before submission to AtlasProduction ‘Transparent’ EDM changes: Occasional necessity of trigger updates that affect the ESD/AOD content  ‘Transparent’: EDM updates do not change the physics output nor break forward / backward compatibility and thus have no impact on physics analyses.  Changes are carefully coordinated & tested by trigger EDM experts  Once a set of tags is established, the changes are tested by running the full reconstruction on cosmics / MC / collision BS files to ensure absence of ERRORs or related WARNINGs  The resulting ESD/AOD pool files are checked for differences 8/06/10Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora2

Recent ‘transparent’ trigger EDM updates Recent bundle submitted to AtlasProduction Y: TrigT1CaloByteStream Trigger/TrigT1/TrigT1CaloByteStream TrigEDMConfig Trigger/TriggerCommon/TrigEDMConfig TriggerJobOpts Trigger/TriggerCommon/TriggerJobOpts RecExPers Reconstruction/RecExample/RecExPers TrigSerializeTP Trigger/TrigDataAccess/TrigSerializeTP Differences in pool files are as expected: ## ERROR: files don't have the same content !! ## collections in 'chk' and not in 'ref’ + Rec::TrackParticleContainer_tlp1_HLT_InDetTrigParticleCreation_minBias_EFID + TriggerTowerCollection_tlp1_TriggerTowersMuon ## collections in 'ref' and not in 'chk’ -TrigOperationalInfoCollection_tlp1_HLT_EXPRESS_OPI_EF ================================================================================ ::: comparing common content (mem-size)... [ERR] kb (ref) ==> kb (chk) | EventStreamInfo_p2_StreamESD [ERR] kb (ref) ==> kb (chk) | HLT::HLTResult_p1_HLTResult_EF [ERR] kb (ref) ==> kb (chk) | POOLContainer_DataHeaderForm ================================================================================ 8/06/10Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora3

Changes included in recent EDM bundle (1) 1)Changing the version of the persistent class of TauDetailsContainer from tlp1 to tlp2: Updating the transient-to-persistent converter class used by the trigger serializer for writing out TauDetailsContainer objects from versions tlp1 to tlp2 in order to catch up with the offline change. First step in tackling some floating point exceptions (bug #65082 – still ongoing) and thus to increase overall robustness.  No consequences for offline analyses 2)Removal of TrigOperationalInfoCollection#HLT_EXPRESS_OPI_EF from ESD, except for express stream reconstruction Recently introduced monitoring quantity that contains lists of chains which have express stream tags Histograms only need to be written to express stream and were never intended for standard reconstruction They have no use for physics analyses  dropped from ESD/AODs to avoid confusion.  No consequences for offline analyses 8/06/10Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora4

Changes included in recent EDM bundle (2) 3)Adding a new key for MinBias TrackParticles (Rec::TrackParticleContainer_tlp1_HLT_ InDetTrigParticleCreation_minBias_EFID) in ESD/AOD This change is necessary to check the performance of EF MinBias tracks w.r.t. offline tracks. Since EF uses a different selection these tracks are not available anywhere else. The size increase is small (order 0.1 kb / event)  Additional quantity in ESD/AOD thus no consequences for offline analyses. 4)Additional LVL1 key adding trigger tower objects to ESDs only (TriggerTowerCollection_tlp1_ TriggerTowersMuon) for L1 monitoring Additional TriggerTowerCollection containing 128 towers but reduced number of readout timeslices in original TriggerTowerCollection so small overall size increase. This information is needed to investigate how tile muon signals can contribute to clean up the cavern background in the RPC triggers.  No consequences for offline analyses 8/06/10Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora5

Other changes to be deployed soon Update of the MuonFeatureDetails TP converter from _tlp1 to _p2 Brings a performance change that results in smaller ESD / AOD sizes and optimized CPU usage. Still validating in devval after solving savannah bugs #68000, #68455 We will start to check with AtlasProduction once it is safely running and well tested. 8/06/10Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora6

Possible Updates from the Tau Slice Tau combined performance group are studying the use of additional variables to handle pile up: Suggestion up-to-date: –Introduce 6 additional variables built out of topo clusters attached to tauJets, which are supposed to give good performance in case of pile-up –Currently tau people are trying to converge on an optimized selection for these variables between offline and trigger More information can be found in a dedicated discussion on the sharepoint of the tau combined performance group: – perf- tau%2fSelection%2fLists%2fGeneral%20Discussions%2fEffects%20of%20pileup%20on%20TauID&FolderCT ID=0x DB9E9CBE9C190841BFFB578FE2AEE66F&TopicsView=https%3A%2F%2Fespace.cern.ch %2Fatlas-perf-tau%2FSelection%2Fdefault.aspx These changes are at an early stage of development – no decisions have been made. Trigger will announce & discuss such changes well in advance when they become necessary and ensure that all requirements and guidelines are met and well tested. 8/06/10Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora7

Summary & Remarks Summary: Recently a few EDM updates have been requested by the trigger community for Tier0. The EDM updates are ‘transparent’ meaning they do not break backwards / forwards compatibility nor affect offline analyses. Some questions & remarks: Occasional transparent trigger EDM updates will continue to be necessary from time to time for debugging purposes etc. All quantities related to physics analyses will remain unchanged. Concerning forward compatibility we would like to know what procedure you recommend for tests and against which reference release you would like to remain compatible. In particular concerning the addition of single data members: Have tests been performed by the reconstruction group yet and can you recommend a clear procedure for such an EDM evolution. We would like to know from the combined performance groups if there are any HLT-related changes foreseen to deal with pileup and if these involve trigger EDM updates. Could the standard reconstruction tests (q120 / q122) be provided with up-to-date cosmics & collisions files. This avoids unnecessary ERRORs and WARNINGs and allows to discover potential problems. 8/06/10Moritz Backes, Clemencia Mora8