Leibniz 1646-1716.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modern Philosophy Part two.
Advertisements

The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
© Michael Lacewing A priori knowledge Michael Lacewing
The Rationalists: Leibniz Individual Substances
Descartes’ rationalism
Leibniz Part 1. Short Biography Leibniz ( ) was the son of a professor of philosophy who had earned his doctorate in law by 21. He invented.
The dead neighbor is floating in the water. The sky is cloudless and has been for two months. The pool is chlorinated. There are small puddles of non-chlorinated.
Views of Knowledge- Rationalism. Rationalism Rationalism- The belief that reason, without the aid of sensory perception, is capable of arriving at some.
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
The Basics: Some Familiar Territory Plato’s knowledge as memory, learning as remembering. Innate ideas. A priori knowledge. Logical “truths” that describe.
 The cosmological argument is, as it’s name sugessts (from the greek cosmos, meaning ‘universe’ or ‘world’). An a posteriori argument for the existence.
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 7 - Rationalism A History of Psychology: Ideas and Context (4 th edition) D. Brett King, Wayne Viney, and William.
Education and Physical Education During the Reformation KPE 260 – Fall, 2000 Dr. D. Frankl.
PHILOSOPHY 101 SPRING 2010 INSTRUCTOR: WILBURN Lecture 1: Introduction and Problems 6/26/20151.
The Euthyphro dilemma Michael Lacewing
1 The Rationalists: Leibniz Rationalism and Theodicy Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Phil 1: An Introduction to Philosophy
More categories for our mental maps  How we understand knowledge has repercussions for how we understand our place in the world.  How we understand.
Epistemology Revision
GOTTFRIED WILHELM VON LEIBNIZ References: Russell, Bertrand The History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster. Stumpf, Samuel Enoch.
9/18/2015 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant I Charles Manekin.
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
2 March.
Descartes & Rationalism
Why Does Anything at all Exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? Leibniz - the principle of sufficient reason.
Ethics Demonstrated in Geometrical Order
Dealing With the Atheist, Skeptic & Intellectual Presented By: Kedron Jones.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
1 The Rationalists: Spinoza Substance, Nature and God Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Why Does Anything at all Exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? Leibniz - the principle of sufficient reason.
1.Everything which begins to exist has a cause. 2.The Universe exists so it must have a cause. 3.You cannot have infinite regress (i.e. An infinite number.
PHIL/RS 335 God’s Existence Pt. 1: The Ontological Argument.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
12/20/2015 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Leibniz – Monadology I Charles Manekin.
L ECTURE 15: C ERTAINTY. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Review Hume’s radical empiricism and its consequences 2.Outline and investigate.
Knowledge rationalism Michael Lacewing
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God August 15, 2015 George Cronk, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy & Religion Bergen Community College.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
EPISTEMOLOGY: BRANCH OF PHILOSOPHY CONCERNED WITH THE SCOPE OF KNOWLEDGE.
Rene Descartes The Father of Modern Philosophy
Plato vs. Aristotle (Metaphysics). Metaphysics The branch of philosophy that deals with the first principles of things, including abstract concepts such.
The Ontological Argument
The Nature of God Nancy Parsons. Attributes- Nature of God Candidates should be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of: 1.God as eternal,
METAPHYSICS The study of the nature of reality. POPEYE STUDIES DESCARTES.
The Copleston, Russell Debate Copleston’s Cosmological argument (1948 BBC radio debate)
Cosmological arguments from contingency
Arguments based on observation Arguments based on reason
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1
OA: Faith and Reason What difference does the argument make
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
The ontological argument
Problem of Evil: Why is there suffering in the world?
c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:
Truths and Possible Worlds
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Descartes’ ontological argument
The Ontological Argument: An Introduction
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Leibniz – Monadology.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative - revision
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
On your whiteboard (1): 1. What is innate knowledge? 2. What were Plato’s arguments for innate knowledge? 3. Was he right? Explain your answer.
A Priori Arguments for God’s Existence
Explore the weaknesses of the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Presentation transcript:

Leibniz 1646-1716

Background Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was born in Leipzig, Germany, on July 1, 1646 Leibniz was the son of a professor of moral philosophy He was a personal aid to many noblemen. Worked as legal advisor as well as official historian

Importance Leibniz made many significant advances in symbolic logic. Leibniz also tried to correct the errors of Cartesian metaphysics without throwing away its main structure.

Philosophy Leibniz’s philosophy, found in his Monadology and Essays in Theodicy, are summarized into three main principles….

Philosophy 1. The Principle of Identity 2. The Principle of Sufficient Reason 3. The Principle of Internal Harmony

Principle of Identity Leibniz divided all propositions into 2 kinds, Analytic and Synthetic. Analytic Synthetic 1. True by definition 1. Not true by definition 2. Necessary 2. Not Necessary 3. A Priori 3. A Posteriori

Identity Analytic Propositions were the positive counterpart of the principle of noncontradiction. This states that the negation of every analytic sentence is a self-contradiction. Analytic: 1. All Bachelors are men 2. 2+3= 5

Examples Synthetic Propositions: 1. The cat is on the mat 2. In 1492 Columbus sailed the ocean blue

Identity Leibniz claimed that all Synthetic sentences were Actually Analytic. Synthetic sentences were relative to time. (i.e. Fluffy the cat was on the sofa at time X.) From God’s point of view, all true sentences are necessarily true, even if it doesn’t seem to be for humans.

Identity The characteristic of Fluffy being on the sofa at time X is as much of a characteristic as Fluffy being a cat. This shows how Leibniz believed in a predestined world from God’s point of view.

Principle of Sufficient Reason Leibniz believed that for anything to exist, there must be a reason why it exists and why it exists as it does. These reasons should also be open to human inquiry. He claimed that this Principle was the Main Principle of Reality. Whoever rejected it was Irrational.

Example If Fluffy the cat is on the sofa, then there must be a reason that it exists at all. There must also be a reason why it exists on the sofa instead of on the roof.

Sufficient Reason Leibniz applied this way of thinking to the universe. Leibniz wondered why something existed rather than nothing. Leibniz concluded that there must be an uncaused cause, an all-perfect God who’s being was necessary.

Sufficient Reason According to Leibniz’s philosophy, one can prove the existence of God from rationality and the proposition that something exists instead of nothing.

Principle of Internal Harmony Leibniz believed that If there is a God, He must be both rational and good. God must also desire and be capable of creating the maximum existence possible: (Metaphysical Perfection) & maximum activity possible : ( Moral Perfection)

Internal Harmony According to this, at creation, God created only the possibilities that would guarantee the maximum moral and metaphysical perfection. Leibniz also based his claim that this is the best of all possible worlds off of this.

Example Fluffy the cat MUST be on the sofa at 4:20. If Fluffy the cat is not on the sofa at 4:20, then it is not Fluffy the cat.

Monads Many philosophers following Descartes viewed reality as being made up of substances. According to Leibniz, these were Monads. Monads: units of psychic force. He believed that these were the simplest and realest “things” that existed.

Monads Monads were not a material substance. Everything was a product of a monad or group of monads. He also believed that each monad is a mirror of the entire universe. He believed that these monads (or groups of monads) were conscious. Lastly, Leibniz believed that the clusters of monads that were free, were human beings.