UM Center for Contextual Psychology dedicated to World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson
Detecting biases
Self-Report
Implicit Association Test World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding HumanAlien Me Not Me
Implicit Association Test HumanAlien Not MeMe HumanAlien Not MeMe World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure
Participants Excluded
Alternative Input Methods
Purpose Input type? clearer data
Two Studies IV Device DV Inclusion Useable Trials % Correct DV LatencyFluencyBias
Procedure IRAP Keyboard Alternative/ Switches Alternative/ Switches Keyboard Informed Consent
Stimuli
Data Analysis Strategy Keyboard Other Device
Alt Keyboard World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Alt Keyboard Participants 21 9 Male12 female
Alt Keyboard Participants Keyboard First 10 Alternative First
Alt Keyboard Participants Caucasians 2 Asian 5 African American
Alt Keyboard Participants Christian 0 Muslim 1 Other2 Atheist 1 Agnostic
Results World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Number of Participants Not Meeting Inclusion Criteria World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Keyboard 1 Alternative 2
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
% Correct on Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 43%
Average Latency of Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 33%
Fluency on Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 67%
Less Bias World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 61.95% 38.05%
Switches World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Switch Participants 21 6 Male15 female
Switch Participants Keyboard First 11 Alternative First
Switch Participants 21 8 Caucasian s 13 African Americans
Switch Participants Christian 0 Muslim 2 Other 1 Agnostic
Number of Participants Not Meeting Inclusion Criteria World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Keyboard 2 Switches 1
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding % of Participants with More Useable Trials by Input Type 95%
% Correct on Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Average Latency of Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 48% 52%
Fluency on Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 52%
Less Bias World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 61.9%
Practice Effects Example World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Summary Inclusion == Useable Trials AlternativeKeyboard % Correct Keyboard World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Study 1Study 2
Summary Latency AlternativeKeyboard Fluency Keyboard Less Bias KeyboardSwitches World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Study 1Study 2
Limitations PracticeSample World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Future Directions and Conclusions Between subjects designLarger sample sizesDevice World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
UM Center for Contextual Psychology dedicated to World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson