Evaluation and Application of AMSTERDAM: Focus on Plume In Grid Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen and Rochelle Balmori Atmospheric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The CAFE baseline scenarios: Air quality and impacts
Advertisements

Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Template Use of Photochemical Grid Models to Assess Single-Source Impacts Ralph Morris, Tanarit Sakulyanontvittaya, Darren Wilton and Lynsey Parker ENVIRON.
1 © 2014 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Naresh Kumar, Ph.D., MBA Senior Program Manager Electric Power Research Institute.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Sulfur & Nitrogen Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference.
COMPARATIVE MODEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CMAQ-VISTAS, CMAQ-MADRID, AND CMAQ-MADRID-APT FOR A NITROGEN DEPOSITION ASSESSMENT OF THE ESCAMBIA BAY, FLORIDA.
Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
CLARIS WP4.3 : Continental-scale air Pollution in South America.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
Mercury Source Attribution at Global, Regional and Local Scales Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Kristen Lohman, and Prakash Karamchandani AER.
Eladio M. Knipping, Ph.D. January 16, 2014 Air Quality Applied Science Team (AQAST) Meeting Rice University, Houston, TX Air Quality Research from the.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
Modeling the Co-Benefits of Carbon Standards for Existing Power Plants STI-6102 Stephen Reid, Ken Craig, Garnet Erdakos Sonoma Technology, Inc. Jonathan.
Template Development of a Plume-in-Grid Version of Global-through-Urban WRF/Chem Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen ENVIRON International.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
Muntaseer Billah, Satoru Chatani and Kengo Sudo Department of Earth and Environmental Science Graduate School of Environmental Studies Nagoya University,
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
Sub-Grid Scale Modeling of Air Toxics Concentrations Near Roadways Prakash Karamchandani, Kristen Lohman & Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 6th Annual.
Plume-in-Grid Modeling for PM & Mercury Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen & Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 5th Annual CMAS.
College of Engineering Update for Agilent Impacts of Emission Changes on Air Quality and Acute Health Effects in the Southeast, 1993 – 2012 Lucas Henneman.
Development and Application of a State-of-the-Science Plume-in-Grid Model CMAQ-APT Prakash Karamchandani, Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan and.
Template Evaluation of an Advanced Reactive Puff Model using Aircraft-based Plume Measurements Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani, Bart Brashers,
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
Further Development and Application of the CMAQ Ozone and Particle Precursor Tagging Methodologies (OPTM & PPTM) 7 th Annual CMAS Conference Chapel Hill,
Predicting Effects of Point Source Controls on Escambia Bay using CMAQ and Watershed Models by Jo Ellen Brandmeyer, Steve Beaulieu, Randy Dodd, and Michele.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
. s Yuqiang Zhang 1, J. Jason West 1, Meridith M. Fry 1, Raquel A. Silva 1, Steven J. Smith 2, Vaishali Naik 4, Zachariah Adelman 1, Susan C. Anenberg.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Application of the CMAQ Particle and Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) to Support Water Quality Planning for the Virginia Mercury Study 6 th Annual.
Development and Application of Parallel Plume-in-Grid Models Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen and Christian Seigneur AER, San.
Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
CMAS Conference 2011 Comparative analysis of CMAQ simulations of a particulate matter episode over Germany Chapel Hill, October 26, 2011 V. Matthias, A.
Impacts of Cumulus Transport and Spatial Resolution on the Simulated Long-Range Transport and Source-Receptor Relationship T.Y. Lee, J.B. Lee and S.Y.
1 Results of 2010/2015 Post-CAIR Ozone Source Apportionment Modeling August 2005 OAR/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
1 Prakash Karamchandani 1, David Parrish 2, Lynsey Parker 1, Thomas Ryerson 3, Paul O. Wennberg 4, Alex Teng 4, John D. Crounse 4, Greg Yarwood 1 1 Ramboll.
A New Version of CMAQ-MADRID and Comparison with CMAQ Christian Seigneur, Betty Pun, Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, and Shu-Yun Chen AER.
Template A screening method for ozone impacts of new sources based on high-order sensitivity analysis of CAMx simulations for Sydney Greg Yarwood
Ozone as a Function of Local Wind Speed and Direction: Evidence of Local and Regional Transport Rudolf B. Husar and Wandrille P. Renard CAPITA, Center.
Impact assessment of anthropogenic emission control upon aerosol mass burden during heavy pollution episodes over North China Plain Meigen Zhang, Xiao.
Impact of Temporal Fluctuations in Power Plant Emissions on Air Quality Forecasts Prakash Doraiswamy 1, Christian Hogrefe 1,2, Eric Zalewsky 2, Winston.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Source-apportionment for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, and Richard.
Pearl River Delta (PRD) The distribution of city clusters in China Analysis and numerical simulation on a server Fan Qi 1,Yu Wei 1, Luo Xuyu 1, (1. Department.
1 DRAFT Report for Air Quality Analysis on Cumulative Emissions, Barrio Logan Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Transport Science Questions.
Template Application of SCICHEM-2012 for 1-Hour NO 2 Concentration Assessments Prakash Karamchandani, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood, Bart Brashers, S.-Y.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Rochelle Balmori, Shu-Yun Chen, Prakash Karamchandani and Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon, CA Justin T. Walters and John J. Jansen.
Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.
1 REMSAD VERSION 7.10 WITH SOURCE TAGGING Inter-RPO Modeling Meeting May 25, 2004 Shan He, Emily Savelli, Jung-Hun Woo, John Graham and Gary Kleiman, NESCAUM.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Single-Source Impacts with SCICHEM and CAMx
FUTURE PREDICTION OF SURFACE OZONE OVER EAST ASIA UP TO 2020
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC
Hybrid Plume/Grid Modeling for the Allegheny County PM2.5 SIPs
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
Air Pollutants 200 Air pollutants are recognized and assessed by the USEPA Listed in the Clean Air Act.
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
The CAFE baseline scenarios: Air quality and impacts
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation and Application of AMSTERDAM: Focus on Plume In Grid Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen and Rochelle Balmori Atmospheric & Environment Research Eladio M. Knipping and Naresh Kumar Electric Power Research Institute CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC Oct 21, 2009

2 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. CMAQ-AMSTERDAM AMSTERDAM –MADRID: Sectional PM Treatment –APT: Advanced Plume Treatment –EPRI/AER Mercury Treatment –Released by CMAS in February 2009 –Evaluation of APT –Impact of APT on Concentrations –Impact of APT on Interstate Contributions

3 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Early Plume Dispersion: NO/NO 2 /O 3 chemistry 1 Mid-range Plume Dispersion Reduced VOC/NOx/O 3 chemistry: acid formation from OH and NO 3 /N 2 O 5 chemistry Long-range Plume Dispersion: Full VOC/NOx/O 3 chemistry: acid and O 3 formation 2 3 Plume Chemistry & Relevance to Modeling

4 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Model Domain with 158 APT Sources and Pseudo-State

5 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Methodology: Simulations Air Quality Simulations –August 2002 –Jan 15-Feb 15, 2002 Actual Emissions Six Simulations –With and Without APT Base Cases: –All Emissions In Pseudo State Sensitivity Cases: –EGU Emissions Out –All Anthro Emissions Out IDAPT Emissions Removed from Pseudo State 1  None 2  EGU 3  All Anthro 4f  None 5f  EGU 6f  All Anthro

6 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Anthropogenic and EGU Emissions in Domain Species Total Anthro Emissions * Total EGU Emissions * 158 Points: EGU Emissions (%) Pseudo-State: EGU Emissions (%) SO M9.9 M756 NO x 15.8 M4.1 M688 * annualized rates derived from monthly emissions (short ton y -1 )

7 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Ozone Results

8 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. 8-Hour Ozone | 2002 Aug 11 8-Hour Average Surface Concentrations with APT Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Min: 17; Max 96 Min: -13; Max +8

9 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. 8-Hour Ozone | 2002 Aug 11 No APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution With APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution Min: -2; Max +16 Min: -2; Max +10

10 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. 8-Hour Ozone | 2002 Aug 11 No APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution With APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution Min: 0; Max +20 Min: -1; Max +18

11 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. PM 2.5 Results

12 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. 24-Hour PM 2.5 | 2002 Aug Hour Average Surface Concentrations with APT Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Min: 17; Max 96 Min: -16.1; Max +2.6

13 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. 24-Hour PM 2.5 | 2002 Aug 11 No APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution With APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution Min: -0.1; Max +5.5 Min: -0.5; Max +4.5

14 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. 24-Hour PM 2.5 | 2002 Aug 09 No APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution With APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution Min: -0.2; Max +8.6 Min: -0.5; Max +4.7

15 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Monthly PM 2.5 | 2002 August Monthly Average Surface Concentrations with APT Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Min: 17; Max 96 Min: -12.5; Max +0.6

16 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. PM 2.5 | Absolute | 2002 August No APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution With APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution Min: 0; Max +5.5 Min: 0; Max +3.0

17 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. PM 2.5 | Absolute | 2002 August No APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution With APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution Min: 0; Max Min: 0; Max +21.2

18 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Monthly PM 2.5 | 2002 Jan 17-Feb 15 No APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution With APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution Min: 0; Max +2.4 Min: 0; Max +1.8

19 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Monthly PM 2.5 | 2002 Jan 17-Feb 15 No APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution With APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution Min: 0; Max Min: 0; Max +16.7

20 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Nitrogen Deposition Results

21 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total N deposition | 2002 August Monthly Deposition with APT Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Min: 17; Max 96 Min: -0.4; Max +0.2

22 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total N deposition | 2002 August Min: -0.2; Max +0.5 Min: 0; Max +0.2 No APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution With APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution

23 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total N deposition | Absolute | 2002 August No APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution With APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution Min: 0; Max +1.5

24 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total N deposition | 2002 Jan 17-Feb 15 Monthly Deposition with APT Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Min: 17; Max 96 Min: -0.1; Max +0.2

25 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total N deposition | 2002 Jan 17-Feb 15 No APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution With APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution Min: 0; Max +0.1

26 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total N deposition | 2002 Jan 17-Feb 15 No APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution With APT: Pseudo State non-EGU Anthro Contribution Min: 0; Max +1.9

27 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Sulfur Deposition Results

28 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total S deposition | 2002 August Monthly Deposition with APT Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Min: 17; Max 96 Min: -5.8; Max +1.1

29 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total S deposition | 2002 August No APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution With APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution Min: -0.2; Max +4.6 Min: 0; Max +2.2

30 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total S deposition | 2002 Jan 17-Feb 15 Monthly Deposition with APT Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Effect of Using APT (APT –No APT) Min: 17; Max 96 Min: -3.9; Max +1.3

31 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Total S deposition | 2002 Jan 17-Feb 15 No APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution With APT: Pseudo State EGU Contribution Min: 0; Max +1.7 Min: 0; Max +0.7

32 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Key Messages Plume-in-Grid Messages –Plume-in-grid has a strong influence on near-field EGU contributions Decreases localized regions of elevated concentration relative to their surroundings for all pollutants: ozone, PM and N & S deposition –In the far field Increases or decreases small contributions depending on chemistry and meteorology Contribution Messages –Non-EGU anthropogenic emissions are key contributors to interstate contributions, particularly to adjacent/bordering states Transport of O 3 and PM has large contributions by non-EGU emissions N Deposition results show important role of non-EGU emissions

33 © 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Please Save the PiG