Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Sept 16, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Advertisements

Automation and Improvements to Default Uplift Methodology (summary/white paper of a draft NPRR)
MCWG Update to WMS Loretta Martin LCRA, Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 03/05/
7/15/2013 CSWG CSWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Matthew Tozer.
1 CRR Credit Policy Task Force Update TPTF July 21, 2008.
PRR 568 – Settlement Timeline PRR 638 – Invoice Timeline PRR 599 – Mismatch Notification COPS January 2006 Updates.
September 2012 Proposed CRR Auction Credit Changes: Summary of Draft NPRR.
1 COMS/Settlements/Credit Weekly Update June 11, 2010.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
1 NPRR 484/554 – Revisions to Congestion Revenue Rights Credit Calculations and Payments Market Call ERCOT Public July 31, 2013.
1 Periodic Revision Request Implementation Review – Q January 17, 2013.
Texas Nodal Section 9: Invoicing ERCOT, Settlements & Billing SDAWG - August 2007.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal CRR Requirements Overview of Requirements for TPTF Shawna Jirasek and Beth Garza September.
Market Credit Working Group update to the Wholesale Market Subcommittee 06/03/
Report to TAC August In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG DSWG (No report) DSWG (No report) MCWG MCWG MWG (No report)
MCWG Update to WMS 5/11/ Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 4/30/11 remains less than Zonal Estimated.
1 CRR Credit Policy Task Force Update WMS April 16, 2008.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
1 COMS/Settlements/Credit Weekly Update July 2, 2010.
September 2012 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
April 2, 2008 CRR Team Update PCRRs CRR Team UpdateApril 2, 2008 Table of contents 1.What is a PCRR? 2.Which NOIEs are eligible for PCRRs? 3.What.
MCWG Update to WMS 08/14/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update -July 31 st Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review NPRRs All operational except – NPRR 552 – Additional.
1 WMS Report TO TAC January In Brief Two Working Group Reports Two Working Group Reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports One PRR.
October 20, 2010 WMS Credit Update. 2 Topics Nodal exposure – how much collateral CRR/TCR auctions – December 2010 Preliminary Credit Cutover Timeline.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations May 8, 2012 – COPS Meeting May 9, 2012 – WMS.
COPS conference call PRR 638 Implementation COPS January 30 th 2006.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Commercial Operations Subcommittee Update to TAC September 7, 2012 Harika Basaran, COPS Chair 2012 Jim Lee, COPS Vice Chair 2012.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 8, 2008.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
9/17/2012 CSWG CSWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT. 2 Settlements Project & Operational Updates February 27, 2012 NPRR 347: Combined Daily Invoice –Still on track.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Invoices Business Requirements Settlements and.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee February 2, 2006.
MCWG Update to WMS 11/13/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update - October 30 th Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review September 25 Meeting Minutes - Approved.
ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (July 2012) August 15, 2012.
Nodal Short Pay and Uplift Process CWG Meeting May 28, 2008.
ERCOT Market Credit Working Group Presentation to the Finance and Audit Committee Payment Short Pay/Default and Uplift for Congestion Revenue rights (CRRs)
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Oct 20, 2010.
1 Nodal Credit Update at WMS June 16, 2010.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Nov 18, 2009.
Default Uplift Max MWh Activity Total Matthew Tozer Manager, Settlements and Billing WMS 1/8/2014.
November 27, 2012 NPRR322, Real-Time PTP Option Modeling Implementation Overview.
July 28, 2010 Market Readiness Seminar Credit Transition to Nodal (Preliminary)
ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (January 2015) ERCOT Public February 15, 2015.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Real Time Operations Energy Settlements Business Requirements.
MCWG Update to WMS 2/9/2010. Agenda Items Exposure / Collateral Status Update 1/26 MCWG/CWG Joint Meeting – Potential NPRR to enable expiring CRRs to.
October, 2011 MCWG/CWG Review of Abacus Loss Allocation ERCOT Mandy Bauld.
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
March 22, 2011 ERCOT Board of Directors Commercial Market Operations Version 2 - Updated on March 18, 2011 Betty Day.
DAM and Nodal Collateral Requirements Concerns and Solutions December 7, 2009.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department September 28, 2006.
Project Funding Review February 7, Background ERCOT has a $15M project budget in 2013 (same as 2012) –To allow for new additions to the.
Money Transfer Due to Real-Time Irresolvable Constraint Resmi Surendran ERCOT.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
Market Continuity WMS June 8, PUBLIC What is Market Continuity? The processes by which ERCOT market-related systems and activities are returned.
Report to TAC June In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG MCWG MCWG QMWG QMWG VCWG VCWG Other Reports Other Reports NOGRR.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 7, 2009.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
CRR Deration and NPRR821 WMS 09/06/2017.
Market Continuity Update to TAC Joel Mickey
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
Initial ERCOT Parking Deck Prioritization Recommendation
John Dumas Director, Wholesale Market Operations
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
Settlements Analysis due to SFT Deration Issue
Initial ERCOT Parking Deck Prioritization Recommendation
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461
Presentation transcript:

Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Sept 16, 2009

MCWG August 2009 Update Overview Update on MCWG work on the two motions approved by WMS in July Update on MCWG work on the two motions approved by WMS in July Mechanics of Options 1, 2, and 3 for Default Methodology Mechanics of Options 1, 2, and 3 for Default Methodology Possible direction on preference by WMS…. Possible direction on preference by WMS…. Future Items for MCWG Future Items for MCWG Next MCWG Meeting Next MCWG Meeting

Update on motions approved by WMS at July Meeting (1) Review options for shared short-pay fund (Participants and ERCOT Inc) Review options for shared short-pay fund (Participants and ERCOT Inc) Expanded loss mutualization for entire market AND accelerated DAM Expanded loss mutualization for entire market AND accelerated DAM Work towards PRR’s to provide to WMS for review Work towards PRR’s to provide to WMS for review

Update on motions approved by WMS at July Meeting (2) August 18 th MCWG Conference Call August 18 th MCWG Conference Call August 28 th MCWG Face-to-face Meeting (plus Webex) August 28 th MCWG Face-to-face Meeting (plus Webex) September 2nd MCWG Conference Call September 2nd MCWG Conference Call

MCWG August Meetings Focus, loss methodology Focus, loss methodology Options Identified for Losses Options Identified for Losses Three options identified Three options identified

Option 2 –Default Methodology Option 2: 180 days later, ERCOT uplifts default amounts using an allocation based on the absolute value of payments and charges where a participant’s allocated portion relative to the corresponding total activity is equal to the absolute value of: 1. The payment for Energy Offers cleared in the DAM at the Settlement Point; plus 2. The charge for Energy Bids cleared in the DAM at the Settlement Point; plus 3. The payment or charge for congestion for its Self-Schedules at the Settlement Point; plus 4. The Real Time Energy Imbalance payment or charge at the Settlement Point less amounts paid to RMR Resources; plus 5. The payment for DC Tie imports at the Settlement Point; plus 6. The Base Point Deviation Charge at the Settlement Point; plus 7. The payments and charges for CRR ownership – Real Time Obligations, Day Ahead Obligations and Obligations with Refunds, Day Ahead Options and Options with Refunds, Real Time Options and Options with Refunds; plus 8. The payment for Flow Gates Rights

Assumptions –Option 2 a. Consider the absolute value of payments and charges at all Settlement Points – Resource Nodes, Load Zones and Hubs b. When payment or charge not available for CRRAH or QSE – assume zero value c. Exclude the following RMR compensation RMR compensation Emergency – BLTR DCTIE Emergency – BLTR DCTIE Oklaunion Oklaunion Capacity payments and Voltage Support Capacity payments and Voltage Support

Participant Activity Ratio Share – Option 2 ( | DAESAMT | p + | DAEPAMT | p + | DAMWAMT | p + | RTCCAMT | p + ( | RTEIAMT | p – | RTEIAMT | p, rmr ) + | RTDCIMPAMT | p + | BPDAMT | p + | RTOBLAMT | source p + | DAOBLAMT | source p + | DAOBLRAMT | source p + | DAOPTAMT | source p + | DAOPTRAMT | source p + | RTOPTAMT | source p + | RTOPTRAMT | source p ) + | DAFGRAMT | ( | DAESAMT | p + | DAEPAMT | p + | DAMWAMT | p + | RTCCAMT | p + ( | RTEIAMT | p – | RTEIAMT | p, rmr ) + | RTDCIMPAMT | p + | BPDAMT | p + | RTOBLAMT | source p + | DAOBLAMT | source p + | DAOBLRAMT | source p + | DAOPTAMT | source p + | DAOPTRAMT | source p + | RTOPTAMT | source p + | RTOPTRAMT | source p ) + | DAFGRAMT | ( ( | DAESAMT | p + | DAEPAMT | p + | DAMWAMT | p + | RTCCAMT | p + ( | RTEIAMT | p – | RTEIAMT | p, rmr ) + | RTDCIMPAMT | p + | BPDAMT | p + | RTOBLAMT | source p + | DAOBLAMT | source p + | DAOBLRAMT | source p + | DAOPTAMT | source p + | DAOPTRAMT | source p + | RTOPTAMT | source p + | RTOPTRAMT | source p ) + | DAFGRAMT | ( ( | DAESAMT | p + | DAEPAMT | p + | DAMWAMT | p + | RTCCAMT | p + ( | RTEIAMT | p – | RTEIAMT | p, rmr ) + | RTDCIMPAMT | p + | BPDAMT | p + | RTOBLAMT | source p + | DAOBLAMT | source p + | DAOBLRAMT | source p + | DAOPTAMT | source p + | DAOPTRAMT | source p + | RTOPTAMT | source p + | RTOPTRAMT | source p ) + | DAFGRAMT |

Option 3 –Default Methodology Option 3: 180 days later, ERCOT uplifts default amounts using an allocation based on MW where a participant’s allocated portion relative to the corresponding total activity is equal to : Option 3: 180 days later, ERCOT uplifts default amounts using an allocation based on MW where a participant’s allocated portion relative to the corresponding total activity is equal to : The amount of its Energy Offers cleared in the DAM at the Settlement Point; plus The amount of its Energy Offers cleared in the DAM at the Settlement Point; plus The amount of its Energy Bids cleared in the DAM at the Settlement Point; plus The amount of its Energy Bids cleared in the DAM at the Settlement Point; plus The amount of its Energy Trades at the Settlement Point where the QSE is the seller; plus The amount of its Energy Trades at the Settlement Point where the QSE is the seller; plus The amount of its Energy Trades at the Settlement Point where the QSE is the buyer; plus The amount of its Energy Trades at the Settlement Point where the QSE is the buyer; plus The amount of its Self-Scheduled quantity at the source and sink Settlement Points; plus The amount of its Self-Scheduled quantity at the source and sink Settlement Points; plus The aggregated generation of its Generators less RMR volumes (multiplied times 4) at the Settlement Point; plus The aggregated generation of its Generators less RMR volumes (multiplied times 4) at the Settlement Point; plus The aggregated Load (multiplied times 4) at the Settlement Point; plus The aggregated Load (multiplied times 4) at the Settlement Point; plus The amount of its DC Tie imports; plus The amount of its DC Tie imports; plus CRR ownership at the source Settlement Point – Real Time Obligations, Day Ahead Obligations and Obligations with Refunds, Day Ahead Options and Options with Refunds, Real Time Options and Options with Refunds; plus CRR ownership at the source Settlement Point – Real Time Obligations, Day Ahead Obligations and Obligations with Refunds, Day Ahead Options and Options with Refunds, Real Time Options and Options with Refunds; plus The total ownership of FGRs. The total ownership of FGRs.

Assumptions Option 3 a. Count quantities at all Settlement Points – Resource Nodes, Load Zones and Hubs b. All quantities at gross – no netting c. When data not available for CRRAH or QSE at a settlement point – assume zero value d. Quantities in MWs e. CRRs counted at Source Settlement Point f. Exclude the following RMR generation volumes RMR generation volumes Emergency – BLTR DCTIE Emergency – BLTR DCTIE Oklaunion Oklaunion

Participant Activity Ratio Share – Option 3 (DAESp + DAEPp + RTQQESp + RTQQEPp + SSSKp + SSSRp + (DAESp + DAEPp + RTQQESp + RTQQEPp + SSSKp + SSSRp + (RTMG1p *4) + (RTAMLp * 4) + RTDCIMPp + RTOBLsource p + DAOBLsource p + DAOBLRsource p + DAOPTsource p + (RTMG1p *4) + (RTAMLp * 4) + RTDCIMPp + RTOBLsource p + DAOBLsource p + DAOBLRsource p + DAOPTsource p + DAOPTRsource p + RTOPTsource p + RTOPTRsource p) + (DAFGR) DAOPTRsource p + RTOPTsource p + RTOPTRsource p) + (DAFGR) ( (DAESp + DAEPp + RTQQESp + RTQQEPp + SSSKp + SSSRp + (RTMG1p *4) + (RTAMLp * 4) + RTDCIMPp RTOBLsource p + DAOBLsource p + DAOBLRsource p + DAOPTsource p + DAOPTRsource p + RTOPTsource p + RTOPTRsource p) + (DAFGR)) ( (DAESp + DAEPp + RTQQESp + RTQQEPp + SSSKp + SSSRp + (RTMG1p *4) + (RTAMLp * 4) + RTDCIMPp RTOBLsource p + DAOBLsource p + DAOBLRsource p + DAOPTsource p + DAOPTRsource p + RTOPTsource p + RTOPTRsource p) + (DAFGR))

Option 1 (Shams to Present) Separate presentation to be provided by Shams Separate presentation to be provided by Shams

Default Methodology Summary Does WMS have a preference for either Option 1, 2 or 3? Does WMS have a preference for either Option 1, 2 or 3? Once Default methodology is completed, then MCWG will begin working on the other part of Motion 2 (further shortening of DAM) as well as Motion 1 (Short-pay fund) Once Default methodology is completed, then MCWG will begin working on the other part of Motion 2 (further shortening of DAM) as well as Motion 1 (Short-pay fund)

Future Items for MCWG Direction of invoice timing change Direction of invoice timing change Perform bottom up review of existing creditworthiness standards (after CCRO Best Practices efforts) Perform bottom up review of existing creditworthiness standards (after CCRO Best Practices efforts) Reduction of settlement cycle due to PRR 568 (7days) Reduction of settlement cycle due to PRR 568 (7days) Further reductions in settlement cycles Further reductions in settlement cycles This includes looking at the potential to reduce the settlement cycle 30% with improved metering This includes looking at the potential to reduce the settlement cycle 30% with improved metering

Next Meeting ~MCWG Thursday September 24, :30 AM -11:30 CST (phone –Do we need in person/ Webex/longer?) Thursday September 24, :30 AM -11:30 CST (phone –Do we need in person/ Webex/longer?) Topics Topics Complete recommendation to WMS on Options 1,2 or 3 for default methodology (if needed) Complete recommendation to WMS on Options 1,2 or 3 for default methodology (if needed) Then second, Further acceleration of DAM (Completes Motion 2 from WMS) Then second, Further acceleration of DAM (Completes Motion 2 from WMS) Third, Short-pay Fund (Motion 1) Third, Short-pay Fund (Motion 1) Hopefully for the October WMS meeting, work on both WMS motions 1 and 2 will be complete. Hopefully for the October WMS meeting, work on both WMS motions 1 and 2 will be complete.