Www.OncologyEducation.com ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates TAS102 and BSC vs. Placebo and BSC Reviewer: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Paz-Ares LG et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract CRA7510.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “ VELOUR” Study Author: J Tabernero et al Reviewed by: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October.
Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib (E) Alone or in Combination with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel (CP) in Never or Light Former Smokers with Advanced Lung.
Randomized Phase II trial of erlotinib (E) alone or in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) in never or light former smokers with advanced lung.
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Abiraterone acetate (AA) plus low dose prednisone (P) improves overall survival in patients with metastatic CRPCa who have progressed.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Long term results.
Clinicaloptions.com/oncology Expert Insight Into the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer N016966: Efficacy Results  PFS significantly.
Efficacy results from the ToGA trial: a phase III study of trastuzumab added to standard chemotherapy in first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor.
ESMO 2011 Lung Cancer AVAPERL Study Authors: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: September 28 th, 2011.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Results of the X-PECT Study: A phase III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of perifosine plus capecitabine (P-CAP) vs. placebo plus capecitabine.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Cetuximab + Cisplatin in Estrogen Receptor-Negative, Progesterone Receptor-Negative, HER2-Negative (Triple-Negative) Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results.
Impact of age and comorbidities on treatment effect, tolerance and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated on CALGB
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
O’Shaughnessy J et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 1007.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
Gemcitabine + Cisplatin +/- Bevacizumab as 1st-line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC: AVAiL Study Manegold PASCO 25:#7514, 2007/Ann.
A Phase III Study (EMBRACE) of Eribulin Mesylate versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Patients with Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
XELOX vs. FOLFOX4: survival and response results from XELOX-1 / NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line treatment for patients with metastatic.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of PD , a Cyclin ‐ Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Letrozole vs Letrozole Alone.
Kang Y et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA4007.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
ESMO 2011 Breast Cancer BOLERO-2 Authors: CARE Faculty (Drs. Anil Joy and Sunil Verma) Date posted: October 12, 2011.
A Multicentre Phase II Study of Cisplatin (C), Gemcitabine (G), and Bevacizumab (B) as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic.
Impact of Bevacizumab (Bev) on Efficacy of Second-Line Chemotherapy (CT) for Triple- Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis of RIBBON-2 Brufsky A et al. Proc.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic castration- resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from a phase II randomized discontinuation.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
Second Interim Analysis of a Phase 3 Study of Idelalisib Plus Rituximab (R) for Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Efficacy Analysis in Patient.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
FINAL RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF PERIFOSINE IN COMBINATION WITH CAPECITABINE (P-CAP) VS. PLACEBO PLUS CAPECITABINE (CAP) IN PATIENTS WITH.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by CapeOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV.
Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial of Decitabine versus Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed.
ASCO 2009 BEVACIZUMAB IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: An Update of the CALGB and AVOREN Trials Reviewed by: Dr. Daniel.
Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation (PACCE) Update Authors: Hecht et al at ASCO GI 2008 Date posted: April
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
North Central Cancer Treatment Group Randomized Phase II Trial of Panitumumab, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine (PGE) versus Erlotinib-Gemcitabine (GE) in Patients.
ESMO 2011 Lung Cancer Vantage 014 Study Authors: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: September 28 th, 2011.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “VELOUR” Study
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Improves Survival in Patients With Metastatic CRC and Mild Renal/Hepatic Impairment: Subgroup Analysis of RECOURSE CCO.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Regorafenib TAS-102 or TAS-102 Regorafenib
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007
UK ABC-02 trial: Gemcitabine with or without cisplatin in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (ABC): Results of a multicenter,
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: TAS 102
R Hermann6, P Sportelli7, L Gardner7 and J Bendell8
Presentation transcript:

ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates TAS102 and BSC vs. Placebo and BSC Reviewer: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October 2011

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II study of TAS-102 plus best supportive care (BSC) versus Placebo plus BSC in patients with chemotherapy- refractory metastatic colorectal cancer ( study) Presenter: Y. Kuboki (The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan)

Background TAS-102 is a new oral anticancer agent that combines trifluorothymidine and thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor at a molar ratio of 1:0.5 –trifluorothymidine inhibits thymidylate synthase and DNA synthesis –thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor prevents the degradation of trifluorothymidine

R n=112 TAS-102+BSC 70mg/m 2 b.i.d q4wks (d 1-5, 8-12) n=57 Placebo + BSC Patient Population 2 or more prior regimens Refractory/Intolerant of: fluoropyrimidine irinotecan oxaliplatin ECOG PS 0-2 TAS-102+BSC vs P+BSC N= 169 Primary Outcome: Overall Survival 2:1

Prior Chemotherapy TAS-102 (N=112) Placebo (N = 57) p-value % # of Chemotherapy Regimens 2 ≥ N.S. Oxaliplatin Base100.0 Irinotecan Base100.0 Bevacizumab N.S. Anti-EGFR N.S.

RESULTS TAS102Placebo HR p-value Response Rate (%) 1%0% Disease Control Rate (%) 43.8%10.5% P< PFS (median, mos) 2 mos1 mos HR=0.41 P< OS (median, mos) 9 mos6.6 mos HR=0.56 P=0.0011

Major Adverse Events (Grade 3/4) TAS-102 (N=112) Placebo (N = 57) Grade 3/4 % Hematological Neutropenia Leukopenia Anemia Lymphopenia Thrombopenia Non-Hematological Fatigue Diarrhea Nausea Anorexia Febrile neutropenia Vomiting There were no treatment related deaths

Post-Treatment TAS-102 (N=112) Placebo (N = 57) p-value N%N% Post-Treatment N.S. # of Chemotherapy Regimens N.S. Fluoropyrimidine base N.S. Oxaliplatin Base N.S. Irinotecan Base P=0.012 Bevacizumab N.S. Anti-EGFR N.S.

STUDY COMMENTARY Interesting subset analysis based on the KRAS status of the patients’ tumours: KRAS WT OS HR = 0.70 KRAS MUT OS HR = 0.44 However: –? Biologic rationale –Needs to be validated in future trials Given that this study was done solely in Japan – would be good to have clinical data from a broader patient population

BOTTOM LINE FOR MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS We are seeing more treatment refractory patients like the patients in this trial that are fit for further therapy – especially patients with KRAS Mutant tumours This randomized phase II trial of this novel agent demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant improvement in OS in this group of patients However a larger, confirmatory phase III trial is needed before it could be considered a standard of care