Teacher Effectiveness: All of Your Questions Answered Matt Gill, Tammy Meyer, Robin Curtis 10/15/2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Advertisements

BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 13, 2015.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Differentiated Supervision
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.
Physical Education SLOs: A Clarification of the State Education Department’s 8 Component SLO Template: Grades K-5 Presented By: Laura Shaw – Dows Lane.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
KEEP And Student Growth Measures for Building Leaders Lawrence School District, May 14, 2014 Bill Bagshaw, Assistant Director, TLA, KSDE Kayeri Akweks,
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Folder for Training South Dakota Student Learning Objectives Enter Your Name Here!
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
SLOs for CTE: All of Your Questions Answered Matt Gill & Tammy Meyer.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
EVALUATIONS, STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES & KEEP AUG 25, 2014 BILL BAGSHAW, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR.
Folder for Training We will use computers after lunch. It’s OK if you don’t have a computer. One computer for 2-3 people is fine. Please launch an internet.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES Condensed from ODE Teacher Training.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
FEH BOCES Student Learning Objectives 3012-c.
Student Learning Objective Planning and Implementation.
South Dakota Student Learning Objectives Enter Your Name Here!
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
South Dakota’s Teacher Effectiveness Model February 20, 2015 Presented by Dr. Sally Crowser and John Swanson, TIE.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
Summary Rating Responses November 13, 2013 Adobe Connect Webinar Bill Bagshaw, Kayeri Akweks - KSDE.
South Dakota Student Learning Objectives Dianna Tyler.
SLG Goals: Reflecting on the First Attempt Oregon Collaboration Grant Statewide Grantee Meeting November 21, 2013.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
No Child Left Behind Waivers: Promising Ideas from Second Round Applications By Jeremy Ayers and Isabel Owen with Glenda Partee and Theodora Chang.
Educator Effectiveness System Overview Training
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Student Learning Objectives. An SLO is a measurable, long-term, academic goal informed by available data that a teacher or teacher team sets at the beginning.
Identifying and Using Multiple Measures Bill Bagshaw.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Five Required Elements
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Effectiveness: All of Your Questions Answered Matt Gill, Tammy Meyer, Robin Curtis 10/15/2015

Teacher Effectiveness Overview

Background Principle 3 of the ESEA Waiver to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Commission on Teaching and Learning (CTL) created to design the Teacher and Principal Educator effectiveness models – Includes teachers, principals, higher ed, SD DOE, SDEA, EDEC

TIMELINE REVIEW SY : Teacher Effectiveness Learning Year SY: : Teacher Effectiveness Full Implementation – Includes SLO and Danielson-aligned Professional Practice Rating Fall 2016: Submission of district-level aggregate Teacher Effectiveness data from SY via PRF – Data will NOT be reported individually

The Parts Professional Practice Rating – South Dakota Framework for Teaching Student Growth Rating – Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Summative Teacher Effectiveness Rating – Combination of the Professional Practice and Student Growth Ratings

Summative Rating Matrix Professional Oversight: Is the rating fair and accurate based on the evidence and data shared by the teacher Determining Teacher Effectiveness Using multiple measures of professional practice and student learning Domain 1Domain 2Domain 3Domain 4 Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities Classroom Observations and Evidence of Effective Practice Components from Each of the 4 Domains At Least 8 Components Chosen Based on District or School Priorities South Dakota Framework for Teaching Professional Practice Rating Below ExpectationsMeets ExpectationsExceeds Expectations Differentiated Performance Categories Student Growth SLOs Growth Rating SLOs State Assessments (as one measure if available) District Assessments Evaluator-Approved Assessments

Professional Practice Rating Student Growth Rating Summative Evaluation Rating

Summative Scoring Matrix Summative Teacher Effectiveness Rating Categories Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Judgment Rating Subject to Review Judgment Rating Subject to Review ✪

Misconceptions Use of the state assessment – The state assessment IS NOT the measure of the SLO in tested grades and subjects – Used to prioritize the learning content and develop SLO baseline Used as a “gotcha” – FALSE – This model is all about growth for all and focused conversations Use of Teacher Effectiveness Ratings – The SD DOE only reports state-level aggregate data Length of SLO – SLO should last the duration of the class (semester, year) and cover the most important learning

The Aspiration: Improve Instruction and Student Learning 1. Encourage meaningful, in-depth dialogue focused on improving instruction 2. Provide regular, timely, useful feedback that guides professional growth 3. Support a culture in which data drives instructional decisions 4. Establish clear expectations for teacher performance 5. Use multiple measures to meaningfully determine and differentiate teacher performance 6. Provide a fair, flexible, research-based model that informs personnel decisions.

Lesson’s Learned

Differentiated Goal **Recommended, not Required** 1. Disaggregate your pre-assessment data and develop differentiated individual or group goals. 2. Write you SLO so that it includes 100% of your students. 100% of my students will reach their individual teacher-created growth goal.

Why Differentiated SLOs? – All students CAN show growth. – All students CAN and SHOULD be included in instruction. – Differentiated SLOs become a true GROWTH goal, set by the teacher who best understands what is realistic and rigorous for the children in his/her classroom. – Doesn’t an SLO like “90% of students will score an 85% or higher on the math assessment” sound a lot like AMOs? NCLB?

Handbooks Teacher Effectiveness – Student Learning Objective (SLO) – Principal Effectiveness –

Comparison of State Requirements to Recommended Model ents/TEReqReco.pdf ents/TEReqReco.pdf

Tammy – What you Learned

Robin – what you learned

The State – what you learned

SDEA Resources SLO Attainment Calculator Professional Development Opportunities SLO Repository -

SD DOE Website

State-Paid Professional Development ents/doepdopts1.pdf ents/doepdopts1.pdf

Teachscape - Updates

Dashboard

Evaluation Plans Teacher Evaluation Plan Non-Evaluation Year Plan (SLO-Only Plan) School Specialist Plans and Rubrics Principal Evaluation Plan (coming soon)

Contact Information

Matt Gill Tammy Meyer Robin Curtis