OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
World’s Largest Educational Community
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Presented by: Kelly Coxe & Mary Greene Thomasson.
Campus Improvement Plans
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Section 2: Historical Perspective of Policy 2320 Dr. Donna Davis Deputy Director, OEPA.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
District Accreditation as a Quality System Presented by Mary Beth Huber On behalf of the Calcasieu Parish SACS CASI Steering Committee.
Preparing for an oepa audit
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL TRAINING  A group intended to represent the broad school community and those persons closest to the students who will.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
NEASCNEASC Standards Committees Kick-off Today’s Topic: Overview of the NEASC Game Plan and instructions for today’s work.
Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.
SACS CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools/ Council on Accreditation and School Improvement
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Monitoring Definitions: Derived from Latin monere “to advise” Ineffective PracticeEffective Practice
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.
WVDE System of Support Michele Blatt Office of School Improvement.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
School Name Visiting Team Exit Report Month, days, year Insert School’s logo or photo of school building.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Berkeley County Schools
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
2009 Shelby County Schools District Accreditation Thompson High School.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Board Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Principals & Self Study Coordinators. School Improvement Concepts Collaboration Data –Collect –Analyze –Use!!! Questions What? So What? Now What?
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
World’s Largest Educational Community
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Presentation transcript:

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office of Education Performance Audits

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy Review

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Characteristics of the New Policy There are six major characteristics of the new policy: (1) improving student performance, (2) clearly communicating the level of school quality, (3) focusing on all schools, (4) purpose – quality and self-improvement, (5) emphasizing local control and accountability, and (6) differentiating supports, consequences, and rewards.

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Section 6: School Accreditation

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Accreditation System Verifying A-F. Assessing and reporting Policy 2322, adherence to policy and Code, reporting best practices, efficiencies, and resource, facility, and capacity building needs. Identifying and reporting classroom conditions and non-compliances.

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Accreditation System System of self-study Method for promoting continuous improvement Basis for determining rewards, supports, technical assistance, and intervention

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Measures and Levels A-F system (Section 5 of Policy 2320) Student outcomes are the primary measures of school effectiveness. School performance rating – Calculated by the WVDE; – Verified by the OEPA through accreditation process; – Approved by the WVBE; and – Communicated to schools, school systems, and communities.

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Operating Principles Focus on Student Performance Transparency and Clarity Vehicle for Local Decision-Making

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Review Processes Annual and cyclical reviews are designed to: 1.verify the school’s annual performance grade; 2.provide feedback for local school improvement efforts; 3.verify compliance with core policy and Code; 4.document best practices; and 5.identify efficiencies, resource, facility, and capacity building needs.

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Annual Reviews School Monitoring Report as self-assessment – School quality defined in Policy 2322 – Compliance with policy and Code – Best practices – School resource and capacity building needs School Monitoring Report – Developed with staff input – Reviewed by Faculty Senate and LSIC – Approved by principal and superintendent – Submitted to the OEPA

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Cyclical Reviews On-site review At least every 4 years Assures all schools are accountable – common set of high quality standards – core policy and Code compliance – continuous improvement External Team managed by OEPA

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Cyclical Reviews Team responsibilities: – Determine accuracy of School Monitoring Report. – Review School Strategic Plan. – Examine school practices (Policy 2322) and provide feedback on strengths and needs. – Document best practices. – Identify resource, facility, efficiency, and capacity building needs impeding improvement.

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Section 9: Continuous Improvement and Strategic Planning

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Continuous Improvement Facilitated – Principal Involves – teachers – staff – stakeholders in decision-making

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Continuous Improvement Data Sources school system RESA WVDE other entities Data Use determining root causes of student deficits determine changes needed in practice.

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Continuous Improvement 1.Designated team or committee 2.Process of using data and information 3.On-going professional development and research

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Continuous Improvement Guiding Improvement Efforts: School Monitoring Report Summary of employee evaluation data

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Strategic Planning Development Process School electronic strategic improvement plan School’s self-study of student performance School’s self-study of school and classroom learning conditions

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Strategic Planning Development Process – The plan is developed under the direction of the principal with collective involvement and input from the staff and the LSIC. – The plan must includes the following: Core beliefs Mission Goals Measurement evidence Action steps Professional development needs

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Strategic Planning Development Process – The action steps are based on examination of best practices and innovative approaches to improve student performance and address student needs. – All members of the school staff are responsible for implementing the plan. – The principal is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the plan. – The plan is updated and revised as data and information dictate based on the tenets of continuous improvement. – Annual updates to the plan must consider the OEPA School Monitoring Report when the report identifies deficits in quality or compliance.

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Onsite Review Process

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Onsite Review Process Overall Intent Review Purposes 80/20 Principle

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Onsite Review Process SECTION 1 – Examination of High Quality Standards – Verifying Evidence of High Quality Standards – Rating the High Quality Standards – Function Statements

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Onsite Review Process Section 2 – Resource Needs – Facility Needs – Capacity Building Needs Section 3 – Best Practices

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Onsite Review Process Section 4 – Policy Compliance – Code Compliance Section 5 – Principal’s Verification – Superintendent’s Verification

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education School Onsite Review Process Rating Determination – Consensus Final Report – Recommendations – Commendations – Findings

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education LESSON PLANS

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Lesson Plans §18A-2-12 states that “Lesson plans are intended to serve as a daily guide for teachers and substitutes for the orderly presentation of the curriculum.“ Policy 2322: Standard 3 – Function C Designed – long term – short term Based On Students – Needs – Interests – Performance Levels

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Lesson Plans The OEPA does not recommend any particular Lesson Plan Format. The focus of an OEPA review is primarily on Instructional Quality. Classroom Lesson Plan review documentation: – Written lesson plans are evident for classroom instruction (could include weekly lessons or extended project-based learning). – Lesson plans focus on delivery of instructional objectives. – The instructional intent of lesson plans is clear and discernible. – Lesson plans adequately cover the instructional time allotted for the class or subject.

OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Questions