Royal Ministry of Education and Research UNESCO/OECD WORK ON GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY PROVISION ------------------ Jan S. Levy, Norwegian Ministry of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JOINT DEGREES The Experience of the ENIC and NARIC Networks Dr. E. Stephen Hunt Manager, USNEI and President, ENIC Network ECA Team II Conference Joint.
Advertisements

BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)
1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
Stamenka Uvalic-Trumbic (UNESCO Division of Higher Education)
New Trends and New Providers in Higher Education Council of Europe Conference on Public Responsibility for Higher Education and Research September.
An Overview of Quality Assurance in the EHEA by Prof. Andreas G. Orphanides President of EURASHE, Rector of European University Cyprus, and Ex-President.
, Implementation of the Action Plan and New Challenges Stamenka Uvalic-Trumbic (UNESCO) 2 nd Global Forum on International Quality Assurance, Accreditation.
Lauritz B. Holm-Nielsen, Rektor A A R H U S U N I V E R S I T E T Globalisering og de Videregående Uddannelser Rotary Århus 22. november 2005.
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
© AUCC Charting the Course: Toward a Plan of Action for National Associations in Quality Cross-Border Higher Education Presentation by Karen McBride Vice-President,
TNE: changing landscapes in provision and regulation Carolyn Campbell Head of International Affairs
The Third UNESCO Global Forum on International Quality Assurance and Recognition Parallel Workshop I: Guidelines and capacity building Dar es Salaam September.
Internationalisation, Globalisation and the Knowledge Economy
Enhancing the quality of distance learning at Western Balkan higher education institutions Danijela Milošević University of Kragujevac, Faculty of technical.
Royal Ministry of Education and Research UNESCO/OECD WORK ON GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY PROVISION Jan S. Levy, Norwegian Ministry of Education.
SQA Standards Colloquium 28 February 2013 – Can Qualification Frameworks Provide a Useful Basis for Comparing Qualifications? Aileen Ponton, CEO,SCQF Partnership.
Challenges of Higher Education in Cyprus Efstathios Michael Senior Education Officer Department of Higher and Tertiary Education Ministry of education.
1 Quality Assurance in Higher Education – its Global Future Richard Lewis OECD/France International Conference 8 – 9 December 2008 Conservatoire National.
UNESCO/OECD Guidelines on transborder higher education Brussels October Counsellor Jan S. Levy.
Unit 2 Regulations and legal framework of ECTS introduction in Russian Federation.
Assuring the quality of distance education at higher education institutions at Western Balkan Radojka Krneta University of Kragujevac, Technical Faculty.
Quality Assurance, Harmonisation and Capacity Building – a German- Southeast Asian Case Study ASEM Conference Quality Assurance and Recognition in Higher.
UNESCO/OECD Guidelines on Quality Provision in Cross-Border Higher Education IAU Global Meeting and International Conference Sharing Quality Higher Education.
International cooperation in recognition and quality assurance What can be learned from higher education ? By Michaela Martin.
1 The UNESCO/OECD Guidelines on Quality Provision in Cross-Border Higher Education: the reasons of their development and their main consequences Alexandria.
A Memorandum on Lifelong Learning Why have a memorandum? Lisbon and Feira Defining Lifelong Learning Making LLL a guiding principle Member State responsibility.
Developing Strategies to support staff in the delivery of blended / online learning Judith Smith, Department of eLearning 21 April 2005.
Enhancing the quality of distance learning at Western Balkan higher education institutions Maja Bozovic University of Kragujevac, Faculty of technical.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Lauritz B. Holm-Nielsen, Rektor A A R H U S U N I V E R S I T E T NORDEN i VERDEN -- VERDEN i NORDEN Nordisk Ministerråd Odense 21. november 2005.
Lauritz B. Holm-Nielsen, Rector EUA, March , Lisbon, Portugal U N I V E R S I T Y O F A A R H U S, D e n m a r k European higher education in.
Centre for Quality Assessment in Higher Education: brief overview Aurelija Valeikienė, Deputy Director.
1 Quality Assurance for Transnational Higher Education: Lessons Learned from the UK’s QAA and Australia’s TEQSA Dr. Linda Chiang Professor Department of.
Promoting partnerships in quality assurance: the cross-border challenge World Bank Learning Seminar Quality Assurance in Tertiary Education (Sevres
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
ECVET AIMS AND KEY DOCUMENTS DARKO MALI (CPI, LJUBLJANA) BLED, 17 SEPTEMBER 2013.
Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.
“The Regulatory Challenge” By Dr. Bassel Hindawi Director General of The Insurance Commission of Jordan at The 42 nd Annual Seminar of the International.
Workshop 4: Recognition of non-formal and informal learning Espoo Lauri Savisaari.
, Opening Address UNESCO Higher Education Division Stamenka Uvalic-Trumbic UNESCO-OECD guidelines on Quality Provision in Cross- border Higher Education.
THE BOLOGNA PROCESS AND RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS Recognition as a key part of higher education policy in Europe.
SECOND GLOBAL FORUM Widening Access to Quality Higher Education Juan Ramón de la Fuente Rector National Autonomous University of Mexico Paris, June 28,
Royal Ministry of Education and Research UNESCO/OECD WORK ON GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY PROVISION Jan S. Levy, Norwegian Ministry of Education.
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
1 UNESCO/OECD Guidelines on “Quality Provision in Cross-Border Higher Education” Second Drafting Meeting Tokyo October 2004 Bernard Hugonnier OECD.
UNESCO: Paris: June 2004 Second Global Forum on International Quality Assurance, Accreditation and the Recognition of Qualifications Widening Access.
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
Systemic Reform and Cross border education in APEC economies Presented to the 2nd APEC Symposium on Education Reform Xi’an, China, January 15-17, 2008.
Future needs for capacity building and recommendations to the OIE Dr Sarah Kahn Consultant to the OIE
STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONALISATION IN B&H HIGHER EDUCATION / STINT FMON’s competencies, organization, role in the project, expectations from the project.
Małgorzata Lublińska Ministry of Regional Development in Poland.
UNESCO-OECD Guidelines on Quality Provision in Cross-Border Higher Education Dr. Antony Stella, Adviser National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC)
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Analysis of current state in internationalization from the accreditation aspect of HEIs Maja.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Quality assurance in Europe The Bologna declaration.
Recognition of Distance Learning Programmes
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
University Community and EFA
UNESCO Higher Education Division Stamenka Uvalic-Trumbic
Business sector engagement and Consumer Awareness October 3rd, 2017
Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARI Baku, 2017
Stamenka Uvalic-Trumbic (UNESCO Division of Higher Education)
1.
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
Yerevan Communiqué: with HE strategy to shape the future society we want Gayane Harutyunyan 19 June 2015, Yerevan Bologna Secretariat.
Cooperation between the Asia-Pacific and the Lisbon Recognition Convention regions re recognition of TNQ Asia-Pacific Forum in Quality and Recognition.
Education International UNESCO, Paris 5 April 2005
Strategy of the Internationalisation of Slovenian Higher Education
Presentation transcript:

Royal Ministry of Education and Research UNESCO/OECD WORK ON GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY PROVISION Jan S. Levy, Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research Chair of UNESCO/OECD Guidelines group

UFD Project overview Common project UNESCO-OECD With relevance both for exporting and importing countries Last year’s OECD forum on trade Consumer protection  Learner protection Concrete goals: – Guidelines for quality provision – Information tools to help learners, institutions and authorities

UFD Major drivers More providers – New providers Reduced transparency – increasing need for guidance General globalisation – GATS Increased demand from learners and societies Need for an educational response

UFD There is a need for an educational response What should we achieve? – Learners need to be protected from the risks of misinformation, low-quality provision and qualifications of limited validity – Qualifications should be readable and transparent in order to increase their international validity and portability – Qualifications should be recognised internationally with as few difficulties as possible – National quality assurance and accreditation agencies need to intensify their international cooperation in order to increase their mutual understanding

UFD The educational response (2) Who should take responsibility of the response? – Organisations with high degree of legitimacy in the world of education – Global organisations, encompassing governments and stakeholders – UNESCO and OECD joining forces – Soft laws – Legal instruments

UFD The educational response (3) How could it be implemented? – Developing guidelines on quality provision in higher education Governments Higher education institutions Quality assurance and accreditation agencies Student bodies Information centres of recognition Professional bodies – Development of reliable information tools for learners/students/institutions – Global Database on nationally approved providers/provision

UFD Ongoing work Working group open to all OECD/UNESCO members and stakeholders Three drafting sessions – 5 – 6 April 2004 in Paris – 14 – 15 October 2004 in Tokyo – 17 – 18 January in Paris Expert groups

UFD Some considerations How to make the Guidelines credible both in exporting and importing countries The guidelines should contribute to sustainable competence building in developing countries The guidelines must promote the full inclusion of stakeholders How to identify and regulate the market for agents/ brokers How could we assure that quality is maintained were degrees provided nationally also is provided cross- border? How to make the guidelines visible and give relevant advice to those in need for information

UFD Over-ambitious…Or? Bold steps – or is it just as we see it? Do we apply different quality control standards to everyday consuming than to education? Learners/students need information Even Institutions/countries may lack information What about a woolmark?

UFD Thank you

UFD Types of cross-border education activities TypeMain formsExamplesSize 1. People Students/traineesStudent mobility-Full study abroad for a foreign degree or qualification - Part of academic partnership for home degree or joint degree -Exchange programmes Probably the largest share of cross border education Professors/trainersAcademic /trainer mobility- For professional development - As part of an academic partnership - Employment in foreign university - To teach in a branch institution abroad An old tradition in the education sector, which should grow given the emphasis on mobility of professionals and internationalisation of education more generally 2. Programmes Educational programmes Academic partnerships E-learning - Joint course or a programme with a foreign institution - E-learning programmes - Selling/franchising a course to a foreign institution Academic partnerships represent the largest share of these activities. E-learning and franchising are small but rapidly growing 3. Institutions/ providers Foreign campuses Foreign investments - Opening of a foreign campus - Buying (part of) a foreign educational institution - Creation of an educational provider abroad A trend increasing very quickly form a low starting point