Saffman-Taylor Instability of Hele-Shaw Cell

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
One-Dimensional Scattering of Waves 2006 Quantum MechanicsProf. Y. F. Chen One-Dimensional Scattering of Waves.
Advertisements

Flat Flow by Kamila Součková 11. Task Fill a thin gap between two large transparent horizontal parallel plates with a liquid and make a little hole in.
Report 5 Grid. Problem # 8 Grid A plastic grid covers the open end of a cylindrical vessel containing water. The grid is covered and the vessel is turned.
Navier-Stokes Equation
Ali Zafarani Subsurface Processes Group University of California, Irvine.
Not quite complete! Maxwell’s Equations We now have four formulas that describe how to get electric and magnetic fields from charges and currents Gauss’s.
Influence of pore-scale disorder on viscous fingering during drainage. Renaud Toussaint, Jean Schmittbuhl Institute of Globe Physics Strasbourg (IPGS/
The Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Jenna Bratz Rachel Bauer.
Introduction: Gravitational forces resulting from microgravity, take off and landing of spacecraft are experienced by individual cells in the living organism.
Pattern Formation in Physical Systems: From a Snowflake to an Air Bubble Student: Vishesh Verma, Stevenson High School Faculty Advisor: Professor Shuwang.
Dr. Kirti Chandra Sahu Department of Chemical Engineering IIT Hyderabad.
Equations of Continuity
This slide intentionally left blank. The Rayleigh Plateau Instability By Mike Cromer and Patrick C. Rowe.
Jordanian-German Winter Academy 2006 NATURAL CONVECTION Prepared by : FAHED ABU-DHAIM Ph.D student UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
Single and multi-phase flows through rock fractures occur in various situations, such as transport of dissolved contaminants through geological strata,
Thin Fluid Films with Surfactant Ellen Peterson*, Michael Shearer*, Rachel Levy †, Karen Daniels ‡, Dave Fallest ‡, Tom Witelski § *North Carolina State.
Injection Flows in a Heterogeneous Porous Medium Ching-Yao Chen & P.-Y. Yan Department of Mechanical Engineering National Chiao Tung University National.
Fluid mechanics 3.1 – key points
CHAPTER 8 APPROXIMATE SOLUTIONS THE INTEGRAL METHOD
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Force on Floating bodies:
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
CP502 Advanced Fluid Mechanics
Chapter 9: Differential Analysis of Fluid Flow SCHOOL OF BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS.
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
Contact Line Instability in Driven Films
Hele-Shaw Experimental Group Lucas Lamb Andrea Roeser Chen Shu.
Teaching Partial Differential Equations Using Mathematica Katarina Jegdic Assistant Professor Computer and Mathematical Sciences Department University.
Numerical Simulation on Flow Generated Resistive Wall Mode Shaoyan Cui (1,2), Xiaogang Wang (1), Yue Liu (1), Bo Yu (2) 1.State Key Laboratory of Materials.
AMS 599 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 5 James Glimm Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University Brookhaven.
The Rayleigh-Taylor Instability By: Paul Canepa and Mike Cromer Team Leftovers.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 4 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
1 ELEC 3105 Basic EM and Power Engineering Start Solutions to Poisson’s and/or Laplace’s.
To stick. All unoccupied spots, around the interface are approximately equal to the circumference of the cluster. However, calculating the circumference.
Powerpoint Slides to Accompany Micro- and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices Chapter 6 Brian J. Kirby, PhD Sibley School of.
Multiphase Field-scale Modeling: Brine Transport Ann Cook Per Per Hatlevik Jonathan Levine Brice Loose Keegan Roberts Amber Sallerson Katy Schulte Martina.
Order of Magnitude Scaling of Complex Engineering Problems Patricio F. Mendez Thomas W. Eagar May 14 th, 1999.
Unit 1: Fluid Dynamics An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Fluid dynamics Learning summary By the end of this chapter you should have learnt.
Saffman-Taylor streamer discharges
Jet With No Cross Flow RANS Simulations of Unstart Due to Mass Injection J. Fike, K. Duraisamy, J. Alonso Acknowledgments This work was supported by the.
An Accurate Mode-Selection Mechanism for Magnetic Fluids in a Hele-Shaw Cell David P. Jackson Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA USA José A. Miranda Universidade.
Note – throughout figures the boundary layer thickness is greatly exaggerated! CHAPTER 9: EXTERNAL INCOMPRESSIBLE VISCOUS FLOWS Can’t have fully developed.
Walter Schostak Center for Materials Under eXtreme Environment
What is Fluid????? A fluid may be liquid, vapour or gas. It has no permanent shape but takes up the shape of a containing vessel or channel or is shaped.
Verification of Computational Methods of Modeling Evaporative Drops By Abraham Rosales Andrew Christian Jason Ju.
Chapter 9: Natural Convection
Rayleigh-Plateau Instability Rachel and Jenna. Overview Introduction to Problem Introduction to Problem Experiment and Data Experiment and Data Theories.
FOOD ENGINEERING DESIGN AND ECONOMICS
Partial Derivatives Example: Find If solution: Partial Derivatives Example: Find If solution: gradient grad(u) = gradient.
The Rayleigh-Taylor Instability By: Paul Canepa and Mike Cromer Team Leftovers.
Two-phase hydrodynamic model for air entrainment at moving contact line Tak Shing Chan and Jacco Snoeijer Physics of Fluids Group Faculty of Science and.
Numerical Modeling of Viscoelastic Drops John Gemmer, Millersville University Tobin Isaac, Rice University Mark Sussman, Florida State University.
AMS 691 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 5 James Glimm Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University Brookhaven.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
Collapsing Bubble Project By: Qiang Chen Stacey Altrichter By: Qiang Chen Stacey Altrichter.
CP502 Advanced Fluid Mechanics Flow of Viscous Fluids and Boundary Layer Flow Lectures 3 and 4.
M. Khalili1, M. Larsson2, B. Müller1
Dynamics of Front Propagation in Narrow Channels Mohammed Abid, Jamal A. Sharif, Paul D. Ronney Department of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering University.
Computational Fluid Dynamics Lecture II Numerical Methods and Criteria for CFD Dr. Ugur GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering.
ELEC 3105 Basic EM and Power Engineering
Numerical study of the Bénard-Marangoni instability
(Photo descriptive du sujet)
INFINITESIMALLY SMALL DIFFERENTIAL CUBE IN SPACE
Topic 6 FluidFlowEquations_Introduction
Topic 5 NavierStokes Equations
Avner Friedman Mathematical Biosciences Institute
Subject Name: FLUID MECHANICS
Anthony D. Fick & Dr. Ali Borhan Governing Equations
The Second Order Adjoint Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Saffman-Taylor Instability of Hele-Shaw Cell Chen Shu, Xizhi Cao, Enkhsanaa Sommers

Introduction Our group focuses on theoretically analyzing two-flow Saffman Taylor instability in a Hele-Shaw cell with numerical methods. A Hele-Shaw cell consists with two parallel plates are spaced infinitesimally thin. Less viscous flow injected from above or below into the more vicious fluid which is sitting between plates. The boundary condition of this flow is defined by surface tension and curvature. In our case we will apply perturbation on Hele- Shaw cell and calculate expected number of fingers. We compare numerical result with the experimental result Fluid #1 Fluid #2

Derive Darcy’s law Navier-Stokes equation: 𝑢∗𝛻 𝑢=− 1 𝜌 𝛻P+ν∗ 𝛻 2 𝑢 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑡 + +𝑔 (1) 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑡 =0 (Since steady state uniform flow) 𝑔 =0 gravity term is ignored since we are dealing with 2-D system

Derive Darcy’s law 𝑢∗𝛻 𝑢=− 1 𝜌 𝛻P+ν∗ 𝛻 2 𝑢 (2) The equation reduced to: 𝑢∗𝛻 𝑢=− 1 𝜌 𝛻P+ν∗ 𝛻 2 𝑢 (2) Evaluate inertial term(IT) and viscous term(VT) 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚 : 𝑢∗𝛻 𝑢=𝑢 𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑥 +𝑣 𝜕𝑄 𝜕𝑦 +𝑤 𝜕𝑅 𝜕𝑧 ~ 𝑂 𝑈 2 𝐿 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚 : v∗ 𝛻 2 𝑢=𝑣∗ 𝜕 2 𝑢 𝜕 𝑥 2 , 𝜕 2 𝑢 𝜕 𝑦 2 , 𝜕 2 𝑢 𝜕 𝑧 2 𝜕 2 𝑢 𝜕 𝑥 2 ~𝑂 𝑈 𝐿 2 𝜕 2 𝑢 𝜕 𝑦 2 ~𝑂 𝑈 𝐿 2 𝜕 2 𝑢 𝜕 𝑧 2 ~𝑂( 𝑈 ℎ 2 h<<L we can ignore x and y axes Reynold Number= 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚 ≪1, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑.

Derive Darcy’s law Since, 𝑈 2 𝐿 𝑣∗ 𝑈 ℎ 2 = 𝑈𝐿 𝑣 ∗ ( ℎ 𝐿 ) 2 << 1 , so 𝑢∗𝛻 𝑢~0 𝑢∗𝛻 𝑢=− 1 𝜌 𝛻P+ν∗ 𝛻 2 𝑢 0= 1 𝜌 𝛻P+ν∗ 𝜕 2 𝑢 𝜕 𝑧 2 (3) 𝛻P=𝜇∗ 𝜕 2 𝑢 𝜕 𝑧 2 𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑥 =𝜇∗ 𝜕 2 𝑢 𝜕 𝑧 2 , 𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑦 =𝜇∗ 𝜕 2 𝑣 𝜕 𝑧 2 , 𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑧 =𝜇∗ 𝜕 2 𝑤 𝜕 𝑧 2 Pressure change in z direction is small enough to neglect

Derive Darcy’s law 𝑢=− 1 2𝜇 ∗𝛻P∗ 𝑧 2 + 𝑐 1 𝑧+ 𝑐 0 (4) Boundary condition: u 0 =0 u h =0 𝑢=− ℎ 2 12𝜇 𝛻P (5)

Laplace-Young BC: General form: ∆P=𝛾𝜅 In our case: Pinner Pouter R2 R1 General form: ∆P=𝛾𝜅 In our case: R2 is big enough so that Pouter can be ignored 𝑷 𝒊𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓 =𝜸𝜿 𝑷 𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒆𝒓 =𝟎 𝛾 - surface tension 𝜅 - curvature

Saffman-Taylor Instability Saffmen Taylor instability occurs when a less viscous fluid is injected into a more viscous fluid.  It can also occur driven by gravity (without injection) if the interface is horizontal separating two fluids of different densities with the heavier fluid on the top. In the rectangular configuration the system evolves until a single finger (the Saffman– Taylor finger) forms. In the radial configuration the pattern grows forming fingers by successive tip-splitting.

Exact solution to circular BC Pinner Pouter R2 R1 𝛻 2 P= r 2 𝜕 2 𝑃 𝜕 𝑟 2 +𝑟 𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑟 + 𝜕 2 𝑃 𝜕 𝜃 2 =0 𝑃=𝑐∗𝑙𝑛𝑟+𝑑 At t=0 , 𝑷 𝑹𝟏 =𝜸𝜿 𝑷 𝑹𝟐 =𝟎, 𝜅 0 = 1 𝑅 1 𝑃 0 = 𝛾 𝑅 1 1− 𝑙𝑛 𝑟 𝑅 1 𝑙𝑛 𝑅 2 𝑅 1 𝑢 0𝑟 =− ℎ 2 12𝜇 𝛻P= ℎ 2 12𝜇 𝛾 𝑅 1 𝑟 1 𝑙𝑛 𝑅 2 𝑅 1

Linear stability analysis: Perturbation: 𝑃= 𝑃 0 +𝜀 𝑃 1 (𝑟,𝜃) Pressure (R1) 𝑢= 𝑢 0 𝑟 +𝜀 𝑢 1 (𝑟,𝜃) Velocity 𝜅= 𝜅 0 +𝜀 𝜅 1 Curvature 𝑅 1 (𝜃,𝑡)= 𝑅 1 (𝑡)(1+𝜀𝜂 𝜃,𝑡 ) 𝜂 𝜃,𝑡 =𝑁(𝑡)cos(𝑚𝜃)

Linear stability analysis: 𝐵𝑦 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛: 𝜅= 𝑟 2 +2 𝑟 ′ 2 −𝑟 𝑟 ′′ ( 𝑟 2 + 𝑟′ 2 ) 3 2 R 1 (t)(1+εη θ,t 𝜅 = 1 𝑅 1 (1−𝜀𝜂−𝜀 𝜂 𝜃𝜃 ) => (𝜅= 𝜅 0 +𝜀 𝜅 1 ) O(1): 𝜅 0 = 1 𝑅 1 O(𝜀): 𝜅 1 =− 𝜂+ 𝜂 𝜃𝜃 𝑅 1

Linear stability analysis: 𝑃= 𝑃 0 +𝜀 𝑃 1 (𝑟,𝜃) (P 0 +ε P 1 ) | R 1 (1+εη) = −γκ | R 1 1+εη =−γ 1 R 1 −ε 𝜂+ 𝜂 𝜃𝜃 𝑅 1 P 1 fits in Laplace equation so that P 1 = P m cos 𝑚𝜃 𝑟 −𝑚 . ln 1+ε𝜂 ≈ε𝜂, 𝜂 𝜃𝜃 =− 𝑚 2 𝜂 P 1 𝑟,𝜃 = γ R 1 ( 1 𝑙𝑛 𝑅 2 𝑅 1 +(1− 𝑚 2 )) 𝑟 −𝑚 𝜂 u r 𝑟,𝜃 | R 1 (1+εη) = ℎ 2 12𝜇 { 𝛾 𝑅 1 2 1 𝑙𝑛 𝑅 2 𝑅 1 +𝜀𝑚 γ 𝑅 1 2 1 𝑙𝑛 𝑅 2 𝑅 1 + 1− 𝑚 2 } 𝜂

Linear stability analysis: Using the algebraic manipulation: 𝑑 𝑑𝑡 ( 1 2 𝑅 1 𝑅 1 )= 𝑅 1 ∗ 𝑑 𝑅 1 𝑑𝑡 𝑅 1 𝑅 1 ′ 1+2𝜀𝜂 + 𝑅 1 2 𝜀 𝜂 ′ = ℎ 2 12𝜇 𝛾 𝑅 1 { 1 𝑙𝑛 𝑅 2 𝑅 1 +𝜀𝑚 1 𝑙𝑛 𝑅 2 𝑅 1 + 1− 𝑚 2 } 𝜂 O (1): ℎ 2 12𝜇 𝛾 𝑅 1 1 𝑙𝑛 𝑅 2 𝑅 1 = 𝑅 1 𝑅 1 ′ O (𝜀): ℎ 2 12𝜇 𝑚 γ R 1 1 𝑙𝑛 𝑅 2 𝑅 1 + 1− 𝑚 2 𝜂=2 𝑅 1 𝑅 1 ′ 𝜂+ 𝑅 1 2 𝜂′ 𝑅 1 ∗ u r 𝑟,𝜃 | R 1 (1+εη) Left hand Side

Linear stability analysis: 𝜂 ′ = 𝑅 1 ′ 𝑅 1 (𝑚+ ℎ 2 12𝜇 γ 𝑅 1 2 𝑅 1 ′ 𝑚 1− 𝑚 2 −2)𝜂 𝜎= 𝑚+ ℎ 2 12𝜇 γ 𝑅 1 2 𝑅 1 ′ 𝑚 1− 𝑚 2 −2 𝜂= 𝜂 0 exp(𝜎𝑡) exp⁡(𝜎𝑡) is the growth rate of 𝜂. If 𝜎>0 the perturbation is unstable (expand), otherwise stable (shrink). In order to find the best perturbation, we need to find the largest 𝜎

Linear stability analysis: Let 𝑎= ℎ 2 γ 12𝜇 𝑅 1 2 𝑅 1 ′ 𝜎=(𝑚+𝑎𝑚 1− 𝑚 2 −2) 𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 1 3 ( 12𝜇 ℎ 2 𝑅 1 2 𝑅 1 ′ γ +1) 𝜎 vs m

Relate Flow and 𝑹 𝟏 ′ 𝑄= 𝜋 𝑅 1 2 ℎ ′ 𝑅 1 ′ = 𝑄 2𝜋 𝑅 1 ℎ 𝑄= 𝜋 𝑅 1 2 ℎ ′ 𝑅 1 ′ = 𝑄 2𝜋 𝑅 1 ℎ 𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 1 3 ( 12𝜇 ℎ 2 𝑄 𝑅 1 2𝜋ℎγ +1) Paterson: 𝑚= 1 3 ( 𝑅𝑄 2𝜋 𝑀 2 γ +1 )

How do we find number of fingers from the experiment result

Comparison between theoretical and experimental result Width of Spacers (mm) Mass (g) Volume Inside Syringe (mL) Number of Fingers (Measure) Number of Fingers (Theoretical) Flow Rate Relative Error 0.32 500 1.2 29 40 1.26E-07 0.275 1000 32 51 2.00E-07 0.37254902 1500 37 79 4.89E-07 0.53164557 2000 88 2.58E-06 0.545454545 0.52 200 18 19 1.20E-07 0.052631579 22 21 1.47E-07 0.047619048 24 27 2.43E-07 0.111111111 42 5.89E-07 0.357142857 0.83 11 8 1.04E-07 0.375 12 1.30E-07 0.5 14 2.46E-07 0.272727273

Result Analysis Spacing 0.32mm has a large error. Small spacing creates a lot of fingers and many of them are small which give us hard time to count Spacing 0.52mm has the closest simulation result. 0.52mm minimize the errors come from experiment equipment Spacing 0.83mm has a large error. the theoretical value for number of fingers are small so a little error will create a large relative error, also the process is quick so it’s hard to tell the exact time Error grows when mass gets bigger. Flow rate grows in a really rapid way while the equation only handle it as 𝑄

Comparison between theoretical and experimental result

Possible causes of error Time error Counting error Error due to the Experiment equipment Our model is not accurate enough

References: References: [1] Acheson, D. J. (1990), Elementary Fluid Dynamics, Oxford Applied Mathematics and Computing Science Series, Oxford University Press, [3] Kondic, Lou (2014), Linear Stability Analysis of two phase Hele­-Shaw Flow, Unpublished. https://web.njit.edu/~kondic/capstone/2015/lin_stab.pdf [4] Paterson, Lincoln (1981) Radial Fingering in a Hele­Shaw Cell, Department of Engineering Physics, Research School of Physical Sciences, The Australian National University, < http://web.njit.edu/~kondic/capstone/2014/paterson_jfm_81.pdf>. [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equations [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_tension [6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young%E2%80%93Laplace_equation [7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curvature