 Service System Structural Proposals Project Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
…being the presence of Christ
Advertisements

NCRSC Leadership Workshop June 14, 2008
Introduction & Background Introduction & Background Group Support Forums Group Support Forums Local Service Conferences Local Service Conferences 2014.
Service System Session 1: Project Update and Local Services.
We welcome your feedback at
 The Group- The foundation of the NA service structure whose purpose is to carry the message of recovery directly to the suffering addict.  The.
NARCOTICS ANONYMOUS SERVICE STRUCTURE One Addict Helping Another.
 Service System Proposals.  Workshop Objectives Provide an overview of the latest draft of the Service System Proposals Answer as many questions as.
 CAT material is considered in new business of the World Service Conference Conference Approval Track Material.
Learning Goals What is an organization’s structure, and what does it consist of? What are the major elements of an organizational structure? What is organizational.
PLANNING OUR FUTURE The Future of Zones. Planning Our Future Sessions How to serve NA’s needs and plan for the WSC’s future No decisions were made at.
Welcome to The Expert Community Forum 19 November 2007.
Public Relations Workshop TOPICS NA and Public Relations Public Relations Principles Effective Services Planning Presentations to the Public.
PLANNING OUR FUTURE The Future of Zones. Planning Our Future Sessions How to serve NA’s needs and plan for the WSC’s future No decisions were made at.
Iowa Core Alignment of Instructional Content to the Iowa Core Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA.
 The source for guidance on the roles, qualities, and practice of leadership in NA comes from our and practice of leadership in NA comes from our Steps,
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
Leadership in NA Combining Principles & Personalities.
Public Relations Workshop Effective Services and Planning Presentations to the Public.
Foundation of Organizational Design
Organizational Structure
Effectiveness Day : Multi-professional vision and action planning Friday 29 th November 2013 Where People Matter Most.
The National Agenda: Moving Forward on Achieving Educational Equality for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students Claire Bugen & Jay Innes National Summit April.
Oslo 27 th September 2011 Interprofessional Education at UEA Overview of IPL delivery & Lessons learnt.
Petra Engelbrecht Stellenbosch University South Africa
 Service System 101 & Project Update November 2012/ January 2013.
 Service System Project Update November  Project Background Workshop feedback for many years reports common challenges – apathy, duplication of.
AREA INVENTORY AND PLANNING. WHY PLAN? Planning helps us better carry the message to the addict who still suffers. If there is no planning, often a service.
NA WAY MAGAZINE: Resubscribe – LIVING CLEAN PROJECT: Approval draft ready end of April. Draft copy purchase price from NAWS is $8.50.
 Service System Proposals - Interactive Session.
The Importance of SCANNING World Service Conference April 2010.
Communication - The Key to Carrying The Message “Our service structure depends on the integrity and effectiveness of our communications. Eighth Concept.
Focus on the Member  Implementing the Vision Joe Lillie IEEE Vice President, Member & Geographic Activities Region 8 Meeting 25 April 2009 Venice, Italy.
 Service System Update MARLCNA February  Timeline of Work Current 4-year project to end at WSC 2012 At WSC 2012, we are planning to offer a set.
Service System Structural Proposals Wrapping Up and Moving Forward 
Region 1 Training Workshop Crowne Plaza Albany – 1-2 August 2008 Session 1A Strategic Planning Arthur W. Winston Chair, R1 Strategic Planning Committee.
 Service System 101 and Group Support Forum.  Project Background Workshop feedback for many years reports common challenges: apathy, duplication of.
Supporting the Outcomes-based Approach Presentation – Public Bodies Workshops Summer 2009 Performance Division.
Being An Effective GSR Florida Region GSR Assembly 2012.
 Service System Structural Proposals European Perspective.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
We welcome your feedback at
Service System—Session One. Service System Project What to expect from this session: Overview of Service System Project Basic grasp of models and options.
2009 SUMA Convention Education Session E - 7. Introductions Direction and Focus of this session Format – two parts.
 Service System Structural Proposals Group Support and Local Services.
 Service System Structural Proposals Background & Introduction.
 Service System Structural Proposals Options for World Service Conference Seating.
Welcome to The Rocky Mountain Forum. Training for Service Why is it important?
This is the second of four videos covering material in the 2016 Conference Agenda Report ®
 Service System Structural Proposals Intermediate Bodies And State/National Services.
 Service System Structural Proposals Swedish Service Assembly.
Health Services Administration
 Service System Structural Proposals Background & Introduction Recap.
 Service System Structural Proposals Background & Introduction.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
Effective GSR/RCM /Facilitator GSR Assembly 2016.
Todays Agenda Introduction Service System Resolutions and Straw Polls World Board Motions Living Clean, FIPT, WCNA Regional Proposals.
Middle Managers Workshop 1: Changing Cultures. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act locally.
 Introduction & Background  Group Support Forums  Local Service Conferences  2014 World Service Conference The Service System Proposals More information:
Building Teams and Empowering Members 1. Empowerment Empowerment is not bestowed by a leader, it is the process of an individual enabling himself to take.
The 4 Topics in CAR Service System Project (SSP)
Service System Structural Proposals
Service System 101 November 2012
The Service System Proposals
The Service System Proposals
Service System Project The Group Support Unit
Service System Structural Proposals
Attracting Members to Service
Service System Structural Proposals
We welcome your feedback at
Presentation transcript:

 Service System Structural Proposals Project Overview

 Desired Outcomes for this Workshop We hope to: Help everyone to understand the proposals Receive input and feedback to help shape the future of the work Hear how these ideas might work in your local communities Work together to build a holistic service system

 Project Background Commonly experienced, ongoing challenges in NA service: Ineffective communication Insufficient resources Frustrated trusted servants Poor atmosphere of recovery in service meetings

 Project Background NAWS restructured in the late 90s, but we haven’t holistically examined local services – until now Current structure designed before the Twelve Concepts were adopted in 1992 Our hope is for a system that more closely embodies the principles of the Twelve Concepts

 Project Background Current system designed to meet NA’s needs in the 1970s Today NA is: – Larger - more than 58,000 weekly meetings – Present in 130+ countries – Faced with far different social/governmental attitudes toward addiction and recovery

 Project Background Current system works for some, but not for many others The hope is to improve all services throughout our system Project unanimously adopted at WSC 2008; Unanimously reaffirmed at WSC 2010 Additional background info available Vision Statement passed at WSC 2010

 Elements of an Effective System

 Process-Driven Structure We must also consider our processes: Planning Effectively and efficiently carrying the message Decision making Reflecting the will of a loving Higher Power Communication Sharing information and ideas with each other and those outside NA Leadership / Training Passing on our service experience More on these processes will come in later versions of these proposals

 Foundational Principles Purpose-Driven Flexible Geographically Defined Group-Focused Collaborative

 Purpose Driven Each service system unit meets a specific need or group of needs, and each unit’s responsibilities are clearly defined and understood.

 Group-Focused The group support unit (GSU) in each model focuses on aiding the groups in their efforts to carry our message.

 Defined by Geographic Boundaries Following established geographic boundaries for our service bodies where practical would: Allow better interface with professional and legislative bodies, Make it easier for professionals and the general public to find and communicate with us.

 Flexible Form should follow function, so each model offers ideas for optional or “intermediate” service bodies, which may be used if needed, but are not “mandated.”

 Collaborative Successful service provision depends on all the elements of a service system working together toward a common goal.

 Focused Local Units Our current ASCs are tasked with group support and local service delivery. In these proposals, local efforts would be divided: Group Support Unit (GSU): devoted entirely to providing support to local groups Local Service Unit (LSU): devoted entirely to providing local services

 The group support unit (GSU) is intended to help groups better carry the message within their meetings by separating out the group support function from the “business” of NA and creating a body whose purpose is helping groups

 GSU Options

 The LSU is the “workhorse” of the service system, responsible for the bulk of local services. Wherever possible and practical, the LSU will be bound by recognized geography (e.g. town, county.) The LSU is plan-driven

 GSU/LSU Options

 Group Support and Local Services Benefits & Challenges

 Reduce travel for rural GSUs Reduce size of urban LSUs Allow minority language groups to come together

 Neighboring LSUs can send delegate(s) Reduces travel time Reduces number of delegates in large state/national body

 Consists of a state, province, or country Could consist of neighboring states, provinces, or countries for seating purposes Provides services that cover the whole state, province, or country Border communities may join neighboring states if practical

 Intended Services State/national service bodies: Interact with government and professional bodies Organize assemblies and conventions Coordinate centralized resources Provide a communication link

 State/National Services and Intermediate Bodies Benefits & Challenges

 Existing and Proposed (Updated) Seating Option

 Service System Project To stay involved, visit the project page: