Southeastern Association for Community College Research 2008 Conference Using Technology to Efficiently and Effectively Gather Information from Recent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
Advertisements

Support Services Review Support Services Review (SSR) is a representative, responsive form of assessment and self-evaluation to ensure continuous quality.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
One System…One Mission Are You Considering a New Baccalaureate Degree Program? A Brief Guide 1.
Development of SPC Baccalaureate Programs A Model for Providing Baccalaureate Access to the Non-traditional Student 1.
The Evolution of Business Intelligence at SPC: One Year Later January 2013 Florida Association of Institutional Research Annual Conference.
Service to Leadership Freshmen Orientation Assessment Service to Leadership Professional Development Training August 14, 2012 Agriculture Research Complex.
Student success is the first priority. Credit Hour Commitment Model Presenters  James Thomas Coraggio, Executive Director, Institutional Research and.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Supervisor Training On-Campus Student Employment.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
GED Scholars Initiative Imagine The Possibilities * Realize Your Potential Sandra Golden, Project Director Kimberly S. McCoy, Technology Coordinator Kent.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
FAIR Best Paper: Using Technology to Efficiently and Effectively Gather Information from Recent Alumni and Employers May 2010 Association of Institutional.
General Education Assessment Process Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment 2010.
Preparation for NCA Accreditation Siva K. Balasubramanian August
Creating a Culture of Collaboration: Collecting Community Engagement Data Susan Connery, Director of the Feinstein Community Service Center Christopher.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Professional Development Day October 2009 Data Matters! Finding and Accessing Information at SPC.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Center for Educator Recruitment, Retention, & Advancement From Recruitment to Retention: A Continuum That Works!
Performance Management Spring  Shared Responsibility  Performance Management Cycle  Gonzaga’s Performance Review Process  Coming.
How Business Intelligence Transformed the Culture at SPC June 2013 State Assessment Meeting.
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Using Technology to Efficiently and Effectively Gather Information from Recent Alumni and Employers April 2009 Florida Association of Community Colleges.
Dr. Ginger Eastman Director of Academic Support Services.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Undergraduate Academic Assessment Plans: What’s New for Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of.
Student Development The Gateway to … Opportunities Accomplishment Financial Solutions Student Success Achievement Student Life.
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-up 2015 Follow-Up of the 2014 CTE Graduates.
Student success is the first priority. Increasing Student Response Rates Presenters  Magaly Tymms, Associate Director, Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Improving the Institutional Effectiveness Process 1.
1 Strategic Master Plan 2015 Annebelle Nery, PhD Executive Dean of Institutional Effectiveness, Educational Services & Planning Daniel Martinez, PhD Director,
Jamestown Community College The Path to NACEP Accreditation.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES Development of Work-Based Learning Programs Unit 6-- Developing and Maintaining Community and Business Partnerships.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
Florida Association of Institutional Research 2008 Annual Conference Beyond Compliance…Using a Model of Comprehensive Academic Program Review to Improve.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
Southeastern Association for Community College Research 2008 Conference Beyond Compliance…Using a Model of Comprehensive Academic Program Review to Improve.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Supervisor Training On-Campus Student Employment.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT PLAN/REPORT By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
CHARTING THE COURSE OF ACTION THE “HOW TO” FOR COURSE OR PROGRAM PROPOSALS.
Performance Accountability System. PAS Overview Performance Accountability System (PAS) was developed by the Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG)
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Florida Association of Institutional Research 2011 Annual Conference The Evolution of the Comprehensive Academic Program Review - Three Years After Inception.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
CTE Data UNLOCKED. Task Force Roll Out #StrongWorkforce 14 Regional College & Faculty Conversations Over 700 attendees, including 40% faculty 6 Strong.
Assessing the Operations at Your Institution: Purposes + Planning + Processes = Performance Arizona Assessment Conference Yavapai College, Prescott, Arizona.
Administrative Services Update Fall 2013 Flex Day August 22, 2013 Gym.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Hourly Student Employees Getting Them Hired & Records Management Best Practices.
Workforce Recruitment Program Orientation Presented by: University Career Services & Office of Disability Services.
Workforce Preparation  Resume  Cover Letter  Job Interview.
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-up 2016 Follow-Up of the 2015 CTE Graduates March 3, 2016.
Academic Program Viability Report February 2010 Florida Association of Institutional Research 2010 Annual Conference.
Preparing for your Departmental Assessment Workshop
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FY’17
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-up
An Overview of the Post-Graduate Education and Training Program
Presentation transcript:

Southeastern Association for Community College Research 2008 Conference Using Technology to Efficiently and Effectively Gather Information from Recent Alumni and Employers August 2008

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research2 Alumni and Employer Surveys Presenters  Dr. James Coraggio, Director of Institutional Research and Effectiveness  Maggie Tymms, Assessment Coordinator for Academic Programs

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research3 SPC Background  SPC, established in 1927, is the oldest 2-year college in Florida  First Community College in Florida to offer 4 year degrees (2002)  9 Campuses throughout the county  FTE: 16,086 (LD), 1,338 (UD)  Opening Spring 2008 headcount: 25,754  Annual enrollment: 62,200

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research4 Institutional Effectiveness “Institutional Effectiveness is the integrated, systematic, explicit, and documented processes of measuring performance against the SPC mission for purposes of continuous improvement of academic programs, administrative services, and educational services offered by the college.” “Closing the Loop”

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research5 Performance Improvement  From Compliance to Performance Improvement

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research6 Agenda  Student Assessment Points  Purpose of Follow-up Surveys  Alumni/Employer Survey Process  Dissemination of Survey Results and Reports

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research7 Student Assessment Points Students surveyed multiple times

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research8 Purpose of Follow-up Surveys Recent Alumni Survey was designed to:  Gain insight into alumni’s perceptions of the quality of general education and career preparation  Determine the current activities of former students such as employment information and educational status

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research9 Purpose of Follow-up Surveys Employer Survey was designed to:  Gain insight into an employer’s perceptions of hired SPC graduates in the areas of key general education competencies and foundational skills  Provide the employee’s major job responsibilities and wage information, as well as employer’s willingness to hire another SPC graduate  Identify employer’s willingness to support various college activities

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research10 Purpose of Follow-up Surveys State Requirements  Survey data are also collected for state required annual Placement & Follow-up Report (FETPIP: Florida Education Training Placement Information Program) and supplemental information to meet workforce criteria

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research11 Alumni/Employer Survey Process Previous model  Labor intensive  Manually tabulated paper surveys  Telephone interviews conducted using overtime hours

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research12 Alumni/Employer Survey Process Issues with previous model  Costly survey process  Declining college budget  Increasing demand for accountability  Outdated contact information  Students over-surveyed  Declining response rates  Conducted in isolation

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research13 Alumni/Employer Survey Process Goals of new survey process A.Improve data collection process B.Enhance quality of survey forms C.Include program specific information D.Increase response rates

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research14 A. Improve Data Collection Process Data Collection Process  Eliminated telephone calls  Automated the process ( merge)  Employ online survey submission (Zoomerang)  Obtain accurate addresses  Use multiple points of contact

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research15 A. Improve Data Collection Process Survey Schedule  Recent Alumni Survey  Graduates surveyed six months after the end of session (Three times per year)  Employer Survey  Employer of graduates surveyed at the end of academic year (Once per year)

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research16 A. Improve Data Collection Process First Second Third First mailing Second mailing 2 weeks Multiple Points of Contact 2 weeks

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research17 B. Enhance Quality Of Survey Forms Improved Survey Forms  Better “look and feel” of survey format  Developed scannable paper forms  Use online branching models to reduce survey length  Design items to gather only pertinent data

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research18 Online Survey: and Form

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research19 Paper Survey: Letter and Form

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research20 C. Include Program Specific Information Program specific information  Meet with PDs  Discuss requirements for program accreditation and timelines  Include their necessary program specific items

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research21 D. Increase Response Rates Create awareness and convey importance  Involve program faculty in the process  Request faculty assistance to inform students  Include a flyer with graduation materials  Coordinate with programs that hand-carry surveys to local employers

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research22 Response Rates  Summer 07

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research23 Response Rates  Fall 07

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research24 Response Rates

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research25 Response Rates

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research26 Response Rates - Employer Other Responses Recent Alumni Surveys Sent Employer Surveys Sent Is a 44% Employer Response Rate Good? COE Responses With Permission Responses Without Permission

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research27 Disseminating Information  College wide access to reports   Program Specific Reports  Published on the Educational Outcomes website 

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research28 Disseminating Information

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research29 Disseminating Information

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research30 Disseminating Information

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research31 Program Specific Reports

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research32 SPC IE Website

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research33 Lessons Learned  Do not expect that students remember their ID#  Administer the survey soon after the end of the session (six months)  Use multiple points of contact (two weeks)  Find the most recent contact information  Make students aware of the importance of the survey process (survey announcements)

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research34 Lessons Learned  Partner with programs to acquire up-to- date information  Provide updates to college data systems (PeopleSoft, Alumni Foundation)  Monitor results and make changes as necessary  More accurate data (quicker turn around of results) with automated processes

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research35 Future Direction  Ultimate goal is to provide Provosts (Deans) and Program Directors ‘timely’, ‘relevant’ ‘accurate’, and ‘interpretable’ information regarding their programs and their performance outcomes  Multi-measure ‘Dashboard’ style reports (Business Intelligence/Performance Measurement)

SACCR 2008 Conference August 2008 August 6, 2008 Southeastern Association for Community College Research36 Questions/Next Steps

Southeastern Association for Community College Research 2008 Conference Using Technology to Efficiently and Effectively Gather Information from Recent Alumni and Employers August 2008