US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Value Engineering the Termination of the Blue River Flood Conveyance Channel Alan Schlindwein, PE US Army.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Head cuts and Knickpoints Identify, Prevent & Stop Georganne Bowman September 30, 2011.
Advertisements

6.5 River Stability and Bank Protection John Ratsey
18 October 2012 WATERSHED Science & Engineering WEST Consultants Chehalis River Basin Hydraulic Modeling and Flood Relief Alternatives Evaluation.
Chattahoochee River Restoration Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration City Mills Dam Eagle and Phenix Dam.
Weirs and Canal Intakes By: Nell Kolden and Taylor Barnett Thursday April 12, 2012 CIVE 717.
Stream Geomorphology Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012.
Grade Control Structures Chris Shrimpton and Jonathan McIntosh CIVE 717 River Mechanics Spring 2012.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri.
Detention / Infiltration Structure. Figure 21–1 Point Discharge and Downstream Stability Analysis Procedure.
DESIGNING STONE TOE PROTECTION. IS STP THE RIGHT SOLUTION? IS THE CHANNEL BED STABLE? IS THE BANKFULL WIDTH IN BEND LESS THAT 130% OF BANKFULL WIDTH.
Gravel Mining Ryan Kindt Kristina Lowthian CIVE 717 April 9, 2012 Gualala River, California fly-over, Courtesy: Jamie Hall.
Waller Creek Outlet CFD Modeling Results Connection #2 with 3’ High Spillway Flip Bucket 2-Year Flood (2320 cfs) Lady Bird Lake Inflow (1.25 ft/s) 9/9/20081ALDEN.
1 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Update FEMA Public Meeting October 22, 2009.
WAYNE KINNEY’S REALLY TALL ENGINEERED ROCKED RIFFLES (ERR) CASE STUDY: ERR #12, WHICH IS A 4.7 FT TALL STRUCTURE.
SAND THE FOOT OF KANOPOLIS DAM, KANSAS Let’s build Engineered Rocked Riffle #5 the most upstream of the five riffles that will be constructed.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® St. Louis District Low Water Operations Russell Errett Water Control St. Louis District February 2013.
SESSION: RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE Stronger and More Resilient Infrastructure to Accommodate the Effects of Sea Level Rise Michael V. Tumulty, P.E., Vice.
The Mission Reach Ecosystem Restoration Project: Floodplain Management Within a Multi-Objective Project Paradigm Steven Schauer San Antonio River Authority.
Pertemuan Open Channel 1. Bina Nusantara.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
HEC-RAS.
Flood Management Dealing with Floodplains in Missouri.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Billings, Montana January 2011 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Kansas City Industrial Council Hydrology and Hydraulics
CE 515 Railroad Engineering Drainage Source: AREMA Ch. 5, J. Rose Lectures, Ch. 19 “Transportation exists to conquer space and time -”
KYTC Bridge Preservation and Maintenance Program David Steele, P.E. Branch Manager for Bridge Preservation.
Acquisition of Flood Control Easements Triangle High-Ground Area City of West Sacramento, Yolo Co. Meeting of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas Flood Risk Management Project Presentation to Kansas City Industrial Council.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Greenup Locks and Dam, Ohio River.
VILLAGE OF PATCH, NM, FEASIBILITY STUDY Village of Patch Case Study Seattle Environmen tal Planning Class June, 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque.
MVS Mainstem Forecast Model Update: NETMISS2 by Joel Asunskis, P.E. Hydraulic Engineer, St. Louis District Water Control U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers October.
Exeter 8/12/00.
Rivers and Streams The Hydrologic Cycle. Rivers and Streams Drainage basin or watershed.
Missouri River Agriculture Reservoirs Nicole, Abagail, Abbey.
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project June 2006.
Libby Dam June 2006 Spill: Total Dissolved Gas Monitoring.
Analysis of Slide Impacts on the North Fork Stillaguamish River Floodplain For Snohomish County May 5, 2014.
FLOOD DEFENCES ALONG THE R. MEDWAY AROUND TONBRIDGE.
An Experience In Conducting A Longitudinal Profile… A Study of the Response of San Pedro Creek to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Flood Control.
DEAD DIKES. DEAD DIKES USING DEAD POSTS IS A DAVE DERRICK DISCOVERY (DDD)
McKinstry Creek, Delevan, NY This was a complete stream and floodway realignment. Constructed June-July The stream had been straightened prior.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation Integration of Results 6 Month Progress ERDC West Bay.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Repairing the Mississippi River Levee with Dredged Material after the Historic 2011 Flood Dredging 2012 Shane.
Waller Creek Outlet CFD Modeling Results Connection #2 with 3’ High Spillway Flip Bucket 500-Year Flood (11,270 cfs) Lady Bird Lake Inflow (3.5 ft/s) at.
CASE STUDY:Grand River at Route “A” 100 miles north of Kansas City, MO. Constructed June 2001 False Banklines using LPSTP (medium-sized river)
Public Meeting April 2, 2015 Albany Park Stormwater Diversion Tunnel.
Obion Creek Stream Restoration Restoration of a Channelized Straight-line Ditch to a Naturalized Meandering Stream Presented by Robert B. Johnson Jackson.
APPLICATION NO LEVEE DISTRICT No. 1 Of SUTTER COUNTY STAR BEND SETBACK LEVEE SUTTER COUNTY April 17, 2009.
Preliminary Engineering Analysis and Design Foxcroft Colony and Mosby Woods Condominiums Prepared for: City Council Work Session November 3, 2015.
GRADE CONTROL.
EPA Region 7 Lead Remediation Byrnes Mill Dam and Park
Anthony Alvarado, PE, CFM National Hydraulic Engineering Conference
WAYNE KINNEY’S REALLY TALL ENGINEERED ROCKED RIFFLES (ERR) CASE STUDY: ERR #12, WHICH IS A 4.7 FT TALL STRUCTURE.
Arithmetic and Geometric Means
INDOT Culvert Sizing Policy
When should you fix a stream????
Why do people try to manage rivers?.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Babcock Basin-Design Phase
Confluence Park Denver, Colorado
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
4n + 2 1st term = 4 × = 6 2nd term = 4 × = 10 3rd term
Leveraging Funding from Other Sources: a Programmatic Approach
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Hydrologic Engineering
Fluvial Hydraulics CH-3
Module # 8 Channel Evolution Implications & Drivers of Instability
When should you fix a stream????
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Value Engineering the Termination of the Blue River Flood Conveyance Channel Alan Schlindwein, PE US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City, Missouri June 14, 2012 Robert Prager, PE Strategic Value Solutions, Inc Independence, Missouri

BUILDING STRONG ® Battle of Westport AKA: The Gettysburg of the West

BUILDING STRONG ® The Real Brush Creek (after USACE project)

BUILDING STRONG ® 1 st & 2 nd Battles of the Big Blue at Byram’s Ford

BUILDING STRONG ® Byram’s Ford

BUILDING STRONG ® Blue River Flood Conveyance Channel  35,000 cfs Flood Control Channel  New Bridges  Remapping of Floodplain

BUILDING STRONG ®  3 rd Battle of Byram’s Ford  Concrete Grade Control Structure

BUILDING STRONG ® Proposed Grade Control Structure

BUILDING STRONG ® Byram’s Ford Industrial Park

BUILDING STRONG ® Stated Goals  Prevent the headcutting at the battlefield location  Limit maximum flood elevation to pre- project conditions  Control velocity upstream to manage scour along the riverbanks

BUILDING STRONG ® Design  The structure was designed to stop head- cutting and control flood elevations upstream to pre-project conditions which in turn aided in managing scour at the battlefield location and along the riverbanks by controlling velocity.

BUILDING STRONG ® Externalities  Construction of the grade control structure would affect the channel upstream of this project and create pre-project conditions, i.e., flooding in areas that had not experienced flooding since the channel project began would now be flooded again.

BUILDING STRONG ®

The Value Ah Ha!  The current flood levels can be maintained to limit maximum flood elevation to below pre-project conditions  Grade controls can be distributed along the river rather than at a concrete waterfall Perfection Cost Functions 0% 100% Poor Value Best Value

BUILDING STRONG ®

Stated Goals  PROTECT THE CHANNEL  PRESERVE THE BATTLEFIELD  By Mimicking Natural Processes

BUILDING STRONG ® Work with River Continuum Riffle Pool Sequence Place at end of Bend

BUILDING STRONG ® River Profile - Newbury & Proposed GCS

BUILDING STRONG ® Grade Control at KC Zoo

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Grade Control Structure

BUILDING STRONG ® 2000 cfs flow

BUILDING STRONG ®