European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Westminster Kingsway College QUALITY. Mission of Westminster Kingsway College: To support all of its students in realising their ambitions as learners.
Advertisements

Customised training: Learner Voice and Post-16 Citizenship.
Ofsted ITE Inspection Briefing PCET trainees, ex-MMU PCET trainees, Course Team Leaders, Mentors and Quality Managers.
Performance management guidance
Early Level Transitions. Are we confident there is effective progression in children’s learning through early level ? Are we confident there is effective.
Learning and skills inspection outcomes LSIS Lorna Fitzjohn Divisional Manager, Learning and Skills January 2012.
Ofsted and the inspection of further education and skills
Overview of key changes to Ofsted inspection of Initial Teacher Training (ITT) from September 2012.
Moving forward with Curriculum for Excellence Phil Denning HMI.
Influencing and challenging mainstream practice- A Scottish perspective. Monica Mc Geever HM Inspector Education Scotland.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Equality and Inspection – an Ofsted perspective of Impact NATSPEC/LSIS June 2011.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
Slide 1 of 17 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 2: The development of English.
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
NCH Embedding Diversity Proposal for an Employee Mentoring Scheme Raj Patel Head of Change Management & Development.
A Governor Update The New Ofsted Inspection Framework DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER 1.
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
Theory & Practice – the new Common Inspection Framework and what it means to governors UCU-LSIS-UNISON FE Staff Governors’ Conference 3 December 2012 Lorna.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Add presentation title to master slide | 1 New inspection methodology from September 2009 NATSPEC conference Lorna Fitzjohn May 2009.
DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Inspection 2012 S48 Diocesan Inspection.
Hertfordshire in Action Working in Partnership to secure effective Transition and Progression.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 …continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director Caroline Lansdown – Senior.
The revised Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills Charlie Henry HMI Principal Officer Special Educational Needs and Disability Natspec.
14 July 2015 – Ofsted Inspection Update London Borough of Bexley Meena Wood School Improvement Officer.
Post-primary model of inspection 14 September 2015.
Reservoir Primary School Literacy Share Day
September 2015 Focus – OfSTED Changes and Curriculum requirements
Primary Inspection Models 14 September Overview of today’s briefing Revisions to the overall effectiveness conclusion Revisions to the performance.
Standards and Quality and Improvement Planning for Session 2014/15 Anne Paterson Education Manager.
Dorset School Sport Conference School Inspection 2015 John Mitcheson HMI 25 September 2015.
STANDARDS, QUALITY AND IMPROVEMENT PLANNING in a Pre 5 Centre April 2014 Marie Keen Quality Improvement Officer – Early Years.
Add presentation title to master slide | 1 New inspection methodology from September 2009 NATSPEC conference Lorna Fitzjohn/Kath Townsley September 2009.
Inspection briefing Further Education & Work-based Learning.
Partnership in ISCs and examples of good practice Sue Preece HMI February 10 th 2010.
The Quality Standards for resource provisions For deaf children and young people in mainstream school.
Development Team Day 4c Disseminating Practice April/May 2009.
Ofsted inspections of local authority arrangements for supporting school improvement Matthew Coffey, Her Majesty’s Inspector National Director for FE and.
Inspection briefing Youth. Topics to cover: 1 Introduction and inspection updates 2 What happens before inspection? 3 What happens during inspection?
Providing Inspection Services for Department of Education Department for Employment and Learning Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure Conference Thursday.
Sheila Nolan Director of School Improvement
The Future of Education Inspection Overview: Key points from the new Common Inspection Framework (CIF) Highlight Ofsted new way of working Priorities.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
The context for the revised guidance Alan Inglis Assistant Principal, John Wheatley College.
Ofsted Common Inspection Framework Mapping to Career Ready September 2015.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Mindset 2000 LtdSlide 1 Train to Gain Provider Support Programme October 2007 Self assessment - introduction.
FE Staff Governors Conference Characteristics of effective governance Vivien Shipley HMI 3 December 2009.
The Inspection Process Special Schools & Education Other Than At School.
EYITT Mentor University of Gloucestershire Wednesday 9 th September 2015 Cathie Clarke Updated 16/09/15.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Customised training: Diversity, community cohesion and citizenship.
A Brave New World: Using the New Ofsted Framework on DWP Inspections Karen Adriaanse March 2010.
April 2016 Marie Keen Quality Improvement Officer – Early Years
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
Dany Thomas, Senior Education Adviser, 0-19 Standards Team Inspection Update November 2015.
Clerks’ Annual Conference 2010 Clerking towards an “Outstanding” Governing Body Steve Telfer Leadership & Governance.
The State of the Nation Matthew Coffey Ofsted Regional Director Date 24 March 2010.
Raising standards, improving lives
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
AELP Dissemination of Chief Inspectors Report 29th November 2011
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Improvements following Inspection-Capacity to Improve
School Self-Evaluation 
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Our new quality framework and methodology:
NATSPEC Governor Seminars 2009
Presentation transcript:

European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones

Introduction Purpose of inspection Review of evaluation visits to date Key findings from evaluation visits Going forward Overview of the inspection process Reporting What happens after inspection

Purpose of inspection: Commissioned by DEL Builds on self- evaluation processes Identifies effective practice & key areas for development Informs quality improvement planning Promote improvement in the interest of all learners

Key messages of improvement from phase 1

Phase 1 - objectives To identify good practice, recognise how to build on this work and where improvement was needed to ensure the achievement of excellence To identify what can be done to make things better for young people, adults and the wider community To inform stakeholders, including providers and the Department about the quality of service provided – openness and transparency

Initial ETI visits Focused on the project’s own self- evaluation processes Evaluated how well the project: -identified their strengths and weaknesses and planned for improvement

Evidence base to date 79 organisations delivering 95 ESF projects All of the 24 CIF Projects –(18 of these projects were delivered by providers who also delivered ESF projects)

Examples of effective practice The strong advocacy roles on behalf of their participant groups and their commitment to social inclusion The experience and expertise of the project teams, including their knowledge and understanding of the target groups and their training and support needs The individualised and tailored programmes to meet the needs of the participants

Examples of effective practice The caring and inclusive ethos demonstrated in the mutually respectful relationships among the staff and participants The increased confidence and enthusiasm for learning expressed by most of the participants The collegial approach by the staff to meeting the needs of the participants, which is underpinned by their willingness to engage in appropriate and effective CPD

Examples of effective practice The strong focus on the employability needs of the participants and the development of the relevant skills, qualities and/or attributes needed to enhance their employability

Going forward Embed the culture and value of SE and QIP processes with staff at all levels across the projects Widen the evidence base used to inform SE and QIP processes Make more effective use of data, including the use of measurable outcomes to demonstrate more clearly the impact and value of the projects Include staff and other key stakeholders more fully in the SE process

Going forward Develop further the tracking of participants’ progress including the analysis of distance travelled based on their entry profiles, the qualifications they achieve, and their success in finding and sustaining employment Reflect more effectively on own practice and identify good practice more clearly Work with other projects to share examples of good practice more widely

Inspection process going forward

Going Forward – What will be different? Size and scale of inspection Longitudinal two phase inspection model Phase 1 - baseline inspection visit – main findings shared with the project and DEL Greater focus on first- hand evidence e,g talking to participants, visits to classes, talking to tutors and/or support staff

Going Forward – What will be different? Visiting participants in the workplace, talking to employers, etc Stronger emphasis on data, measuring progress and impact Direct observations of practice Second inspection visit within approximately12 months after the baseline will include performance levels and a published report The report from the second visit will be published on the ETI website

Going Forward – What will be the same? Self-evaluation report and quality improvement plan required as part of the overall process The inspection team will share their findings with you at both stages The interim period between visits is an opportunity to build on strengths and address areas for improvement

Performance levels Outstanding Very Good Good Important area(s) for improvement Requires significant improvement Requires urgent improvement Used to report on the quality of: Achievement and standards Provision for learning Leadership and management

One of four inspection outcomes for overall effectiveness Inspection reporting The organisation has a high level of capacity for sustained improvement in the interest of all the learners. The ETI will monitor the organisation’s progress in addressing any area(s) for improvement through its annual quality improvement planning.

One of four inspection outcomes for overall effectiveness Inspection reporting The organisation demonstrates the capacity to identify and bring about improvement in the interest of all the learners. The ETI will monitor the organisation’s progress in addressing the area(s) for improvement through its annual quality improvement planning.

One of four inspection outcomes for overall effectiveness The organisation needs to address (an) important area(s) for improvement in the interest of all the learners. The ETI will monitor and report on the organisation’s progress in addressing the area(s) for improvement, which includes the need to produce an improvement plan, which will be the basis for a formal follow-up inspection within months.

One of four inspection outcomes for overall effectiveness Inspection reporting The organisation needs to address urgently the significant areas for improvement identified in the interest of all the learners. The ETI will monitor and report on the organisation’s progress in addressing the areas for improvement, which includes the need to produce an improvement plan, which will be the basis for a formal follow-up inspection within months.

What happens before inspection? Letter of notification, 2 weeks prior to inspection Immediately, the reporting inspector will contact the organisation via phone call – direct them to ETI website RI will conduct a briefing, normally by phone to agree inspection requirements and arrangements Immediately prior to inspection, organisation to data and other inspection material to the ETI (RI)

NB: Updated annually

What happens during inspection? Inspection teamInspection activitiesInspection reporting

ETI: ETI team to include reporting/deputy reporting inspector Associate assessors, if required Organisation: BoG/M’c representatives Senior management Tutors, staff, participants & employers DEL Representative attends report back Inspection Team

The number of inspection days varies depending on the size and scale of the project Presentation by senior management Observation of sessions Scrutinise participants’ work/files/PTPs Meetings with key personnel Review of care, support and guidance Visit workplace training, meet employers Focus groups with learners Daily report backs to manager At the end of the inspection Moderation meeting, Report backs, DEL representative present

Baseline Inspection Visit Aim:To evaluate and baseline current practice to inform their interim QIP To provide a clear indication to the project as to what they need to do to enhance the overall quality of provision Will result in: Spoken report back of main findings for the organisation overall Written SOKF

Inspection Visit Aim: To evaluate impact, outcomes and to inform future developments Will result in: Spoken report back of main findings for the organisation overall Written SOKF One of six performance levels used for each of the three key questions Overall effectiveness paragraph.

WHAI

For ESF projects after their second visit Organisation (and DEL) receive a pre- publication copy of the report for factual accuracy check The RI considers any factual errors identified, and if necessary, discuss these with the organisation, making any required adjustments to the report prior to publication Report publishes on the ETI website, normally within 30 days of oral report back

If safeguarding is evaluated as unsatisfactory Safeguarding areas for improvement followed-up by the ETI within 6 working weeks Short letter publishes on the ETI website

Questions