Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan Stakeholders Meeting February 26, 2014.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
LCAPs in Orange County and the Role of the Orange County Department of Education Jeff Hittenberger, Ph.D. Chief Academic Officer.
LCAP Update, Feedback, & Input Vision Quality Indicator 5: Professional Learning For All December 9, 2014.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
40. Overcoming Barriers to Transformation Through System-Wide Leadership Dr. Carol Johnson, Superintendent Central Dauphin School District.
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
District Vision “To Become a Premier District” District Instructional Goals 1.Increase AA, Hispanic, & low SES scores on TAKS science & math to meet or.
1 Great Things Are Happening In Paramount Schools - Where We Inspire Great Learning Through Great Teaching Great Things Are Happening In Paramount Schools.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
 Bellview Elementary School Title I Funding. Your Money at Work  This year Title I provides funding for:  Math Specialist  Reading Specialist  Social.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
Macomb County Support for Priority & Focus Schools Judith P. Pritchett, PhD Chief Academic Officer Macomb Intermediate School District
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
1 SEC EDUCATION LEADERS CONFERENCE St. Louis, Missouri September 12, 2007 Idaho’s PRINCIPAL ACADEMY of LEADERSHIP.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Staff Development BOT/ Superintendent Goal’s Goal 1: the district will provide a safe learning and working environment for student, employees.
Adopting the Iowa Core CSL Working Group Nov. 10, 2009.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Persistently Low Achieving Schools Update September 14, 2010 Board of Education Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary.
District Program Improvement Update Title I Schools Board of Education Study Session August 18, 2009.
1 Handout #1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Language Arts)  Performance Indicator Progression  Scope and Sequence  Instructional Guide  Language.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Mid-Course Adjustments in Learning Results Implementation CAEA Summer Conference Patrick R. Phillips, Deputy Commissioner August 15, 2005.
Professional Development for High-Poverty Schools Joseph F. Johnson, Jr., Ph.D. MSP Conference January 10, 2007 Phoenix, AZ.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Why 21st Century Skills & STEM? Research indicates students across all grade-levels lack competencies in math and science. New demands have been placed.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
Our time today… 10/7/11PSESD Assistant Superintendent CCSS Update 2  Updates on CCSS  Implementation discussion….  What do curriculum directors want.
Dr. Vashti K. Washington Superintendent of Schools Presented by Dr. A. Lee Holmes Chief Officer of Academics and Human Resources September 9, Presented.
Berkeley County Schools
1 SEC State Collaborative Meeting San Diego February 10-12, 2008 Idaho’s PRINCIPAL ACADEMY of LEADERSHIP and the SEC Peter Kavouras Curt Rathburn.
CAA Options: Collection of Evidence CTE Connection December 8, 2006 Rod Duckworth, Director of Career and Technical Education OSPI.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
THE BIG INTERVIEW KORRINA L. TAITANO EDU650 INSTRUCTOR RICCI NOVEMBER 02, 2015.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
December 2016 AESA The Future Depends On Their Future
HCS Elementary Education Department
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington School Principals Day 2

July January September October November December District implementation ReviewingImprovementResults District Planning BudgetCalendar$$AnnualPerformance Legislative Session ExploreLearnEvaluate OSPI Conference ExploreEvaluate OSPI / ESD/ District Training February June August April May March

Math Science Social Studies Arts Health / Fitness Living Learning Working Relating Representing Reasoning GOAL 3 Reading Writing Communications GOAL 1 GOAL 4 GOAL 2

Classroom Based Evidence of Student Learning Professional Development System Indicators State Level Assessment Assessment System

Making the diploma meaningful Transforming the teaching profession Transforming school leadership Engaging parents and the community Harnessing the power of technology Creating a safe, civil and healthy learning environment Coordinating a research agenda

Building a High Performance Education System: Outputs All kids with 21st century diplomas Processes Teaching and Leadership Transformed Learning, Feedback for Accountability Classroom Assessments WASL/ITBS Alternate Assessments Research Agenda Inputs Kids Skilled educators Learning goals/EALRs Graduation requirements Curriculum Technology Conditions: Parent Involvement and community support Learning Environment +

The Journey of Education Reform A major culture change

Components of Ed Reform State Learning Goals Assessment system Essential Academic Learning Requirements Support, Funding +Flexibility

Accountability = Shared Responsibility Professional development School improvement plans Focused assistance to struggling schools Partnership between OSPI, the ESDs, and districts

Principals Teachers Parents Learners Leaders

Education Leadership Functions Information Possibilities Organization Possibilities Human Possibilities

School Leadership Functions Instructional Leadership Aligning Resources Processing Systems

Classroom Leadership Functions Instructional Delivery Learner Diagnosis Curriculum and Lesson Development

Essential Learning Requirements Content Teacher Living Learning Working

Home Leadership Functions Supporting Teacher Supervising Child Developing Self

Student Leadership Functions S-P-R Generative S-O-R Discriminating S-R Conditioned Responding

Conditions: Strong Parent and Community Involvement Supportive Learning Environment + Feedback Frequent Monitoring ( recognition and support ) Outputs Achievement of a Clear and Shared Vision Processes Learning,Teaming and Professional Development Inputs - High Expectations for all - Strong Leadership - Aligned Curriculum and Time for Instruction - Collaborative Staff Building a High Performance School:

Characteristics of High Performing Schools Effective instructional & administrative leadership –Prerequisite to school change –Leadership come in many forms (principal, school & district staff) Clear and shared vision/purpose –Everybody knows where they are going and why –All staff participate in developing the common focus High standards and expectations all – Get all students to do better – Positive attitudes, no excuses – Realize continuous improvement needed over the long haul 1 2 3

Characteristics of High Performing Schools (cont.) Changes in curriculum & instruction –Alignment with state standards and assessments –More time found for instruction High levels of teamwork – Everybody is involved all – Collaboration and communications among all staff Frequent monitoring of teaching and learning – Constantly determining who does well and who need help – Recognize success, support those in need.

Characteristics of High Performing Schools (cont.) Supportive learning environment – Safe, civil, healthy atmosphere where respect is the norm – Personalized instruction Increased Parent and Community involvement – Strong partnerships with parents, businesses, community groups and higher education Emphasis on professional development –Focus, extensive, ongoing –Never comfortable or satisfied with status quo