DLab Day 3 eProtocol Submissions Diana Holt and Colleen Kohashi Office for the Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
Advertisements

IRB SUBMISSION PROCESS FOR SHB STUDIES Version 9/18/2013.
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
The Protection of Human Subjects in Research Piece Presenter: Roxana Killian.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
USF Research Integrity & Compliance eIRB Comprehensive Training 10/07/2014.
Submission to Approval What happens to my protocol once I submit it to the HIC office.
The IRB Process Tony Medure, M.A., CIP, RAC Vanderbilt Human Research Protection Program.
Using ERA-IRB How to submit new IRB applications, continuing reviews, and modifications using ASU’s new online submission system.
IRB Review and Approval of Community Based Research
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager Radford University.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Completing a Questionnaire B Form (and beyond…) Office of Research and Project Administration 1.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
UTHSC IRB: A How-To Guide
Who’s the Boss? Faculty Advisor or Principal Investigator Supervision versus Student Investigator or Study Coordinator Responsibilities Gwenn Snow, MS,
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Introduction to INSPIR OCR Seminar Series January 21, 2004 Mary Banks, RN Administrator, Office of the IRB.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
IRB Electronic Submission. IRB Definition Committee formally designated to approve, monitor, and review biomedical and behavioral research involving human.
Human Subjects Research Cynthia Edmonds Director, Office of Research Support Committees.
Welcome to IRBManager! To access IRBManager, type the following address in your web browser:
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
I JUST SUBMITTED TO THE IRB… WHAT NOW?. HAVE I REALLY SUBMITTED IT?? (NOT IN THIS CASE - CLICK THE YELLOW BOX)
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
1 Role of the Privacy Officer on the IRB Stephania H. Griffin, RHIA, CIPP/G VHA Privacy Officer.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Getting Your Research Through IRB (UCHS) Review Elaine Wethington, Chair Cornell University Committee on Human Subjects (Ithaca)
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
IRB Applications Ten Common Mistakes. 1. Failing to attach documents properly.
Human Subjects Research Office of Responsible Research Practices Human Subjects Research Vanessa Hill, MSHS, CCRC Senior Quality Improvement Specialist.
Ver. 02/13/  Registration  New Studies  Continuing Reviews  Amendments  Reportable Events  Tips & Tricks  Questions 2.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
2012 State of the IRB Boston University Charles River Campus (CRC) Cynthia J. Monahan, MBA, CIP Director, Institutional Review Board.
Fully accredited since 2006 Tom Conquergood, CIP Working with Quorum October 13, 2015 Thomas Jefferson University.
The IRB Process Southern New Hampshire University.
Senta Baker Sharon Moran IU Human Subjects Office Human Subjects Office IRB Submissions and KC Demostration School of Music November 13, 2015.
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Paul Hryvniak MS, CIP Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP September 30, 2014 Student Human Research Education Session Tel:
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM (HRPP) OFFICE Developing a Satisfactory IRB Application.
Lifespan 1 Submission Process to the IRB part 2 Revisions to Protocol.
IRB BASICS BETTY WILSON, MS, CIP. CONCEPTS SUBMISSION APPROVAL RECRUITING WORKING WITH PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) /SPONSOR POLICIES DEVIATIONS RECORD.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Faculty Advisor Responsibilities
CayuseIRB A Quick Start Guide for IRB, IACUC, and IBC Researchers
Submitting a New IRB Protocol
Principal Investigator Responsibilities
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Submitting a New IRB Protocol
Dining with Diabetes IRB Training 2017.
Welcome New IRB Members!
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
AAHRPP Accreditation Welcome to the University of Georgia’s presentation for accreditation of the human research protection program (HRPP). This presentation.
Scholars in Medicine 2015 Student Projects IRB Submission Process
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
Cayuse IRB USER guide Villanova University
USF Research Integrity & Compliance
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Patty Orndoff RN, MEd IRB Education Coordinator
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

dLab Day 3 eProtocol Submissions Diana Holt and Colleen Kohashi Office for the Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS)

Today’s Agenda eProtocol Essentials Short eProtocol Demo General Tips for Approval Common Submission Problems Question & Answer Period

eProtocol Essentials Who can use eProtocol? Who can be listed as Principal Investigator (PI) or Faculty Sponsor? Berkeley eProtocol uses CalNet authentication. Anyone with a CalNet ID and password can access the system.CalNet The person listed on the protocol as Principal Investigator (PI) must be an employee of UCB (usually with an academic appointment) who is eligible under University policy to submit proposals for extramural support of a research & to perform research involving human subjects.

eProtocol Essentials // Designations Principal Investigator (PI) The Principal Investigator is the person who has primary responsibility for the design, execution, and management of a research project and is involved in a significant manner. Faculty Sponsor The Faculty Sponsor is a faculty member who has Principal Investigator status and agrees to sponsor the research of a student or postdoctoral investigator. Student or Postdoctoral Investigator (*must have faculty sponsor) The Student or Postdoctoral Investigator is an undergraduate or graduate student enrolled at UCB, or a postdoctoral scholar with a UCB appointment.

eProtocol Essentials // Compatibility Browser Make sure that you are using a web browser that is compatible with eProtocol: With Macs, use Safari With PCs, use Firefox (*eProtocol does not consistently support Chrome) Pop-up Blockers Make sure that your pop-up blocker is turned off

eProtocol Essentials // Plan Ahead Exempt Protocols: Reviewed on a rolling basis // Usually a month or less for review and approval. Expedited Protocols: Reviewed on a rolling basis // Depending on the quality and completeness of the submission, approval can take up to 8 weeks or longer. Full Committee Protocols: Submit by the deadlines posted on the CPHS website. Note: Limited summer and winter holiday meetings. 12/21/2015 6

eProtocol Essentials // Forms Social Behavioral / Exempt Social Behavioral / Non-Exempt Biomedical / Exempt Biomedical / Non-Exempt *Non-Exempt forms are used for protocols reviewed by Expedited and Full Committee procedures. Note: There is no Exempt to Non-Exempt application “conversion system.” If in doubt, call OPHS for a consultation.

eProtocol Tips // Informed Consent Provide a comprehensive informed consent process. Researchers should ensure that the consent documents are clear and concise Include translations Use waivers (e.g., unsigned consent) where appropriate See the Informed Consent Resources on the CPHS website, including Consent Builder ( 12/21/2015 8

eProtocol Tips // Confidentiality Privacy refers to the individuals’ right to control access to themselves. Confidentiality refers to how private information provided by individuals will be protected by the researcher from release. **Describing how the confidentiality of research information will be maintained is an important element of the protocol & consent process. 12/21/2015 9

eProtocol Tips // Anonimity Anonymous data collection means that no identifiable information (e.g., name, address, student ID number, , phone number, etc.) is connected to the data either directly or through a coding system, at any point in the study. Videotapes and photographs, audio recordings are considered to be identifiable; therefore the use thereof would not be considered anonymous. Multiple pieces of information, none of which are identifiable on their own, may identify a person when brought together. In this instance, the data would not be anonymous. 12/21/

eProtocol Tips // Resources eProtocol Quick Guides For step-by-step instructions on how to check for completeness, submit the protocol, respond to comments, etc. ( CPHS Guidance Documents There are Guidance documents on specific topics that may be germane to your research including deception in research, subject recruitment, etc. (

eProtocol Tips // Resources (con’t.) Student Investigator Guide: A comprehensive step-by-step sheet to help with planning, completing the application and what to expect and when. ( Contact the Office: We are available by phone, and in-person meetings to assist investigators. (Contact information to follow at the end of the presentation.) 12/21/

Commonly Requested Revisions Subject Population & Recruitment Include maximum total sample size. If unsure, over- estimate. Include recruitment details specific to the proposed study and provide copies of all recruitment documents (e.g., scripts, web postings, etc.). Data Collection Include copies of all data collection materials. Include interview guide(s). At minimum, include topics to be explored during the interview.

Commonly Requested Revisions (con’t.) Benefits: Include anticipated benefit to subject and society in the protocol. If there is no benefit to subject, state so. Attachments section: Include a PDF copy of the UCB CITI completion report for all students listed on the protocol. Complete Group 1 (bio-medical) or Group 2 (social-behavioral) for Research Investigators and Key Personnel. *The Responsible Conduct of Research will not suffice. 12/21/

Commonly Requested Revisions (con’t.) There are specific timeframes for reporting Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events (see as follows (copy into eProtocol application): “An initial report will be made to the Director, Research Subject Protection, within no more than one week (7 calendar days) of the Principal Investigator learning of the incident. The report can be made by fax, mail/delivery, phone, or . The initial report will be followed by a formal written report, submitted via eProtocol, within no more than two weeks (14 calendar days) of the Principal Investigator learning of the incident.”

Commonly Requested Revisions (con’t.) When responding to comments: Provide thorough but concise answers. Only include information relevant to the question posed. Be sure make the applicable revisions directly into the protocol as well. Be sure to click on the “submit to IRB” button to submit your responses and revisions. Once successfully sent, your dashboard will state “Responses Sent Cycle XX.”

For More Information & Assistance Call Monday to Friday, 8:30am-12pm, 1pm- 4:30pm Speak with the analyst who answers the phone In-person Meeting 2150 Shattuck Ave., Suite 300 Monday to Friday, 8:30am-12pm, 1pm- 4:30pm In-person assistance must be scheduled in advance Website