Scott Davis, Team Leader March 13, 2009.  SC DDFO established fiscal year 2009 Annual Performance Plan and assessments objectives, which included this.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ways to Improve the Hazard Management Process
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
1 Documentation Legal Framework Air Navigation Orders Guidelines ATS Manual Airport Manual Safety Management Manual ICAO Annexes Licenses / Certificates.
Module N° 7 – SSP training programme
St. Louis Public Schools Curriculum Management Audit Speaker Dr. James Scott Lead Auditor for the St. Louis Public Schools Curriculum Management Audit.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety.
Contractor Assurance System AC Overview October 13, 2009.
RENEWAL & SUCCESSION CONSIDERATIONS Elisa A. Falco, Director of Education & Training.
Performance management guidance
Fermilab Environmental Management System (EMS)
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
LCLS Transition to Science DOE Status Review of the LUSI MIE Project LCLS NEH ARR John Arthur LCLS Experimental Facilities Division August 11, 2009 Welcome.
1 Assessment: Audits. Assessment: Audits - Module 9 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this activity, you will be able to: Develop a process to prepare.
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
EMS Training, Awareness & Competence Norma Murphy
CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety FIRE PROTECTON FUNCTIONAL AREA CDNS BIENNIAL REVIEWS May 15, 2012 Carl Sykes.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice from Federal Compliance to Accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Old Policy – which no one ever seem to have heard of.
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
1 Integrated Safety Management Peer Review Corrective Action Plan Howard K. Hatayama Director Environmental Health and Safety Division Presented to the.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
Environmental Management System Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
COMMUNITY AWARENESS / EMERGENCY RESPONSE BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLES AND TOOLS David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council May 31,
Soft Tech Development Inc. 1 Software Project Tracking A CMM Level 2 Key Process Area Soft Tech Development Inc.
Research Auditing Presented by: Darlene Krueger, MBA RN CCRA Chief, GCP Auditing & Training VA Cooperative Studies Program Albuquerque, NM.
Health and Safety Policy
The Expectation Triad Healthcare Engineering Consultants Regulatory Compliance: “Ensuring that all of the required standards are being met”
Important informations
Project Life Cycle – Project Initiation © Ed Green Penn State University All Rights Reserved.
11 FSO Assessment of Fermilab QA Program Status September 14 – 18, 2009.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Inspection Policies and Procedures INSPECTION POLICIES.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Edward T. Lessard ESHQ.
Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Grandview High School March 9-10, 2009.
1.  Mission: Improve and operate accelerators, support the experimental program, and design and construct new accelerator facilities in an environmentally.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
Dispensary and Administration Site Information Presentation.
Start Something Quality Assurance System Assessment ™
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Laser Safety Roundtable 2005 DANGER !. Agenda May 2005 In-house Laser Safety Audit Results Upcoming Laser Safety Audit: Oak Ridge Site Office Sept 13-14,
NASRO Management Symposium Copyright NEW SRO ORIENTATION & TRAINING “THE HARDEST THING TO LEARN IN LIFE IS WHICH BRIDGE TO CROSS AND WHICH.
1 David Schultz 1 SLAC Self-Assessment Programs meeting ASO Requirements David Schultz LCLS Program Division Director SLAC National.
Project Management Processes for a Project
Accelerator Safety Order Revision Process Frank Kornegay, ORNL SNS Dennie Parzyck, DOE FSO.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Engineering Documentation
Audits & DOE Walkthroughs ISO and OHSAS surveillance audits August 18 th – 20 th –CD, ESH&Q, and FESS organizations to be audited Software.
PIP-II Environment, Safety, Health & Quality Assurance Strategy John Anderson Jr. DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Overview of FESHCom Subcommittees Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013.
Radiation Protection Standards for Prompt Radiation Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013.
Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence (VPP CX) Capability for the Department.
Personnel.
Planning for Succession
Inspector's Role and Responsibilities
Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) Training for Safety and Health Staff
Inspector's Role and Responsibilities
Our new quality framework and methodology:
Ian Evans SSRL Safety Office
Presentation transcript:

Scott Davis, Team Leader March 13, 2009

 SC DDFO established fiscal year 2009 Annual Performance Plan and assessments objectives, which included this review.  The purpose of the assessment was to evaluate all aspects of implementation of the DOE Order and the elements of SCMS relevant to accelerator safety at Fermilab.

 Scott Davis, SC, Team Leader – DOE Order 226.1A and SCMS Requirements, DOE Site Office, DDFO Assessment Items  Michael Epps, TJ Site Office – Training and Qualification, Written Procedures, DOE Order 226.1A and SCMS Requirements (Training), DOE Site Office Accelerator Safety Responsibilities  Russell Kelly, ORO – SADs, ASEs, Shielding Policy  Scott Wenholz, SLAC Site Office – USIs, ARRs, Internal Safety Review System, DOE Order 226.1A and SCMS Requirements  Karen Brown, Parallax – Coordinator/Editor

 Strengths: 3  Level 2 Findings: 6  Level 3 Findings: 1

 STR-ISSS-1: Historically, the ES&H group and the FSO have conducted regular scheduled and spontaneous walkthroughs of all the Fermilab facilities during all aspects of construction and operation.  STR-ISSS-2: All Fermilab Department Heads now report to their respective Division/Section/Center Heads, and the ES&H Director reports directly to the Laboratory Director. The laboratory has thus removed layers of management to improve communications.  STR-DOE-1: The working relationship between the FSO and Fermilab is excellent, with open lines of communication. For example, Fermilab involves the FSO Facility Representative in new project planning long before the stage when these projects would normally be brought to DOE’s attention.

 FIND-SAD/ASE-L2-1: The Fermilab SADs should contain sufficient descriptive information and analytical results pertaining to the specific hazards and risks identified during the safety analysis process to provide an understanding of the risks presented by the proposed operations.  FIND-SAD/ASE-L2-2: Fermilab lists the safety class SSCs in FESHM Chapter 3010, Significant and Reportable Occurrences, but the listed items are not consistent with the engineered controls identified in the various Fermilab SADs.

 FIND-SAD/ASE-L2-3: The ASE must contain the critical controls that are necessary to attain acceptable risk.  FIND-USI-L2-1: Fermilab does not have a formal USI procedure. FESHM Chapter 2010, Planning and Review of Accelerator Facilities and Their Operations, is partially equivalent, but it does not fully meet the requirements.

 FIND-ISSS-L2-1: The Fermilab Director’s Policy Manual, No , Revision 0, requires, “At a minimum, all documents shall have Document number, Revision, Issue and Date in the heading of all controlled documents.” This policy does not appear to be consistently applied based on the documents reviewed.  FIND-DOE-L2-1: Two of the ASEs (A0 Photoinjector and Vertical Cavity Test Facility) do not have DOE approval, and an ASE has not been developed for the D Zero Test Calorimeter.

 FIND-ISSS-L3-1: Seven of the 11 SADs are beyond the five-year review due date. Fermilab’s schedule to bring all out-of-date SADs into compliance with the internal five- year review schedule is in the planning stages.

This assessment team identified the following key results:  The assessment team validated the accelerator inventory.  The assessment resulted in numerous opportunities for improvement in the accelerator safety documentation.  The safety management systems supporting accelerator safety are being implemented; however, we recommend better consistency and control of documentation.

 Fermilab has done a good job in tracking training for operations and support personnel.  The accelerator activities that the team observed demonstrated a good safety culture.  The issues identified in the area of accelerator safety documentation and identified program areas can be used to strengthen the FSO Oversight Program.  The team determined that the FSO implements its responsibilities for accelerator safety activities.

 Support from the FSO and Fermilab was outstanding. In particular, the team would like to recognize the following people:  Dennie Parzyck, FSO  Mary Ann Burt, FSO  Don Cossairt, Fermilab  John Anderson, Fermilab  Chicago IT Staff (especially Daryl)