ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Fall 2004 Jeff Killen Brandon Ade Drew Whipple Matt Compton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 6  Spring 2010 Digital Sound Projection.
Advertisements

ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Srichand Varun Madhu Anvesh.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Stuart Pulliam Will Granger Linda.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Nathan Irvin Will Bouchonnet Allen.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 03  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Design Review – Spring 2010 Team 15. Team Members.
Group 5: Universal Exports Group Members (left to right): Dan Sparks, Edward Sheriff, Mike Klockow, and Jon Hopp.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 14  Spring 2006 Jason, Nathanael, David, David.
Ryan McLean John-Michael Mulesa Joe Perrin Zach Schoenberger Formal Design Review.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2008 Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Ian Bacon Eric Yee.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 14  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
Flatiron Mobile Device Security Monitor Thomas Horacek Lucas Greve.
ECE Grande ECE 477 Design Review Team 3 - Fall 2008.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 16 − Spring 2013 Scott Stack Neil Kumar Jon Roose John Hubberts.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 09  Spring 2010 Luke Ethan Andy Dhruv.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Spring 2005.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 8  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Professional componentsProfessional.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 1  Fall 2005 Kwun Fung Yau Chad Carrie Zubin Rupawala Manoj Jacob.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 7  Spring 2011 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 9  Fall 2005 Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich Steven Kady.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 7  Fall 2005 Tarun Siripurapu Nichole Mattson Colleen Shea Siddharth Sen.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 9  Fall 2004 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 2  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 14  Spring 2005 BENNY PARICHEY RAKESH ANUBHAV.
Team Foreigner (Group 11) “Cold as Ice” Smart Refrigerator Midterm Design Review.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Fall 2005 ChadJeffMel Maruf.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 6  Spring 2005 Mike Lowe Eric SuJohn Parlindungan KamBiu Chan.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Fall 2009 Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips,
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Spring 2006 Prashant Grimella Andy Brezinsky Tim Sendgikoski Clark Malmgren.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 14  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 5  Fall 2009 Left to right: Ben, Dennis, Jacqui, Ian.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 3  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 14  Spring 2012.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 10  Spring 2005 Jer-Wei Lam (Sean) Jacinto Chang Ming Sum Wong Kevin Muthuri Team Lead Web:
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 2  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8(SLOW)  Spring 2006.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Spring 2014 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2006 Justin Thacker, Matt Kocsis, Ian Snyder, Dustin Poe.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 2  Spring 2010 Caleb Ayew-ew Josh Long Katie Schremser The Digi-Brush.
1 © 2008 RoboRubik ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 11 – Spring 2008 Tyler Heck Dave Bukiet Erik Carron Casey Kloiber.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 7  Spring 2005.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 3  Fall 2012 Daniel Carolyn Jonathan Mihir Stein McMican Kuntzman Shah.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Spring 2010 Mike Wei Jon SchwarzCarlo Mesina Bill Bergquist.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Fall 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Spring 2011 Petra M. Alex B. Alex G. Kim S.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4 Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team BOAR  Fall 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Left to Right:
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Spring 2009 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Senior Design Group 10  Spring 2006 Jonathan Jared Jennifer Josh.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 22  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2008 Varun Srichand Anvesh Madhu.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 9  Fall 2009 DART.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 3  Spring 2005 “VoIP Connect” Ankur TrushalAshish Dushyant.
<Add team picture or relevant project picture here>
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 04  Spring 2010
ECE 477 Design Review Group 3  Fall 2005
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 5  Spring 2005
ECE 477 Digital Systems Senior Design Project  Fall 2004
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2006
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 15  Spring 2010
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2011
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 10  Spring 2005
Presentation transcript:

ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Fall 2004 Jeff Killen Brandon Ade Drew Whipple Matt Compton

Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Professional componentsProfessional components Design componentsDesign components Success criteria demonstrationsSuccess criteria demonstrations Individual contributionsIndividual contributions Project summaryProject summary Questions / discussionQuestions / discussion

Project Overview “Cold as Ice” Refrigerator“Cold as Ice” Refrigerator Intelligent applianceIntelligent appliance –RFID scanning for real-time inventory –Digital temperature control –Remote user interface through Ethernet –Local user interface with LCD and keypad RFID is an emerging technologyRFID is an emerging technology –Current products –Many future applications

Block Diagram 9V DC wall-wart Texas Instruments Housed S6350 Midrange RFID Reader RabbitCore RCM2200 C- Programmable Module 12V DC wall-wart National Semiconductor LM2676S – 5.0 3A step-down voltage regulator Maxim +/- 15kV ESD-Protected, Signle/Dual/Octal, CMOS Switch Debouncers Storm 3K button keypad Microchip TC72 Digital Temperature Sensor with SPI Interface Potter & Brumfield T77S1D10-05 Sealed Power Relay Compressor Ethernet Port 120V AC wall outlet DB9 Connector 9 2 ~ Reset Switch Crystalfontz America, Inc. Mod. CFAH2004A-NYA-JP 4x20 LCD RFID Button

Professional Components Constraint analysis and component selection rationaleConstraint analysis and component selection rationale Patent liability analysisPatent liability analysis Reliability and safety analysisReliability and safety analysis Ethical and environmental impact analysisEthical and environmental impact analysis

Constraint Analysis MicrocontrollerMicrocontroller –Ethernet Interface –Simplicity RFID KitRFID Kit –Range - Ideally –Problems –Alternatives

Patent Liability Analysis Possible Literal InfringementsPossible Literal Infringements –6,327,576: System and method for managing expiration-dated products utilizing an electronic receipt Recommend to pay licensing fees to FujitsuRecommend to pay licensing fees to Fujitsu Possible Doctrine of Equivalents InfringementPossible Doctrine of Equivalents Infringement –6,793,127: Internet enabled resource constrained terminal for processing RFID tags Recommend to continue with developmentRecommend to continue with development –6,802,186: Refrigerator system and software architecture for 2 refrigerated compartments with user specified temperature Recommend to pay licensing fees to GERecommend to pay licensing fees to GE

Reliability/Safety Analysis 5 critical components analyzed5 critical components analyzed –LM2676 Step-down Regulator – MTTF 9.8 years –T77 Power Relay – MTTF 19 years –TC72 Temperature Sensor – 51 years –Rabbit 2000 Microcontroller – MTTF 52 years –TIP122 NPN Transistor – 575 years High criticality failuresHigh criticality failures –Voltage regulator power supply –Compressor control involving temperature sensor

Ethical/Environmental Analysis Ethical IssuesEthical Issues –Protect electrical components from food spills / condensation –Warning label on main board enclosure –Compressor blowout prevention module –Cold environment component ratings –High temperature/food spoilage prevention module Environmental IssuesEnvironmental Issues –PCB fabrication (high material consumption) & disposal (lead, hazardous waste) Dry plasma metal depositionDry plasma metal deposition –Refrigerator coolant Substitute for Freon and other CFC/HCFCSubstitute for Freon and other CFC/HCFCrefrigerants

Design Components Packaging design considerationsPackaging design considerations Schematic design considerationsSchematic design considerations PCB layout design considerationsPCB layout design considerations Software design considerationsSoftware design considerations

Packaging Design Packaging ComponentsPackaging Components –Mini-fridge, LCD, keypad, RFID, scan- request pushbutton Weight: 58 lbsWeight: 58 lbs Cost: $854.30Cost: $854.30

Schematic Design

PCB Layout Design

6.706” x 3.030”6.706” x 3.030” 12 mil / 40 mil tracings12 mil / 40 mil tracings Decoupling caps for all ICsDecoupling caps for all ICs Single point ground/powerSingle point ground/power 3 segments (power supply, relay driver, micro/all else)3 segments (power supply, relay driver, micro/all else) Off-board relayOff-board relay Result: no burnt traces or EMI problemsResult: no burnt traces or EMI problems

Software Design Interrupt Driven/PollingInterrupt Driven/Polling ModulesModules –Keypad Control Module –RFID Control Module –Temperature Control Module –Web Server

Success Criteria Demonstrations 1. Ability to sense and decode RFID tags affixed to ‘food’ items 2. Ability to query ‘food inventory’ via web Demonstration of 1 & 2 Demonstration of 1 & 2 Demonstration of 1 & 2 3. Ability to update/maintain a food inventory Demonstration of 3 Demonstration of 3 4. Ability to display status information on an LCD display – Demonstration of 4 Demonstration of 4Demonstration of 4 5. Ability to control cabinet temperature via keypad and web via keypad and web Demonstration of 5 Demonstration of 5

Individual Contributions Team Leader – Drew WhippleTeam Leader – Drew Whipple Team Member 2 – Matt ComptonTeam Member 2 – Matt Compton Team Member 3 – Brandon AdeTeam Member 3 – Brandon Ade Team Member 4 – Jeff KillenTeam Member 4 – Jeff Killen

Team Leader – Drew Whipple Packaging DesignPackaging Design Patent Liability AnalysisPatent Liability Analysis Software implementationSoftware implementation Software/hardware interactionSoftware/hardware interaction

Member 2 – Matt Compton Component Selection RationaleComponent Selection Rationale SoftwareSoftware –Design of Software Structure –Software Implementation Hardware/Software InteractionHardware/Software Interaction Hardware DebugHardware Debug

Member 3 – Brandon Ade Reliability/Safety AnalysisReliability/Safety Analysis SchematicSchematic Hardware components selectionHardware components selection PCB solderingPCB soldering Hardware testing and modificationsHardware testing and modifications

Member 4 – Jeff Killen PCB Layout and DesignPCB Layout and Design Ethical and Environmental Impact AnalysisEthical and Environmental Impact Analysis Refrigerator selection/preparation/modificationRefrigerator selection/preparation/modification Hardware testing/debuggingHardware testing/debugging Adapt to separate temperature compartmentsAdapt to separate temperature compartments

Project Summary Important lessons learnedImportant lessons learned –Division of labor and individual accountability –Get parts as early in the project as possible –Peer reviews of other team members’ work –Plan in-depth early –Understand components’ soldering temperature limits

Project Summary Second iteration enhancementsSecond iteration enhancements –Better optimized product packaging –More robust/secure web server and LCD –Online recipe database –More powerful RFID scanner

Questions / Discussion