C2d 12.12.02 Data flow diagram BCD from SSC Texas SAO Quality Analysis and Improved Calibrated Data Mapping team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 KEPLER; Data Validation and Follow Up Observations CoRoT Symposium W.J. Borucki & the Kepler Team 5 February.
Advertisements

Change Detection C. Stauffer and W.E.L. Grimson, “Learning patterns of activity using real time tracking,” IEEE Trans. On PAMI, 22(8): , Aug 2000.
MIPS Data Processing for SINGS George J. Bendo & Chad Engelbracht (A ''George's Adventures in Learning OpenOffice'' Presentation)
Spectroscopic Data ASTR 3010 Lecture 15 Textbook Ch.11.
SJC - 109/29/05IRAC Calibration Workshop Status of IRAC Artifact Corrector Sean Carey.
VISTA/WFCAM pipelines summit pipeline: real time DQC verified raw product to Garching standard pipeline: instrumental signature removal, catalogue production,
FMOS Observations and Data 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
AIA Level 1 Processing N. Hurlburt. AIA Data Levels.
HAWCPol / SuperHAWC Software & Operations J. Dotson July 28, 2007.
Section 15-1GLAST Ground System Design Review August 18&19, 2004 ISOC Organization ISOC Manager R Cameron Commanding, H&S Timeline Planning Command Generation.
Cosmos Data Products Version Peter Capak (Caltech) May, 23, 2005 Kyoto Cosmos Meeting.
VISTA pipelines summit pipeline: real time DQC verified raw product to Garching standard pipeline: instrumental signature removal, catalogue production,
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Section Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large Area Telescope ISOC Peer Review 7.2.
CXC CUC September SDS Page 1 CUC Sep 2007 Science Data Systems – Jonathan McDowell.
PSF Reconstruction: Part I The PSF “Core” Primary Goal: Derive PSFs for point source detection and PSF fitting photometry. Secondary Goal: Derive PSFs.
Stellar Linearity Test Jason Surace (Spitzer Science Center)
Introduction to Spitzer and some applications Data products Pipelines Preliminary work K. Nilsson, J.M. Castro Cerón, J.P.U. Fynbo, D.J. Watson, J. Hjorth.
A Preliminary Cycle 1 Calibration Plan for the JWST Science Instruments James Muzerolle.
A Primer on Image Acquisition and Data Reduction Using TheSky6, CCDSoft V5 and Microsoft Excel Thomas C. Smith Dark Ridge Observatory (DRO)
Processing of exoplanet full field images Farid Karioty CoRoT Week 12/06/2005.
NICMOS IntraPixel Sensitivity Chun Xu and Bahram Mobasher Space Telescope Science Institute Abstract We present here the new measurements of the NICMOS.
0. To first order, the instrument is working very well ! 1.Evolution of the IR detector with time 2.Stability of the L channel 3.Saturation 4.Linearity.
Memorandam of the discussion on FMOS observations and data kicked off by Ian Lewis Masayuki Akiyama 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
Pipeline calibrations of ACS data Max Mutchler Hubble Space Telescope Calibration Workshop October 2005.
Detector Monitoring as part of VLT Science and Data Flow Operations Wolfgang Hummel DMO/DFO/QC group Lander de Bilbao, SDD/pipeline group Andrea Modigliani,
Beating Noise Observational Techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 11 Textbook.
Distortion in the WFC Jay Anderson Rice University
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
RAS National Astronomy Meeting April 2006, University of Leicester, UK The XMM-Newton Slew Survey The excellent sensitivity of the XMM-Newton.
VIPER Quality Assessment Overview Presenter: Sathyadev Ramachandran, SPS Inc.
SCIOPS 2013 Reinhard Hanuschik, ESO Garching The VLT Quality Control Loop.
1 Groningen, November 2003 ASTROWISE OAC TEAM The ASTRO-WISE project: status at OAC The OAC AW team: J.M. Alcalà, F. Getman, A. Grado, M. Pavlov,
Data Analysis Software Development Hisanori Furusawa ADC, NAOJ For HSC analysis software team 1.
Source catalog generation Aim: Build the LAT source catalog (1, 3, 5 years) Jean Ballet, CEA SaclayGSFC, 29 June 2005 Four main functions: Find unknown.
Counting individual galaxies from deep mid-IR Spitzer surveys Giulia Rodighiero University of Padova Carlo Lari IRA Bologna Francesca Pozzi University.
UPDATED CTE CORRECTION FORMULAE FOR ACS Marco Chiaberge Pey Lian Lim, Vera Kozhurina-Platais, Marco Sirianni Ron Gilliland, Jennifer Mack.
18/01/01GEO data analysis meeting, Golm Issues in GW bursts Detection Soumya D. Mohanty AEI Outline of the talk Transient Tests (Transient=Burst) Establishing.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
April 2001 OPTICON workshop in Nice 1 The PSF homogenization problem in large imaging surveys Emmanuel BERTIN (TERAPIX)
Page 1 Visual calibration for (mobile) devices Lode De Paepe GOAL: Calibrate the luminance response of a display (transfer function of the display.
VST ATLAS: Requirements, Operations and Products Tom Shanks, Nigel Metcalfe, Jamie McMillan (Durham Univ.) +CASU.
MOS Data Reduction Michael Balogh University of Durham.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
Kitt Peak Vacuum Telescope -- Raw to Synoptic Map J. Harvey.
JWST Time-Series Pipeline Nikole K. Lewis STScI. Data Pipeline for Transiting Exoplanets The foundation for the Spitzer and Hubble data pipelines were.
1 Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Daryl Swade Archive Team Meeting June 16, 2014.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
Corot:Ubatuba Nov The Ground Segment: Data Processing. Software development in laboratories. Brazilian contribution. Michel Auvergne Réza Samadi.
NIRISS NRM bad pixel tolerance analysis David Lafrenière 2012 February 21.
Mountaintop Software for the Dark Energy Camera Jon Thaler 1, T. Abbott 2, I. Karliner 1, T. Qian 1, K. Honscheid 3, W. Merritt 4, L. Buckley-Geer 4 1.
Data Processing & Quality Control Group [ Faculty Meeting Sept Data Processing & Quality Control Quality Control Group head: Reinhard.
STScI 2010 Calibration Workshop The NICMOS Legacy Archival Recalibration Project Anton M. Koekemoer and the STScI NICMOS Team (E. Barker, E. Bergeron,
July 21, 2004 Natalia Kuznetsova NICMOS Analysis of ACS ● Data Inventory ● Calibration ● Bad pixel mask ● Extracting photometry ● Next steps 1.
Spotting the life of stars „Pi of the Sky” Project Katarzyna Kwiecińska UKSW-SNŚ on behalf of the Pi of the Sky collaboration.
Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University.
1 Notes about eis_prep Alessandro Gardini University of Oslo Oslo, July 9th, 2009.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
14/02/2008 Michele Bianco 1 G.Chiodini & E.Gorini ATLAS RPC certification with cosmic rays Università del Salento Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
SINFONI data reduction using the ESO pipeline. Instrument design and its impact on the data (I) integral field spectrometer using mirrors brickwall pattern.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
Single Object Slitless Spectroscopy Simulations
European Southern Observatory
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía
JWST Pipeline Overview
Imaging data obtained with the
Basics of Photometry.
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

c2d Data flow diagram BCD from SSC Texas SAO Quality Analysis and Improved Calibrated Data Mapping team

c2d BCD products Data Contents BCDBasic calibrated data – dark-subtracted, linearized, flat-fielded, flux-calibrated Raw16-bit unreduced array data PmaskData quality flag image for calibration images associated with the DCE DmaskData quality flag image for the DCE LatentsLatent image prediction C-RayProbability of CR event for a pixel FlatFlat field divided into raw data DarkDark image subtracted from raw data LinearityLinearity correction factor

c2d IRAC calibration and characterization  Characterize residual instrumental effects in Basic Calibrated Data (BCD).  Monitor image quality in BCD.  Provide Improved Calibrated Data (ICD).  Work with Instrument Team (IT) at SAO and Instrument Support Team (IST) at SSC to implement improved processing.  Provide feedback to c2d team on observing strategies.  Deliver ICD to mapping teams in 2-4 days. Myers, Allen, Porras

c2d Zeroth level QA  Is AOR complete?  Are images uncorrupted?  Did AOT execute correctly?  Is pointing reconstruction correct?  Do images in map overlap sufficiently?  Are images in focus?  Do images suffer from jitter?  Are the images badly under or over exposed?  Is the background level correct?  Were there dark/flat calibration errors?  Was there significant stray/scattered light? The SSC will do this checking for each BQD.

c2d Higher level QA  Do simple image statistics. median, sigma flux distribution of extracted sources flux distribution of background pixels (may be able to access SSC BCD statistics)  Monitor image quality over time – track changes in focus or PSF.  Check cosmic ray, latent identification, etc.  Create and maintain database with QA “scores” (statistics and image quality measures).  Primary tools: IRAF/IDL and “QLVT” (or similar).

c2d Putting the “I” in ICD  Improved dark subtraction or flat field division e.g. using different set of calibrator images.  Improved cosmic ray detection, latents detection. e.g. experiment with detection/sensitivity thresholds.  Improved astrometric solution. e.g. fits to 2MASS (better than SSC pipeline?)  Primary tool: SAO pipeline (hear about later).

c2d Data volume  Clouds 2 dithers x 4 bands x 2 (HDR) + 2 dithers x 4 bands) x 2320 pointings = 55,680 images  Cores = 8500 images  Stars = 2880 images  BCD = 6.71 images x 3.5 Mbytes/image = 235 Gbytes Store on 2x 144 GB NetApp data disks

c2d Data rate  Total of 67,000 images obtained over 2.5 years  1 IRAC PAO = 10 days == 17.4 PAO/yr == 43.5 PAO  67,000 images / 43.5 PAO = 1540 images/PAO = 154 images obtained per day assume 2 FTE’s == 77 images / day / person  Volume = 540 Mbytes per day  Transfer rate Texas SAO = 1.5 Mbytes/sec ???

c2d IRAC health & safety  ~500 Housekeeping channels every 30 sec.  Automatically delivered to SAO every 24 hrs, along with S/C command history and fault report.  Automatic limit checking, statistics. Web report generated.  Software already in place to do trending analysis, merging of cmd history and HK.