UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Advertisements

1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
The Towson University Learning Environment Results of the 2002 National Survey of Student Engagement Linda Suskie, Director Office of Assessment.
College of Engineering. Table of Contents Introduction about the National Survey of Student engagement. NSSE response rate Benchmarking areas Areas of.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
 NSSE Results Austin Peay State University.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE): Overview of 2008 Results for Rutgers University.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Faculty Senate Pat Hulsebosch, Office of Academic Quality 11/17/08.
Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, & Assessment
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
Presentation transcript:

UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012

Questions to be answered include… What is NSSE? What does NSSE measure? How many students completed the 2012 NSSE survey? How did Nicholls perform on the 2012 administration compared with other UL system institutions? How did NSSE scores for Nicholls change between the administrations compared with other UL system institutions? What additional NSSE data and resources can the AIR office provide?

What is NSSE? NSSE is an national survey of freshmen and senior college students conducted every spring that measures the level of student engagement in academic and social practices that are linked to student learning, satisfaction, and overall success. In 2012 over 285,000 students at 546 institutions completed a NSSE survey. The large number of NSSE-participating institutions allows for comparisons between Nicholls and other universities.

What does NSSE measure? NSSE benchmarks NSSE consists of five benchmarks which cover different areas of student engagement. These benchmarks are: Level of Academic Challenge measures time spent preparing for class, amount of student reading and writing, and institutional emphasis on academics. Active and Collaborative Learning measures class participation, working collaboratively with other students, and involvement in tutoring or community-based projects. Student-Faculty Interaction measures the extent to which students talk, work with, and receive feedback from faculty members.

What does NSSE measure? NSSE benchmarks (continued) Enriching Educational Experiences measures campus diversity and student participation in out-of-class learning activities (e.g., internships, capstone courses, etc.). Supportive Campus Environment measures student perceptions of campus social/academic support and quality of relationships with other students, staff, and faculty.

What does NSSE measure? Other items Other NSSE items of interest include: Time usage items ask students how many hours per week they spent preparing for class, working, participating in co-curricular activities, relaxing/socializing, caring for dependents, and commuting to class. Global items ask students how they feel about their entire educational experience and if they would attend Nicholls if they could start over again.

How many students completed the 2012 NSSE survey? 540 Nicholls students completed the NSSE in Spring 2012 (149 freshmen and 391 seniors). Nicholls had a 30% response rate, which was higher than the 24% response rate for UL system institutions overall. The national response rate was 32%.

How did Nicholls perform on the 2012 administration compared with other UL system institutions? – NSSE Benchmarks

How did Nicholls perform on the 2012 administration compared with other UL system institutions? – Global Items

How did Nicholls perform on the 2012 administration compared with other UL system institutions? - Time usage items

How did NSSE scores for Nicholls change between the administrations compared with other UL system institutions? – NSSE benchmarks

How did NSSE scores for Nicholls change between the administrations compared with other UL system institutions? – Global items

How did NSSE scores for Nicholls change between the administrations compared with other UL system institutions? – Time usage items

Summary of NSSE results: NSSE benchmarks Nicholls freshmen had significantly lower scores that UL system freshmen on four out of five benchmarks. Some improvement was seen between , especially on Student-Faculty Interaction (4 pt. increase). Nicholls seniors had significantly lower scores on the Level of Academic Challenge benchmark than UL system seniors, but significantly higher scores on Active and Collaborative Learning. Substantial improvement was seen between on all benchmarks except Level of Academic Challenge.

Summary of NSSE results: Global Items (Attending the same institution) When asked “If you could start over again, would you go to the same institution you are now attending?”, 39% of Nicholls freshmen said “definitely yes” compared with 49% of UL system freshmen. The percentage of seniors that said “definitely yes” was the same for both groups (47%). Similar results were observed for Nicholls students in 2010, with a slight increase seen between for UL system freshmen/seniors.

Summary of NSSE results: Global Items (Entire educational experience) When asked “How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution?”, 32% of Nicholls freshmen said “excellent” compared with 38% of UL system freshmen. A 7% decrease of Nicholls freshmen responding “excellent” or “good” was seen between % of Nicholls seniors responded “excellent”, which is the same percentage UL system seniors. Little change was observed since 2010.

Summary of NSSE results: Time usage Nicholls freshmen work almost 2.5 hours more than UL system freshmen, and spent slightly more than 1 hour relaxing/socializing than UL system freshmen. Compared with 2010, Nicholls freshmen spent almost 1 hour more working, and 1 hour less commuting to school. UL system freshmen worked over an hour less than in Nicholls seniors work between 1.5 – 2 hours less than UL system seniors, spent 1 hour more relaxing, and spent almost 1 hour more commuting. Compared with 2010, Nicholls seniors work 2.5 hours less, and spent almost an hour less commuting to school.

What additional NSSE data and resources can the AIR office provide? Information about statistical significance tests and effect sizes on NSSE benchmarks and items Breakouts by major and program area (Major field reports) Breakouts for specific populations (e.g., international students, students with disabilities, athletes, etc.) Information about using NSSE data to conduct focus groups and cognitive interviews with students For more information about NSSE, contact Tucker Handley at ext or