De Jonge v. Oregon John Salinkas. Case facts  Case heard: December 9th,1936  Defendant: Dirk De Jonge  Decided by Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes 

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Schenck v US Facts of the case Charles Schenck, Secretary of the Socialist party, was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 Along with.

Advertisements

Supreme Court First Amendment Case Freedom of Speech

Judicial Branch Facts about the Judicial Branch by: Aireannah and Zoe.

Marbury vs. Madison (1803) Essential Skill:

TEXAS V. JOHNSON. WHAT HAPPENED 1984 Gregory Lee Johnson was a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade At a rally he burned the American flag.

Yates vs. United States Argued October 8-9, 1956 Decided June 17, 1957.

Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule Section 10.2 The Exclusionary Rule.

The federal Court System Jobs of the Court. 1.Civil Disputes -Court settle disputes (arguments) The court uses the law to make a decision Cases deal with.

Put the statements in order according to the following terms: (a.) jurisdiction (b.) judicial review (c.) subpoena (d.) magistrate (e.) remand __ Issues.

THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Chapter 18. The Judicial System  Articles of Confederation did not set up a national judicial system  Major weakness of the Articles.

Supreme Court Case Review. Marbury v Madison What was an influence this case had on the power of the Federal Government?

Lemon v. Kurtzman by Jake Olsen. The Facts Two separate laws were at issue in this case – The Rhode Island Salary Supplement Act of 1969 – Pennsylvania.

Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco

Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?

Gitlow vs. New York Background Information  Gitlow v. New York was a Supreme Court decision which ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment had extended.

Famous court cases #4 Emmitt and Jordan.

A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation vs. The United States By: Nandan Patel Civic and Economics Honors 10/26/2013.

Supreme Court Cases Continued Civics. Furman V Georgia 1972 William Henry Furman convicted on Murder and Sentenced to Death – Supreme Court hears his.

Changes on the Constitution The power of the 14 th Amendment Amending the Constitution Amending the Constitution = Difficult process Amending the Constitution.

The Supreme Court. Separation of Powers Purpose of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court of the United States was created in accordance with provision.

Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.

Six Key Constitutional Principles: Popular Sovereignty.

Mapp v Ohio By: Gavin Koonts 10/27/13 Block 2. Mapp v Ohio  Dollree Mapp v State of Ohio  Argued: March 29, 1961  Decided: June 19, 1961.

MAPP V. OHIO Rachel Simmons. Background & Freedom at Issue  The 4 th and 14 th Amendments  With reasonable suspicion of a bomb at the house, the police.

THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Chapter 18. The Judicial System  Two types of cases:  Criminal Law: Government charges an individual with violating one or more.

Annie Ruch and Kylie McBride. The First A mendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise.

Crime and Justice Tuesday, January 21, Review Packet Due Tomorrow… In order to qualify for a retake on the test, the packet is due ▫At the BEGINNING.

Plessy V. Ferguson U.S. 537 Cassidy Osborne.

Chapter 10: The Judicial Branch

TOP 10 MOST IMPORTANT SUPREME COURT CASES By: Chevelle Caldwell.

The Judicial Branch of the Federal Government

LEHHS FOCUS: Lawyer Reconstruction to the Rise of Railroads.

Two cases Roe V. Wade and Morse v. Frederick. Roe v. Wade 1969 Norma Rae McCorvey asked for an abortion due to an unwanted pregnancy and was denied under.

What is this civil liberty? What does it look like in action? Our civil liberty is punishment. Punishment has looked many different ways. The civil.

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia 1831 John Ross- Cherokee Chief John Marshall- Chief Justice The Cherokee Nation wanted a federal injunction against laws passed.

Essential Question How does the Supreme Court function?

 The United States has an adversarial court system. › This means that two opposing sides must argue their cases before a judge in order to find the truth.

Texas vs. Johnson Argued: March 21, 1989 Decided: June 21, 1989 By: Garialdy De Jesus.

Look over all the cases in the powerpoint and select only one of the cases. Open the Supreme Court Cases Reading file on Edmodo and read about the case.

Wallace vs. Jaffree Alabama, 1985 Father versus Mobile County School – Ishmael Jaffree claimed his kids were being subjected to regular religious practices.

Shawn Blaisdell Period 1 1/19/09. Presented: April 17 th 1995 Decided Upon: June 14 th 1995  Witte pleaded guilty to a federal marijuana charge  Witte.

Frisby v. Schultz Alyssa Goodwin. Background Brookfield, Wisconsin Pro-life picketing Sandra Schultz Robert Braun Targeted Ordinance Residential area.

1 Chapter 5: The Court System. 2 Trial Courts Trial courts listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputes. There are 2 parties.

The Warren Court ( ) Appointed by Eisenhower Liberal period in court’s history Protected Civil Liberties & First Amendment Rights Malapportionment.

United States v. Nixon (1974) Ciera Dalton Block 2 10/26/13.

Chapter 10: Judicial Branch Describe the organization, functions, and jurisdiction of courts within the American judicial system. Explain the kinds of.

THE SEVENTH AND EIGHTH AMENDMENT ERIC FRENCH JOHN CASSIDY AUSTIN LIGHT.

Rachel Sturgis.  In 1994 Oregon enacted the Death with Dignity Act, which authorized physicians to prescribe lethal doses of controlled substances to.

US Government: Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Supreme Court Case Project By: Meadow Noonan.

Judicial and First Amendment Supreme CourtJudicial BranchMore Supreme Court Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech

Court cases. Schenck v. US Argued January 8,1919 Decided March 2,2919.

Baker v. Carr Facts  Charles Baker was a Republican who lived in Shelby County, Tennessee who argued that although the Tennessee Constitution requires.

Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation The criminal justice process includes everything that happens to a person from the moment of arrest, through.

Bellwork: Day 5 BrainPopBrainPop: Write out the seven scenarios below and decide if they are criminal cases or civil cases. Prepare your notebook!

Argued: March 19, 2007 Decided: June 25, =2&i= &w=580&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=

Schenck vs United States

Schenck vs United States(1919)

The Judicial Branch Chapter 6

Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines

Lemon v. Kurtzman.

Landmark Freedom of Speech Cases

Gitlow v. New York 1925 By Shannon Bess.

Chapter 8 Section 1.

Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.

GOVERNMENT UNIT 5 REVIEW.

Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda: DO NOW: Legal or Illegal?

How a case Gets to the Supreme Court

Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Reasonable Limits

Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.

Presentation transcript:

De Jonge v. Oregon John Salinkas

Case facts  Case heard: December 9th,1936  Defendant: Dirk De Jonge  Decided by Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes  Respondent: Oregon

What Happened  On July 27 of 1934, in Portland Oregon, the police raided a meeting held by the communist party.  Dirk De Jonge was arrested and charged with the violation of the Criminal Syndicalism Law of Oregon.

Critical Question  Were the charges pressed against Dirk De Jonge in violation of the Due Process Clause?  Was this a violation of the First Amendment?

Ruling  Conviction violated both First and 14 th Amendment.  Evidence showed he took no active part in teaching of Criminal Syndicalism.  The Conviction was reversed

Work cited   

United States v. Stevens  Argued October 6 th, 2009  Robert Stevens knowingly sold videos of illegal dog fights  convicted under the Pennsylvania Federal District Court – Violation of 18 U.S.C section 48  Claimed it was a violation of his freedom of speech.  Court agreed it was unconstitutional.