By: Jill Sparrow Date: July 25, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration July 15, 2012 Automation Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration FAASTeam & North Florida Flight Standards District Office FAA Safety Team Safety Presentation Seminar.
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
October 31, Metron Aviation, Inc. Dan Rosman Assessing System Impacts: Miles-in-Trail and Ground Delays.
Research for Ground Delay Program Enhancements October 31, 2001 Metron Aviation, Inc. Robert Hoffman, Ph.D.
Vastly Distributed System ATCSCC CDM net TFM hub TRACONs TRACON(s) Towers ARTCC ARTCC(s) Towers Airports Industry AOC(s) GA International.
Schedule Delay Initial Delay Crews Gate Space Aircraft Passengers Propagates into Large Delay.
Resource Allocations within Constrained Airspace October 31, 2001 Metron Aviation, Inc. Robert Hoffman, Ph.D.
Reduced EDCT Window CDM A&D Meeting December 13, CDM Meeting Daytona Beach, FL Presented by Roger Beatty - AAL SOC.
FLIGHT SCHEDULE MONITOR (FSM)
Authors: Alan Carlin and R.E. Park (1970) Presented by: Jared Hayden.
Heather Bell GMFIR Vancouver November 9, 2010 NAV CANADA.
Queue Assignment - Flights With Airline Created Slots CDM A & D Meeting June 5, 2001.
Historical Use of “Exempt by Time/Status” Parameter in GDPs CDM Meeting June 28, 2000.
FSM 8.02 Algorithm Changes. Earliest Departure / Arrival Time.
Efficiency and Equity Tradeoffs in Rationing Airport Arrival Slots Preliminary Results Taryn Butler Robert Hoffman, Ph.D.
NAS Resource Allocation and Reallocation on Day-of-Operations Michael O. Ball Robert H Smith School of Business and Institute for Systems Research University.
1 Data Quality Metric Based on Time-out CNX CDM A&D Meeting 5 June 2001 Dennis Gallus.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Weather Impacts to Philadelphia Air Traffic Operations National Weather Service Workshop David.
1 Hashing (Walls & Mirrors - end of Chapter 12). 2 I hate quotations. Tell me what you know. – Ralph Waldo Emerson.
1 Resource Rationing and Exchange Methods in Air Traffic Management Michael Ball R.H. Smith School of Business & Institute for Systems Research University.
Queueing Systems They’re EVERYWHERE!. Basic Concept Service Request... Done Numerous requests made for service Lines back up waiting for service Waiting.
And now … Graphs simulation input file parameters 10,000 requests 4 categories of file sizes 1K- 80% frequency 4K – 15% 16K – 4% 64K –1% poisson arrival.
Effects of the 3- Hour Tarmac Delay Rule Yi-Hsin Lin 15 December Final Project.
Airline On Time Performance Systems Design Project by Matthias Chan.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
Presented to: By: Date: File: apo130\Airport Efficiency\TAER SAER Updated Briefing(2).ppt 1030 Federal Aviation Administration Presentation of System Airport.
Airborne Flights with ETA before the GDP Start Time CDM A&D Meeting 5 June 2001.
Adaptive Traffic Light Control For Traffic Network.
Federal Aviation Administration FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (Public availability to be determined under 5USC 552) Data Communications Program DCL Benefits Modeling.
Client: North Texas Food Bank Senior Design 2010 Nafees Ahmed Prajyot Bangera Shahrzad Rahimian Pablo De Santiago May 10, 2010 “Passionately pursuing a.
Workshop on National Airspace System Resource Allocation: Economics and Equity Organizers: Mike Ball, University of Maryland George Donohue, Karla Hoffman,
Federal Aviation Administration Date: July 2011 Terminal Arrival Efficiency Rate (TAER) 101 Metric Explanation.
Simplified Subs Update A&D Meeting April 18, 2001 Rick Oiesen, Volpe Center.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
System Design Zhen Jiang West Chester University
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program Operational Trials in Domestic Airspace Presented to:Data Comm Implementation Team (DCIT) By:Jerry.
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Federal Aviation Administration System Airport.
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program MEM/EWR ATCT DCL Trials DCIT25 Update To:DCIT25 Plenary From: Matt Maki Date:
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 6 “Collaborative Tools and Technology”
Releasing a GS into an Initial GDP. Is the current approach the right choice? Current procedure for issuing a GDP out of a FSM-issued GS –Non-GS flights.
1 REAL-TIME INTER-MODAL SUBSTITUTION (RTIMS) AS AN AIRPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Mark Hansen Yu Zhang University of California Berkeley.
1 An Integer Linear Programming model for Airline Use (in the context of CDM) Intro to Air Traffic Control Dr. Lance Sherry Ref: Exploiting the Opportunities.
Weather Impacts on System Operations Importance of the Forecast in TFM Planning Jim Ries Oct 19, 2006.
Design and Control of a Home Delivery Logistics Network Michael G. Kay North Carolina State University.
Dan Allen MEM DCL Trials. 2 FedEx Corporation Operate Independently, Compete Collectively, Manage Collaboratively.
How do we mitigate weather impacts to the NAS?
1 Real-Time Scheduling. 2Today Operating System task scheduling –Traditional (non-real-time) scheduling –Real-time scheduling.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from Topic of the Month October Fuel Monitoring.
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
14/01/20161 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP HOW TO SAVE FUEL.
1 Federal Aviation Administration NBAA HND October 2011 Areas D, F and TMU Briefing 9/26/ /2/
Federal Aviation Administration AOC/FOC Interface for Data Comm Production System To: AOC WG From: Data Comm Production Sub-Team Date: 08/22/12.
Air Traffic Control System Command Center Activities and Perspective Steve McMahon, Manager, System Efficiency.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Project and Implementation Update Presentation to: Congressional Staffers By: Steve Kelley, Airspace Redesign.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Tradeoff Optimization at STL: a Case Study Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo tel.: (617) CDM.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Record of Decision (ROD) Announcement Congressional Briefing Name: Steve Kelley Date: September 5, 2007 Federal.
Analysis of Demand Uncertainty in Ground Delay Programs Mike Ball University of Maryland.
Presented to: By: Date: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration Go Around Defined Business Rules.
LGA before and after AIR-21 December 13, 2000 Metron Inc.
1 Impact of data accuracy on TFM initiatives Fluctuation in demand leads to : –Fewer compressions –More revisions –Unnecessary extensions –Needless delay.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Quantification of Benefits of Aviation Weather A discussion of benefits Friends and Partners in.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Aviation’s Impact on the Economy Airports Conference Diane Crean, AEA Deputy Administrator April.
1 Surface CDM Sub-team Concept of Operations Briefing Marshall Mowery (FAA CDM Lead) Dan Allen, FedEx Express (Industry CDM Lead) Carl Calcasola, ATM PBI.
Federal Aviation Administration Real Time Flight Schedule Analyzer RT-FSA 8.40 New Features Spring 2007.
University of Brasilia TransLab Enhancement of Airport Collaborative Decision Making with Matching Theory Antonio Carlos de Arruda Junior Li Weigang Kamila.
1 A General Approach to Equity in Traffic Flow Management and Its Application to Mitigating Exemption Bias in Ground Delay Programs Michael Ball University.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Greater Binghamton Airport March 2016 BGM. Sixel Consulting Group March 2016.
24 February 2019 Model Antrian M/D/1.
AIRPORT VOCABULARY ATC: air traffic control
Presentation transcript:

By: Jill Sparrow Date: July 25, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration July 15, 2012 Automation Review

Federal Aviation Administration Automation Review Slot allocation RBS++ AFP controlled flights before GDP implementation AFP Override vs. Exempted AFP flights Exemption of AFP flights for the EWR GDP on July 15, 2012

Federal Aviation Administration Flights in Q1 are exempted from delay and are given a slot as close to their ETAs as possible Flights in Q2 are sorted by ASlot time and are assigned to the next available slots Flights in Q3 are sorted by Initial Gate Time of Arrival (IGTA) and are given slots after flights in Q2 have been assigned slots Data Time 1810z RBS++ Queues 1, 2 and 3

Federal Aviation Administration AFP In Place Before GDP Flights controlled by the AFP are considered “previously controlled” flights (Q2) and will have a higher priority over flights that have never been controlled (Q3) All flights destined to the GDP airport, including flights currently controlled by an AFP, will be given control times for the airport

Federal Aviation Administration Flights controlled by AFP are considered “previously controlled” (Q2) and will receive higher priority over flights not yet controlled All flights not yet controlled are in Q3 and will be given slots in order of IGTA after the flights in Q1 and Q2 have been given slot times AFP Before GDP Cont. AFP05 AFP08 EWR GDP

Federal Aviation Administration Why doesn’t the demand reach the program rate for 20z, 22z and 01z? Only 12 non-exempted flights out of 228 from 1810z to 0159z

Federal Aviation Administration AFP OVERRIDE VS. EXEMPT AFP FLIGHTS FROM GDP

Federal Aviation Administration AFP Override Gives priority to a new AFP over a previously issued AFP FSM will assign control times based on the new modeled AFP and will override other control times that flights received due to previous AFP Does not override control times due to GDPs

Federal Aviation Administration AFP Override cont. 9 Using AFP Override for FCABW1 will override the control times for flights filed through FCAA05

Federal Aviation Administration Exempt AFP Flights From GDP Exempt AFP flights from a GDP places all AFP flights in Q1 of the GDP so that no additional delay will be applied to the currently issued AFP EDCTs Used when AFP stability has higher priority –I.E. ARTCC declares ATC Zero Used to eliminate additional delay for flights that have already been assigned delay Used to minimize EDCT changes –Keeps AFP demand in place –Towers and customers receive fewer EDCT changes

Federal Aviation Administration July 15 “Exempt AFP” Flights EWR 373 Total Flights in the GDP 283 Exempted Flights –132 AFP –151 Other exemptions Time Now +30 International Airborne Only 90 non-exempted flights The non-exempted flights received average delays of 295 minutes, max delay was 432 minutes

Federal Aviation Administration EWR GDP Exempt AFP Flights

Federal Aviation Administration Model of EWR GDP with AFP Flights Not Exempted 373 Total Flights in the GDP 151 Exempted Flights –Time Now +30 –International –Airborne 222 Non-exempted Flights Overall program average dropped program delay for the non-exempted flights to 153 minutes

Federal Aviation Administration Model of EWR GDP with AFP Flights Not Exempted cont. The delay changes were primarily for the 132 AFP flights (Q2). They were longer exempt so they received delay around the exempted flights. NO significant delay changes for the original 90 flights in Q3. Flights on the east and north sides of the AFPs still received average delays near 300 minutes and a max of 432.

Federal Aviation Administration EWR GDP AFP Flights Non-Exempt

Federal Aviation Administration Questions?

Federal Aviation Administration