Bike Path and Street Name Signage Walt Seifert December 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Part 9 Traffic Controls for Bicycle Facilities. 9A.03 Definitions Relating to Bicycles Adds a definition for Bicycle Facilities Removes the definition.
Advertisements

Part 7 Traffic Controls For School Areas. Section 7A.01 STANDARD statement changed to GUIDANCE statement TCDs in school areas should be related to: Volume,
Signing Plan Design - At Grade Intersections TEM Chapter Application Guidelines - Guide Signing.
* 07/16/96 Guide Sign Design June 18-19, 2013 Arden Hills, MN *
Louisiana Safe Routes To School Program
2-10 ODOT Sign Policy and Guidelines for the State Highway System Ch. 6 – Construction and Maintenance Signs Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic-Roadway.
Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 8 – Traffic Control for Railroad and LRT Grade Crossings.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 7 – Traffic Control for School Areas.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Lesson 15 Publication No. FHWA-HRT Bicycle Lanes.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 3 Why Signs are Installed Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
P IKES P EAK R EGIONAL N ONMOTORIZED T RANSPORTATION S YSTEM P LAN P UBLIC M EETING N OVEMBER
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
2009 MUTCD Revisions Part 4 – Traffic Signals Revisions to the 2009 MUTCD.
Overview of 2009 MUTCD. Tom McDonald, PE Safety Circuit Rider Iowa LTAP.
Ed Cox City of Sacramento, Department of Public Works Bicycle Solutions in Sacramento.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD CA MUTCD 2012 Revisions to Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
Freeway Signing Plan Design April 29, 2008
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2D – Guide Signs for Conventional Roads.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2E – Guide Signs for Freeways and Expressways.
Caltrans Approval Process: Update Van Ness Avenue BRT Citizens Advisory Committee September 8 th, 2009.
1 City of Rapid City and Rapid City Community Planning RAPID CITY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN in collaboration with: Kadrmas, Lee and Jackson RDG.
Main Roads WA Perth Bicycle Network - Operational Overview Cycling Safety Forum 14 th May 2011.
Chapter 6 Color Image Processing Chapter 6 Color Image Processing.
June 2011 Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Interstate Guide Sign Upgrade Projects.
Network and Dynamic Segmentation Chapter 16. Introduction A network consists of connected linear features. Dynamic segmentation is a data model that is.
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
DATS Bicycle Planning 2009 Bicycle Advisory Committee Kickoff Danville Area Transportation Study July 13, 2009.
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Aren Cambre
South Park Business Outreach By Melanie Mayock, Outreach Coordinator Duwamish TMA.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 2 Signing Overview Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
Brett Hondorp Alta Planning + Design. Suggested Routes to School Details Primary Goals 1.To develop suggested route maps for 18 elementary and middle.
INTERSECTION SAFETY PERFORMANCE AND AUDIT Andy Loonan Basak Aldemir-Bektas Intersection: Welch Avenue & Lincoln Way.
Work Zone Traffic Control for Pedestrians and Bicyclists ATSSA Virginia Chapter Meeting April 15, 2015 Paul Kelley – VDOT Work Zone Safety.
General Revisions to Part 2 – Signs. New chapters and revisions for Part 2 Relocation of gates and barricades to Chapter 2B Relocation of object markers.
Department of Transportation Consideration of Potential City of Pasadena Position Related to SR710 Extension Alternatives Being Considered By Metro City.
Highway Functional Classification Chapter 16 Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA. CVE 505 HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I.
Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications Dick Albin Washington State Department of Transportation Presented at the AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Meeting.
Revisions to Chapter 2D – Guide Signs for Conventional Roads.
SW Region Construction Conference February 19 th 2015 Jim Romanowski – Work Zone Engineer Traffic Section – SW Region Madison Office.
Revisions to Chapter 2C – Warning Signs and Object Markers
Oregon Transportation Commission October 14, 2015 OR 99 Rogue Valley Corridor Plan.
General Revisions to Part 2 – Signs
2003 MUTCD Chapter 2A Signs General. 2A.06 Design of Signs  Add to the support statement “General appearance” of sign legends, colors, and sizes shown.
REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED SIGNIFICENT REVISIONS TO THE 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL Fall 2014 Virginia ATSSA Chapter Meeting October 1, 2014.
Traffic Signals & ITS to Encourage Walking & Cycling
Complete Streets Training Module 10 – Street Elements: Design & Safety Considerations for Context-Based Solutions.
District 11 CEAL Meeting: Bike/Ped Update SETH CUTTER DISTRICT BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN COORDINATOR APRIL 13, 2016.
2016 Active Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives & Criteria Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee March 2, 2016 meeting.
Indiana MUTCD: for Operations & Maintenance Issues/Solutions – Part II.
Proposed Additions to MUTCD. Chapter 8E. Busway Grade Crossings Proposed revision submitted to FHWA in June Intended for next edition of MUTCD.
What's in the 2009 MUTCD For Bicyclists?
Saving the King Street Bicycle Boulevard
BIKE WALK CIVICS KING STREET NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY PILOT March 9, 2017.
UGA Bicycle Facilities Study
regional bike routes ARE FOR everybody
Stanford Avenue/El Camino Real Intersection Improvements Project
Revisions to Part 7 – Traffic Control for School Areas
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN FINAL PRESENTATION
After the NACTO Guide Now I’m going to discuss the options available within the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide.
Technical Committee on Geometric Design
Color Image Processing
Design Standards.
Chapter 5 Select Figures from MN MUTCD
Example of cones and signs as traffic control at a roadway incident.
Presentation transcript:

Bike Path and Street Name Signage Walt Seifert December 2015

Street name signage vs. wayfinding Wayfinding Street name signage

Bike path and street name signage Existing conditions Existing conditions Little or no street name signage at bike path/street or bike path/bike path intersections Little or no street name signage at bike path/street or bike path/bike path intersections No identification of bridge or street overcrossings of bike paths No identification of bridge or street overcrossings of bike paths

Bike path and street name signage Existing guidance in MUTCD (CA) Existing guidance in MUTCD (CA) Intersection signs Intersection signs Section 2D.43 recommends D3-1 or D3-1a or G7-1(CA) street name signs “in urban areas at all street intersections” Section 2D.43 recommends D3-1 or D3-1a or G7-1(CA) street name signs “in urban areas at all street intersections” Shared use (bike) path intersections not specifically mentioned Shared use (bike) path intersections not specifically mentioned Part 9 on bicycle facilities has one mention of D3-1 street name signs (in a list of guide signs). Figure 9B-4 (Guide Signs and Plaques) includes a street name sign image. Part 9 on bicycle facilities has one mention of D3-1 street name signs (in a list of guide signs). Figure 9B-4 (Guide Signs and Plaques) includes a street name sign image. No specific guidance given and street name signs are not included in Figures 9B-5 or 9B-7 which illustrate signage for bike path intersections No specific guidance given and street name signs are not included in Figures 9B-5 or 9B-7 which illustrate signage for bike path intersections Bridge/overcrossing signs Bridge/overcrossing signs No guidance No guidance

Bike path and street name signage Proposal for intersections Proposal for intersections Make bike path intersection signs mandatory Make bike path intersection signs mandatory Use same signs as at street intersections Use same signs as at street intersections Bike paths will need names Bike paths will need names Use same color palette as existing street name signs Use same color palette as existing street name signs Change MUTCD sections accordingly Change MUTCD sections accordingly

Bike path and street name signage Bike path intersection signage benefits Bike path intersection signage benefits Clarity in MUTCD: eliminates Chapter 2 ambiguity Clarity in MUTCD: eliminates Chapter 2 ambiguity Standardize intersection signage Standardize intersection signage Equity: respect for bicycling as transportation mode Equity: respect for bicycling as transportation mode Wayfinding: reduce confusion, anxiety and out-of-direction travel Wayfinding: reduce confusion, anxiety and out-of-direction travel Assist emergency services in finding locations Assist emergency services in finding locations Promotion of bicycling Promotion of bicycling Help meet Caltrans goal to triple number of bike trips by 2020 Help meet Caltrans goal to triple number of bike trips by 2020

Bike path and street name signage Proposal for bridges/overcrossing Proposal for bridges/overcrossing Attach street name sign to overcrossing Attach street name sign to overcrossing Size according to distance from bike path Size according to distance from bike path Match jurisdiction’s colors for name signs Match jurisdiction’s colors for name signs

Bike path and street name signage Bridge/overcrossing signage benefits Bridge/overcrossing signage benefits Sign on structure does not add clutter and may have aesthetic benefit Sign on structure does not add clutter and may have aesthetic benefit Wayfinding Wayfinding Assist emergency services in finding locations Assist emergency services in finding locations Help meet Caltrans goal to triple levels of bicycling Help meet Caltrans goal to triple levels of bicycling

Bike path and street name signage Caltrans concerns Caltrans concerns Attachment: drilling in Caltrans’ structure prohibited Attachment: drilling in Caltrans’ structure prohibited Maintenance: burden of sign upkeep Maintenance: burden of sign upkeep Cost: conceivably quite expensive Cost: conceivably quite expensive

Bike path and street name signage Bridge/overcrossing signs options in light of Caltrans concerns Bridge/overcrossing signs options in light of Caltrans concerns Exempt all Caltrans’ facilities Exempt all Caltrans’ facilities Use pole mounted signs Use pole mounted signs Use route shields for Interstates and state highways instead of street names Use route shields for Interstates and state highways instead of street names Exempt Interstate and other freeway crossings (as they generally cannot be accessed by bicyclists) Exempt Interstate and other freeway crossings (as they generally cannot be accessed by bicyclists) Make local jurisdictions responsible for maintenance Make local jurisdictions responsible for maintenance Make signage optional for Caltrans and local facilities Make signage optional for Caltrans and local facilities