Measurements and Activities for Mud Removal and Disposal of Sediments " Novi Sad, 27. mart 2014. „Environmentally friendly water management in plain areas„

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal issues on shale gas activities raised in petitions received by the European Parliament Committee on Petitions.
Advertisements

1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Jerevan November Tailing dams inspection Juliane Knaul Legal Expert, Agency of Mining, Geology and Minerals of Brandenburg, Germany AGENCY.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
WASTE MANAGEMENT I WASTE HIERARCHY EUROPEAN UNION FRAMEWORK WASTE DIRECTIVE DEFINITION OF WASTE + ASSOCIATED PROBLEMS 1 Environmental Law.
Module 3: Environmental Objectives, Programme of Measures, Economic Analysis, Exemptions Environmental Objectives Yannick Pochon Afyon, 2015.
NATO/CCMS Pilot StudyRehabilitation of Old Landfills, Cardiff, 24 May 2004 Bob Harris Environment Agency England & Wales NATO/CCMS Pilot StudyRehabilitation.
DEREL TEMPUS DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCES ENGINEERING LEARNING SURVEY ON NATIONAL CAPACITY NEEDS OF SERBIA FOR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
Remediation schemes to mitigate the impacts of abandoned mines Brian Bone Environment Agency for England and Wales.
WATER POLLUTION.
A Brief Review by: Akbar Tahir Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries University of Hasanuddin Marine coastal pollution: causes, effects and management.
Health and Safety Executive Amenity Forum Updating Events 2015 London – City Hall Nigel Chadwick Chemicals Regulation Directorate.
Acquis communautaire in Chapter 27 – Environment
Lesson 2 The wastes generated by human activity can pollute both land and water. However, there are many actions people can take to reduce pollution and.
Water Seminar – 14 April 2010, Athlone European Communities environmental objectives (Groundwater) Regulations 2010 S.I. 9. of 2010 Colin Byrne Water Inspector.
CARICOM. Definition ICT and the environment Sub-Themes Indicators and Rationale CARICOM.
The Contaminated Land Regulations – Consolidated Review 21 September 2005 Craig Edwards.
Pilot project “Regional Risk Assessment of Mining Sites and Contaminated Sites in the Upper Silesia Region” Janusz Krupanek, Marek Korcz Institute for.
NATO-CCMS Pilot Study Tour de Table - Greece Recent Developments on Contaminated Land in Greece Anthimos Xenidis Laboratory of Metallurgy National Technical.
Brownfields Health Risks & Remediation Diogo Cadima Topic ‘A’ Term Project CET 413.
UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes A unique framework for improved management of shared waters.
TURNING BROWNFIELDS. Definition US EPA 1997 abandoned, idled or under-used industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated.
Extension of the EEA European Topic Centre’s Work Program to the West Balkan Countries in the field of water Norman Green, NIVA Nov 2006, Belgrade.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
Water Seminar – 14 April 2010, Athlone European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface Waters) Regulations 2009 S.I. No. 272 of 2009 Pat Duggan.
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Compensation in Czech law Petra Humlickova Utrecht, Water and Oceans Law in Times of Climate Change 2013.
Sign env. Risk Human uses What is the (weighted) extent of exceedance of a GW-QS or criteria’s value in a GWB? Further assessments verify GWB is of good.
Offsite transfer of waste EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Bristol,19 March 2008 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the WG.
Bioremediation and Bionanotechnology
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
A Practical Approach: The General Physico-Chemical Quality Elements and the Classification of Ecological Status.
Rob Collins Water Group EEA Hazardous Substances in Europe’s fresh and marine waters – An overview Report for publication – 1 st half of 2011 Rob Collins.
Soil contamination Proposed EEA/ETC contribution to the working group on Soil Contamination European Topic Centre on Terrestrial Environment SESSION 2.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
1. Outline 2 “Pre-Harmonization” Groundwater Management Perspectives EU’s DirectivesWhy Are the New Approaches Needed? Turkey’s Institutional Structure:
1. Outline 2 Earlier Groundwater Management Approaches of Turkey European Union: An Example for Groundwater Management Turkey Current Situation and Distances.
Organized under UNESCO-IHP International Initiative on Water Quality (IIWQ) Hosted by Federal Institute of Hydrology, Germany International Centre for.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Dedicated maps on contaminants
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Landfilling in the Slovak Republic – legislation and actual situation
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Principles and Key Issues
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Groundwater Watch List Meeting
Anna Hall Senior Groundwater Advisor
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Daughter Directive Groundwater - Working Procedure -
Warmup 10/22/12 As the population of Durham increases…
Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Topic 5 - Getting Away From It All
Source Screening and Measures Sheets for WG/E Brussels 21/10/10
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
SURFACE WATER /GROUNDWATER INTERACTIONS
Paul Whitehouse Chair, EG-EQS
Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
Good groundwater chemical status
Presentation transcript:

Measurements and Activities for Mud Removal and Disposal of Sediments " Novi Sad, 27. mart „Environmentally friendly water management in plain areas„ eWAM HUSRB/1203/121/237 Dejan Krčmar, PhD PMF – Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection

Why sediment?  The dynamic component of all aquatic systems may be a reservoir of accumulated toxic and persistent compounds of natural and predominantly anthropogenic origin due to the strongly expressed tendency of binding  In the sediment, there is a million times bigger concentration of pollutants (e.g. metal) than in the same volume of water  The source of secondary pollution “Time bomb” Resuspension –Flooding –Raising the floodgates - Mud removal –Bioturbation

Sediment Sustainable Management When and where to monitor sediment quality? How often? How to evaluate sediment quality? How does sediment affect water quality? – Which methods should be used? – Which pollutants should be monitored? – Which quality criteria should be used? Is that sufficient for making conclusions? What should be done when the sediment quality does not satisfy? – To remove the mud or leave it? What to do with the removed material? – Should it be disposed of? Or can it be spread onto the coast, adjacent land or move to another aquatic environment? – Can it be used for material extraction? – What effect will sediment removal have on the aquatic system?

When and where? 1.Rating chemical status and trend of sediment quality - WFD (2000/60/EC) Each Member State should make the identification of contaminated sediment requiring remediation. If the quality of the sediment is bad and affects the achievement of good ecological status, Member State must, in accordance with Article 4 and Article 11, initiate appropriate action since contaminated sediments may pose a barrier to achieving good ecological status of water bodies. 2.In case of regular watercourse maintenance Maintenance of waterways Reducing the risk of flooding Coastal management... WFD only implies monitoring the quality of sediments and provides a framework within which the problem of sediment must and can be handled at locations where the ecological status is disrupted due to the degraded quality of the sediment. How?

 System dynamics – Spatial (horizontal and vertical distribution of pollutants) - design of monitoring – Weather (seasonal changes, the impact of sediment geochemistry and the process of "aging" on the bioavailability of pollutants) – Environmental conditions  Discrepancies between the chemical and ecological status – The impacts caused by the presence of pollutants whose presence in the sediments is not monitored, – The synergistic or antagonistic effect of the pollutants, – The occurrence of pollutants in different chemical forms (e.g. metals), which significantly affects their toxicity, – Different sensitivity of different organisms to different types of pollutants. The complexity of the process of quality assessment of sediment

Additional:  Complex and incomplete regulation,  The lack of data on the concentrations of the compounds and elements in sediments,  Lack of data on reference conditions,  There is no homogeneous classification of sediment,  There are no agreed criteria on sediment quality,  Conventional methods aim to determine the concentrations of pollutants in the sediment, therefore they are not suitable since they overestimate the bioavailable fraction. Available fraction Total PAH concentration Accumulated fraction Receptor

Sediment (mud removed material) as waste If the definition of waste in Directive on Waste (2006/12/EC codifies Directive 75/442/EEC and repealing in its subsequent amendments) is applied, it indicates that the sediment after mud removal automatically becomes a waste, regardless of the contamination level. The definition of waste is “any substance or object in the categories set out in Annex I which the holder discards or intends or is required to discard”. In Annex I of this Directive the following categories are stated: Q15 “Contaminated materials, substances or products resulting from remedial action with respect to land”, Q16 “Any materials, substances or products which are not contained in the abovementioned categories” When does mud removed material become waste?

Classification of mud removed material depends on the assessment of hazardous nature of waste by : The European waste catalogue (2000/532/EC) Hazardous Waste Directive EU (91/689/EEC) When does mud removed material become hazardous waste? Clean and free of adverse ecotoxic effects Contaminated with the expression of ecotoxic effects Mud removed material harmless hazardous WASTE Sediment that is too contaminated to be transferred to another water environment, should not automatically be classified as hazardous waste!

 Limit values for pollutants for assessing the status and trends of sediment quality, i.e. the target value, the maximum concentration value and remediation value  and the values ​​of pollutants that are used in mud removal and dislocation of the sediment from the water stream, i.e. the target value and remediation, the limits value and verification level Sediment quality standards in Serbia Regulation on limit values ​​for pollutants in surface and ground waters and sediments and deadlines for their achievement (Official Gazette of RS, 50/2012)

Status assessment 1.Rating chemical status and trend of sediment quality  Includes arsenic, heavy metals, PAHs, PCBs, organochlorine pesticides, mineral oils

Mud removal for maintenance 2.In the case of regular maintenance of waterways  Includes arsenic, heavy metals, PAHs, PCBs, organochlorine pesticides, mineral oils

What to do with mud removed material? Class Criterion Ways of dealing with mud removed sediment 0  Target value Concentrations of contaminants in the sediment are at the level of natural background. Sediments can be displaced without any special protection measures. 1 > Target value  Limit value Sediment is slightly polluted. During dislocation the disposal without special measures of protection is permitted in the band width of up to 20 m in the vicinity of watercourses. 2 > Limit value  Verification limit 3 > Verification level  Remediation value The sediment is contaminated. Its disposal is not allowed without special measures. It is necessary to keep in the controlled conditions along with the special protection measures to prevent the spread of pollutants in the surroundings. 4 > Remediation value Extremely polluted sediments. Remediation is obligatory or keeping mud removed materials in controlled conditions with special protection measures to prevent the spread of pollutants into the environment.

Correction of metal content for the given sediment Correction of organic substances for the given sediment. Correction of threshold values

However, the quality of the sediment is not the list of chemical substances concentration...  The total concentrations of contaminants - despite correction, the estimated risk often exceeds the actual risk.  Necessary research in order to fully understand the processes that define the bioavailability and the development of quantitative descriptive models for these processes.  It is necessary to develop chemical and biological tests for quick and easy assessment of the bioavailability and thus the quality and sediment assessment of risks to the environment.  Data on the natural level of pollutants (especially metals)  Eco-toxicity, benthic community structure, bioaccumulation

Safe mud removal and disposal of sediments Selecting the right alternative for mud removal/ remediation is based on balancing the many demands in terms of: technical feasibility, economic feasibility and environmental protection including the DISABLING THE EXPANSION OF HARMFUL SUBSTANCES INTO THE ENVIRONMENT. The basic roads of pollutant losses during mud removal, treatment and disposal of sediments : 1.Resuspension of sediment 2.Dissolution / desorption of the pollutants 3.Leaching

PHASE I - Initial characterisation and potential for desorption PHASE II - works control on mud removal PHASE III - control of the deposited material and leachate from the landfill and protection measures Yes No Yes No Yes No Surveillance monitoring of the landfill and groundwater Continued work with occasional control of pore (leachate) water The temporary interruption of work and review of some of the stabilisation options of mud removed material. After that, work continuance with planned protection measures. Is there a leakage from the landfill? Mud removal and deposition with special protection measures Is there a risk of desorption of pollutants Sediment quality satisfies the criteria? INITIAL POLLUTION CHARACTERISATION WORK PLANNING Mud removal and deposition without any special protection measures PHASE IV - surveillance monitoring

Thank you!