Clean Power Plan Compliance Pathways

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clean Energy Project Analysis Course Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis with RETScreen ® Software © Minister of Natural Resources Canada 2001 – Photo.
Advertisements

EPA’S DRAFT GUIDELINES TO STATES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATE 111(d) PLANS MIDWESTERN POWER SECTOR COLLABORATIVE JUNE 17, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT.
S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S This may not necessarily represent the view of the Government CBA/Justice Annual.
1 It's All in the Numbers: Options for State and Regional Compliance Tracking for EPA's Clean Power Plan Lars Kvale - Managing Director APX Environmental.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
State of the Arizona Energy System Examining the current state of Arizona’s energy mix in the context of the Clean Power Plan.
EPA Clean Power Plan. Emission Targets StateInterim Goal Final Goal 2030 AECI 2013 Net Rate Interim Reduction Final Reduction Missouri 1,6211,5441, %21.3%
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
Bob McConnell, EPA Region 1
Clean and Affordable Energy Future in Northwest U.S. Nancy Hirsh NW Energy Coalition October 1, 2014.
Proposed EPA Requirements for Existing Power Plants under FCAA 111(d) Erik Hendrickson Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Indiana’s Clean Energy Credit Program (Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Set-aside) Roger Letterman Sr. Environmental Manager Office of Air Quality.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
EPA Rulemakings to Set GHG Emission Standards for Power Plants National Hydropower Association Webinar Kyle Danish February 14, 2014.
EPA Basics on Clean Air Act Sec. 111(d) Reducing Carbon Emissions from Existing Power Plants NW Energy Coalition May 2, 2014.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
World Bank Experience with Power Sector Baselines Workshop on CDM Methodologies for Grid-Connected Power Projects Buenos Aires, 8 December 2004 Fernando.
Comments on Best Practices Report and Multi-state Analysis NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting Philadelphia, PA | ©2015 Synapse Energy Economics.
Energy Efficiency in the Clean Power Plan Opportunities for Virginia Mary Shoemaker Research Assistant Spring 2015 VAEEC Meeting May 11, 2015.
David C. Schanbacher, P.E. TNRCC Air Program Coordinator Renewable Energy Credit Trading Program.
CLEAN ENERGY TO PROMOTE CLEAN AIR & IMPROVE ELECTRICITY PRICE STABILITY Alden Hathaway, ERT Debra Jacobson, GWU Law School April 6, 2006.
OPTIONS FOR STATES IMPLEMENTING CARBON STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS ARKANSAS STAKEHOLDER MEETING MAY 28, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT.
EPA’s Final Clean Power Plan: Overview Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section September 1, 2015.
CDM Projects: Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects Project cycles and Technical Issues.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
Clean Power Plan - Final Rule Overview Mark Leath, PE Prepared for - Missouri Air Conservation Commission September 24, 2015.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT Phone: web: Tracking Renewable Energy for.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
EPA’s Proposed Federal Clean Power Plan Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section October 6, 2015.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan: Compliance Options and Engagement Opportunities Vicki Arroyo, Executive Director Gabe Pacyniak, Mitigation Program Manager Lissa.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment February 12, 2015 Tegan B. Treadaway Assistant Secretary Office of.
September 17, 2002 Van Jamison, POWAIR and Global Environment and Technology Foundation POLLUTION PREVENTION TEMPLATES WESTAR Technical Conference Snowbird,
California Energy Commission IEPR Lead Commissioner Workshop University of California, Irvine August 17,
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
CLEAN POWER PLAN PROPOSAL Reducing Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants Kerry Drake,Associate Director Air Division, US EPA, Region 9 California.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Model Cap and Trade Rules: Unique Elements and Flexibilities Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Clean Power Plan Handbook For the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates | ©2015 Synapse Energy Economics Inc.
Overview of EPA’s Final Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Emissions Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Electric Generating Units Overview.
Presentation to RGGI Stakeholder Group September 21, 2005.
Clean Power Plan: Overview of Proposed Federal Plan and Model Rules Clean Power Plan: Overview of Proposed Federal Plan and Model Rules Air Quality Committee.
Clean Power Plan – Now What? OCTOBER 16, 2015 FALL PR-MR & MARKETING MEETING.
NTAA Webinar 10/15/2015. Summary 2 Climate change is a threat in the U.S. -- We are already feeling the dangerous and costly effects of a changing climate.
National Tribal Air Association Webinar October 15, 2015.
Clean Power Plan TENNESSEE MINING CONFERENCE AGENDA November 3, 2015 John Myers Director, Environmental Policy and Regulatory Affairs.
EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Rules NOVEMBER 6, Overview Greater stringency overall: 32 percent vs. 30 percent reductions by 2030; setting the stage post-2030.
EPA Workshop for Environmental Justice Communities December, 2015.
Clean Energy Incentive Program Michigan Energy Optimization Collaborative October 20, PRESENTATION.
FINAL CLEAN POWER PLAN Before the Virginia Energy Efficiency Council Virginia Department of Environmental Quality November 12, 2015.
Proposed Federal Plan & Model Trading Rules Training for Tribal Communities Farmington, New Mexico | Tuba City, Arizona December 7 – 10, 2015.
Regulatory Framework Options 1. State Measures without Emission Standards Pros  Affected EGUs not subject to federally enforceable requirements unless.
Clean Energy Incentive Program (CEIP) Training for Tribal Communities Farmington, New Mexico | Tuba City, Arizona December 7 – 10, 2015.
EPA Workshop for Environmental Justice Communities December, 2015.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
TEPPC Meeting February 4, 2016 Salt Lake City, UT Thomas Carr Western Interstate Energy Board CREPC/SPSC/ WIRAB Update.
Clean Power Plan: A Western and Utah Perspective on Compliance with the Rule Power Through Ideas Utah Air and Energy Symposium October 27 th, 2015 Jeff.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan and the Supreme Court’s Stay of the Rule April, 2016 Carol Kemker U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Atlanta, Georgia.
Clean Power Plan EW Tim Wilson Director of Energy Supply Services.
© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP Overview of the EPA Clean Power Plan Suzanne Beaudette Murray February 19, 2016 Tulane Environmental Law Summit.
Clean Power Plan Insights for Pennsylvania Jeffrey Anderson, Paul Fischbeck, Haibo Zhai, David Rode Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie.
Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal- fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme CEDM Annual Meeting May.
Clean Power Plan Kyra Moore Director, Air Pollution Control Program Prepared for: Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6, 2015.
The Clean Power Plan.  Standards of Performance for GHG Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources (111(b)).  Carbon Pollution.
Western State Targets and Key Issues Patrick Cummins, CNEE September 10, 2015.
ROK-PH Partneship: Exploring Cooperation in Renewable Energy Mr. Ariel D. Fronda Division Chief, Geothermal Energy Management Division Renewable Energy.
© 2016 Portland General Electric. All rights reserved. I NTEGRATED R ESOURCE P LAN 2016 OPUC Meeting April 21, 2016.
CLOSING THE POWER PLANT CARBON POLLUTION LOOPHOLE:
Integrated Resource Plan 2016
Help make energy efficiency easy, transparent and scalable.
Metro4-SESARM Meeting October 28, 2015
Summary Climate change is a threat in the U.S. -- We are already feeling the dangerous and costly effects of a changing climate – affecting people’s.
Presentation transcript:

Clean Power Plan Compliance Pathways Lissa Lynch Georgetown Climate Center September 10, 2015

State Plan Options Model Rule Streamlined Options Model Rule Rate-Based “Emissions Standards” Approach Subcategorized Rates Rate Goal State-Wide State-Defined Rates Mass-Based Existing Units Only Existing Units + New Source Complement “State Measures” Approach State Measures Plan Model Rule Streamlined Options Model Rule Streamlined Options

Emission Standards vs. State Measures Rate Emissions Standards Approach Mass Emissions Standards Approach State Measures Approach Steam NGCC All requirements on affected EGUs State Measures (alone or in combination with limits on affected EGUs) Subcategorized Rates State Rate Goal State Mass Goal State Mass Goal

Rate-Based Approaches Standards on Affected EGUs Interstate Trading Sub-categorized Rates All NGCC: 771 lb/MWh All fossil steam EGUs: 1,305 lb/MWh Trading-Ready Model Rule State-Wide Rate Goal All affected EGUs: EPA-established goal rate Multi-state plan with joint blended-rate goal Other State-Defined Rates Any other rates Requires projection that plan will achieve state goal No interstate trading Source: Section VIII.C.

Emission Rate Credits (ERCs) Generation and savings eligibility: State issues ERCs on MWh basis using 2-step process: Provider submits eligibility form to state Description of project; projection of MWh generation or savings; EM&V plan Projections must be independently verified After generation/savings, provider submits EM&V report to state Results must be verified Appropriate number of ERCs issued to tracking system to account held by provider Compliance Period 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Generation or energy savings during the compliance period Zero-emitting energy and energy efficiency measures installed/implemented after Jan. 1, 2013 Source: Section VIII.K.

Resources Eligible for Credits Eligible Resources New Renewable Energy: wind, solar, geothermal, hydropower, biomass, wave & tidal Demand-Side Management: zero-emitting actions that avoid electricity use Transmission & Distribution measures that improve efficiency Demand-Side Energy Efficiency: measures that reduce electricity use in grid- connected buildings/equipment Nuclear: generation from new units and capacity uprates at existing units Combined Heat and Power (with approved calculation method) Resources NOT Eligible for Credits New, modified, and reconstructed EGUs covered under 111(b) Measures that reduce emissions outside the power sector Existing (pre-2013) measures Source: Section VIII.K.

Geographic Eligibility In-State Crediting A rate-based state can credit in-state RE or EE measures Rate-Rate Interstate Crediting: RE or EE A rate-based state can issue ERCs for out-of-state RE or EE incentivized by the state as long as not double counted Rate-Mass Interstate Crediting: RE only Rate-based states can issue ERCs for certain out-of-state RE generation located in a mass-based state Rate-based states cannot issue ERCs for out-of-state EE measures located in mass-based states Sources: Section VIII.K. and VIII.L.

Crediting Fossil Generation Crediting generation below performance standard Subcategorized rates only: Gas Shift ERCs NGCC Emission Performance Rate ERCs ERCs Based on difference between EGU’s reported rate and emission rate limit NGCC Based on emission reductions from incremental NGCC generation Gas Shift ERCs Steam Source: Section VIII.K.

Rate-Based Approaches Standards on Affected EGUs Plan Requirements Interstate Trading EM&V Plan Measurement & verification of EE/RE Documentation of EE/RE GS-ERCs Sub-categorized Rates NGCC: 771 lb/MWh Fossil steam: 1,305 lb/MWh Model Rule Trading-Ready State-Wide Rate Goal EM&V Plan Measurement & verification of EE/RE Documentation of EE/RE Multi-state plan with joint blended-rate goal EPA-established goal rate Projection that plan will achieve goal EM&V Plan Measurement & verification of EE/RE Documentation of EE/RE Other State-Defined Rates No interstate trading Any other rates Source: Section VIII.K.

Mass-Based Approaches Mass-Based “Emission Standards” Approach Existing Units Only Existing Units + New Source Complement Model Rule

Mass Goal for Existing Units Only Standards on Affected EGUs Plan Requirements Interstate Trading Emission budget trading program: Emission monitoring & reporting Allowance allocation Allowance tracking Address potential leakage: Include new sources (New Source Complement presumptively approvable) Supported demonstration Existing Units Only Surrender allowances equal to reported emissions (under emission budget trading program) Model Rule Trading ready Source: Section VIII.J.

Existing Units + New Source Complement Standards on Affected EGUs Plan Requirements Interstate Trading Emission budget trading program: Emission monitoring & reporting Allowance allocation Allowance tracking Existing Units + New Source Complement Surrender allowances equal to reported emissions (under emission budget trading program) Trading ready Source: Section VIII.J.

State Measures Approach Mass-Based Goal State Measures Plan State Measures (alone or in combination with limits on affected EGUs) Federally enforceable backstop Source: Section VIII.C.3.

Multiple Options for Interstate Trading Mass Trading-ready Individual plans with specified partner states Multi-state plan with joint goal Rate Trading-ready Individual plans with specified partner states Joint ERC issuance Multi-state plan with joint goal Existing Units Only Sub-categorized Rates Existing + New Source Complement State Measures* * requires adjustments for net import / export of allowances State-Wide Rate Goal Sources: Section VIII.J.3. and VIII.K.4.

State Plan Options Model Rule Streamlined Options Model Rule Rate-Based “Emissions Standards” Approach Subcategorized Rates Rate Goal State-Wide State-Defined Rates Mass-Based Existing Units Only Existing Units + New Source Complement “State Measures” Approach State Measures Plan Model Rule Streamlined Options Model Rule Streamlined Options

For questions or comments, please contact: Thank You For questions or comments, please contact: Lissa Lynch 202-661-6548 lynch@law.georgetown.edu Resources: Clean Power Plan summary webinar recording: http://www.georgetownclimate.org/clean-power-plan-summary-of-the-final-rule. Summary of goal setting approach and new flexibilities in final rule: http://www.georgetownclimate.org/understanding-state-implementation- options-under-the-clean-power-plan. Clean Power Plan Tool Kit: http://www.georgetownclimate.org/clean-energy/clean-power-plan-tool-kit.