1 Strategic Decision Making Joint Response Team - DWAF, SALGA, NT and dplg Following due process to facilitate good decision making.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Buying Better Outcomes Workshop 4 Equalities and Contract Management If you do not take it seriously, why should the supplier?
The legislative framework for public procurement: implications for the 2010 ARV tender Jonathan Berger Senior Researcher AIDS Law Project Friday, February.
Public Private Partnerships MUNICIPAL PPP CONFERENCE Date: 18 February 2010.
1 Municipal Ports Training Seminar: Board Governance Issues Prepared for DfT by Fisher Associates June 2007.
INPUTS INTO THE DRAFT DISASTER MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT BILL Portfolio Committee on Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs 22 APRIL.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
COUNCILLORS, MAYOR & ADMINISTRATOR ROLES and RESPONSIBILITIES.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
Cardiff Business School-12 June The Gender Equality Duty: A lever for equal pay? Bronwyn McKenna Director of Organising and Membership.
The Role of Local Government in implementing Biogas Projects Barry Coetzee, Head: Integrated Waste Management, Strategy & Policy Solid Waste Management.
Chairpersons for Finance Portfolio committees The role of Council in Supply Chain Management (SCM) 29 May
Small-Scale Embedded Generation (AMEU and its Work Group Input) Gerrit Teunissen 18 April 2013.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
1 1 BRANCH: CORPORATE AFFAIRS 1. CORPORATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES To provide financial and strategic support services that enhance service delivery by the.
IMFO 5 AUDIT & RISK INDABA Fostering better service delivery through governance service (MPAC Oversight) Presented by: PR Mnisi East London ICC.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices March 2006 Building Quality into the Financial Audit Process The NAO’s experience Gareth Caller.
1 Delivery Mechanisms and Scoping Joint Response Team - DWAF, SALGA, NT and dplg Using Section 78.
CENTLEC (SOC) LTD (Addressing EDI Service Delivery Challenges) Centlec Delegation (SOC) LTD Joint Hearing between PC on Energy & PC on Cooperative Governance.
Principles of Local Governance: Covering local governmental legislations and compliance issues IMFO WOMEN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CONFERENCE 07/02/13.
KOUKAMMA MUNICIPALITY INTERVENTION STATUS REPORT PRESENTED TO SELECT COMMITTEE 19 OCTOBER 2010 PARLIAMENT – CAPE TOWN.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 20 OCTOBER 2004 MANAGEMENT OF HIV and AIDS IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE.
Presentation for Masibambane Co-ordinators 6 March 2007 Petunia Ramunenyiwa Water Services Sector Support Strategy.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
Department : Water Affairs & Forestry Directorate : WS Regulation DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY WATER SERVICES REGULATION By Bongiwe Msane
STREAM 1B: SECTOR STRUCTURAL AND RESTRUCTURING ISSUES CLLR C JOHNSON, SALGA NEC ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE SUMMIT 9 JUNE 2008.
Councillor Community Fund Isabell Procter Director of Resources Francis Fernandes Borough Secretary.
LEGISLATIVE OVERVIEW November 2003
MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS BILL September LEGISLATION n Municipal Demarcation Act, 1998 n Municipal Structures Act, 1998 n Municipal Systems Bill (1999)
COMMENT ON THE SPATIAL PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT BILL PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM 21 AUGUST 2012.
2009/10/06 STUDY ON RECOGNITION OF PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Alternative title slide.
ROLE OF COUNCILLORS IN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IMFO NATIONAL CONFERENCE – CAPE TOWN SEPTEMBER 2011 Presenters: Thulani Mandiriza & Conrad Barberton.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
1 BRIEFING TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS AMENDMENT BILL 22 SEPTEMBER 2003.
SERVICE DELIVERY MECHANISMS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT INCA 2004 SUMMER SCHOOL.
SEYCHELLES EXPERIENCE Hon. Nichole Barbe, PAC Member, Seychelles.
1 Welcome… Administrative and Political Oversight towards 2014 and beyond Lungelwa Dlulisa.
1 External Delivery Mechanisms Joint Response Team - DWAF, SALGA, NT and dplg What are the different options?
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
1 Consolidated Municipal Infrastructure (CMIP) and Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) DPLG PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
Financial and Fiscal Commission Submission on the 2011 Division of Revenue Bill Select Committee on Appropriations 22 March 2011.
1 Response to Financial and Fiscal Commission Submission for The Division of Revenue 2010/2011 Presentation to Select Committee on Finance 06 August 2009.
Legacy Report of Select Committee on Finance By: Zolani Rento Date: 09 July 2014.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee Establishment of an Agency for Social Security 26 February 2003 Department of Social Development.
1 SECTION 78(3) – A GUIDE TO THE PROCESS Understanding and using the s78(3) process to achieve meaningful results National Joint Response Team - DWAF,
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM OF WATER SERVICES PROVISION Portfolio Committee on Water Affairs and Forestry 22 June 2005 V.227.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Provincial & Local Government Branch: Free Basic Services and Infrastructure Mr Yusuf Patel 19 ~ 20 February.
Page 1 The statutory framework for financial oversight Select Committee on Finance, 13 April 2010 Annexure B.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM OF WATER SERVICES PROVISION
Municipal Water Infrastructure Grant (MWIG)
Equality and Human Rights Exchange Network
Jane Sinson Educational Psychologist
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Portfolio Committee On Sports and Recreation 7 November 2017
2018/19 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN FOR MISA
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN LANGUAGE PRACTITIONERS COUNCIL ACT, 2014 (Act No. 8 of 2014) PRESENTED TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION & RECREATION.
FURTHER ENGAGEMENT ON THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT BILL
EFFECTIVE POLITICAL OVERSIGHT ROLE ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Select Committee on Finance (SCoF) National Treasury 10 October 2007
PRESENTATION TO THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATION
Portfolio Committee on Social Development: Public Hearings
The Role of Local Government in implementing Biogas Projects Barry Coetzee, Head: Integrated Waste Management, Strategy & Policy Solid Waste Management.
Presentation transcript:

1 Strategic Decision Making Joint Response Team - DWAF, SALGA, NT and dplg Following due process to facilitate good decision making

2 Purpose of this presentation The purpose of this presentation is:  To provide an overview of the decisions required at various stages of a s78 process  To strengthen s78 process management and decision making  To highlight legal decisions and risks

3 What does the presentation cover?  This presentation provides an overview of the following decisions through the s78 process:  Statutory decisions - triggers, 78(2) and 78(4)  Scoping decisions  Internal assessments 78(1)  External assessments 78(3)  Mechanisms for consulting labour and the local community

4 Types of decisions required The S78 process is comprised of a series of statutory and strategic decisions These decisions build on one another towards selecting the most appropriate mechanism/s for improved service delivery In addition to the decisions set out in the legal process, s78 requires decisions about: the scope of the assessment whether and who to appoint to provide technical assistance in undertaking the assessment selecting an internal project officer to lead the process the mechanisms to be used for consulting with labour and the local community

5 OR Status Quo and Needs Analysis Macro Scoping Internal Assessment section 78(1) Implement Internal Mechanism S78 Process External Assessment and Feasibility Study section 78 (3) Implement External Mechanism TRIGGERSTRIGGERS S78 (4) decision S78 (2) decision Terms of Reference Inception Report Status Quo Report Internal Assessment Report External Assessment Report Stakeholder involvement

6 Statutory decisions required

7 What are the statutory decisions? The Systems Act requires 3 major decisions when choosing mechanisms for service provision: Decision 1: Must a S78 assessment be conducted? Decision 2: Should an internal mechanism be selected without considering external mechanisms? Decision 3: Should an internal or external mechanisms be selected? We call these ‘Statutory Decisions’ because they are required by the Municipal Systems Act Other strategic decisions are also needed in order to make a good informed decision, but these decisions are not required by legislation

8 Conduct section 78? DECIDE EXPLORE EXTERNAL MECHANISMS SELECT APPROPRIATE INTERNAL MECHANISM 2 Implement appropriate internal mechanisms Assess external mechanisms DECIDE INTERNAL MECHANISM EXTERNAL MECHANISM 3 DECIDE 1

9 Decision 1 - To conduct a S78? A municipality must review and decide on appropriate mechanism/s to provide a municipal service in the municipality or a part of the municipality when – A review is required by an intervention in terms of the Constitution A new municipal service is to be provided Requested by the local community through mechanisms, process and procedures established in terms of the Municipal Systems Act A review of its IDP requires a review of the delivery mechanism

10 Decision 1 - the Section 77 Trigger If a municipal service is provided internally – do a section 78 when: The existing service is to be significantly upgraded, extended or improved or A review is required by the performance management system The municipality is restructured or reorganised in terms of the Municipal Structures Act

11 Decision 1 - the Section 77 Trigger If a municipal service is provided externally – do a section 78 when: A review of the SDA is required by the performance management system, or The SDA is likely to terminate within 12 months, or The existing service is to be significantly upgraded, extended or improved – beyond the terms of the SDA

12 Guidance on Decision 1 Decision 1 can be difficult – particularly when the current mechanism is internal For example, when is a service significantly upgraded, extended or improved? Judgment must be exercised Note that a s78 process is not for functions that are not “municipal services”, e.g. credit control functions, meter reading Legal Risk: If a decision is taken not to conduct a s78 process, this can be challenged. Advice should be obtained if there is uncertainty.

13 Decision 2 Decision 2 is required by section 78(2) of the Systems Act After conducting an internal assessment, a municipality may: Decide on an internal mechanism or Explore external mechanisms The decision in section 78(2) is really a decision to postpone the final decision about what kind of mechanism should be selected. It is a decision to get more information before making the final decision

14 Decision 3 Decision 3 is required by section 78(4) of the Systems Act and is the final decision on an appropriate internal or external mechanism The municipality must make a decision at this point – it cannot choose to leave the matter undecided It could, however, request further information before making the decision

15 Who Makes These Decisions? Municipal Councils must make the statutory decisions The decision to enter into a service delivery agreement (SDA) with an external mechanism cannot be delegated to any committee of Council, e.g. the Mayoral Committee or Exco or a s80 “portfolio” committee However, Decision 1 and Decision 2 can be made by a Committee of the Council

16 How are these decisions made? Section 78 sets out the process for making Decision 2 and Decision 3 - these decisions cannot be made using any other process For example, it is not possible to make Decision 3 without first considering internal mechanisms. It is also not possible to make Decision 3 without (a) consulting organised labour, (b) consulting the local community and (c) conducting a feasibility study These are called “mandatory procedures” Legal Risk: If a municipality does not follow the mandatory procedures before making a decision – the decision could be invalid.

17 Decisions can be challenged Decisions may be challenged if they are made without following the requirements of the legislation - “mandatory procedures” must be followed However, the grounds on which a decision can be challenged are complex and advice should be obtained if an entity seeks to challenge a s78 decision At this stage the key challenge is from organised labour – who have taken the City of Cape Town, for example, to court twice already

18 Enhancing Decision Making Because a municipality must exercise its judgment before making a decision, it must be fully informed of all the issues The purpose of s78 reports is to provide a full briefing on these issues Decision making can be enhanced by creating steering committees or stakeholder committees to consider issues along with the consultants writing the s78 reports

19 Scoping decisions

20 The importance of macro scoping Before undertaking a S78 process, the munciplaity needs to think holistically about service delivery and understand its needs and challenges, as well as the desired outcomes of the assessment Macro scoping enables the municipality to decide: The area where the services will be provided The needs that the mechanism should be designed to address The different service delivery mechanisms or options

21 Section 78(1) process and decisions

22 The Process Section 78(1) requires an assessment of: capacity – both current and potential future capacity -- to provide the service internally the views of organised labour direct and indirect costs and benefits – note that consideration should be given to both financial and non-financial benefits

23 The S78 (1) decision Before taking a final decision to go internal a municipality can explore the possibility of providing the service through an external mechanism A municipality can still implement an internal mechanism after exploring external mechanisms, although a lot of time and cost will have been spent exploring external options A municipality will not know if there are benefits and efficiencies from restructuring to another entity (e.g. regional), unless it explores external options s78(3) provides information to compare internal and external options before Council takes a final decision

24 Section 78(3) process and decisions

25 External Assessment Section 78(3) is the process a municipality must embark upon if it wants to explore the possibility of providing a service through an external mechanism Section 78(3) is far more rigorous than s78(1) It requires an assessment of all 6 external options It also requires: An assessment of the views of local communities A further assessment of the views of organised labour A detailed feasibility study Regulator involvement Consideration of issues required in a Service Delivery Agreement if an external mechanism is chosen

26 Steps of an external assessment ASSESS the 6 legislated service delivery options against legislated criteria and against the service delivery needs and challenges of the area Take into account the VIEWS of the local community and organised labour when assessing the options Conduct or commission a FEASIBILITY STUDY of preferred mechanism/s

27 External assessment criteria Each option (municipality, municipal entity, NGO, CBO, organ of state, or private sector operator) must be assessed against: Direct and indirect costs and benefits Capacity and potential future capacity of prospective service providers The likely impact on development, job creation and employment patterns The views of the local community and organised labour

28 The Feasibility Study A Feasibility Study should include: Developing a financial model Testing sensitivity of assumptions Addressing legislated criteria Articulating non-financial costs and benefits Key issues: Value-for-money: will there be a benefit (in financial and non-financial terms) if there is change as a result of restructuring Affordability: an external service provider does not divest the municipality from understanding and supporting how the provision of services is to be funded (funders will not lend money unless they can be sure it will be repaid over time)

29 Feasibility Study issues to be assessed Assess how the preferred mechanism will: Provide value for money Address the needs of the poor Be affordable Transfer risk Consider the projected impact on the WSA's: staff, assets and liabilities IDP Budget (impact on revenue, expenditure, borrowing, debt and tariffs)

30 The Service Delivery Agreement “SDA” The key difference between an internal and external mechanism is the SDA The SDA regulates the relationship between the WSA and the WSP It sets out who has to what and when There are “generic” types of SDAs Each WSA must ensure that its SDA is appropriate to its specific needs, risk allocation, and also allows the WSA to “ensure service delivery”

31 Which Service Delivery Mechanism is for you? The type of output specification (i.e. what the WSA wants to achieve through the service delivery mechanism) and the risk transfer will influence which external mechanism is appropriate for your needs The communities’ needs should drive the assessment of external mechanisms, rather than the other way around! Review s81 of the Municipal Systems Act and s19 of the Water Services Act

32 What to think about when considering external mechanisms Affordability – matching needs (service levels) against revenue (tariffs collected and grant funding) Securing and allocating grant funding – MIG for capital expenditure for the poor Formula for allocating equitable share to WSP to provide free basic services Responsibility of WSP to collect water revenue Consolidated invoice or separate invoices By-laws in place to allow revenue collection and credit control

33 Consultation processes required Assessing the views of organised labour and the local community

34 Involving labour Lessons learnt: If the views of labour are not adequately assessed, s78 decisions can be challenged Employees need to be kept informed Good governance is needed to create a positive environment for s78 assessments Labour consultation should be seen in the context of change management and not merely as legal compliance Local labour forums should be used to deal with employer-labour issues

35 Recommendations for involving labour A labour engagement strategy is needed upfront Involve labour from the start although this is not legally required S78 requires that the views of labour are assessed through effective information exchange with reasonable timeframes – it does not require a bargaining process Labour relations officer or appointed official should engage directly with labour, not consultants Engagement with labour should happen through existing channels such as the Local Labour Forum

36 In most circumstances, unions should not be consulted separately - this can lead to mistrust Engagement with labour to be based on accessible documents and the process to be properly documented Engagement with labour to happen ‘informally’ through steering committee representation AND formally through labour forums S78 requires that the views of labour are formally assessed when (i) an internal mechanism decision is taken and (ii) if external mechanisms are assessed Recommendations for involving labour (cont.)

37 Community participation Section 78 (3) requires that the local community is given notice if external mechanisms for service delivery are to be explored Chapter 4 of the Systems Act obliges municipalities to: encourage and create conditions for the local community to participate in the affairs of the municipality, including in strategic decisions relating to the provision of municipal services, contribute to building the capacity of the local community, councillors and staff to enable participation, and use its resources and budget to implement community participation

38 Why is community participation important? Community participation: increases community responsibility as consumers strengthens participatory governance strengthens problem solving and participatory skills and abilities increases the likelihood of community satisfaction with water services helps identify and mange potential areas of conflict

39 How should communities participate? Participation must take place through political structures in terms of the Structures Act such as Ward Committees In addition, municipalities must establish appropriate mechanisms, processes and procedures to enable communities to participate, such as: public notification and comment public meetings and hearings consultative sessions with locally recognised community organisations and traditional authorities where appropriate report back The special needs of people who cannot read or write, people with disabilities, women and other disadvantaged groups must be taken into account

40 Implementation Considerations

41 What decisions follow the assessment? Important decisions must be made after the s78 assessment has been concluded. If an internal mechanism is selected: Resources must be allocated to the provision of the service – this involves budgetary, planning and human resources decisions If an external mechanism is selected: A procurement process must be conducted – this may involve the appointment of consultants and a decision about which bid to accept following a procurement process

42 Implementation… Life after s78 The WSA remains the authority responsible for ensuring service delivery Some considerations regarding implementation: Monitoring capacity Contract Management Plan Performance capacity: budgets, tariff setting, passing and enforcing by-laws Customer Care Political Support

43 Thank You