Including School Stakeholders. There are many individuals and groups associated with schools and many of these people are likely to have valuable ideas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slides have references to related pages in the Guide
Advertisements

Welcome to Volunteer Management
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Chapter 13: Organizational Innovation and Change
Head of Learning: Job description
Patient Public Involvement (PPI) Policy What is PPI? PPI means putting patients and public at the centre of all that we do. It encourages the active participation.
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
PUT TITLE HERE Collaborating for Better IEPs Slide Deck No.4 Ministry of Education, 2009.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Chapter 3 – Evaluation of Performance
Public Consultation/Participation in an EIA Process EIA requires that, as much as possible, both technical / scientific and value issues be dealt with.
An introduction to Learning in Future Environments (LiFE)
Creating Better Health and Care Services An overview of a Better Health and Care Review process.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
INTEGRATING BENEFICIARY FEEDBACK INTO EVALUATION- A STRUCTURED APPROACH Presentation to UKES Conference May 2015 Theme: Theory and practice of inclusion.
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
Challenge Questions How well do we meet the need of our stakeholders?
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
The Community Investment Triangle Targeting Our Resources Part 3: Aligning Around Strategies for Impact.
Microsoft 2013 All Rights Reserved. Partners in Learning School Research Background.
Performance Management Upul Abeyrathne, Dept. of Economics, University of Ruhuna, Matara.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
CREATING OPPORTUNITIES – JOB CREATION WITH THE THIRD SECTOR LEARNING FROM COMMUNITY JOBS SCOTLAND Alex McTier 18 th September 2013.
SMSC and Inspection Spiritual Moral Social & Cultural.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
Identification, Analysis and Management
HM Inspectorate of Education 1 Literacy and Numeracy Across the Curriculum May 2008.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Context setting, assessment scenarios, and communications.
C H A P T E R 2 Stakeholder Relationships, Social Responsibility, and Corporate Governance.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Families as Partners in Learning Principals and teaching staff Why are partnerships important?
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Providing Orientation and Training Training is important to.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Stakeholder Analysis.
1 Building Faculty Involvement. 2 Objectives Understand why staff need to be committed to decreasing problem behaviors and increasing academic behaviors.
The ILA in Detail. OBJECTIVES 1.To understand the purpose of the ILA 2.To have a clear understanding of how to complete the ILA 3.To have considered the.
Inspire Personal Skills Interpersonal & Organisational Awareness Developing People Deliver Creative Thinking & Problem Solving Decision Making, Prioritising,
Module 2 Stakeholder analysis. What’s in Module 2  Why do stakeholder analysis ?  Identifying the stakeholders  Assessing stakeholders importance and.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
 Question:  How many CSOs working in your country have an impact on children?  Answer:  All of them.  Whether or not they work in a traditionally.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
Corporate Social Responsibility LECTURE 25: Corporate Social Responsibility MGT
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
SEELB Primary Principals 26 th & 27 th October 2011.
Participatory Development. Participatory Development-PD Participatory Development seeks to engage local populations in development projects or programs.
@theEIFoundation | eif.org.uk Early Intervention to prevent gang and youth violence: ‘Maturity Matrix’ Early intervention (‘EI’) is about getting extra.
PLANNING YOUR APPROACH: THE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT OF CPS.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Better Care Better Health Better Life Leadership Framework The Leadership Framework is based on the concept that leadership is not restricted to people.
Business Strategy and Business Planning. Objectives Examples may include the following: Profit Maximisation Survival Market Growth Corporate Image Environmental.
Performance Measurement 201: Measuring What Matters and Creating a Legacy (Please Note: Community Engagement 101 a prerequisite for this presentation.)
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
The Engagement Cycle : engaging with patients and public throughout the commissioning process In collaboration with NHS Institute and DH.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Visit Mendocino County: Strategic Direction 2017/ /20
Building the foundations for innovation
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Human Resources Management
Environment and Development Policy Section
Wide Ideas Idea Management Software Idea Management Process
Presentation transcript:

Including School Stakeholders

There are many individuals and groups associated with schools and many of these people are likely to have valuable ideas to contribute to schools. Because they are close to your school they also have a vested interest in its success. The more you involve these people in contributing to the strategic direction you wish the school to take, the more ownership they will have of the final product and the more loyalty for the brand.

Who Are Stakeholders? Generally when schools talk about their stakeholders they are thinking of the board, parents, staff and students; however, this excludes many important and valuable groups from providing input to your strategic planning and thinking. However, stakeholders might also include: Old Scholars Business owners Employees who take students for work experience, for example Clients/customers Community groups Community leaders Competitors Donors Experts on educational issues, such as university personnel Regulators Suppliers Professional Organizations Partners or potential partners Potential enrolments.

Four Important Reasons to Include Stakeholders One: Increases the quality and quantity of input and reduces the chances of group think. A broader perspective challenges traditional thinking and increases the likelihood of more creative decision making and problem solving. Two: Encourages ownership of school goals. The more opportunity people have to shape the direction of the school, they more likely they are to be satisfied with the final product. Three: Increases the chances of success. The more commitment you have to a plan the more the people involved are motivated to make it happen and the more interest others have in monitoring its success. Four: Widespread consultation improves relationships. Genuinely seeking and valuing the input of others increases their self esteem and improves relationships. It also reduces the chances of misinformation and complaints of lack of transparency.

How to Include Stakeholders Schools can include stakeholders in a variety of ways: by surveying as many as possible; by providing opportunities for one-on-one meetings; or by organizing focus group consultations with a small group of stakeholders. Surveys are cost efficient and provide quantitative information. One- on-one meetings build personal relationships and provide deep, quality and detailed data. Similarly, focus group consultations bring together people, often from the same representative group (e.g. parents) to present the point of view of a particular category of stakeholders and provide qualitative data. All of the data provided from a wide cross section of stakeholders feeds into the strategic planning and thinking of the school, and increases the chances of accessing quality data for quality decision making. Based on Four Important Reasons to Consult with School Stakeholders by Robyn Collins

Stakeholder Engagement Plan Credit for subsequent charts and questions: Stakeholder Engagement Framework, Victoria, Australia, Department of Education

Identifying Appropriate Stakeholders Who is responsible for the wider project or policy? What individuals or groups have a stake or an interest in the issue? Who is influential in the policy arena? Who makes the decisions? Who can influence decisions? Who is critical to delivery? Who will potentially be impacted by the outcomes? Who will contribute resources? Who can slow or stop the project? Who is excluded and may not have been considered? What point in the process are stakeholders being engaged? (e.g. development of policy or a response to policy) Have you considered the voiceless, marginalized and harder to reach stakeholders who may include those with limited ICT literacy or access, Indigenous groups or those from culturally and linguistic diverse groups with low English language proficiency?

Stakeholder Analysis Tool Involve/Consult Ensure needs and concerns are understood and considered. Obtain feedback on alternatives and/or decisions. Collaborate/Empower Partner with on each aspect of the decision Potential decision making authority Co-design/Co-production Inform Provide balanced and objective information Limited monitoring and management Consult Obtain feedback on alternatives and/or decisions Level of Interest Low High High Level of Influence Low

Stakeholder Analysis Tool Instructions If a stakeholder has high levels of influence over and interest in the project’s outcomes they should be placed in the top right quadrant. Conversely, if they have a low level of influence and low interest they should be placed in the bottom left quadrant. The level of interest and influence of stakeholders will depend on a range of issues, such as the nature of the policy or project, the timing and extent of their involvement and their potential ability to impact on the effectiveness of the outcomes. It is important to keep in mind that the interest or influence of a stakeholder may change as the policy or project progresses. Therefore, there is a need to continuously reassess and identify new stakeholders and the level of stakeholder engagement at different stages of the project.

Levels of Participation in Stakeholder Engagement

Communicate Consistent Messages Considerations for consistent messaging include: What can actually change as a result of engagement and what will not change Whether stakeholders will be involved in the final decision making or as input only Expectations of the level of input required of stakeholders How the outcomes of the stakeholder engagement process are to be communicated What the benefits are for the stakeholders.

Evaluating the Stakeholder Engagement Process Stakeholder evaluation should address the following questions: Was the planning process effective? Has the engagement process worked well? Has it delivered the intended outputs? Has it delivered the intended outcomes?