Research, Data Sharing & Publication/Authorship Protocols Lynch Syndrome Screening Network - October 27, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Authorship APS Professional Skills Course:
Advertisements

Starting Planning for the 2010 Policy Key Issues Notes for the TAC Executive Committee April 8, 2009 Phil Hattis, AIAA VP for Public Policy.
Technology and Ethics Joel Price. Lenses The first lens is as a technology user. The second lens is as an educator. The third lens is as a writer.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
1 © Copyright and other Intellectual Property. 2 What is intellectual property? Patents Trade Marks Designs Plant Breeders Rights Copyright Confidential.
How to publish a case report
Welcome! LSSN Meeting Yawkey Center Dana-Farber Cancer Institute October 27, 2012.
Rachel Wolfson, MD Vineet Arora, MD, MA.  Workshop based on curriculum for junior faculty found in MedEdPORTAL O’Sullivan P, Chauvin S, Wolf F, Richardson.
Group 3 – Benny, Tao, Ruth. “Authorship credit should be based on 1) substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis.
Customs for authorship in Biomedicine Peter G Robinson School of Clinical Dentistry.
The Publishing Cycle Closing the Ethical Loop October 2011, University of Maryland Gert-Jan Geraeds, Executive Publisher
RESPONSIBLE AUTHORSHIP Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University Adapted from Scientific Integrity: An Internet-based course in.
The material was supported by an educational grant from Ferring How to Write a Scientific Article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
Authorship Kazem Heidari.
Stacy A. Rudnicki, M.D. Brendan C. Stack, Jr., M.D., FACS, FACE.
The ethics of multiple authorship in East Asia The case of Hong Kong Bruce Macfarlane University of Hull, 17 th March 2015.
ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH Muhammad Taher Abuelma’atti Department of Electrical Engineering King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals.
Welcome to The Need To Know Team Meeting #8 The Need To Know: collaborative research by MCHP, rural and northern RHAs, and Manitoba Health Director: Dr.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
 needs to be met  existing resources  content outline  contributor team  contract details  timeline.
Authorship and the reviewer process Joana Pinto Vieira Matthieu Delincé Nicole Zürcher Responsible Conduct in Biomedical Research, EPFL, April 13 th 2012.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Research Integrity The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research Dr Peter Wigley Manager, Research Ethics and Integrity Flinders University.
The Database. Goals Surveillance of routine LS screening on newly diagnosed CRC (HP 2020) Data to answer questions regarding efficacy, efficiency, utility.
Legislative Policy Committee ISAC Board approved concept at their meeting in December.
RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Publications Guidelines Eric Grimson.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
So You’ve Just Become the Boss… Skills to Deal with Difficult Situations Virginia M. Miller, MBA, PhD Professor, Surgery and Physiology Director, Office.
Publication Ethics Hooman Momen, Editor Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome with Cascade Screening for Relatives September 7, 2012 Deb Duquette, MS, CGC Michigan Department of Community Health.
Authorship and accountability ContributorshipContributorship –Listed authors deserve authorship IndependenceIndependence –The authors enjoyed the prerogatives.
Responsible Conduct of Research Publications. Authorship Acknowledging contributors Conflicts of interest Overlapping publications
Acknowledgements and Conflicts of interest Dr Gurpreet Kaur Associate Professor Dept of Pharmacology Government Medical College Amritsar.
Organizational Structure Organizational Structure House of Delegates is comprised of 116 delegates Currently, there are 58 Chapters (one at each.
Publication ethics Professor Magne Nylenna, M.D., PhD
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Publication Ethics Hooman Momen, Editor Bulletin of the World Health Organization SUMBER: bvs4.icml9.org/.../Presentation%20to%20%20ethics%20workshop ‎
Publications Dr Sarah Wendt. Context PhD conferred Oct 2005, fulltime lecturer in 2006 at UniSA (40/40/20). Promoted to Senior Lecturer (2010). Social.
Authorship Criteria; Updated Version 2013 By: Behrooz Astaneh MD Founder and Head, Medical Journalism Department Visiting Editor, BMJ COPE Council Member.
Geant4 Publication Procedures Geant4 Collaboration Meeting 23 September 2013 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Research Integrity & Publication Ethics: a global perspective
Authorship, peer review and conflicts of interest.
Natasha Floersch Journal Manager American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, University.
Ethics and Scientific Writing. Ethical Considerations Ethics more important than legal considerations Your name and integrity are all that you have!
An initiative of the International Rare Diseases Research Consortium-IRDiRC Spanish Rare Diseases Registries Research Network - SpainRDR
Mail: Content Who are we? What is our purpose? Get involved with the TNF 1)Become a journalist! How to write an article?
HOW TO WRITE A PAPER FOR PUBLICATION IN A SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL.
CIRTL Data Sharing 10/9/15. New Opportunities The CIRTL Network Commons (CNC) offers the potential for easier access to data for evaluation purposes.
Ethical Considerations Dr. Richard Adanu Editor-in-Chief International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (IJGO)
UPV RESEARCHERS’ MENTORING INITIATIVE (07 March 2012) By: Dr. Ricardo Babaran Dr. Rosalie Arcala Hall Dr. Wilfredo Campos.
Getting published Sue Symons Editorial Manager Karen Mattick
Why Authorship is Important
2017 Convening & Collaborating (C2) Awards
Fostering a Collaborative Approach in the Management of BRCA-Mutated Ovarian Cancer.
Mojtaba Farjam, MD PhD, member of ethics committee for research
Publication ethics PU 7, March 15, 2017
ICJME Authorship Criteria
MUSC Postdoctoral Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research
Overview of Sabbatical Leave Policies and Procedures
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
What the Editors want to see!
The Revised Common Rule
Updated NIH Public Access Policy
Advice on getting published
University of Missouri, Columbia
Why we are Here? (Our Purpose)
MANUSCRIPT WRITING TIPS, TRICKS, & INFORMATION Madison Hedrick, MA
Publishing Your Quality Improvement Work Jennifer Elston Lafata, PhD
Presentation transcript:

Research, Data Sharing & Publication/Authorship Protocols Lynch Syndrome Screening Network - October 27, 2012

Data Goals/Questions  Show cost effectiveness of LS screening, for institutional and state funding purposes (newborn screening model)  Cascade testing of family members  Provide data to promote appropriate practices  Prevalence of LS among newly diagnosed colorectal and endometrial cancers  Penetrance of LS for various related cancers  Family history patterns associated with mutation, including proportion who do not meet Bethesda or Amsterdam criteria  Measure implementation of LS screening  Number of newly diagnosed colorectal and endometrial cancers screened over time  Proportion of positive screens for each screening protocol  Provide data to health plans in support of coverage policies

Proposed Publications Policy List of priority publications established by LSSN Investigators from contributing institutions submit proposals for analyses outside established list Publications committee reviews proposals Individual-level aggregate data given to investigators for approved project Publications committee and board approves final manuscript

Analyses and Data Sharing  Institutions will always have access to their own data  Some aggregate analyses will be performed by staff affiliated with LSSN  Should there be access to aggregate raw data (vs. results of an analysis) for LSSN investigators?  More sharing is better  Should allow non-full members to author publications in conjunction with full member institutions, especially for LSSN members Based on institutions sharing de-identified data

Proposals and Writing  Their team will have primary authorship/writing responsibilities  Should meet contribution guidelines  Deadlines for completion?  Authorship guidelines vary by journal  Solicit volunteers from LSSN for editing?  How to establish priority for authorship? Investigators from contributing institutions submit proposals for analyses outside established list

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Authors should meet all three conditions:  Substantial contribution to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; AND  Draft the article or revise it critically for important intellectual content; AND  Give final approval of the version to be published

Publications Committee  5 – 7 individuals will comprise the publications committee, based on skill set considerations  1 or 2 year terms  Flexibility  How to appoint? Publications committee reviews proposals Publications committee approves final manuscripts

Priority Publications  These publications will include a certain number of authors from every contributing institution  Writing team will include the Board and others TBD  How to finalize official topic list?  Number from each institution?  Authorship order? List of priority publications established by LSSN

Data Goals/Questions  Show cost effectiveness of LS screening, for institutional and state funding purposes (newborn screening model)  Cascade testing of family members  Provide data to promote appropriate practices  Prevalence of LS among newly diagnosed colorectal and endometrial cancers  Penetrance of LS for various related cancers  Family history patterns associated with mutation, including proportion who do not meet Bethesda or Amsterdam criteria  Measure implementation of LS screening  Number of newly diagnosed colorectal and endometrial cancers screened over time  Proportion of positive screens for each screening protocol  Provide data to health plans in support of coverage policies

Thoughts? Contact Sarah Mange