Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection December 11, 2006 Track Selection for T-Alignment studies Louis Nicolas EPFL Monday Seminar December.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

Terzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE - LNF, Andrea Dainese 1 Preparation for ITS alignment A. Dainese (INFN – LNL) for the ITS alignment group.
Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●
1 Online data quality and monitoring M. Ellis Daresbury DAQ Meeting 31 st August 2005.
Sept G. Zech, Iterative alignment, PHYSTAT 2003, SLAC. 1 A simple iterative alignment method using gradient descending minimum search G. Zech and.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Steven Blusk, Syracuse University -- 1 Update on Global Alignment Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
Inner Tracker Alignment study Kim Vervink Monday seminar, 10th April 2006, EPFL.
Robust Alignment of the Inner Detector Alignment Meeting – 1 st June 2005 Florian Heinemann ATLAS  Alignment Challenge  Robust Alignment  Code.
Velo to T Alignment - Reminder General Strategy  Perform relative VELO-to-IT/OT alignment using  X,  Y at the center of magnet and  X,  Y (each.
1 Track reconstruction and physics analysis in LHCb Outline Introduction to the LHCb experiment Track reconstruction → finding and fitting Physics analysis.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
ITS Alignment: Millepede Results S. Moretto, C. Bombonati, A. Dainese, M. Lunardon, A. Rossi.
PHENIX Drift Chamber operation principles Modified by Victor Riabov Focus meeting 01/06/04 Original by Sergey Butsyk Focus meeting 01/14/03.
Javier CastilloLHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 05/09/ Alignment of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Javier Castillo CEA/Saclay.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
TRD and Global tracking Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration meeting Dresden, 27 September.
Preliminary results with the Alibava Telescope G. Casse, S. Martì, J. Rodriguez, I. Tsurin and the Alibava collaboration 1 G. Casse,20th RD50 Workshop,
LHCb Lausanne Workshop, 21st March /12 Tracking Software for DC’06 E. Rodrigues, NIKHEF LHCb Tracking and Alignment Workshop  To do list, and done.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Refitting Tracks from DST E. Rodrigues, NIKHEF LHCb Tracking and Alignment Workshop, Lausanne, 8-9th November 2006  Motivations  Step-by-step …  Current.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
T-Station Alignment Infrastructure at LHCb Adlène Hicheur (Ecole Polytechnique F é d é rale de Lausanne) T-Station Alignment group: J.Blouw, F.Maciuc,
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Detector alignment Stefania and Bepo Martellotti 20/12/10.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai, Kazuhiko Hara (Univ. of.
CMS Torino meeting, 4 th June, 2007 R. Castello on behalf of Torino Tracker’s group Tracker Alignment with MillePede.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
Barbara Storaci, Wouter Hulsbergen, Nicola Serra, Niels Tuning 1.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
Development of the parallel TPC tracking Marian Ivanov CERN.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Confirming L1 decision Use: DaVinci v7r4 field 043 Idea (Teubert’s) : Most of min.bias L1 possitive trigger are due to missmeasurements of Pt (P) How mutch.
STAR SVT Self Alignment V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
Javier Castillo3rd LHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 15/06/ Status of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Alignment Strategies & Results from Cosmic run Javier.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1 Status of Tracker Alignment b-tagging Workshop Nhan Tran (JHU) On behalf of the Tracker Alignment Group.
M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification.
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.
LHCb Alignment Strategy 26 th September 2007 S. Viret 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
Detector Alignment with Tracks Wouter Hulsbergen (Nikhef, BFYS)
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
Alignment of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer
External Alignment Maya Shimomura (ISU)
F2F Tracking Meeting, Prague 12/12/2013
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
Global Alignment in LHCb Steve Blusk Syracuse University
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Validating Magnets Using Beam
AIDA Alignment Package
External Alignment Maya Shimomura (ISU)
The LHC collider in Geneva
HPS Collaboration meeting, JLAB, Nov 16, 2016
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Alignment of the PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX) in 2014
Monitoring SCT Efficiency and Noise
DQM for the RPC subdetector
LHCb Alignment Strategy
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection December 11, 2006 Track Selection for T-Alignment studies Louis Nicolas EPFL Monday Seminar December 11, 2006; LPHE T-station alignment framework Effects of misalignments Solving the alignment problem Track selection and monitoring tool for the T-station alignment Some variables and results Conclusion

Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 2/23 December 11, 2006 LHCb detector The whole detector will have to be aligned I concentrate on the Inner Tracker for now The Outer Tracker should follow shortly

Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 3/23 December 11, 2006 Different types of misalignments Aligned detector Internal misalignments Global shifts or rotations Global distortions Other possible effects: scaling,...

Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 4/23 December 11, 2006 Alignment framework Upstream processing (tracking algs, etc…) AlignTools Align Data objects Align Algorithms Stores/DBs Transient event store Transient detector store Conditions DB Solving Track Selection Track Model Update Book-keeping of alignable geometry etc… Tracking info Geometry info iterate LHCb Brunel environment Job done in collaboration between LPHE, CERN, NIKHEF, Zurich and Heidelberg © A. 1 st LHC Detector Alignment Workshop, CERN, 09.06

Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 5/23 December 11, 2006 Use of residuals to recover the motion and rotation of the detection planes. For N planes, 6N parameters to determine Figure of merit:  2 =  (r i /  i ) 2 How to spot a misalignment? © A. Tracking & Alignment Workshop, Zurich, Misalignments change the tracks' path and hence the vertices. The vertex position is of utmost importance for the precise measurements of the Standard Model physics parameters.

Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 6/23 December 11, 2006 Several solving methods are combined Global/Collective modes not constrained: singularities appear in the solving procedure These singularities must be avoided (use constraints on alignment params) Global fit: correlate different planes Alignment problem M  a = b One method: Diagonalize matrix: With M = U T D U ==>  a = U T D -1 U b Hierarchical alignment: Stations Boxes Layers Ladders Solving the mathematical problem © A. Tracking & Alignment Workshop, Zurich, 07.06

Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 7/23 December 11, 2006 σ ~ 0.51%σ ~ 0.90% Bias © J. Tracking & Alignment Workshop, Lausanne, Example of the effect of misalignments on Physics σ ~ 23 MeV σ ~ 41 MeV Worst Misalignment: T1 and T3 moved in Opposite directions in all the 6 d.o.f. of 0.5 mm for translations and 0.5 mrad for rotations

Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 8/23 December 11, 2006 Motivations of the track selection and monitoring tool Physics motivations: Select proper tracks for alignment Reject ghost tracks Select isolated tracks Provide monitoring variables for the alignment e.g. ladder and box overlaps (see next slides) Technical motivation: Set a tool usable as pre-filter for tracks used for alignment studies Steps to perform : Save a standard monitoring NTuple (used later as monitoring tool) Offline analysis of this NTuple Define a set of cuts in order to achieve the physics motivations Use this set of cuts in the track selection tool Configuration: Code developed in LHCb reconstruction software packages Analysis done using ~25k B --> J/  (-->  ) K s events

Quality selection: residuals and pull Pull of the residual for non-ghost tracks: Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 9/23 December 11, 2006 Plot of hits residuals:  not measurable (1.58 for black curve above) The large peak is not quite understood yet

Quality selection: pull of momentum Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 10/23 December 11, 2006 Fraction of non-ghost tracks vs. track momentum:  = 1.14 Understood by the tracking experts Pull of the momentum for non-ghost tracks:

Quality selection: Track – Muon matching We want to match track with muons: In case of no B field, we know that the particles reaching the muon chambers have a momentum of p > 5 GeV Loop on all muon tracks Extrapolate track and muon track to a defined z (set as property) Calculate a chi2 of the position of these states: (X_track-X_muon)²   X_track   X_muon ) + (Y_track- Y_muon)²   Y_track   Y_muon ) If chi2 < C (C is a property) set flag to 1 ==> 1.55 % of all tracks matched to muons for B->J/psi(mu mu) Ks data Warning: This is not a matching efficiency! Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 11/23 December 11, 2006

Fraction of non-ghost tracks vs. number of holes (layers with no hits): (we want the best possible tracks for alignment, i.e. only tracks with 0 holes will be selected) Quality selection: number of holes Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 12/23 December 11, 2006

Quality selection: number of shared hits Fraction of non-ghost tracks vs. number of shared hits: (we want the best possible tracks for alignment, i.e. only tracks with 0 shared hits will be selected) Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 13/23 December 11, 2006

Quality selection: isolated tracks We need isolated tracks: Reject tracks with shared hits Reject tracks with too many neighbouring hits: For each track, look at each layer if other hits found within n strips on each side of the track (n is a property): In case one hit is found in layer, loop on all clusters and compare layer and strip number In case no hit is found in layer, extrapolate track to z of layer with hole, convert extrapolated state position to local position and then to strip number and compare to all clusters If more than N hits found, reject the track (N will be a property) Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 14/23 December 11, 2006

Quality selection: isolated tracks Plot of number of neighbouring hits found inside 2 strips around track (just showing that I find neighbouring hits...): Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 15/23 December 11, 2006

Quality selection: track  2 Probability Fraction of non-ghost tracks vs.  2 Probability: It looks like nothing can be gained from here... except if you look at the ghost rate as a function of the cut on this variable: Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 16/23 December 11, 2006

Only a few preliminary cuts could be found by looking at the plots: Number of holes== 0 (we want the best possible tracks) Number of shared hits== 0 (we want isolated tracks) Probability of chi2> 30 % (by looking at significance optimisation) No cut on momentum in case we run with magnet off With these three cuts: ==> Isolated tracks (no shared hits, cut on NNeighbouringHits doesn't change much) ==> Ghost rate reduced from % to 0.03 % ==> Selection of non-ghost tracks: efficiency = 3.25 % ==> Rejection of ghost tracks:efficiency = % Alignment will guide us for optimising efficiency vs. ghost rate e.g. would 1 % ghost rate screw up the alignment? Need simulated misaligned data to check the efficiency of the selection. Quality selection: preliminary cuts and results Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 17/23 December 11, 2006

Monitoring tool: Ladder overlaps What are ladder overlap residuals? For each IT layer, we have an overlap as follows (old drawing, sorry): Hence, for each layer, we can have up to two hits. Definition: if track has two hits in the same layer by convention: overlap residual = res(Hit higher Z) – res(Hit lower Z) What are they useful for? With the distribution of ladder overlap residuals, we can constrain and monitor the relative motion of ladders contained in a same layer. Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 18/23 December 11, 2006

Monitoring tool: ladder overlap residuals Plot of ladder overlap residuals: Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 19/23 December 11, 2006

Monitoring tool: box overlaps What are box overlap residuals? Same idea as for ladder overlaps: we want to constrain and monitor the relative motion of two boxes of the same station If hits are found in two contiguous boxes and at least 4 hits in one of the boxes: then: “Fit” piece of track in one box (we don’t want to depend on other stations) Extrapolate to other box Compare “piece of track” to hits of other box Define overlap residual as distance of closest approach Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 20/23 December 11, 2006

Monitoring tool: box overlaps  2 “fit” of the hits in the box with most hits: x track = az hit + b y track = cz hit + d ==> where y global is the y coordinate of the track state at hit z and sigma yglobal its error. Ad-hoc model for the moment to test the principle of the method. More accurate formulation to follow (e.g. using parabolic model of “track”) Minimise this  2 and get “track” parameters (a, b, c and d) Extrapolate “piece of track” to z position of hits in other box Define box overlap residual as distance between hit and fitted piece of track (several residuals per box overlap) Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 21/23 December 11, 2006

Plot of box overlap residuals: Strange double peak distribution probably comes from linear approximation to compute residual. To be confirmed. Sigma is far too large. Refinement to come... Monitoring tool: box overlap residuals Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 22/23 December 11, 2006

Conclusion The whole detector needs to be aligned in order to get good physics measurements. The VeLo already has a working software. T-station alignment software is on the way to completion: Solving tools are ready, track selection is close to be finished, global framework is nearly ready,... A track selection and monitoring tool has been set up: Cuts are there to reject the ghosts and select the good tracks. An NTuple and histograms are implemented for monitoring purposes. We're waiting for misaligned data to check if everything works properly. Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection 23/23 December 11, 2006