Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Spring 2005 Northeast Florida Institute for Science, Mathematics, and Computer Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Conducting Action Research in Your School. What is Action Research? “The development of powers of reflective thought, discussion, decision and action.
February 29,  Name  Regional Rep & Location or Planning Committee  Organization.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Curriculum Maps Public Release: February 10, 2014
1 Rhode Island School Counselor Evaluation Jean Greco, Patricia Nailor and Karl Squier RISCA Spring Conference Rhode Island Convention Center April 11,
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Adapted by: Kim Scott (From Vicki Nicolson & Jane Nicholls)
ACTION PLAN Ayesha Mujtaba DA Public School (O & A Levels) English, Grade VIII.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Johns Hopkins University School of Education 2006 ACTION RESEARCH Eileen Ferrance Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratories Brown University.
Assisting Struggling Readers and Writers: Using Evidence-Based Resources to Support Adult Learners Michigan Conference 2014 Kathy Houghton-- LINCS.
Developing an Individual Professional Growth Plan
Jack C Richards Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning Jack C Richards & Thomas.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Making Teachers’ Voices Heard: Empowering Innovative Florida Teachers Fall 2006 Florida Laptops for Learning Project.
1.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Oregon State Board of Education January 19, 2012.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
CriteriaExemplary (4 - 5) Good (2 – 3) Needs Improvement (0 – 1) Identifying Problem and Main Objective Initial QuestionsQuestions are probing and help.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Lesson Study Opening Activities (Movement Activity) Grouping Subgroup Article Sharing –Subgroup Reporting.
The PYP Exhibition Mentor Information. What is it?  The Exhibition is:  An individual, group or whole class inquiry  An inquiry that starts from personal.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Primary Years Programme FLIBS PYP: PYP Chair: Sandy Wesson PYP Chair Elect: Rachel Goodnow PYP Secretary: Gayle Baisch Grants Committee: Cynthia Doyle.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
School of Education, CASEwise: A Case-based Online Learning Environment for Teacher Professional Development Chrystalla.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
+ Dynita Padgett EDUC 534/SUMMER 2009 LEADERSHIP PROJECT.
Professional Development: Finding the Keys to Unlocking the Door to School Improvement Catherine Stickney February 26, 2011.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Center for Teacher Leadership Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Mrs. Stacey Branch Coordinator,
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
Action Research Purpose and Benefits Technology as a Learning Tool to Improve Student Achievement.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
+ Professional Development Characteristics Alternatives Stages Extending the Concept.
Applied Instruction Project Presentation Carolyn Vance-Hicks EDU605 Differentiated Instruction Professor Susan Shaw.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Chapter 18: Professional Development
Action Research in Education
EDU 675 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu675study.com.
EDU 695 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu695study.com.
Internship Bill of Rights
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Spring 2005 Northeast Florida Institute for Science, Mathematics, and Computer Technology at UNF Duval County Public Schools

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Facilitators l Dr. Faiz Al-Rubaee Associate Professor, Mathematics and Statistics l Dr. Marianne Barnes Professor, Curriculum and Instruction l Dr. Cathy Cavanaugh Assistant Professor, Curriculum and Instruction

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Definition of Action Research Action research is the process of systematically evaluating the consequences of educational decisions and adjusting practice to maximize effectiveness (McLean, 1995). The process is situation-specific, cyclical, and ongoing, with the results from one cycle leading to further action research.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Central Ideas in Action Research I am the central person in my research. I am asking a real question about a real issue, and I am hoping to move towards a solution. I am starting from where I am. I am trying to bring about some improvement. (McNiff, Lomax, & Whitehead, 1996)

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Rationale for Developing Proficiency in Action Research The process of action research supports: l strategic problem solving for specific educational challenges; l positive communication between administrators and teachers; l empowerment of teachers and administrators; l increased professional satisfaction;

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Rationale for Developing Proficiency in Action Research The process of action research supports: l flexible, solution-oriented thinking; l increased professional motivation to improve practice; l increased collegiality, on-going inquiry, self- reflection, and decision making skills; l increased expectations for student learning; l increased expectations for self-improvement.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Rationale for Developing Proficiency in Action Research According to Osterman and Kottkamp (1993), the following are reasons for engaging in action research: l Everyone needs professional growth opportunities. l All professionals want to improve. l All professionals can learn. l All professionals are capable of assuming responsibility for their own professional growth and development. l People need and want information about their own performance. l Collaboration enriches professional development. (p. 46)

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research The Goal of Action Research Those engaging in action research aim “…to take action and effect positive educational change in the specific school environment that was studied...with the goals of gaining insight, developing reflective practice, effecting positive changes in the school environment (and on educational practices in general), and improving student outcomes and the lives of those involved.” (Mills, 2000, pp.5-6)

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Validity of Action Research High validity when results are applied in the situation in which action research was conducted, but low validity when trying to broadly generalize. Validity also depends upon proper use of action research procedures.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research ACTION RESEARCH MODEL (Calhoun, 1994)

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research References Calhoun, E. (1994). How to use action research in the self-renewing school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. McLean, J. E. (1995). Improving education through action research: A guide for administrators and teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Hyde Publications. Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Columbus, OH: Merrill. Osterman, K. F., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1993). Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling through professional development. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Technology Support We will use a project website for: l Threaded discussion l Sharing results and resources l Peer review of documents

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research NATURE OF INSTRUCTIONAL SESSIONS: The design and presentation of the instructional sessions will: 1. link learning to personally relevant goals; 2. offer opportunities for professional self- reflection, collaboration, and self-assessment; 3. provide guided instruction, supportive materials, and feedback; 4. be interactive among session participants; 5. focus on problem solving.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Session 1: January. Planting Seeds 1. identify, in writing, an area of interest and prepare a specific proposal to address through action research; 2. share and discuss proposal within the session’s learning community; 3. use project website; 4. commit to steps to begin action research project.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Session 2: February. Germination 1. Update group on implementation of the planned action research; 2. Gather written data to assess effectiveness of action research.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Session 3: March. Bearing Fruit 1. Plan analysis of data obtained through action research; 2. Plan a written and oral presentation of action research project; 3. Use action research outcomes to generate new action research.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Session 4: April. Harvesting Results 1. Share results of action research with session colleagues; 2. Plan publication of action research project so others in the profession will be able to access it; 3. Articulate implications of action research for future research; 4. Confirm your level of interest in continuing as an action researcher.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Action Research Conference l We will join other groups of Northeast Florida teachers who are participating in action research; l We’ll gather at the Schultz Center to share results.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Due at January session: Your action research proposal: 1. Write an area of focus statement. 2. Define the variables. 3. Develop research questions. 4. Describe the intervention or innovation. 5. Describe the membership of the action research group. 6. Describe the negotiations that need to be undertaken. 7. Develop a timeline. 8. Develop a statement of resources. 9. Develop data collection ideas.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Apply Now! l Turn in your application form today. l You’ll hear by January 1 whether you have been selected. l Begin developing your proposal. l Contact us with questions, changes in plans.

December 9, 2004 Teacher Leaders Engaged in Mathematics and Science Action Research Contact us: l Faiz Al-Rubaee l Marianne Barnes l Cathy Cavanaugh l Rachel Raneri