Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crab crossing and crab waist at super KEKB K. Ohmi (KEK) Super B workshop at SLAC 15-17, June 2006 Thanks, M. Biagini, Y. Funakoshi, Y. Ohnishi, K.Oide,
Advertisements

Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
1 Crossing Angle I.Koop UK SuperB meeting April 26-27, 2006 I.A.Koop, E.A.Perevedentsev, D.N.Shatilov, D.B.Shwartz for the UK SuperB meeting, April 26-27,
Beam-Beam Collision Studies for DA  NE with Crabbed Waist Crabbed Waist Advantages Results for SIDDHARTA IR P.Raimondi, D.Shatilov (BINP), M.Zobov INFN.
Towards an extremely-flat beam optics with large crossing angle for the LHC José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN Beams dep. Supervised by F. Zimmermann,
Analytical Treatment of Some Nonlinear Beam Dynamics Problems in Storage Rings J. Gao Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire CNRS-IN2P3, FRANCE Journées.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
Issues for Optimization of a Super-B Factory John T. Seeman SBF Workshop SLAC June 14, 2006.
Beam-beam simulations M.E. Biagini, K. Ohmi, E. Paoloni, P. Raimondi, D. Shatilov, M. Zobov INFN Frascati, KEK, INFN Pisa, SLAC, BINP April 26th, 2006.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Crab-Crossing and Luminosity Simulations J.W. Flanagan, KEK
Beam-Beam Optimization for Fcc-ee at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk 11 December 2014, CERN.
Analytical Estimation of Dynamic Aperture Limited by Wigglers in a Storage Ring 高傑 J. Gao 弘毅 Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire CNRS-IN2P3, FRANCE.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
1 BeamBeam3D: Code Improvements and Applications Ji Qiang Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration.
On the Possibility of Using Landau Damping Octupoles in the Recycler Y. Alexahin, A. Burov, E. Gianfelice-Wendt, V. Lebedev, A. Valishev Abstract: To provide.
CLIC Pre-damping rings overview F. Antoniou, Y. Papaphilippou CLIC Workshop 2009.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Beam-Beam Simulations for RHIC and LHC J. Qiang, LBNL Mini-Workshop on Beam-Beam Compensation July 2-4, 2007, SLAC, Menlo Park, California.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Study and Optimization of Dynamic Aperture for the SuperKEKB LER E.Levichev and P.Piminov, BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang US LARP CM12 Collaboration Meeting Napa Valley, April 8-10, 2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
1 Dynamic aperture studies in e+e- factories with crab waist IR’07, November 9, 2007 E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Chaos and Emittance growth due to nonlinear interactions in circular accelerators K. Ohmi (KEK) SAD2006 Sep at KEK.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Beam-beam simulations with large synchrotron tune for strong RF focusing scheme D.Shatilov (BINP), M.Zobov (LNF) SBSR Workshop LNF, Frascati, 7-8 November.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Muon Collider Physics Workshop FNAL November 10-12, 2009 Muon Collider Lattice Design FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY f Y.
Collision with a crossing angle Large Piwinski angle
Overview of Beam-Beam Effects at FCC-ee
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Dynamic Aperture Studies with Acceleraticum
Crab Waist at DAFNE: Numerical Simulations versus Experimental Results
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Super-c-tau factory in Novosibirsk
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Crab Waist Collision Studies for e+e- Factories
Beam Collector Ring Dmitry Shwartz BINP, Novosibirsk 6th BINP-GSI-FAIR workshop
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
BINP Tau-Charm Project
The new 7BA design of BAPS
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Beam-beam simulations with crossing anlge + crab-waist
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
SuperB Dynamic Aperture A. Bogomyagkov, E. Levichev, P
Some notes on the SuperB Dynamic Aperture
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
100th FCC-ee Optics Design Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm Factory” September 2008, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia

Beam-Beam Studies (step by step)  Determine the main set of parameters (emittances, beta-functions, bunch current, damping decrements, crossing angle, etc.)  Wide range scan of betatron tunes for the simplified model: linear lattice and beam-beam. Two options: with and without Crab Waist.  Select a working point, taking into account the dynamic aperture Investigations.  More detailed simulations, including beam tails (linear lattice yet). Scan for bunch current. Two options: with and without Crab Waist.  Beam-Beam simulations for the actual (nonlinear) lattice: sextupoles and octupoles included.

Set of parameters Horizontal beta β * x (mm) 20 Vertical beta β * y (mm) 0.76 Horizontal emittance  x (nm) 10 Vertical emittance  y (nm) 0.1 Bunch length σ z (mm) 10 Energy spread σ E Damping decrements d x,y 9·10 -5 Circumference C (m) 810 Number of bunches N b 380 (1350) Particles per bunch N p 7·10 10 Total beam current I (A) 1.6 Crossing angle (full)  (mrad) 34 Piwinski angle  12 “Head-on” tune shifts  x,  y 0.79, 1.53 Actual tune shifts  x,  y , Luminosity L10 35  z 4 σ x /  σ z ·  /2 Piwinski angle: Basic relations for large Piwinski angle:

Betatron Tunes Scan Crab ON: L max =1.05·10 35 Crab OFF: L max =0.44·10 35 N p =7·10 10 N b =380 N p =3·10 10 N b =890 Luminosity contour plots in the “geographical map” colors. Red – maximum, Blue - minimum Same total beam current

Simulations for the working point (0.533, 0.570) Crab OFF Crab ON Contour plots in the space of normalized betatron amplitudes. Scales (in sigmas): 20  100.

Crab Scan for N p =7·10 10 Contour plots in the space of normalized betatron amplitudes. Scales (in sigmas): 10  50. optimum

Summary  Luminosity of can be achieved with the total beam current 1.6 A and rather small  y (can be increased from 0.13 to 0.15÷0.17).  Crab Waist is a key feature, otherwise “mission impossible”.  More detailed simulations with the actual (nonlinear) lattice are required. This will be done as soon as the lattice is ready.