New Learning Ecosystems NLII 2004 Annual Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNDERACHIEVEMENT - CLOSING THE GAP Dr. Bill Maxwell Her Majestys Chief Inspector of Education and Training in Wales. Excellence for All The Annual Report.
Advertisements

7th April 2011 School of CS & IT 1 Mobile technologies: Can they make learning a social activity? Mercy Maleko, RMIT University.
Playing board for the game Crooked rules
Exploring Your Purpose for Attending College
LETTING GO: HELPING CREATE A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION TO ADULTHOOD Laurie Stephens, Ph.D. Director of Clinical Services Education Spectrum.
How to make the most of your Academic Relationships Presented by Jennifer Duncan In association with the Academic Advisement Center.
Learning Theories 101 Naomi Iuhasz-Velez Jennifer Langer-Osuna, PhD UM School of Education and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning.
Demonstration Lesson Guide
Peer-Led Team Learning: A Model for Enhancing Student Learning Claire Berardini & Glenn Miller Third Annual Faculty Institute Pace University.
Faculty Perceptions about Barriers to Active Learning
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
Playing board for the game Crooked Rules
INTRODUCTION The concept of action research, or practitioner inquiry, as a form of teacher professional development has been around for years (Figure 1.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study 1. Maths Department, Our Lady’s College Geometry in Context Transition Year and Ordinary Level Junior Cert 2.
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
PLT Professional Learning Teams Weaver Elementary School January, 2013.
Are you prepared for class?
Reflective practice Session 4 – Working together.
Game Technology = Next-Gen Learning. Gaming As a Next-Generation Learning Technology Joel Foreman, Associate Professor, George Mason University NLII Annual.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
Engaging Students: Piloting “Clickers” in AUC Classrooms Azza Awwad, Maha Bali, Riham Moawad Center for Learning and Teaching.
Two questions: What do you know about this picture?
Counseling and its Benefits Presented by Ms Salma Prabhu Clinical Psychologist, Director Academy for Counseling & Education.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Key Leaders Network “Making Connections” October, 2012 Alabama Best Practices Center.
Bridging the “Disciplinary Divide” Steve Burian Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Assoc. Director, Global Change and Sustainability Center.
Critical Thinking and Knowledge of Subject Matter
Learning within Teaching What professors can learn about their students and themselves as teachers when they innovate in their teaching ANABELLA MARTINEZ,
Conducting Scenario-based Simulations Sandrijn van Schaik, MD PhD Jenna Shaw-Batista, CNM PhD Cynthia Belew, CNM MS UCSF Center for Faculty Educators &
Elements of Learning S tudent C ontent T eaching.
Basic concepts of language learning & teaching materials.
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
University 100 Classroom Management and Instruction Workshop by Dr. Kathryn Hoover.
ICreate Session 6 of 8 Conducting a Peer Review. Focusing Questions How can I improve my technology- enriched lesson? What methods can I use to get feedback.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 1 February 4-6, 2009 Dallas, TX.
Facilitating Learning in Professional Experience: Mentoring for Success Module 1 - An Introduction.
2009 Teaching and Learning Symposium John H. Bantham Management & Quantitative Methods Establishing Student-Faculty Expectations in the Classroom.
Transitions: Becoming a College Teacher Purpose What is being done to prepare community college faculty to become effective instructors? What is being.
Presenter: Wan-Ning Chen Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: November 11, 2009 Ramaswamy, S., Harris, I., & Tschirner, U. (2001). Student peer teaching: An.
To explore through experience, the process of inquiry and how we can utilise it Purpose of this session.
Towards some Grand (?) Challenges for Technology Enhanced Learning Richard Noss London Knowledge Lab University of London (IOE/Birkbeck) TLRP - Technology.
Developing Social Emotional Awareness in Novice Teachers.
Professional Development Stages and Volunteer Development Dr. Jim Rutledge Retired Extension Educator 1.
Facilitate Group Learning
Welcome to Physics AP Physics C.
Welcome to Physics AP Physics 1. What is physics? Driven by “big ideas” and key concepts Mathematical description of the physical world (mathematical.
Small Group Teaching เชิดศักดิ์ ไอรมณีรัตน์ ภาควิชาศัลยศาสตร์ คณะ แพทยศาสตร์ศิริราชพยาบาล มหาวิทยาลัย มหิดล.
Activity 1. Think Back to Activity 1 (Imagine you are having a practical exam) You will complete an independent, timed activity for a grade. Once you.
Lesson Plans Objectives
Building Capacity on Protected Areas Law & Governance Module 2 Governance Principles & Approaches Exercise 1 Understanding the Nature & Relationship Between.
LRC STUDY GROUP AND WORKSHOP TRAINING Spring, 2016.
Active Learning Refers to techniques where students do more than simply listen to a lecture. Less emphasis on transmitting information. More emphasis.
Mini Session (15 minutes): My Office Hours Thursday, 5:00 pm to 5:15 pm Track: Track 1 – Authoring Learning Objects Presenter: Marion Carroll EsterwoodMarion.
A Presentation by Dr. Stephanie Demaree Liberal Studies Program Director Science in Action.
LEADING LIFELONG LEARNERS A TLC Study of Strategies for Facilitating and Leading Adult Learners April 14, 2008.
Community Event Bonita Burton-Washington Educator EDU 620 Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Instructor: Patricia Neely 8/17/15.
Week 2: Interviews. Definition and Types  What is an interview? Conversation with a purpose  Types of interviews 1. Unstructured 2. Structured 3. Focus.
1 Sample Introductory Rounds Session, Day 2. Learning Goals By the end of Day 2, we will:  Understand the elements of the instructional core  Be familiar.
To explore through experience, the process of inquiry and how we can utilise it Purpose of this session.
About Me Katie Martin, PhD Director of Leadership &
Communication in a Global Society
Communication in a Global Society
Learning Analytics Methods, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review Sandy Center for Educational and Instructional.
From College Campuses to #MeToo: Sexual Assault in America
What Graduate Students Need: In their own Words
From College Campuses to #MeToo: Sexual Assault in America
(De)motivators of using interactive teaching methods
Authority of Consensus: Next-Generation Course Management System Features The work presented here represents the culmination of two years of study sponsored.
Keeping the Learning in Learning Objects
Presentation transcript:

New Learning Ecosystems NLII 2004 Annual Meeting

Purpose of this session  have a stimulating conversation and see whether any insights or potential next steps emerge  conduct initial exploration and inquiry - so not a lot of emphasis on engineering any particular work product - just want to see if relationships, key research & analysis questions, or common models start to emerge naturally

Format/What to Expect  5 panelists present their premises (mini- lectures)  Small groups have facilitated discussions around specific questions (15 minutes)  Reporting out is done in the San Diego Experiment

Introductions  Diana Oblinger (New Learners/New Roles) –Executive Director of Higher Education, Microsoft Corporation  Ellen Wagner (Learning-Centered Interactivity) –Director, Global Higher Education, Macromedia  Joel Foreman (Gaming as a Learning Technology) –Associate Professor, George Mason University  Van Weigel (Peer-to-Peer Learning Technologies) –Professor of Ethics and Economic Development, Eastern University  Bryan Alexander (M-Learning) –Co-director, Center for Educational Technology, Middlebury College

 1) How might all of these influences/elements interact to create a new learning space? What will the learning space of the future look like? Will it be the holodeck? is it the matrix?  2) How do we design a learning space that "understands" M-learning? Where do we "stick" the teacher (physically and philosophically)?  3) I want to use my phone in an wireless space, but my colleague likes her palm. Is there a common ground for those of us who have very different "personal" devices?  4) Can an environment be too immersive? Where does all the material we generated/collected go at the end of term? How does the learner get "back" to the experience if they want to retrace their learning path?  5) Van speaks about disequilibrium. In what ways could disequilibrium go too far and create dysfunctional learning spaces? How might we predict and counter these dysfunctions?  6) How do we ensure that a learning session stays on track in a learning environment? How can an instructor be sure that their students are paying attention (and he or she is earning their attention)? How can we teach students to gracefully multi-task (e.g., manage the transitions and the social protocols)?